Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 132 references

Real Time Child Abduction And Detection System

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Raspberry Pi running several vision-language agents can detect child abduction in live video and alert caregivers in near real time.

desk verdict The submission is a mismatched document: its body is an unrelated UAV anti-jamming survey by different authors, leaving the claimed child-abduction system with zero supporting evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11690 v1 pith:3M7HYFZJ submitted 2025-08-12 cs.CY cs.AI

Tadisetty Sai Yashwanth , Yangalasetty Sruthi Royal , Vankayala Rajeshwari Shreya , Mayank Kashyap , Divyaprabha K N This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords childabductiondetectionvision-languagemodelsmulti-agentsystemsedgecomputingRaspberryPireal-timevideosurveillanceTwilioalerts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that a multi-agent team of vision-language models, deployed on a Raspberry Pi connected to a webcam, can detect child abduction events in live video and immediately alert caregivers through SMS and WhatsApp via the Twilio API. If correct, this would make continuous, privacy-preserving, low-cost monitoring practical. The manuscript as submitted, however, contains no system description, model specifications, latency measurements, or evaluation dataset: the accompanying full text is an unrelated survey of game-theoretic and reinforcement-learning anti-jamming techniques for UAV communications. The abstract's experimental claim therefore stands without supporting evidence in the submitted material.

What carries the argument

The central object is a multi-agent framework in which each agent is a Vision-Language Model, a model that jointly understands images and text, deployed on a Raspberry Pi connected to a webcam; an integrated alert system uses the Twilio API to send SMS and WhatsApp notifications. The machinery is supposed to let the edge device process video feeds locally and convert scene understanding into rapid caregiver alerts, but its design details and evaluation are absent from the submitted manuscript.

What would settle it

Collect a preregistered set of videos containing staged abduction attempts and ordinary adult-child interactions, run the described multi-agent VLM system on a Raspberry Pi with a webcam, and measure end-to-end latency, false positives, and false negatives. If the reported near real-time and high-accuracy claims do not reproduce, the central claim fails; a simpler check is that the submitted manuscript reports no such measurements.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The intended contribution is an edge-based child-abduction detection and alert system. Each agent in a multi-agent framework incorporates a Vision-Language Model, so that several agents jointly interpret complex child-adult interactions in webcam footage, and the team's collective assessment triggers an alert. The authors claim that this multi-agent architecture improves detection over single-model approaches, that the Raspberry Pi deployment reduces latency and enhances privacy, and that experimental results show high accuracy with near real-time performance. The submitted text does not actually report those experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The system's central claim rests on the assumption that several vision-language model agents can run concurrently on a Raspberry Pi and reliably separate genuine abduction events from ordinary adult-child interactions in live video, at near real-time speed, without a false-alert rate that makes the system unusable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A working system would let a caregiver place a low-cost device in a home or school and receive immediate SMS/WhatsApp alerts when an abduction-like interaction is detected.
  • Processing video on the Raspberry Pi rather than in the cloud would reduce latency and keep video private.
  • The multi-agent VLM design, if it performs as claimed, would improve detection of complex interactions over a single-model system.
  • The use of Twilio for calls, SMS, and WhatsApp would provide multiple redundant alert channels for caregivers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the submission specifies no VLM models, prompt templates, or dataset, the most informative next step would be a preregistered comparison of the multi-agent team against a single VLM on the same staged abduction and benign scenes.
  • A practical deployment constraint the paper leaves implicit is alert fatigue: even a low false-positive rate could make caregivers ignore alerts, so a usable system likely needs escalation tiers or human review.
  • The claimed edge-deployment advantage could be tested directly by measuring frames per second and model memory footprint on a Raspberry Pi with several agents running concurrently; the abstract's 'near real-time' claim is only meaningful against such numbers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission, arXiv:2508.11690, carries an abstract proposing an edge-based child-abduction detection and alert system that uses a multi-agent framework of Vision-Language Models deployed on a Raspberry Pi, with Twilio-based SMS/WhatsApp/call alerts, and claims that "experimental results demonstrate... high accuracy... with near real-time performance." The full text of the manuscript is, however, an entirely different paper: a survey titled "Agent-Based Anti-Jamming Techniques for UAV Communications in Adversarial Environments: A Comprehensive Survey" (arXiv:2508.11687v1), covering interference types, anti-jamming strategies, game-theoretic modeling, and reinforcement-learning approaches for UAV communications. The body contains no description of the child-abduction system, no VLM architecture, no Raspberry Pi deployment details, no Twilio integration, no dataset, and no accuracy or latency measurements. The central claim of the abstract is therefore unsupported by any material in the submitted document.

