Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 300 references

Stellar mergers in dense clusters can spin up black holes to a ≃ 0.5–0.8 and reshape gravitational-wave sources.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 06:50 UTC pith:3FJS2VUW

load-bearing objection Solid CMC census of pre-collapse MS+giant interactions that can spin up BHs, but the headline a~0.5-0.8 and 95% ejection numbers rest on a truncated MESA grid the authors themselves flag as covering only half the sample. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05495 v1 pith:3FJS2VUW submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Formation of rotating supergiants via stellar mergers in dense clusters: Implications for black hole natal spins

Ishaan Satish , Kyle Kremer , Fulya K{\i}ro\u{g}lu , Daichi Tsuna , Shahed Shayan Aran This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords stellar mergersblack hole natal spinsdense star clustersblue supergiantsgravitational-wave recoilshierarchical mergerscluster Monte CarloMESA stellar evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard stellar evolution expects black holes to form with nearly zero spin because stars shed angular momentum before collapse. This paper argues that the opposite can happen in dense star clusters: when a main-sequence star merges with a giant at mass ratio above about 0.3, the product remains a compact blue supergiant whose rotating envelope can fall back and spin the newborn black hole up to dimensionless spins of roughly 0.5–0.8. Using a large suite of cluster N-body models, the authors find that up to half of all black holes experience some pre-collapse merger or collision, and up to about 10 percent experience a significant one. In optimistic initial conditions (high massive-star binary fractions and primordial mass segregation) these spun-up black holes can participate in roughly 10–15 percent of binary black-hole mergers—comparable to second-generation mergers. Because the spins broaden gravitational-wave recoil kicks, most of those merger remnants are ejected, which suppresses hierarchical growth inside the cluster. The result matters because it supplies a dynamical channel for moderate-to-high natal spins that standard single-star models miss, and it changes the expected retention and spin demographics of LIGO/Virgo sources formed in clusters.

Core claim

Massive main-sequence plus giant mergers with mass ratio q ≳ 0.3 in dense clusters produce blue-supergiant progenitors that, upon failed supernova and rotating-envelope fallback, form black holes with dimensionless spins a ≃ 0.5–0.8. In Milky-Way-like cluster models, up to half of black holes form after some stellar interaction and up to ~10 percent after significant (q > 0.1) interactions; under optimistic initial conditions such spinning components can constitute ~10–15 percent of binary black-hole mergers and strongly suppress remnant retention via enlarged gravitational-wave recoils.

