Reply to the comment of P. Lipavsky
classification
❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
cond-mat.str-elnucl-th
keywords
conservationlawslipavskycommentcorrectionscounterexamplecriticsdensity
read the original abstract
The critics of P. Lipavsky on the derivation of conservation laws including gradient corrections is refuted since his counterexample is based on a mathematical error. Instead, the derived conservation laws for density, momentum and energy remain valid even without using the objected relation. Only for the entropy local terms are missing which vanish under integration.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.