Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

A single prefill attention pass can rank every schema candidate, and direct supervision of that attention reaches 99.22/95.95/83.29 mAP on the three main text-to-SQL benchmarks while keeping latency in milliseconds.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Attention from an LLM's generation-start position, pooled over schema candidates, yields millisecond-scale, controllable schema-linking scores that beat prior linkers on three benchmarks.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection AttnLink is a genuinely novel and well-tested attention-based schema linker; the main open question is whether the gold labels it trains and evaluates on are clean enough to fully trust the headline numbers. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00693 v1 pith:3GAYGXYN submitted 2026-08-01 cs.CL

AttnLink: Turning Attention into Schema Links for Text-to-SQL

Jinwang Song , Tao Liu , Haowen Zheng , Xiangheng Li , Yifan Li , Hongying Zan This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords Text-to-SQLschema linkingattention probinggeneration anchorset-mass lossmulti-positive coverageschema pruningprefill inference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the attention an LLM already computes from the generation-start position—the token where copying an identifier would begin—is a sufficient schema-linking signal. Both a training-free probe and a lightly supervised variant convert that attention into continuous relevance scores for every table and column in one prefill pass, without autoregressive decoding or an auxiliary retriever. The supervised variant reaches mean average precision of 99.22%, 95.95%, and 83.29% on Spider, BIRD, and Spider2-SQLite, and produces the best or tied-best SQL execution accuracy in seven of nine generator-dataset settings. If correct, schema linking becomes a standard attention extraction with millisecond cost and tunable precision-recall trade-offs, rather than a separate model or a decoding step.

Core claim

The central claim is that the attention distribution from the generation anchor—the final prompt token at which the model would begin copying an identifier from a candidate list—is a usable continuous relevance score for schema items. AttnLink-U extracts that attention from a selected layer and head, mean-pools it over each candidate's token span, and normalizes it with temperature scaling. AttnLink-S keeps the same pipeline but directly supervises the resulting candidate distribution with a set-mass objective that shifts probability onto the gold schema set, plus an adaptive probability floor per positive item that prevents a few easy positives from soaking up all the mass. Inference is a s

What carries the argument

Generation-anchor attention: at the last token of the input prompt, the effective query vector of the final layer attends over all visible prompt tokens; the paper treats this as a retrieval operation from candidate schema spans. Token-level attention weights over each candidate identifier are mean-pooled into a candidate score, mapped through a temperature-scaled softmax over candidates, and selected by top-p cumulative mass. For the supervised variant, the training objective is a set-mass loss over the gold positives plus a floor regularizer that penalizes any positive falling below rho over the number of positives, ensuring coverage without forcing uniformity.

Load-bearing premise

The gold schema for every example is defined by automatically parsing the reference SQL query and collecting the physical tables and columns it mentions, so if that parse misses a schema item a correct query could use, or includes items only because of the reference query's style, the supervision signal and all reported metrics inherit that bias.

What would settle it

Construct an independent gold set for a random sample of BIRD and Spider examples by having human annotators mark, without seeing the reference SQL, every table and column needed to answer the question, then compare against the parsed gold. If agreement is low, or if AttnLink-S's mAP drops sharply when retrained or re-evaluated on the human gold set, the reported accuracy partly reflects the parser, not schema relevance. A lighter check is to verify that the gold sets cover all columns appearing in any execution-equivalent query, since different valid SQL formulations can reference different c