Significance. If the abstracted child-abduction system were actually implemented and evaluated as described, it could be of practical interest to the edge-AI and public-safety communities, particularly as a demonstration of multi-agent VLMs on constrained hardware. However, as submitted, the manuscript does not deliver that contribution. The body is a UAV anti-jamming survey, and the abstract's empirical claims are bare assertions. There are no machine-checked proofs, no reproducible code, no parameter-free derivations, and no falsifiable experimental results to assess. The only verifiable content is a literature survey unrelated to the stated topic. Thus the submission has no soundness basis for its central claim, and its significance relative to the stated contribution cannot be evaluated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs. Sections I–VII] The central claim—that a multi-agent VLM system deployed on a Raspberry Pi achieves high accuracy in detecting child-abduction scenarios with near real-time performance—is nowhere supported in the body. The full text is a survey on agent-based UAV anti-jamming communications: its title, abstract, index terms, and Sections I–VII all concern UAV interference, game theory, and reinforcement learning. There is no section, equation, figure, or table describing the child-abduction system, its components, or its operation. The abstract is not a derivation or an evaluation; the claimed contribution is absent from the submitted manuscript.
  2. [Abstract, "Experimental results demonstrate..."] The paper asserts experimental results, but the manuscript contains no experiments. There is no dataset, no evaluation protocol, no accuracy metric, no latency measurement, no false-positive/false-negative analysis, and no comparison against a single-model baseline. The only empirical content in the body is a citation list from a UAV anti-jamming survey. The claimed evidence for "high accuracy" and "near real-time performance suitable for practical deployment" therefore does not exist in the submitted text.
  3. [Paper header and metadata] The submission is internally inconsistent at the provenance level. The paper header reads "arXiv:2508.11687v1 [eess.SP] 11 Aug 2025" and the title/abstract are those of a UAV anti-jamming survey, while the submission identifier is 2508.11690 and the abstract is about child-abduction detection. This mismatch makes it impossible to determine which work is actually being submitted and prevents verification of any claims. The error is not a minor formatting issue: it undermines the identity of the manuscript as a coherent document.
  4. [Entire submission] Even setting aside the topic mismatch, the abstract's load-bearing premise is unsubstantiated: that several VLM agents can run concurrently on a Raspberry Pi-class edge device and reliably distinguish genuine abduction events from ordinary adult-child interactions in live video at near real-time speed. The manuscript provides no model specifications, prompt designs, inference-time measurements, power or thermal data, alert latency analysis, or discussion of the false-alert rate that would determine practical usability. Without any of these, the proposed deployment claim is not merely incomplete; it is entirely unevidenced.
minor comments (3)
  1. [References] Several reference entries are malformed: reference [93] appears as "[93 ? ]" in Section V-A, and references [8] and [9] are duplicated entries for the same work. There are also duplicate/overlapping entries for [104] and [101]/[15]. These should be cleaned and de-duplicated.
  2. [Language and formatting] The survey text contains typographical and grammatical issues, such as inconsistent spacing in "UA V," "researchers have proposes," and nonstandard capitalization. The figures (e.g., Figs. 1–4) are referenced but do not convey clear information in the provided text. These issues are presentation-level only.
  3. [Section II-B] The taxonomy of anti-jamming strategies lists six categories (confrontation, avoidance, elimination, concealment, deceit, bypass), but the terms for the first two categories in the text are "Confrontation" and "Avoidance," which are inconsistent with the figure labels and the broader survey terminology. This should be harmonized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the manuscript's abstract asserts an empirical system, but the body contains no derivation to be circular about.

full rationale

The claimed contribution is the abstract's assertion that a multi-agent VLM system on a Raspberry Pi achieves high-accuracy, near real-time child-abduction detection with Twilio alerts. The body, however, is an unrelated survey on agent-based UAV anti-jamming communications, with a different title and arXiv identifier, and it contains no description of the child-safety system, no VLM architecture, no Raspberry Pi deployment details, no dataset, no accuracy metric, and no latency measurement. There is therefore no derivation chain to inspect for circularity: nothing is fitted, predicted, derived, or evaluated in the submitted text. The abstract's empirical claims are bare assertions unsupported by the body, which is a soundness/completeness failure rather than a circular-reasoning failure. The only self-citations that appear in the body (e.g., reference [2] to J. Yang et al.) belong to the UAV survey and are not load-bearing for the child-abduction claim; they do not support it and cannot make it circular. Accordingly, no step reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The manuscript body contains none of the claimed system, so no fitted parameters are identifiable and no new entities are postulated. The abstract's 'high accuracy' claim is a bare assertion resting entirely on unstated assumptions about task separability, edge hardware capability, and dataset representativeness.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption VLM agents can reliably distinguish abduction events from ordinary adult-child interactions in live video
    The abstract claims 'high accuracy in detecting potential abduction scenarios' but the manuscript contains no model, dataset, or error analysis. The separability assumption enters silently in the abstract's accuracy claim.
  • domain assumption A Raspberry Pi can run multiple VLM agents concurrently at near real-time frame rates
    The abstract describes 'a multi-agent framework where each agent incorporates VLMs deployed on a Raspberry Pi' with 'near real-time performance'. No latency, model-size, or throughput data supports this hardware assumption.
  • domain assumption The unstated evaluation dataset is representative of real-world child abduction scenarios
    The abstract cites 'experimental results' but the body omits the dataset and protocol; without this assumption the claimed accuracy has no referent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real Time Child Abduction And Detection System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3M7HYFZJ

