Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving the Learning of Code Review Successive Tasks with Cross-Task Knowledge Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02063 v1 pith:3GOFX4EJ submitted 2024-02-03 cs.SE

Improving the Learning of Code Review Successive Tasks with Cross-Task Knowledge Distillation

classification cs.SE
keywords codefine-tuningrefinementreviewtasksmodelcommentgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Code review is a fundamental process in software development that plays a pivotal role in ensuring code quality and reducing the likelihood of errors and bugs. However, code review can be complex, subjective, and time-consuming. Quality estimation, comment generation, and code refinement constitute the three key tasks of this process, and their automation has traditionally been addressed separately in the literature using different approaches. In particular, recent efforts have focused on fine-tuning pre-trained language models to aid in code review tasks, with each task being considered in isolation. We believe that these tasks are interconnected, and their fine-tuning should consider this interconnection. In this paper, we introduce a novel deep-learning architecture, named DISCOREV, which employs cross-task knowledge distillation to address these tasks simultaneously. In our approach, we utilize a cascade of models to enhance both comment generation and code refinement models. The fine-tuning of the comment generation model is guided by the code refinement model, while the fine-tuning of the code refinement model is guided by the quality estimation model. We implement this guidance using two strategies: a feedback-based learning objective and an embedding alignment objective. We evaluate DISCOREV by comparing it to state-of-the-art methods based on independent training and fine-tuning. Our results show that our approach generates better review comments, as measured by the BLEU score, as well as more accurate code refinement according to the CodeBLEU score

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Selective LLM reformulation guided by high-quality exemplars yields cleaner, more diverse code-review datasets that improve downstream comment generation and code refinement.