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Schema linking can run in a single prefill pass with millisecond-scale latency, making it compatible with existing serving infrastructure and applicable to very large schemas.
  • The resulting continuous scores allow post-hoc precision-recall control by temperature and top-p selection, letting users calibrate schema budget per generator without retraining the linker.
  • Direct attention supervision improves multi-positive coverage over the training-free probe, transferring from BIRD training to the no-training-split Spider2-SQLite benchmark.
  • Table-level linking is nearly saturated by the same mechanism, with supervised variants reaching at least 99.91% mAP on Spider, indicating attention already carries strong table-grounding signal.
  • Best execution accuracy is generator-dependent: stronger generators benefit from higher schema recall, while weaker generators prefer sharper filtering, so the operating point should be chosen per generator.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same generation-anchor attention probe could generalize to other list-copying and structured-span retrieval tasks, such as tool selection, entity linking, or fact extraction, where an LLM is asked to copy one identifier from a candidate list.
  • Because the probe only needs query and key tensors at one position, it may extend to long-context pruning or retrieval within the same prefill, treating arbitrary spans as candidates rather than just schema items.
  • The observed pattern that optimal temperature varies with generator strength suggests a practical closed-loop controller: pick the temperature on a small validation set of the target generator, making the schema budget adaptive rather than fixed.
  • The copy-oriented instruction is load-bearing for inducing the useful attention distribution; replacing it with semantic reasoning destroys the signal, so this prompting design is likely essential beyond schema linking and worth testing in other copying tasks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes AttnLink, a schema-linking framework that converts the attention of a decoder-only LLM at the generation-start position ('generation anchor') into continuous relevance scores for candidate schema items. AttnLink-U probes pretrained attention with no parameter updates; AttnLink-S additionally applies LoRA supervision using a set-mass objective and an adaptive probability floor. Both variants rank all candidates in a single prefill pass, with temperature and top-p selection controlling precision/recall. Experiments on Spider, BIRD, and Spider2-SQLite report state-of-the-art mAP for ranked linkers (99.22/95.95/83.29 for AttnLink-S with Qwen3.5-9B), millisecond-scale latency, and best or tied-best downstream execution accuracy in seven of nine generator-dataset settings. The appendix includes ablations on the floor ratio, pooling strategy, layer-head selection, candidate-order stability, and the necessity of the copy-oriented instruction.

Significance. The central observation—that generation-anchor attention can act as a schema-linking signal—is interesting and reasonably well supported. The method is simple, efficient, and compatible with standard LLM serving infrastructure, and the ablations are unusually thorough: the copy-instruction versus semantic-rationale comparison, the candidate-order perturbation analysis, and the pooling and floor-ratio studies all speak to the mechanism rather than only to benchmark numbers. If the gold-label construction is audited and the headline comparisons are shown to be statistically stable, the result would be a useful contribution to text-to-SQL schema linking. The paper is not circular in the sense of fitting constants from test labels; AttnLink-S uses gold labels as ordinary supervision, and the copy-instruction ablation indicates the signal is not a trivial artifact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix, 'Datasets and Gold-Schema Construction'; Eqs. (6)-(10), (15)-(19)] The gold set G is defined by parsing the reference SQL with SQLGlot and resolving aliases. The appendix discloses that 477 BIRD training reference SQLs fail to execute and removes them from training only; no equivalent audit is reported for the dev splits on which all headline numbers are computed. Because the same gold sets supervise AttnLink-S (Eqs. 6-10) and define every mAP/SRR/recall number in Table 1, any malformed or non-parseable dev reference SQL biases both training and evaluation in unknown directions. Please report the number of dev reference SQLs that fail to execute/parse, manually inspect a sample, and show that Table 1 is stable when problematic examples are excluded.
  2. [Table 4; Table 1] The 'best or tied-best in seven of nine' claim and several mAP differences are reported without error bars or significance tests. On Spider2-SQLite (135 examples), Qwen3-4B AttnLink-S achieves EX 9.6% versus RSL-SQL 10.3%; on Spider Dev, Qwen3.5-9B AttnLink-S ties ExSL at 84.1%. Since SQL generation uses stochastic decoding, these differences may be within run-to-run noise. Please report standard deviations over repeated runs or a significance test for the main comparisons, or qualify the claim accordingly.
  3. [Table 2; Implementation Details] The floor ratio is set to rho=0.25 in the main experiments, and Table 2 reports the rho ablation on BIRD Dev and Spider2-SQLite. If rho was selected by inspecting these dev results, then the BIRD Dev and Spider2-SQLite numbers in Table 1 are selected optima rather than held-out evaluations, and the cross-dataset transfer claim for Spider2-SQLite is weakened. Please clarify whether rho was chosen before seeing dev labels; if not, re-run with a prespecified value or a calibration split separate from the reported dev sets.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous formatting and spacing errors in the extracted text (e.g., 'fine-tuneLLMstooutput' in the Introduction) and in Table 1 (e.g., '89.3091.15N/A'). These make the paper harder to read and should be fixed.
  2. [Eq. (10)] The floor regularizer writes log(f/(pi+eps)) with a max; please clarify the epsilon handling for pi = 0 and state whether the gradient is clipped or stabilized.
  3. [Implementation Details] The fixed inference setting tau=2.0, p=0.99 is justified empirically, but the paper should state explicitly whether these values were chosen on a development split or prespecified.
  4. [Appendix, 'Temperature Sensitivity...'] The appendix reports post-hoc best-temperature EX values that exceed the main fixed-temperature results. This is a useful sensitivity analysis, but the wording 'establish a new maximum' should be accompanied by a clear caveat that these are selected optima, not a prespecified evaluation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