@misc{pith2026250811690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real Time Child Abduction And Detection System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3M7HYFZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11690}
}
read the original abstract

Child safety continues to be a paramount concern worldwide, with child abduction posing significant threats to communities. This paper presents the development of an edge-based child abduction detection and alert system utilizing a multi-agent framework where each agent incorporates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) deployed on a Raspberry Pi. Leveraging the advanced capabilities of VLMs within individual agents of a multi-agent team, our system is trained to accurately detect and interpret complex interactions involving children in various environments in real-time. The multi-agent system is deployed on a Raspberry Pi connected to a webcam, forming an edge device capable of processing video feeds, thereby reducing latency and enhancing privacy. An integrated alert system utilizes the Twilio API to send immediate SMS and WhatsApp notifications, including calls and messages, when a potential child abduction event is detected. Experimental results demonstrate that the system achieves high accuracy in detecting potential abduction scenarios, with near real-time performance suitable for practical deployment. The multi-agent architecture enhances the system's ability to process complex situational data, improving detection capabilities over traditional single-model approaches. The edge deployment ensures scalability and cost-effectiveness, making it accessible for widespread use. The proposed system offers a proactive solution to enhance child safety through continuous monitoring and rapid alerting, contributing a valuable tool in efforts to prevent child abductions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Autonomous navigation uavs for enhancing information freshness for reconnaissance,

    C. Xie, B. Wu, D. Guo, and X. Chen, “Autonomous navigation uavs for enhancing information freshness for reconnaissance,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 7, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Frequency Point Game Environment for UAVs via Expert Knowledge and Large Language Model

    J. Yang, “Frequency point game environment for uavs via expert knowledge and large language model,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02757

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Multi-uav networks for disaster monitoring: challenges and opportunities from a network perspective,

    I. Chandran and K. Vipin, “Multi-uav networks for disaster monitoring: challenges and opportunities from a network perspective,” Drone Systems and Applications , vol. 12, pp. 1–28, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Development of an effective relay communication technique for multi-uav wireless network,

    Y . Li, R. Wu, L. Gan, and P. He, “Development of an effective relay communication technique for multi-uav wireless network,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 74 087– 74 095, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Unmanned aerial vehicle- aided intelligent transportation systems: Vision, chal- lenges, and opportunities,

    A. Telikani, A. Sarkar, B. Du, F. Santoso, J. Shen, J. Yan, J. Yong, and E. Yap, “Unmanned aerial vehicle- aided intelligent transportation systems: Vision, chal- lenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Communications Sur- veys Tutorials, pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Research on a new improved uav anti-jamming and optimization model,

    L. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Yang, L. Tian, Y . Chen, Y . Zhang, and P. Li, “Research on a new improved uav anti-jamming and optimization model,” in Third Inter- national Conference on Computer Science and Commu- nication Technology (ICCSCT 2022), vol. 12506. SPIE, 2022, pp. 754–759

    2022

  7. [7]

    Uav-assisted space- air-ground integrated networks: A technical review of recent learning algorithms,

    A. H. Arani, P. Hu, and Y . Zhu, “Uav-assisted space- air-ground integrated networks: A technical review of recent learning algorithms,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 5, pp. 1004–1023, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Jamming- resistant uav communications: A multichannel-aided ap- proach,

    B. Wang, J. Fang, J. Du, and S. Shao, “Jamming- resistant uav communications: A multichannel-aided ap- proach,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025

    2025

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    Jamming-resistant uav communications: A multichannel-aided approach,

    ——, “Jamming-resistant uav communications: A multichannel-aided approach,” IEEE Wireless Commu- nications Letters, pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Jamming and spoofing techniques for drone neutralization: An experimental study,

    Y . Zidane, J. S. Silva, and G. Tavares, “Jamming and spoofing techniques for drone neutralization: An experimental study,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 12, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Strong electromagnetic interference and protection in uavs,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Zhou, Y . Zhang, and B. Qian, “Strong electromagnetic interference and protection in uavs,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 2, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Ood- control: Generalizing control in unseen environments,

