REVIEW
A straightforward method to assess motion blur for different types of displays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A straightforward method to assess motion blur for different types of displays
read the original abstract
A simulation method based on the liquid crystal response and the human visual system is suitable to characterize motion blur for LCDs but not other display types. We propose a more straightforward and widely applicable method to quantify motion blur based on the width of the moving object. We thus compare various types of displays objectively. A perceptual experiment was conducted to validate the proposed method. We test varying motion velocities for nine commercial displays. We compare the three motion blur evaluation methods (simulation, human perception, and our method) using z-scores. Our comparisons indicate that our method accurately characterizes motion blur for various display types.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.