AttnLink-S's headline mAPs on BIRD Dev and Spider2-SQLite are the exact values used to select the floor ratio rho; otherwise the attention-to-schema-link mechanism is not circular.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Implementation Details / Table 2 / Table 1]
    "We use top-p= 0.99 and τ= 2.0 for both variants during inference, and set ρ= 0.25 for AttnLink-S during training. Table 2: Dataset ρ 0 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 BIRD Dev 88.41 95.54 95.95 95.72 95.48 94.96 Spider2-SQLite 71.44 82.06 83.29 80.75 81.22 78.75. Table 1: AttnLink-S Qwen3.5-9B ... BIRD Dev ... 95.95 ... Spider2-SQLite ... 83.29"

    Table 2 is an ablation on the same evaluation sets used for the headline results. The value ρ=0.25 is the one that maximizes mAP on BIRD Dev and Spider2-SQLite (95.95 and 83.29), and Table 1 reports those same maxima as AttnLink-S's performance. Thus the reported mAPs are the selection criterion for ρ, not an independent evaluation of a fixed configuration. This is a fitted hyperparameter presented as a prediction, statistically forcing the two headline numbers. The core attention mechanism is not itself circular, but these specific headline metrics are contaminated by selection on the evaluation sets.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular: AttnLink extracts generation-anchor attention over candidate spans, pools it, normalizes it, and for AttnLink-S supervises the resulting distribution with gold schema items obtained by parsing reference SQL. This is standard supervised learning and evaluation; the gold labels do not come from AttnLink's own outputs. The copy-instruction vs. semantic-rationale ablation further shows the signal is not a trivial artifact of pretraining. No load-bearing self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz-by-citation is present. The SQLGlot-based gold-schema construction is a data-quality risk (e.g., 477 BIRD training SQLs that fail to execute are removed only from training, with no dev-set audit), but that is a correctness concern, not circularity. The one genuine circular step is the selection of ρ on BIRD Dev and Spider2-SQLite in Table 2 followed by reporting the selected maxima in Table 1; this affects only the headline AttnLink-S mAP values and does not invalidate the overall mechanism, the training-free variant, or the downstream EX comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

AttnLink introduces no new physical or model-level entities; the 'generation anchor' is a position in the prompt. The approach relies on attention being a usable operational signal (assumption) and on the correctness of gold labels derived from reference SQL parsing (assumption). Several inference and training hyperparameters (tau, p, rho, layer-head choices) are set empirically and partly tuned on validation sets, and the rho ablation includes a test-set column.

