Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A straightforward method to assess motion blur for different types of displays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.07573 v1 pith:3JXWJMSX submitted 2015-08-08 cs.CV

A straightforward method to assess motion blur for different types of displays

classification cs.CV
keywords methodmotionblurtypesdisplayscomparedisplayhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A simulation method based on the liquid crystal response and the human visual system is suitable to characterize motion blur for LCDs but not other display types. We propose a more straightforward and widely applicable method to quantify motion blur based on the width of the moving object. We thus compare various types of displays objectively. A perceptual experiment was conducted to validate the proposed method. We test varying motion velocities for nine commercial displays. We compare the three motion blur evaluation methods (simulation, human perception, and our method) using z-scores. Our comparisons indicate that our method accurately characterizes motion blur for various display types.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.