REVIEW
Deep Learning based Automatic Quantification of Urethral Plate Quality using the Plate Objective Scoring Tool (POST)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Objectives: To explore the capacity of deep learning algorithm to further streamline and optimize urethral plate (UP) quality appraisal on 2D images using the plate objective scoring tool (POST), aiming to increase the objectivity and reproducibility of UP appraisal in hypospadias repair. Methods: The five key POST landmarks were marked by specialists in a 691-image dataset of prepubertal boys undergoing primary hypospadias repair. This dataset was then used to develop and validate a deep learning-based landmark detection model. The proposed framework begins with glans localization and detection, where the input image is cropped using the predicted bounding box. Next, a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture is used to predict the coordinates of the five POST landmarks. These predicted landmarks are then used to assess UP quality in distal hypospadias. Results: The proposed model accurately localized the glans area, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 99.5% and an overall sensitivity of 99.1%. A normalized mean error (NME) of 0.07152 was achieved in predicting the coordinates of the landmarks, with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.001 and a 20.2% failure rate at a threshold of 0.1 NME. Conclusions: This deep learning application shows robustness and high precision in using POST to appraise UP quality. Further assessment using international multi-centre image-based databases is ongoing. External validation could benefit deep learning algorithms and lead to better assessments, decision-making and predictions for surgical outcomes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.