    N. Ye, Z. Zeng, J. Zhou, L. Zhu, Y . Duan, Y . Wu, J. Wu, H. Zeng, Q. Gu, X. Wang, and C. Zhou, “Ood- control: Generalizing control in unseen environments,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 7421–7433, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Anti-jamming null space projection beamforming based on symbiotic ra- dio,

    B. Ji, Y . Liu, T. Li, L. Xing, W. Wang, S. Mumtaz, X. Shang, W. Liu, and C. Han, “Anti-jamming null space projection beamforming based on symbiotic ra- dio,” CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 679–689, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Cellular based small unmanned aircraft systems mimo communications,

    H. Li, H. Zeng, A. N. Downey, R. J. Kerczewski, W. D. Ivancic, K. Matheou, and R. W. Murawski, “Cellular based small unmanned aircraft systems mimo communications,” in 2019 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS) , 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  7. [15]

    Interference-aware cooperative anti-jamming distributed channel selection in uav communication networks,

    Y . Xu, G. Ren, J. Chen, X. Zhang, L. Jia, and L. Kong, “Interference-aware cooperative anti-jamming distributed channel selection in uav communication networks,” Applied Sciences , vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1911, 2018

    1911

  8. [16]

    An anti-interference scheme for uav data links in air– ground integrated vehicular networks,

    Y . He, D. Zhai, R. Zhang, X. Du, and M. Guizani, “An anti-interference scheme for uav data links in air– ground integrated vehicular networks,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 21, p. 4742, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Research on uav anti-multi-type interferences strategy based on improved q-learning,

    W. Xie, “Research on uav anti-multi-type interferences strategy based on improved q-learning,” in Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Informa- tion Technology and Computer Communications , 2021, pp. 109–114

    2021

  10. [18]

    Cyber-physical attacks and defences in the smart grid: a survey,

    H. He and J. Yan, “Cyber-physical attacks and defences in the smart grid: a survey,” IET Cyber-Physical Sys- tems: Theory & Applications , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2016. 13

    2016

  11. [19]

    Analysis of the impact of a gps spoofing attack on a uav,

    E. Basan, O. Makarevich, M. Lapina, and M. Mecella, “Analysis of the impact of a gps spoofing attack on a uav,” in CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3094, 2022, pp. 6–16

    2022

  12. [20]

    Anti- jamming communications in uav swarms: A reinforce- ment learning approach,

    J. Peng, Z. Zhang, Q. Wu, and B. Zhang, “Anti- jamming communications in uav swarms: A reinforce- ment learning approach,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 180 532–180 543, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Reinforce- ment learning based anti-jamming frequency hopping strategies design for cognitive radar,

    L. Kang, J. Bo, L. Hongwei, and L. Siyuan, “Reinforce- ment learning based anti-jamming frequency hopping strategies design for cognitive radar,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Com- munications and Computing (ICSPCC) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–5

    2018

  14. [22]

    Gps-spoofing attack detection tech- nology for uavs based on kullback–leibler divergence,

    E. Basan, A. Basan, A. Nekrasov, C. Fidge, N. Sushkin, and O. Peskova, “Gps-spoofing attack detection tech- nology for uavs based on kullback–leibler divergence,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 8, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Energy-efficient uav-based iot communications with wifi suppression in 5 ghz ism bands,

    D. Lin, P. Zuo, T. Peng, R. Qian, and W. Wang, “Energy-efficient uav-based iot communications with wifi suppression in 5 ghz ism bands,” IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 2024– 2039, 2022

    2024

  16. [24]

    Countering unauthorized drone activities: an analysis of drone jamming techniques, challenges, and ethical implications,

    R. Rahut, “Countering unauthorized drone activities: an analysis of drone jamming techniques, challenges, and ethical implications,” 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Uav communication and navigation signals jamming methods,

    J. Ding, C. Tang, L. Zhang, Z. Yue, Y . Liu, and Z. Dan, “Uav communication and navigation signals jamming methods,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  18. [26]

    Deep reinforce- ment learning-based anti-jamming approach for fast frequency hopping systems,

    S. Cheng, X. Ling, and L. Zhu, “Deep reinforce- ment learning-based anti-jamming approach for fast frequency hopping systems,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Construction of a communication channel with uavs based on direct sequence spread spectrum signals,

    D. Chirov, O. Chertova, E. Lobov, and M. Bazylev, “Construction of a communication channel with uavs based on direct sequence spread spectrum signals,” in 2024 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–4

    2024

  20. [28]

    Physical layer security performance analysis in multi- antenna noma-based uav relay networks,

    H. Haiyan, Z. Hongsheng, L. Linlin, and L. Yahong, “Physical layer security performance analysis in multi- antenna noma-based uav relay networks,” China Com- munications, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 98–108, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Drones in distress: A game-theoretic countermeasure for protect- ing uavs against gps spoofing,

