REVIEW 1 cited by
A Comparison of Synthetic Oversampling Methods for Multi-class Text Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The authors compared oversampling methods for the problem of multi-class topic classification. The SMOTE algorithm underlies one of the most popular oversampling methods. It consists in choosing two examples of a minority class and generating a new example based on them. In the paper, the authors compared the basic SMOTE method with its two modifications (Borderline SMOTE and ADASYN) and random oversampling technique on the example of one of text classification tasks. The paper discusses the k-nearest neighbor algorithm, the support vector machine algorithm and three types of neural networks (feedforward network, long short-term memory (LSTM) and bidirectional LSTM). The authors combine these machine learning algorithms with different text representations and compared synthetic oversampling methods. In most cases, the use of oversampling techniques can significantly improve the quality of classification. The authors conclude that for this task, the quality of the KNN and SVM algorithms is more influenced by class imbalance than neural networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Approximate Borderline Sampling using Granular-Ball for Classification Tasks
GBABS samples only approximate borderline points detected via non-overlapping granular balls, reporting better classifier accuracy and noise robustness than GB-based and standard sampling baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.