What carries the argument

The MS+giant merger product that becomes a compact blue supergiant (Teff > 10^3.9 K at carbon depletion) whose failed-supernova fallback of a rotating envelope is mapped, via MESA models and the Tsuna et al. prescription, onto black-hole natal spin.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the premise that mergers with mass ratio above about 0.3 really do leave blue-supergiant remnants that undergo failed supernovae with efficient rotating-envelope fallback, and that the limited MESA grid used to compute those spins remains representative even though roughly half the cluster merger products lie outside that grid.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the observed spin distribution of first-generation black holes in dense-cluster gravitational-wave events against the paper’s predicted fraction of a ≃ 0.5–0.8 components; a null result (essentially all first-generation spins near zero) at the predicted occurrence rate would falsify the channel.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A non-negligible subpopulation of first-generation black holes in clusters should carry moderate-to-high natal spins (a ≃ 0.5–0.8) rather than the near-zero spins assumed in most dynamical models.
  • Binary black-hole mergers that include these spun-up components receive larger gravitational-wave recoils, so ≥ 95 percent of their remnants escape a typical 10^6 solar-mass cluster and hierarchical (second-generation) growth is suppressed.
  • The fraction of spinning first-generation components rises sharply with higher massive-star binary fractions and primordial mass segregation, offering a direct link between uncertain cluster initial conditions and the observed spin demographics of LIGO/Virgo sources.
  • The same blue-supergiant collapsars that produce spinning black holes are expected to power bright electromagnetic counterparts (long gamma-ray bursts, 1987A-like supernovae, or fast blue optical transients).
  • Lower-metallicity environments lower the mass-ratio threshold for blue-supergiant formation and raise the resulting black-hole spins, predicting a metallicity dependence in the spin distribution of cluster-formed black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the channel is real, hierarchical-merger rate predictions that assume zero natal spin for all first-generation black holes systematically overestimate retention and therefore overestimate the second-generation fraction in lower-mass clusters.
  • The same pre-collapse mergers that spin up black holes also alter the black-hole mass function; any joint mass-spin analysis of cluster sources should therefore treat the two quantities as correlated rather than independent.
  • Because the MESA grid is truncated at giant masses ∼ 25–30 solar masses, the true spinning fraction may be higher once more massive merger products can be evolved self-consistently, making the present numbers a lower bound.
  • Electromagnetic surveys that catch luminous red novae or collapsar-like transients inside young massive clusters could provide an independent census of the same merger channel that later produces spinning black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper uses ~150 CMC N-body models of Milky Way-like globular clusters (plus a small set of new runs with 100% massive-star binaries, primordial mass segregation, and zero natal kicks) to quantify pre-collapse stellar collisions and mergers that produce black holes. MS+giant interactions dominate; up to ~half of BHs form after some interaction and up to ~10% after significant (q>0.1) events, with strong dependence on virial radius and binary fraction (Figs. 1–6, Table 1). Spins are estimated by interpolating a limited MESA grid (Z=0.1 Z⊙, giant masses ≲25–30 M⊙) onto the Tsuna et al. (2025) failed-supernova fallback prescription: MS+giant products with q≳0.3 that remain inside the grid become blue supergiants and yield a≃0.5–0.8. In the most optimistic models these spinning components can comprise ~10–15% of BBH mergers (comparable to second-generation mergers) and broaden GW recoil kicks so that ≳95% of the remnants escape a 10^6 M⊙ cluster (Figs. 7–8, §5).

Significance. If the spin map holds, the work supplies a concrete dynamical channel that can produce a non-negligible population of moderately spinning first-generation BHs inside clusters, with direct consequences for hierarchical-merger rates and retention. The CMC demographics themselves (interaction fractions versus density, binary fraction, and mass segregation) are a solid, catalog-level result that will be useful even if the spin assignment is later revised. The combination of a large, publicly documented CMC suite with an explicit MESA fallback calculation is a clear methodological strength; the paper also flags the mass-cut limitation and treats the spinning-BH count as a lower limit.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.3 and Appendix A: the headline spin values a≃0.5–0.8 and the subsequent BBH fractions / recoil statistics rest on interpolation of the Tsuna et al. (2025) fallback model onto a MESA grid limited to giant masses ≲25–30 M⊙ (black box of Fig. 4). The text states that ~50% of post-interaction BHs involve giants above this cut and that the comparison is therefore only a lower limit. Outside the grid the BSG transition, failed-SN assumption, and super-Eddington disk-wind mass loss that set a are not computed. Because Figs. 7–8 and the ≳95% ejection claim of §5 are built exclusively from the in-grid subset, any systematic change in a for the more massive half would rescale both numbers. A quantitative sensitivity test (or an explicit statement that the 10–15% and 95% figures apply only to the in-grid population) is needed before these percentages can be treated as robust.
  2. §2.1 and §5: all CMC runs adopt the sticky-sphere (zero mass-loss) collision prescription. For the high-q MS+giant events that dominate the spinning sample, even modest mass loss or angular-momentum redistribution during the merger could alter the post-merger envelope structure that MESA later evolves. The paper does not quantify how sensitive the BSG transition or final a is to this assumption; a short discussion or a reference to existing hydro results would strengthen the load-bearing link between CMC demographics and the MESA spin map.
  3. §4–5 and Table 1: the optimistic ~10–15% spinning-BBH fraction and the recoil distributions of Fig. 8 are obtained only after simultaneously turning on 100% massive binaries, primordial mass segregation, and zero natal kicks. While each choice is motivated, the joint extreme is not representative of the CMC Catalog baseline. The text should more clearly separate the baseline Catalog fractions from the optimistic extremes so that readers do not conflate the two when citing the hierarchical-merger implications.
minor comments (6)
  1. Abstract and §6.1: the phrase “up to roughly half of black holes are formed from such mergers” is accurate only for the densest / highest-binary models; the Catalog average is closer to ~10%. A single clarifying clause would prevent over-reading.
  2. Fig. 3 caption and body: the metallicity labels alternate between Z=0.02 / 0.002 / 0.0002 and Z=0.01 / 0.1 Z⊙; consistent notation would help.
  3. Eq. (1): the collision-rate formula is standard but the symbols n2 and N1 are introduced without an explicit statement that they refer to the secondary and primary populations, respectively.
  4. Table 1: the “MESA” columns are defined only in the caption; a short footnote or column header would make the table self-contained.
  5. §3.3: the statement that 1 132 of the 2 543 significant interactions undergo a subsequent minor collision is useful, but it is unclear whether the spin is assigned from the most significant event alone or from a cumulative angular-momentum budget.
  6. References: a few recent hydrodynamical merger papers (e.g., Ballone et al. 2023, Costa et al. 2022) are already cited in the discussion; ensuring they appear in the introduction would better frame the sticky-sphere caveat.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation load-bearing on co-author Tsuna et al. (2025) fallback/spin map; CMC demographics and combination are independent, not circular by construction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.3 (and Appendix A)]
    "To estimate BH spins, we apply the recent model of Tsuna et al. (2025), which performed a suite of stellar evolution calculations of post-main sequence binary mergers... we adopt the method of Tsuna et al. (2025) that solved the time-dependent fallback accretion (and outflow due to its super-Eddington nature) of the outer rotating envelope onto the newborn BH."