    A. Eldosouky, A. Ferdowsi, and W. Saad, “Drones in distress: A game-theoretic countermeasure for protect- ing uavs against gps spoofing,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2840–2854, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Design and field test of a gps spoofer for uav trajectory manipulation,

    M. Li, Y . Kou, Y . Xu, and Y . Liu, “Design and field test of a gps spoofer for uav trajectory manipulation,” in China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2018 Proceedings: Volume II. Springer, 2018, pp. 161–173

    2018

  23. [31]

    Effects of gps spoofing on unmanned aerial vehicles,

    D. Mendes, N. Ivaki, and H. Madeira, “Effects of gps spoofing on unmanned aerial vehicles,” in 2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 155– 160

    2018

  24. [32]

    An experimental study of gps spoofing and takeover attacks on uavs,

    H. Sathaye, M. Strohmeier, V . Lenders, and A. Ran- ganathan, “An experimental study of gps spoofing and takeover attacks on uavs,” in 31st USENIX security symposium (USENIX security 22) , 2022, pp. 3503– 3520

    2022

  25. [33]

    Detection of uav gps spoofing attacks using a stacked ensemble method,

    T. Ma, X. Zhang, and Z. Miao, “Detection of uav gps spoofing attacks using a stacked ensemble method,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    A new approach to estimate true position of unmanned aerial vehicles in an ins/gps integration system in gps spoofing attack conditions,

    M. Majidi, A. Erfanian, and H. Khaloozadeh, “A new approach to estimate true position of unmanned aerial vehicles in an ins/gps integration system in gps spoofing attack conditions,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 747–760, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Development of a gps spoofing apparatus to attack a dji matrice 100 quadcopter,

    E. Horton and P. Ranganathan, “Development of a gps spoofing apparatus to attack a dji matrice 100 quadcopter,” The Journal of Global Positioning Systems, vol. 16, pp. 1–11, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    An identity authentication scheme based on sm2 algorithm in uav communication net- work,

    T. Xia and J. He, “An identity authentication scheme based on sm2 algorithm in uav communication net- work,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Comput- ing, vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 7537764, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    A mutual authentication and cross verification protocol for secur- ing internet-of-drones (iod),

    S. U. Jan, I. A. Abbasi, and F. Algarni, “A mutual authentication and cross verification protocol for secur- ing internet-of-drones (iod),” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 5845–5869, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Secur- ing uav flying ad hoc wireless networks: Authentica- tion development for robust communications,

    M. A. Sen, S. Al-Rubaye, and A. Tsourdos, “Secur- ing uav flying ad hoc wireless networks: Authentica- tion development for robust communications,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 1194, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    A lightweight authentication scheme for a network of unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs) by using physical unclonable functions,

    M. S. Alkatheiri, S. Saleem, M. A. Alqarni, A. O. Aseeri, S. H. Chauhdary, and Y . Zhuang, “A lightweight authentication scheme for a network of unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs) by using physical unclonable functions,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 2921, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Safeguarding unmanned aerial systems: An approach for identifying malicious aerial nodes,

    M. A. Sayeed, R. Kumar, and V . Sharma, “Safeguarding unmanned aerial systems: An approach for identifying malicious aerial nodes,” IET Communications, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 3000–3012, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    Position deceptive tracking controller and parameters analysis via error characteristics for unmanned aerial vehicle,

    Y . Guo, M. Wu, K. Tang, J. Tie, and J. Zhang, “Position deceptive tracking controller and parameters analysis via error characteristics for unmanned aerial vehicle,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems , vol. 16, no. 1, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Uav swarm communica- tion reliability based on a comprehensive sinr model,

    R. Y . H. Lim, J. M.-Y . Lim, B. L. Lan, P. W. C. Ho, N. S. Ho, and T. W. M. Ooi, “Uav swarm communica- tion reliability based on a comprehensive sinr model,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 47, p. 100781, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Integrated sensing, communi- cation, and over-the-air control of uav swarm dynam- ics,

    Z. Wei, W. Hu, Y . Bouazizi, M. Zou, C. Liu, Y . Chen, H. Sun, and J. McCann, “Integrated sensing, communi- cation, and over-the-air control of uav swarm dynam- ics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07467 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Communication capacity maximization in drone swarms,

    F. Javed, H. Z. Khan, and R. Anjum, “Communication capacity maximization in drone swarms,” Drone Sys- tems and Applications , vol. 11, pp. 1–12, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Joint optimization method of spectrum resource for uav swarm information transmission,

    D. Wu, Y . Zhang, and Y . Chen, “Joint optimization method of spectrum resource for uav swarm information transmission,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 3372, 2022. 14

    2022

  38. [46]

