Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Agent-Environment Alignment via Automated Interface Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.21055 v1 pith:3JJHE5DS submitted 2025-05-27 cs.AI

Agent-Environment Alignment via Automated Interface Generation

classification cs.AI
keywords interfaceagentenvironmentunderlineagent-environmentmisalignmentacrossaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents have shown impressive reasoning capabilities in interactive decision-making tasks. These agents interact with environment through intermediate interfaces, such as predefined action spaces and interaction rules, which mediate the perception and action. However, mismatches often happen between the internal expectations of the agent regarding the influence of its issued actions and the actual state transitions in the environment, a phenomenon referred to as \textbf{agent-environment misalignment}. While prior work has invested substantially in improving agent strategies and environment design, the critical role of the interface still remains underexplored. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that agent-environment misalignment poses a significant bottleneck to agent performance. To mitigate this issue, we propose \textbf{ALIGN}, an \underline{A}uto-A\underline{l}igned \underline{I}nterface \underline{G}e\underline{n}eration framework that alleviates the misalignment by enriching the interface. Specifically, the ALIGN-generated interface enhances both the static information of the environment and the step-wise observations returned to the agent. Implemented as a lightweight wrapper, this interface achieves the alignment without modifying either the agent logic or the environment code. Experiments across multiple domains including embodied tasks, web navigation and tool-use, show consistent performance improvements, with up to a 45.67\% success rate improvement observed in ALFWorld. Meanwhile, ALIGN-generated interface can generalize across different agent architectures and LLM backbones without interface regeneration. Code and experimental results are available at https://github.com/THUNLP-MT/ALIGN.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DiagEval: Trajectory-Conditioned Diagnosis for Reliable Software Evaluation with GUI Agents

    cs.SE 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    DiagEval is a new diagnostic protocol that conditions on failed trajectories to attribute GUI-agent evaluation failures, recovering 45-62% of misattributed cases and lifting accuracy 8-16 points on two benchmarks.

  2. SEAL: Synergistic Co-Evolution of Agents and Learning Environments

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SEAL co-evolves LLM agents and environments via shared turn-level failure diagnoses, yielding +8.25 to +26.25 point gains on tool-use tasks with only 400 samples.

  3. DiagEval: Trajectory-Conditioned Diagnosis for Reliable Software Evaluation with GUI Agents

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DiagEval applies trajectory-conditioned diagnostic probes to recover 45.6-62.1% of misattributed failures in GUI-agent software evaluation, raising accuracy from 69.9% to 78.3% on WebDevJudge-Unit and 65.0% to 81.6% o...