The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2103.10294 · v1 · pith:3GM56UCL · submitted 2021-03-18 · cs.LG · cs.DM· math.OC

Learning to Schedule Heuristics in Branch-and-Bound

Reviewed by Pithpith:3GM56UCLopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.DMmath.OC
keywords heuristicsperformanceprimalschedulesolutionssolversolversexact
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Primal heuristics play a crucial role in exact solvers for Mixed Integer Programming (MIP). While solvers are guaranteed to find optimal solutions given sufficient time, real-world applications typically require finding good solutions early on in the search to enable fast decision-making. While much of MIP research focuses on designing effective heuristics, the question of how to manage multiple MIP heuristics in a solver has not received equal attention. Generally, solvers follow hard-coded rules derived from empirical testing on broad sets of instances. Since the performance of heuristics is instance-dependent, using these general rules for a particular problem might not yield the best performance. In this work, we propose the first data-driven framework for scheduling heuristics in an exact MIP solver. By learning from data describing the performance of primal heuristics, we obtain a problem-specific schedule of heuristics that collectively find many solutions at minimal cost. We provide a formal description of the problem and propose an efficient algorithm for computing such a schedule. Compared to the default settings of a state-of-the-art academic MIP solver, we are able to reduce the average primal integral by up to 49% on a class of challenging instances.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A note on the convergence guarantees of RLT-based algorithms for polynomial optimization

    math.OC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A note that flags an oversight in RLT convergence proofs for polynomial optimization and recovers correctness via one extra natural assumption.