    Communication aware uav swarm surveillance based on hierarchical architecture,

    C. Xu, K. Zhang, Y . Jiang, S. Niu, T. Yang, and H. Song, “Communication aware uav swarm surveillance based on hierarchical architecture,” Drones, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 33, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Slot allocation protocol for uav swarm ad hoc networks: A distributed coalition formation game approach,

    L. Song and D. Guo, “Slot allocation protocol for uav swarm ad hoc networks: A distributed coalition formation game approach,” Entropy, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 256, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Joint clustering and resource allocation opti- mization in ultra-dense networks with multiple drones as small cells using game theory,

    T. T. Bui, L. D. Nguyen, H. H. Kha, N.-S. V o, and T. Q. Duong, “Joint clustering and resource allocation opti- mization in ultra-dense networks with multiple drones as small cells using game theory,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, p. 3899, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Evolutionary game analysis of behaviour strategy for uav swarm in communication-constrained environ- ments,

    S. Hu, L. Ru, M. Lv, Z. Wang, B. Lu, and W. Wang, “Evolutionary game analysis of behaviour strategy for uav swarm in communication-constrained environ- ments,” IET Control Theory & Applications , vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 350–363, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Ionosphere disturbances on gnss signal and positioning performance: Analysis of the solar flare and geomag- netic storm events in september 2017 and october 2021,

    W. Zhou, Y . Yuan, C. Tang, Y . Meng, and Y . Chen, “Ionosphere disturbances on gnss signal and positioning performance: Analysis of the solar flare and geomag- netic storm events in september 2017 and october 2021,” Advances in Space Research , vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 4608– 4620, 2024

    2017

  43. [51]

    Mete- orologically introduced impacts on aerial channels and uav communications,

    M. Song, Y . Huo, T. Lu, X. Dong, and Z. Liang, “Mete- orologically introduced impacts on aerial channels and uav communications,” in 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall) , 2020, pp. 1– 5

    2020

  44. [52]

    Uav communication recovery under meteorological conditions,

    M. Song, Y . Huo, Z. Liang, X. Dong, and T. Lu, “Uav communication recovery under meteorological conditions,” Drones, vol. 7, no. 7, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Analysis of global ionospheric scintillation and gps po- sitioning interference triggered by full-halo cme-driven geomagnetic storm: A case study,

    D. Zhao, S. Cui, X. Zhang, L. Li, P. Sun, C. Bian, W. Ban, C. M. Hancock, Q. Wang, and K. Zhang, “Analysis of global ionospheric scintillation and gps po- sitioning interference triggered by full-halo cme-driven geomagnetic storm: A case study,” Advances in Space Research, vol...

    2024

  46. [54]

    Space weather impact on radio communication and navigation,

    M. Ishii, J. Berdermann, B. Forte, M. Hapgood, M. M. Bisi, and V . Romano, “Space weather impact on radio communication and navigation,” Advances in Space Research, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Performance analysis of reconnaissance coverage for huav swarms under communication interference based on different architectures,

    Y . Fan, B. Chen, Y . Zhao, F. Hu, C. Liu, and Y . Li, “Performance analysis of reconnaissance coverage for huav swarms under communication interference based on different architectures,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 4067, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    An in- telligent game-based anti-jamming solution using adver- sarial populations for aerial communication networks,

    Y . Ma, K. Liu, Y . Liu, X. Wang, and Z. Zhao, “An in- telligent game-based anti-jamming solution using adver- sarial populations for aerial communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Power control scheme for spectral coexisting multistatic radar and massive mimo communication systems under un- certainties: A robust stackelberg game model,

    C. Shi, W. Qiu, F. Wang, S. Salous, and J. Zhou, “Power control scheme for spectral coexisting multistatic radar and massive mimo communication systems under un- certainties: A robust stackelberg game model,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 94, pp. 146–155, 2019

    2019

  50. [58]

    Cooperative anti-jamming for uav networks: A local altruistic game approach,

    yueyue Su, N. Qi, Z. Huang, R. Yao, and L. Jia, “Cooperative anti-jamming for uav networks: A local altruistic game approach,” 2021

    2021

  51. [59]

    Co- operative anti-jamming and interference mitigation for uav networks: A local altruistic game approach,

    Y . Su, N. Qi, Z. Huang, R. Yao, and L. Jia, “Co- operative anti-jamming and interference mitigation for uav networks: A local altruistic game approach,” China Communications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    A uav communication system based on anti-interception and anti-interferencetechnology,

    X. Liu, R. Li, P. Li, X. Chen, S. Li, and F. Wang, “A uav communication system based on anti-interception and anti-interferencetechnology,” in2023 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), 2023, pp. 287–292

    2023

  53. [61]

    Design of future uav-relay tac- tical data link for reliable uav control and situational awareness,