free parameters (7)
  • Temperature tau = 2.0
    Controls concentration of the normalized candidate distribution (Eq. 5); fixed to 2.0 for main results, with sensitivity analysis and per-generator tuning in Figure 9.
  • top-p cumulative mass p = 0.99
    Cumulative-mass threshold for selecting the predicted set (Eq. 13); fixed to 0.99 for main results.
  • Floor ratio rho = 0.25
    Controls the adaptive probability floor f = rho/|I+| in Eq. 9; selected from ablation in Table 2, affecting multi-positive coverage. Table 2 also reports Spider2 values, creating a potential test-set tuning concern.
  • Layer-head selection (AttnLink-U) = e.g., Qwen3.5-9B L23/H9
    Selected on a 400-example BIRD training sample; reused across datasets. Claimed to be cross-dataset stable (Figures 4-5).
  • Supervised head (AttnLink-S) = final layer head 0
    Head 0 of the final layer chosen for training; Table 8 shows mid-to-late layers are nearly equivalent, so this is a robustness choice rather than a tuned parameter.
  • LoRA rank/alpha/dropout = r=64, alpha=512, dropout=0.08
    Training hyperparameters (Table 5); standard PEFT choices that affect the trained variant's capacity.
  • Epsilon epsilon = small constant
    Numerical stability constant in Eqs. 5, 8, 10; not meaningfully tuned.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The generation anchor's attention distribution over candidate spans is a valid operational relevance signal for schema linking.
    Central mechanism of the method, stated in Method ('We view next-token prediction at the generation anchor as a retrieval operation over candidate schema items'). The copy-instruction ablation supports it empirically (Table 7, Figures 6-7), but it is an assumed property of LLM attention, not a theorem.
  • domain assumption Gold schema items obtained by parsing reference SQL with SQLGlot and resolving aliases are complete and correct targets for schema linking.
    Used both as supervision for AttnLink-S and as ground truth for all evaluation metrics. Any parse error or valid alternative SQL would bias training and mAP/SRR/recall. Described in Appendix 'Datasets and Gold-Schema Construction'.
  • ad hoc to paper A single layer-head pair captures a transferable schema-grounding signal; no multi-head or cross-layer aggregation is needed.
    Stated in Implementation Details ('AttnLink uses a single layer-head pair ... multi-head or cross-layer averaging yields no consistent gains') and supported by Figures 4-5, but this is a design choice specific to this method.
  • ad hoc to paper Mean pooling over candidate token spans is the best aggregation; first-token or sum pooling are worse.
    Supported by Table 6 pooling ablation; a methodological assumption, not a first-principles result.
  • domain assumption The copying prompt with random uniform selection induces attention that covers multiple relevant candidates even though the model is asked to copy only one.
    Necessary for AttnLink-U's training-free high recall. The random-selection instruction is intended to prevent the model from attending to only the single most salient item; the assumption is that prefill attention at the anchor nonetheless distributes over all candidates the model considers relevant. Supported by the instruction ablation (Table 7).

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AttnLink: Turning Attention into Schema Links for Text-to-SQL." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3GAYGXYN

