Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Forethought and Hindsight in Credit Assignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.13685 v1 pith:3GGWUG6S submitted 2020-10-26 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords modelsplanningassignmentbestcreditforethoughthindsightpredictions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We address the problem of credit assignment in reinforcement learning and explore fundamental questions regarding the way in which an agent can best use additional computation to propagate new information, by planning with internal models of the world to improve its predictions. Particularly, we work to understand the gains and peculiarities of planning employed as forethought via forward models or as hindsight operating with backward models. We establish the relative merits, limitations and complementary properties of both planning mechanisms in carefully constructed scenarios. Further, we investigate the best use of models in planning, primarily focusing on the selection of states in which predictions should be (re)-evaluated. Lastly, we discuss the issue of model estimation and highlight a spectrum of methods that stretch from explicit environment-dynamics predictors to more abstract planner-aware models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools