Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Chain-of-Thought Matters: Improving Long-Context Language Models with Reasoning Path Supervision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.20790 v1 pith:3DBAEGGV submitted 2025-02-28 cs.CL

Chain-of-Thought Matters: Improving Long-Context Language Models with Reasoning Path Supervision

classification cs.CL
keywords long-contextmodelsreasoningtasksacrossscenarioschain-of-thoughtdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the challenge of handling long-context tasks, where models need to reason over extensive input contexts to aggregate target information. While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has shown promise for multi-step reasoning, its effectiveness for long-context scenarios remains underexplored. Through systematic investigation across diverse tasks, we demonstrate that CoT's benefits generalize across most long-context scenarios and amplify with increasing context length. Motivated by this critical observation, we propose LongRePS, a process-supervised framework that teaches models to generate high-quality reasoning paths for enhanced long-context performance. Our framework incorporates a self-sampling mechanism to bootstrap reasoning paths and a novel quality assessment protocol specifically designed for long-context scenarios. Experimental results on various long-context benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving significant improvements over outcome supervision baselines on both in-domain tasks (+13.6/+3.8 points for LLaMA/Qwen on MuSiQue) and cross-domain generalization (+9.3/+8.1 points on average across diverse QA tasks). Our code, data and trained models are made public to facilitate future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PROF curates RL training data via PRM-ORM consistency to improve both final-answer accuracy and intermediate reasoning quality while reducing reliance on strong process reward models.

  2. From Chatbot to Digital Colleague: The Paradigm Shift Toward Persistent Autonomous AI

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0

    Autonomous AI becomes dependable when tool use is embedded in persistent workspaces with reusable skills, shifting evaluation from answers to task closure.