    The quantitative claim a ≃ 0.5–0.8 (and all downstream BBH fractions and ≳95 % ejection statistics built from the colored points in Figs. 4/6–8) rests on the BSG transition threshold and failed-SN fallback prescription imported from Tsuna et al. (2025), whose author list overlaps the present paper. New MESA models are run, but the interpretive map that turns those models into natal spins is not independently derived; it is justified by the overlapping-author citation. This is the sole mild circularity; the CMC demographics themselves do not depend on it.

full rationale

The derivation chain is sequential and non-circular: CMC Cluster Catalog (and new variants) supply interaction demographics and later BBH pairing statistics independently of any spin assumption; a separate MESA grid (new runs at 0.1 Z⊙ plus the prior method) supplies a mass-ratio-to-spin map; the two are then combined by interpolation to color candidates and compute recoil kicks. No quantity is defined in terms of itself, no parameter is fitted to a subset and then re-predicted, no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The only mild circularity-adjacent feature is that the load-bearing BSG/failed-SN/fallback prescription that converts q ≳ 0.3 MS+giant products into a ≃ 0.5–0.8 is taken from Tsuna et al. (2025) (overlapping author) rather than re-derived from first principles here; new MESA models are computed and the paper flags the mass-cut limitation, so the dependence is real but not definitional. Score 2 reflects that single non-load-bearing-to-the-whole self-citation; the central demographic claims stand without it.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing claim combines standard cluster dynamics and stellar-evolution machinery with several free modeling choices (binary fraction, mass segregation, kick prescription, q thresholds, sticky-sphere collisions) and domain assumptions about failed supernovae and envelope fallback. No new physical entities are postulated; the “significant merger” and “spinning BH candidate” labels are classification cuts on existing quantities. The MESA grid boundary and the q≳0.3 BSG threshold are the most consequential free choices for the spin numbers.

