REVIEW 4 cited by
SpreadsheetBench: Towards Challenging Real World Spreadsheet Manipulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce SpreadsheetBench, a challenging spreadsheet manipulation benchmark exclusively derived from real-world scenarios, designed to immerse current large language models (LLMs) in the actual workflow of spreadsheet users. Unlike existing benchmarks that rely on synthesized queries and simplified spreadsheet files, SpreadsheetBench is built from 912 real questions gathered from online Excel forums, which reflect the intricate needs of users. The associated spreadsheets from the forums contain a variety of tabular data such as multiple tables, non-standard relational tables, and abundant non-textual elements. Furthermore, we propose a more reliable evaluation metric akin to online judge platforms, where multiple spreadsheet files are created as test cases for each instruction, ensuring the evaluation of robust solutions capable of handling spreadsheets with varying values. Our comprehensive evaluation of various LLMs under both single-round and multi-round inference settings reveals a substantial gap between the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models and human performance, highlighting the benchmark's difficulty.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Skills on the Fly: Test-Time Adaptive Skill Synthesis for LLM Agents
SkillTTA synthesizes temporary task-specific skills from retrieved training trajectories to boost LLM agent Pass@1 scores on SpreadsheetBench and BigCodeBench without parameter updates.
-
Rethinking Self-Evolving Agent Skills: Feedback Dynamics over Multiple Rounds
Persistent agent skill evolution is sparse, validation-filtered search whose gains depend strongly on model, benchmark, and which feedback (failures versus successes) is shown.
-
AgentOmnia: Scaling Agentic Models for Full-Scenario Applications
Post-training an open Qwen3-30B agent on 52,361 verifiable tasks in 5,018 synthesized stateful environments lifts its average across four agent benchmarks from 22.9% to 41.7%.
-
Relay-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Multi-Domain Reasoning Chains
Relay-Bench, a 30-problem benchmark of chained multi-domain tasks with encoded prompts, resists saturation: the best tested model, GPT-5.5, scores 43.3% Pass@1.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.