@misc{pith2026260800693,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AttnLink: Turning Attention into Schema Links for Text-to-SQL},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3GAYGXYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00693}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Schema linking is a critical component of Text-to-SQL systems, but existing approaches often trade off contextual modeling capacity, score-based controllability, and inference efficiency. We introduce AttnLink, an attention-based framework that converts LLMs' internal attention into continuous relevance scores for schema items. AttnLink extracts the attention from the generation-start position to candidate schema spans, enabling all candidates to be ranked in a single prefill pass without autoregressive decoding. We develop two variants: AttnLink-U, which directly probes pretrained attention without parameter updates, and AttnLink-S, which aligns the attention distribution with gold schema items through direct supervision. To improve coverage of multiple relevant schema items, AttnLink-S combines a set-mass objective with an adaptive probability-floor regularizer. The resulting scores support post-hoc precision-recall control through temperature scaling and cumulative-mass selection. Experiments on Spider, BIRD, and Spider2-SQLite show that AttnLink-S achieves mAP scores of 99.22%, 95.95%, and 83.29%, respectively, with millisecond-scale schema-linking latency. It also yields the best or tied-best execution accuracy for downstream SQL generation in seven of nine generator-dataset settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00693 by Haowen Zheng, Hongying Zan, Jinwang Song, Tao Liu, Xiangheng Li, Yifan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of AttnLink. 1. We propose AttnLink, a unified schema linking frame￾work that converts LLMs’ internal attention into contin￾uous table and column relevance scores. This formula￾tion supports both zero-training probing and supervised alignment, and enables post-hoc precision–recall control through temperature scaling and top-p cumulative-mass selection. 2. We show that LLM attention provides a stro… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration of the Generation Anchor. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temperature & Top-p sensitivity of Qwen3.5-9B AttnLink-S on BIRD Dev. 3 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 (a) Full Softmax Attention Layer 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Mean single-head mAP Selected L23 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (b) Attention Head (Layer 23) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Single-head mAP Selected H9 BIRD Spider Spider2-SQLite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Layer–head analysis of AttnLink-U with Qwen3.5- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Per-head mAP of Qwen3.5-9B Layer 23 under eight randomized candidate-order perturbations on BIRD Dev. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Generation-anchor attention of AttnLink-U under the copy-oriented instruction for a Spider Dev example. Darker red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Generation-anchor attention of AttnLink-U for the same Spider example after replacing the copy-oriented instruction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Single-turn prompt used for downstream SQL generation, following the prompt format of OmniSQL. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Downstream execution accuracy as a function of the schema-link temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S pider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to- SQL Task

    Yu, Tao and Zhang, Rui and Yang, Kai and Yasunaga, Michihiro and Wang, Dongxu and Li, Zifan and Ma, James and Li, Irene and Yao, Qingning and Roman, Shanelle and Zhang, Zilin and Radev, Dragomir. S pider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to- SQL Task. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical...

    doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1425 2018

  2. [2]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Can llm already serve as a database interface? a big bench for large-scale database grounded text-to-sqls , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year =

    Haoyang Li and Jing Zhang and Cuiping Li and Hong Chen , title =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year =

    work page

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00073 , year =

    Zhenbiao Cao and Yuanlei Zheng and Zhihao Fan and Xiaojin Zhang and Wei Chen and Xiang Bai , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00073 , year =. 2411.00073 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year =

    Mohammadreza Pourreza and Davood Rafiei , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year =. 2304.11015 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , volume=

    Text-to-sql empowered by large language models: A benchmark evaluation , author=. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16755 , year=

    Chess: Contextual harnessing for efficient sql synthesis , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16755 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17174 , year=

    Extractive schema linking for text-to-sql , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17174 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Hu and Yelong Shen and Phillip Wallis and Zeyuan Allen-Zhu and Yuanzhi Li and Shean Wang and Lu Wang and Weizhu Chen , title =

    Edward J. Hu and Yelong Shen and Phillip Wallis and Zeyuan Allen-Zhu and Yuanzhi Li and Shean Wang and Lu Wang and Weizhu Chen , title =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  10. [10]

    JOLT - SQL : Joint Loss Tuning of Text-to- SQL with Confusion-aware Noisy Schema Sampling

    Song, Jinwang and Zan, Hongying and Zhang, Kunli and Mu, Lingling and Han, Yingjie and Hua, Haobo and Peng, Min. JOLT - SQL : Joint Loss Tuning of Text-to- SQL with Confusion-aware Noisy Schema Sampling. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.308

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.308 2025

  11. [11]

    Gonzalez and Hao Zhang and Ion Stoica , title =

    Woosuk Kwon and Zhuohan Li and Siyuan Zhuang and Ying Sheng and Lianmin Zheng and Cody Hao Yu and Joseph E. Gonzalez and Hao Zhang and Ion Stoica , title =. Proceedings of the 29th. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3600006.3613165 , note =

    arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , year =

    Bailin Wang and Richard Shin and Xiaodong Liu and Oleksandr Polozov and Matthew Richardson , title =. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , year =

    work page

  13. [13]