free parameters (5)
  • initial massive-star binary fraction
    Baseline catalog uses 5%; optimistic runs set 100% for M≥15 M⊙, which drives the large jump in merger-born BHs (Table 1, Figure 5).
  • mass-ratio thresholds q=0.1 and q=0.3
    q>0.1 defines “significant”; q≳0.3 is taken as the BSG/spin-up threshold from the MESA grid and controls which products are assigned a≃0.5–0.8.
  • MESA mixing-length α_MLT=3
    Updated from 1.5 in Tsuna et al. (2025) for convergence and RSG surface properties (Appendix A); mainly affects convective envelopes but is a free modeling choice.
  • BH natal-kick / fallback prescription
    Default rapid Fryer et al. (2012) vs delayed + zero kicks; zero-kick runs maximize retention of spinning BHs that later merge (Table 1, bottom panels of Figures 6–7).
  • sticky-sphere collision assumption (zero mass loss)
    All collisions conserve mass (Section 2.1); mass loss would change remnant mass and angular-momentum budget.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Isolated (non-interacting) stellar collapse produces BHs with essentially zero natal spin (Fuller & Ma 2019).
    Default CMC assumption; the paper’s contrast and post-processing spin-up rest on this baseline (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption MS+giant merger products with sufficient mass ratio die as compact blue supergiants whose rotating envelopes undergo failed-SN fallback that spins up the BH (Tsuna et al. 2025 prescription).
    Core of the spin estimate; applied via MESA grid interpolation in Section 3.3 and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption CMC sticky-sphere collisions and COSMIC binary evolution adequately represent physical mergers for angular-momentum purposes.
    Section 2; no hydrodynamical merger modeling is performed.
  • standard math Gravitational-wave recoil kicks follow the Gerosa & Kesden (2016) fitting formulae given component masses and spins.
    Used in post-processing for Figure 8 and retention estimates (Section 5).
  • ad hoc to paper Primordial mass segregation and 100% massive binaries are plausible extremes for young cluster initial conditions.
    Section 2.2 and 4; used to bracket optimistic spinning-BH yields rather than as measured defaults.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 25237 in / 3764 out tokens · 33512 ms · 2026-07-11T06:50:41.397742+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate how massive stellar mergers in young star clusters imprint on black hole spin distributions and the broader implications for gravitational wave sources. The central hypothesis is that angular momentum transferred during stellar mergers substantially affects the spins of the merger products and resulting black holes, with some merger products evolving into collapsar-like objects that retain thick accretion disks that enable efficient spin up. This is in contrast to the more general expectation that black holes form with very small spins, having shed most of their envelope angular momentum via winds and expansion before core collapse. Using roughly 150 N-body models generated with the $\texttt{Cluster Monte Carlo}$ code, $\texttt{CMC}$, we analyze stellar mergers that lead to black hole formation, prioritizing ``significant'' events with mass ratio $q>0.1$. After identifying optimal candidates from our $\texttt{CMC}$ models, we explore detailed stellar structure and post-merger evolution implications with MESA stellar evolution models to capture angular momentum injection and pre-collapse profiles most relevant for the BH natal spin. In our current dataset representative of Milky Way-like globular clusters, up to roughly half of black holes are formed from such mergers, including up to roughly $10\%$ from significant mergers with $q>0.1$. Preliminary angular momentum estimates indicate substantial spin-up during the merger, and trends with mass ratio and stellar properties suggest strong correlations with the final black hole spin. In some cases, dimensionless spin parameters of $a\simeq 0.5$ or more are expected. This process has important implications for the dynamical formation and retention of gravitational wave sources in clusters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05495 by Daichi Tsuna, Fulya K{\i}ro\u{g}lu, Ishaan Satish, Kyle Kremer, Shahed Shayan Aran.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of stellar interaction mass ratios from the CMC Cluster Catalog simulations, with the larger stellar mass on the x-axis and the smaller mass on the y-axis. Plots are separated by interaction type, from left to right: Main sequence + main sequence (MS+MS), MS+giant, and giant–giant. Upper (lower) panels show stellar collisions (mergers). occur, 𝑣∞ represents the relative velocity of the stellar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mass ratio distributions of stellar interactions that form BHs, separated by stellar type. Dotted lines mark 𝑞 = [0.01, 0.1, 1]; interactions with 𝑞 ≥ 0.1 are classified as “dynamically significant” and are shaded in gray. cut from indigo to cyan to yellow corresponds to roughly an order of magnitude decrease in sample size. This indicates that, in to￾tal, roughly 10% of all BHs originate from collisions/m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mass distributions for all BHs formed via stellar collapse in our CMC Cluster Catalog models. The 4 × 4 grid is organized by formation channel (top two rows: Collisions; bottom two rows: Mergers) and progenitor metallicity (Rows 1 & 3: 𝑍 = 0.02; Rows 2 & 4: 𝑍 ∈ {0.002, 0.0002}). Columns represent the model virial radius (𝑟𝑣), serving as a proxy for cluster density. Within each panel, distributions are show… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stellar masses for all MS+giant interactions that ultimately collapse to BHs in the CMC Cluster Catalog models. We compare to the parameter space covered by our MESA models (shown as diamonds; see Tsuna et al. (2025) and Appendix). All scatter points are colored by the BH spin estimated for the interaction product, with spin values inferred from interpolation of the MESA models. The three diagonal lines de… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: BH mass distributions across three of our six cluster model variations. Columns represent varying initial conditions: Baseline CMC Catalog model (left), the high mass binary fraction of 100% model (middle), and primordial mass segregation with 100% binary fraction (right). The upper (lower) panels display BHs formed from stellar collisions (mergers). Indigo distributions represent the total BH population, … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stellar masses for all MS+giant interactions that collapse to BHs in our new models with increased binary fraction and primordial mass segregation (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Secondary versus primary mass for all BBH mergers occurring in the models presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cumulative probability distribution of gravitational-wave recoil velocities for all stellar interaction products that eventually participate in BBH mergers in the CMC models of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Effective temperatures of the MESA models at core carbon depletion near core-collapse. Left panels show our newly calculated models with 𝑍 = 0.1 𝑍⊙, while right panels show the models with 𝑍 = 0.5 𝑍⊙ of Tsuna et al. (2025). 10 20 30 40 BH mass [M ] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 BH spin 0.1Z 0.5Z M1 = 10M M1 = 15M M1 = 20M M1 = 25M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: BH mass and spin predictions, for the MESA models that are BSGs at core carbon depletion. Black filled symbols are newly calculated models with 𝑍 = 0.1 𝑍⊙, while grey open symbols show models with 𝑍 = 0.5 𝑍⊙ of Tsuna et al. (2025). MNRAS 000, 000–000 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 71 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Binary Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters: Exploring the Theoretical Uncertainties. , keywords =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Shock-powered light curves of luminous red novae as signatures of pre-dynamical mass-loss in stellar mergers. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1768 , archivePrefix =. 1705.03895 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1768