    H. Baek and J. Lim, “Design of future uav-relay tac- tical data link for reliable uav control and situational awareness,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 144–150, 2018

    2018

  54. [62]

    Securing uav networks: A lightweight chaotic-frequency hopping approach to counter jamming attacks,

    C. Atheeq, Z. Gulzar, M. S. Al Reshan, H. Alshahrani, A. Sulaiman, and A. Shaikh, “Securing uav networks: A lightweight chaotic-frequency hopping approach to counter jamming attacks,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 38 685–38 699, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    A local reaction anti-jamming scheme for uav swarms,

    K. Li, C. Wang, M. Lei, M.-M. Zhao, and M.-J. Zhao, “A local reaction anti-jamming scheme for uav swarms,” in 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall), 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  56. [64]

    Control simulation and anti- jamming verification of quadrotor uav based on matlab,

    Z. Chen and B. Xu, “Control simulation and anti- jamming verification of quadrotor uav based on matlab,” in 2020 5th International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS) , 2020, pp. 70–75

    2020

  57. [65]

    A uav communication system with anti-interference and covert communication capa- bilities using two antennas,

    J. Chen and C. Zhang, “A uav communication system with anti-interference and covert communication capa- bilities using two antennas,” in 2024 AIAA DATC/IEEE 43rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) , 2024, pp. 1–4

    2024

  58. [66]

    Learning-based defense against malicious unmanned aerial vehicles,

    M. Min, L. Xiao, D. Xu, L. Huang, and M. Peng, “Learning-based defense against malicious unmanned aerial vehicles,” in 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technol- ogy Conference (VTC Spring) , 2018, pp. 1–5

    2018

  59. [67]

    Multi- uav cooperative anti-jamming for gnss signals based on frequency-domain power inversion,

    J. Zhou, W. Wang, X. Hong, and C. Zhang, “Multi- uav cooperative anti-jamming for gnss signals based on frequency-domain power inversion,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 30 778–30 791, 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Topology optimization for uav swarm communication with jamming,

    H. Li, H. Wang, X. Zheng, J. Gu, X. Guan, and H. Liu, “Topology optimization for uav swarm communication with jamming,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 983–987, 2025

    2025

  61. [69]

    Automating the ooda loop in the age of intelligent machines: reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age,

    J. J. and, “Automating the ooda loop in the age of intelligent machines: reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age,” Defence Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 43–67, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    A new method for uav’s datalink adaptive to emi,

    Z. Dong-xiao, C. Ya-zhou, C. Er-wei, and X. Tong, “A new method for uav’s datalink adaptive to emi,” Transactions of Beijing institute of Technology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 880–887, 2020

    2020

  63. [71]

    Anti-jamming path planning using gcn for multi-uav,

    H. Jeong, “Anti-jamming path planning using gcn for multi-uav,” 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    Joint communication-motion planning for uav swarm 15 against jamming with multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,

    Z. Guo, Y . Liu, Y . Wang, Y . Meng, and B. Liu, “Joint communication-motion planning for uav swarm 15 against jamming with multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” in 2024 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2024, pp. 1–7

    2024

  65. [73]

    Efficient reinforcement learning via decou- pling exploration and utilization,

    J. Yang, H. Wang, Q. Zhao, Z. Shi, Z. Song, and M. Fang, “Efficient reinforcement learning via decou- pling exploration and utilization,” in Advanced Intel- ligent Computing Technology and Applications , D.-S. Huang, X. Zhang, and Y . Pan, Eds. Singapore: Springer Nature Singa...

    2024

  66. [74]

    Collaborative multi-agent jamming deceiving for uav-assisted wireless communications,

    C. Zhang, Z. Xiao, L. Zhang, G. Liu, W. Zhang, and X.-G. Xia, “Collaborative multi-agent jamming deceiving for uav-assisted wireless communications,” in 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) , 2024, pp. 549–554

    2024

  67. [75]

    Cooperative multi- uav dynamic anti-jamming scheme with deep reinforce- ment learning,

    R. Wang, S. Wang, and W. Zhang, “Cooperative multi- uav dynamic anti-jamming scheme with deep reinforce- ment learning,” in 2022 IEEE 22nd International Con- ference on Communication Technology (ICCT) , 2022, pp. 590–595

    2022

  68. [76]

    Multi-uav telecommunication inspection against intelligent jamming attacks: A rein- forcement learning framework,

    B. Zeng and X. Gong, “Multi-uav telecommunication inspection against intelligent jamming attacks: A rein- forcement learning framework,” in 2024 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), 2024, pp. 1545–1550

    2024

  69. [77]

    Approximating stackelberg equilibrium in anti-uav jamming markov game with hierarchical multi-agent deep reinforcement learning algorithm,

