Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Deception Detection Go Deeper? Dataset, Evaluation, and Benchmark for Deception Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11432 v3 pith:3FIXKCI6 submitted 2024-02-18 cs.CL

Can Deception Detection Go Deeper? Dataset, Evaluation, and Benchmark for Deception Reasoning

classification cs.CL
keywords deceptiondetectionreasoningtaskbenchmarkdatasetevaluationevidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deception detection has attracted increasing attention due to its importance in real-world scenarios. Its main goal is to detect deceptive behaviors from multimodal clues such as gestures, facial expressions, prosody, etc. However, these bases are usually subjective and related to personal habits. Therefore, we extend deception detection to deception reasoning, further providing objective evidence to support subjective judgment. Specifically, we provide potential lies and basic facts and then analyze why this sentence may be a lie by combining factual inconsistencies and intent behind them. Compared with deception detection, this task is more applicable to real-world scenarios. For example, in interrogation, the police should judge whether a person is lying based on solid evidence. This paper presents our initial attempts at this task, including constructing a dataset and defining evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, this task can serve as a benchmark for evaluating the complex reasoning capability of large language models. Our code and data are provided in the supplementary material.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantics of Subterfuge: Benchmarking Legal Deception Detection Against General-domain State-of-the-Art

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    On deception detection benchmarks, fine-tuned transformers beat LLMs on data-rich datasets, few-shot GPT-4o wins the small legal corpus, and chain-of-thought prompting frequently reduces F1.