Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.04608 v2 pith:3LLJUDHJ submitted 2023-10-06 physics.bio-ph physics.med-ph

Volume electron microscopy in injured rat brain validates white matter microstructure metrics from diffusion MRI

classification physics.bio-ph physics.med-ph
keywords dmrihistologicalvivobraindiffusionelectronevaluatedfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Biophysical modeling of diffusion MRI (dMRI) offers the exciting potential of bridging the gap between the macroscopic MRI resolution and microscopic cellular features, effectively turning the MRI scanner into a noninvasive in vivo microscope. In brain white matter, the Standard Model (SM) interprets the dMRI signal in terms of axon dispersion, intra- and extra-axonal water fractions and diffusivities. However, for SM to be fully applicable and correctly interpreted, it needs to be carefully evaluated using histology. Here, we perform a comprehensive histological validation of the SM parameters, by characterizing WM microstructure in sham and injured rat brains using volume (3d) electron microscopy (EM) and ex vivo dMRI. Sensitivity is evaluated by how close each SM metric is to its histological counterpart, and specificity by how independent it is from other, non-corresponding histological features. This comparison reveals that SM is sensitive and specific to microscopic properties, clearing the way for the clinical adoption of in vivo dMRI derived SM parameters as biomarkers for neurological disorders.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.