Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SKT5SciSumm -- Revisiting Extractive-Generative Approach for Multi-Document Scientific Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17311 v2 pith:3L4WZ7YL submitted 2024-02-27 cs.CL

SKT5SciSumm -- Revisiting Extractive-Generative Approach for Multi-Document Scientific Summarization

classification cs.CL
keywords scientificsummarizationmulti-documenttextskt5scisummbenefitsmodelssentences
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Summarization for scientific text has shown significant benefits both for the research community and human society. Given the fact that the nature of scientific text is distinctive and the input of the multi-document summarization task is substantially long, the task requires sufficient embedding generation and text truncation without losing important information. To tackle these issues, in this paper, we propose SKT5SciSumm - a hybrid framework for multi-document scientific summarization (MDSS). We leverage the Sentence-Transformer version of Scientific Paper Embeddings using Citation-Informed Transformers (SPECTER) to encode and represent textual sentences, allowing for efficient extractive summarization using k-means clustering. We employ the T5 family of models to generate abstractive summaries using extracted sentences. SKT5SciSumm achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Multi-XScience dataset. Through extensive experiments and evaluation, we showcase the benefits of our model by using less complicated models to achieve remarkable results, thereby highlighting its potential in advancing the field of multi-document summarization for scientific text.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ResearchPulse: Building Method-Experiment Chains through Multi-Document Scientific Inference

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    ResearchPulse extracts motivation-method chains and experimental trends from related papers, rendering them as mind maps and line charts, and releases a 100-cluster benchmark; the reported '7B beats GPT-4o' result is ...