Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards cross-lingual distributed representations without parallel text trained with adversarial autoencoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.02996 v1 pith:3GYFIGNQ submitted 2016-08-09 cs.CL cs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.LGcs.NE
keywords representationscompatibletexttrainedvectorswordadversarialcross-lingual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Current approaches to learning vector representations of text that are compatible between different languages usually require some amount of parallel text, aligned at word, sentence or at least document level. We hypothesize however, that different natural languages share enough semantic structure that it should be possible, in principle, to learn compatible vector representations just by analyzing the monolingual distribution of words. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, we propose a scheme to map word vectors trained on a source language to vectors semantically compatible with word vectors trained on a target language using an adversarial autoencoder. We present preliminary qualitative results and discuss possible future developments of this technique, such as applications to cross-lingual sentence representations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do We Really Need Fully Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Embeddings?

    cs.CL 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 210-pair bilingual lexicon induction evaluation, unsupervised cross-lingual embeddings underperform weakly supervised methods on every pair, including 87 pairs where they collapse to near-zero accuracy.

Pith tools