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Rapidly Evolving and Luminous Transients from Pan-STARRS1. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/23 , archivePrefix =. 1405.3668 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/23

  4. [4]

    Explosions of blue supergiants from binary mergers for SN 1987A

    Explosions of blue supergiants from binary mergers for SN 1987A. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2647 , archivePrefix =. 1806.08072 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2647

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant Stars: An End-to-end Simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabcc1 , archivePrefix =. 1803.04983 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabcc1

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    A Theory for Neutron Star and Black Hole Kicks and Induced Spins. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2353 , adsurl =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2353

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Interplay between neutrino kicks and hydrodynamic kicks of neutron stars and black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04343-1 , archivePrefix =. 2401.13817 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04343-1

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Simple recipes for compact remnant masses and natal kicks. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3043 , archivePrefix =. 2006.08360 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3043 2006

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    The impact of fallback on the compact remnants and chemical yields of core-collapse supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1431 , archivePrefix =. 2003.04320 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1431 2003

  10. [10]

    Blue: How metallicity shapes black hole dynamics and mergers in dense star clusters

    Red vs. Blue: How metallicity shapes black hole dynamics and mergers in dense star clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  11. [11]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A high fraction of close massive binary stars at low metallicity. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02610-x , archivePrefix =. 2509.12488 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02610-x

  12. [12]

    Machine Learning Methods for Stellar Collisions. I. Predicting Outcomes of SPH Simulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10191 , archivePrefix =. 2602.10191 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10191

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Black Hole Accretion and Spin-up through Stellar Collisions in Dense Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada26b , archivePrefix =. 2410.01879 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada26b

