Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Power of Stories: Narrative Priming Shapes How LLM Agents Collaborate and Compete

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03961 v2 pith:3EOL7XTT submitted 2025-05-06 cs.AI cs.CLcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.MA
keywords agentsstoriesdifferentnarrativesnegotiationprimingagentcollaboration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

According to Yuval Noah Harari, large-scale human cooperation is driven by shared narratives that encode common beliefs and values. This study explores whether such narratives can similarly nudge LLM agents toward collaboration. We use a finitely repeated public goods game in which LLM agents choose either cooperative or egoistic spending strategies. We prime agents with stories highlighting teamwork to different degrees and test how this influences negotiation outcomes. Our experiments explore four questions:(1) How do narratives influence negotiation behavior? (2) What differs when agents share the same story versus different ones? (3) What happens when the agent numbers grow? (4) Are agents resilient against self-serving negotiators? We find that story-based priming significantly affects negotiation strategies and success rates. Common stories improve collaboration, benefiting each agent. By contrast, priming agents with different stories reverses this effect, and those agents primed toward self-interest prevail. We hypothesize that these results carry implications for multi-agent system design and AI alignment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-based HSE Compliance Assessment: Benchmark, Performance, and Advancements

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HSE-Bench is a new 1,020-question LLM benchmark for HSE compliance reasoning, and the paper claims LLMs rely on semantic matching rather than structured legal reasoning.

Pith tools