    Towards Complex Text-to- SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representation

    Guo, Jiaqi and Zhan, Zecheng and Gao, Yan and Xiao, Yan and Lou, Jian-Guang and Liu, Ting and Zhang, Dongmei. Towards Complex Text-to- SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representation. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019. doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1444

    doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1444 2019

  14. [14]

    Re-examining the Role of Schema Linking in Text-to- SQL

    Lei, Wenqiang and Wang, Weixin and Ma, Zhixin and Gan, Tian and Lu, Wei and Kan, Min-Yen and Chua, Tat-Seng. Re-examining the Role of Schema Linking in Text-to- SQL. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.564

    doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.564 2020

  15. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07702 , year =

    Karime Maamari and Fadhil Abubaker and Daniel Jaroslawicz and Amine Mhedhbi , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07702 , year =. 2408.07702 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    MAC - SQL : A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to- SQL

    Wang, Bing and Ren, Changyu and Yang, Jian and Liang, Xinnian and Bai, Jiaqi and Chai, LinZheng and Yan, Zhao and Zhang, Qian-Wen and Yin, Di and Sun, Xing and Li, Zhoujun. MAC - SQL : A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to- SQL. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    2024 , eprint=

    CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQL , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  18. [18]

    Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych , title =. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) , year =

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    M 3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation

    Chen, Jianlyu and Xiao, Shitao and Zhang, Peitian and Luo, Kun and Lian, Defu and Liu, Zheng. M 3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.137

    doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.137 2024

  20. [20]

    Manning , title =

    Kevin Clark and Urvashi Khandelwal and Omer Levy and Christopher D. Manning , title =. Proceedings of the 2019. 2019 , pages =

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Attention is not not Explanation

    Wiegreffe, Sarah and Pinter, Yuval. Attention is not not Explanation. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. doi:10.18653/v1/D19-1002

    doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1002 2019

  22. [22]

    A Primer in BERT ology: What We Know About How BERT Works

    Rogers, Anna and Kovaleva, Olga and Rumshisky, Anna. A Primer in BERT ology: What We Know About How BERT Works. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2020. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00349

    doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00349 2020

  23. [23]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

    Spider 2.0: Evaluating language models on real-world enterprise text-to-sql workflows , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05176 , year=

    Qwen3 embedding: Advancing text embedding and reranking through foundation models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05176 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages=

    Dts-sql: Decomposed text-to-sql with small large language models , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages=

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    Linkalign: Scalable schema linking for real-world large-scale multi-database text-to-sql , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Autolink: Autonomous schema exploration and expansion for scalable schema linking in text-to-sql at scale , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    work page

  28. [28]

    Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers , booktitle =

    Shijie Chen and Bernal Jim. Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers , booktitle =. 2025 , eprint =

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =

    Wuwei Zhang and Fangcong Yin and Howard Yen and Danqi Chen and Xi Ye , title =. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1214 , eprint =

    doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1214 2025

  30. [30]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.06588 , url =

    Ko, Ching-Yun and Chen, Pin-Yu , year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.06588 , url =. 2603.06588 , archivePrefix =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06588

  31. [31]

    5-coder technical report , author=

    Qwen2. 5-coder technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12186 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

    Qwen3 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    2026 , eprint=

    Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Report , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

    The llama 3 herd of models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Rethinking the role of scale for in-context learning: An interpretability-based case study at 66 billion scale , author=. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    How do large language models learn in-context? query and key matrices of in-context heads are two towers for metric learning , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    A survey on employing large language models for text-to-sql tasks , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

    A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where are we, and where are we going? , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

  39. [39]

    2025 , volume=

    Hong, Zijin and Yuan, Zheng and Zhang, Qinggang and Chen, Hao and Dong, Junnan and Huang, Feiran and Huang, Xiao , journal=. 2025 , volume=. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2025.3609486 , url =

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , volume=

    OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-Quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scale , author=. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.