  14. [14]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    GW231123: a Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190-265 M_. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.08219 , archivePrefix =. 2507.08219 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.08219

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Black Hole Mergers in the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/312422 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9910061 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/312422

  16. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Mass Distribution of Binary Black Hole Mergers from Young and Old Dense Star Clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.07183 , archivePrefix =. 2507.07183 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07183

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    precession: Dynamics of spinning black-hole binaries with python. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124066 , archivePrefix =. 1605.01067 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.124066

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Predicting the Direction of the Final Spin from the Coalescence of Two Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L40 , archivePrefix =. 0904.2577 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/1/l40

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Further insight into gravitational recoil. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044028 , archivePrefix =. 0708.4048 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.044028

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Large Merger Recoils and Spin Flips from Generic Black Hole Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/516712 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/0701164 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/516712

  21. [21]

    , year = 1973, month = jul, volume =

    Gravitational-Radiation Recoil and Runaway Black Holes. , year = 1973, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/152255 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/152255 1973

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    How Black Holes Get Their Kicks: Gravitational Radiation Recoil Revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/421552 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402056 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/421552

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Consequences of Gravitational Radiation Recoil. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/421551 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402057 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/421551

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124046 , archivePrefix =. 1703.06223 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.124046

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Production of intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05112.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0106188 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05112.x 2002

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational Wave Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef , archivePrefix =. 2011.05332 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef 2041

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Black hole growth through hierarchical black hole mergers in dense star clusters: implications for gravitational wave detections. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1149 , archivePrefix =. 1811.03640 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1149

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Demographics of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd9c9 , archivePrefix =. 2302.11613 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd9c9

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Black holes: The next generation repeated mergers in dense star clusters and their gravitational-wave properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043027 , archivePrefix =. 1906.10260 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043027 1906

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Are LIGO's Black Holes Made from Smaller Black Holes?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7045 , archivePrefix =. 1703.06869 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7045 2041

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Stellar-mass black holes in young massive and open stellar clusters and their role in gravitational-wave generation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3392 , archivePrefix =. 1611.09357 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3392

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103014 , archivePrefix =. 1711.07452 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103014

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Black hole and neutron star mergers in galactic nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1651 , archivePrefix =. 1811.10627 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1651

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Merging Black Hole Binaries in Galactic Nuclei: Implications for Advanced-LIGO Detections. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187 , archivePrefix =. 1606.04889 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/187

  35. [35]

    Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    A progenitor model of SN 1987A based on the slow-merger scenario. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx166 , archivePrefix =. 1705.04084 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx166

  37. [37]

    The quest for blue supergiants: binary merger models for the evolution of the progenitor of SN 1987A

    The quest for blue supergiants: binary merger models for the evolution of the progenitor of SN 1987A. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx818 , archivePrefix =. 1703.04918 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx818

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    A binary merger model for the formation of the Supernova 1987A triple-ring nebula. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15114.x , adsurl =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15114.x 2009

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Presupernova Evolution in Massive Interacting Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171341 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/171341

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    A merger model for SN 1987A. , keywords =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    A common envelope model for SN 1987A. , keywords =

  42. [42]

    Theoretical uncertainties of the type Ia supernova rate

    Theoretical uncertainties of the Type Ia supernova rate. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322714 , archivePrefix =. 1401.2895 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322714

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Compact Object Modeling with the StarTrack Population Synthesis Code. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521026 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0511811 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/521026

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0201220 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Modeling Stellar Collisions in Galactic Nuclei Using Hydrodynamic Simulations and Machine Learning. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae459b , archivePrefix =. 2511.01811 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae459b

  46. [46]

    Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 3 , year = 2026, volume =

    Compact objects in globular clusters. Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 3 , year = 2026, volume =. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00103-6 , archivePrefix =. 2508.14308 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00103-6 2026

  47. [47]

    Binary Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters: Exploring the Theoretical Uncertainties

    Binary Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters: Exploring the Theoretical Uncertainties. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/68 , archivePrefix =. 1603.00884 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/68

  48. [48]

    Evidence for primordial mass segregation in globular clusters

    Evidence for Primordial Mass Segregation in Globular Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590488 , archivePrefix =. 0806.0622 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/590488

  49. [49]

    The Secrets of the Nearest Starburst Cluster. II. The Present-Day Mass Function in NGC 3603. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/504589 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0604333 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/504589

  50. [50]

    Mass Segregation in Young Magellanic Clouds Star Clusters: Four Clusters observed with HST

    Mass segregation in young Magellanic Cloud star clusters: Four clusters observed with HST. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031702 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311477 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031702

  51. [51]

    Mass Segregation in Young Large Magellanic Cloud Clusters. I. NGC 2157. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/300212 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/300212

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    A Preliminary Study of the Orion Nebula Cluster Structure and Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305076 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/305076

  53. [53]

    Formation of Massive Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. II. Initial Mass Function and Primordial Mass Segregation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/43 , archivePrefix =. 1105.5884 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/1/43

  54. [54]

    The influence of initial mass segregation on the runaway merging of stars

    The Influence of Initial Mass Segregation on the Runaway Merging of Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/589278 , archivePrefix =. 0804.2299 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/589278

  55. [55]

    Science , keywords =

    Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1223344 , archivePrefix =. 1207.6397 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.1223344

  56. [56]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066 , archivePrefix =. 2203.10066 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10066 2023

  57. [57]

    Monte Carlo Simulations of Globular Cluster Evolution. IV. Direct Integration of Strong Interactions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/511809 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608261 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/511809

  58. [58]

    The ACS survey of Galactic globular clusters. XII. Photometric binaries along the main sequence. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016384 , archivePrefix =. 1111.0552 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016384

  59. [59]

    How black holes shape globular clusters: Modeling NGC 3201

    How Black Holes Shape Globular Clusters: Modeling NGC 3201. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab26c , archivePrefix =. 1802.09553 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab26c 2041

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Post-Newtonian dynamics in dense star clusters: Formation, masses, and merger rates of highly-eccentric black hole binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123005 , archivePrefix =. 1811.04926 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.123005

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    A new route towards merging massive black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628133 , archivePrefix =. 1601.03718 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628133

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw379 , archivePrefix =. 1601.00007 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stw379

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    On the Origin of Black Hole Spin in High-mass X-Ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b , archivePrefix =. 1810.13016 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b 2041

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    The Extreme Spin of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/85 , archivePrefix =. 1106.3690 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/85

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Collapsars: Gamma-Ray Bursts and Explosions in ``Failed Supernovae''. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307790 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9810274 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/307790

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172359 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/172359

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Black Hole Spin Evolution by Mergers and Accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590379 , archivePrefix =. 0802.0025 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/590379

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Final spin from the coalescence of two black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044002 , archivePrefix =. 0712.3541 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.044002

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54 , archivePrefix =. 2510.26931 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54 2041

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Binary black hole mergers from globular clusters: Masses, merger rates, and the impact of stellar evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084029 , archivePrefix =. 1602.02444 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.084029

  71. [71]

    Coalescing binary black holes originating from globular clusters

    MOCCA-SURVEY Database - I. Coalescing binary black holes originating from globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw177 , archivePrefix =. 1608.02520 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw177

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    The cosmic evolution of binary black holes in young, globular, and nuclear star clusters: rates, masses, spins, and mixing fractions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac422 , archivePrefix =. 2109.06222 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac422

  73. [73]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =

    Rates of compact object coalescences. Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3 , archivePrefix =. 2107.14239 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e , archivePrefix =. 2011.10057 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e 2011

  75. [75]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18082 , archivePrefix =. 2508.18082 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18082

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , archivePrefix =. 1602.03837 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M _. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102 , archivePrefix =. 2009.01075 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102 2009

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    The Runaway Growth of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341798 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0201055 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/341798

  79. [79]

    Star cluster ecology. III. Runaway collisions in young compact star clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9812006 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9812006 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9812006

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Stellar collisions during binary-binary and binary-single star interactions. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07914.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0401004 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07914.x 2004

Showing first 80 references.