    Z. Feng, Y . Wu, M. Huang, and D. Wu, “Approximating stackelberg equilibrium in anti-uav jamming markov game with hierarchical multi-agent deep reinforcement learning algorithm,” 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Dis- tributed reinforcement learning based framework for energy-efficient uav relay against jamming,

    W. Wang, Z. Lv, X. Lu, Y . Zhang, and L. Xiao, “Dis- tributed reinforcement learning based framework for energy-efficient uav relay against jamming,” Intelligent and Converged Networks , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 150–162, 2021

    2021

  71. [79]

    A collaborative multi-agent re- inforcement learning anti-jamming algorithm in wire- less networks,

    F. Yao and L. Jia, “A collaborative multi-agent re- inforcement learning anti-jamming algorithm in wire- less networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1024–1027, 2019

    2019

  72. [80]

    Power control for anti-jamming commu- nications in large-scale uav networks: A mean field game,

    R. Chen, Y . Xu, X. Zheng, Z. Hou, Z. Feng, X. Zhang, and Y . Xu, “Power control for anti-jamming commu- nications in large-scale uav networks: A mean field game,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Un- manned Systems (ICUS) , 2024, pp. 989–994

    2024

  73. [81]

    A dyna-q-based solution for uav networks against smart jamming attacks,

    Z. Li, Y . Lu, Y . Shi, Z. Wang, W. Qiao, and Y . Liu, “A dyna-q-based solution for uav networks against smart jamming attacks,” Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 5, 2019

    2019

  74. [82]

    Multi-uav co- operation for anti-jamming communication,

    H. Wei, S. Li, Z. Liu, and Z. Wang, “Multi-uav co- operation for anti-jamming communication,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), 2022, pp. 1035–1040

    2022

  75. [83]

    Uav-enabled semantic communication for mobile edge computing under jamming attacks,

    S. Liu, H. Yang, M. Zheng, L. Xiao, Y . Jiang, Z. Xiong, and B. Wang, “Uav-enabled semantic communication for mobile edge computing under jamming attacks,” in 2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Commu- nications in China (ICCC) , 2024, pp. 897–902

    2024

  76. [84]

    Uav-enabled semantic communication in mobile edge computing under jamming attacks: An in- telligent resource management approach,

    S. Liu, H. Yang, M. Zheng, L. Xiao, Z. Xiong, and D. Niyato, “Uav-enabled semantic communication in mobile edge computing under jamming attacks: An in- telligent resource management approach,” IEEE Trans- actions on Wireless Communications , vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17 493–17 507, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Uav swarm communication under malicious jamming: Joint trajec- tory and clustering design,

    Y . Wu, X. Guan, W. Yang, and Q. Wu, “Uav swarm communication under malicious jamming: Joint trajec- tory and clustering design,” IEEE Wireless Communi- cations Letters, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2264–2268, 2021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Game theory and multi–agent drl based anti-jamming transmission for integrated air-ground net- work,

    C. Liao, K. Xu, G. Hu, X. Xia, C. Wei, W. Xie, C. Li, and Y . Wang, “Game theory and multi–agent drl based anti-jamming transmission for integrated air-ground net- work,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 19 565–19 581, 2024

    2024

  79. [87]

    Distributed collaborative anti-jamming chan- nel access in dynamic uav networks,

    J. Deng, Y . Xu, S. Liu, X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Du, and X. Wang, “Distributed collaborative anti-jamming chan- nel access in dynamic uav networks,” in2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), 2024, pp. 1385–1389

    2024

  80. [88]

    A multi-domain anti- jamming strategy using stackelberg game in wireless relay networks,

    Y . Li, S. Bai, and Z. Gao, “A multi-domain anti- jamming strategy using stackelberg game in wireless relay networks,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 173 609– 173 617, 2020

    2020

  81. [89]

    Dynamic uav swarm collaboration for multi- targets tracking under malicious jamming: Joint power, path and target association optimization,

    L. Xiang, F. Wang, W. Xu, T. Zhang, M. Pan, and Z. Han, “Dynamic uav swarm collaboration for multi- targets tracking under malicious jamming: Joint power, path and target association optimization,” IEEE Trans- actions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 5410–5425, 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    Uav anti-jamming communications with power and mobility control,

    H. Wang, G. Ding, J. Chen, Y . Zou, and F. Gao, “Uav anti-jamming communications with power and mobility control,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communica- tions, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 4729–4744, 2023

    2023

  83. [91]

    Energy-efficient trajectory design for uav-enabled communication under malicious jamming,

    Y . Wu, W. Yang, X. Guan, and Q. Wu, “Energy-efficient trajectory design for uav-enabled communication under malicious jamming,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 206–210, 2021

    2021

  84. [92]

    Anti- jamming trajectory and power design for cognitive uav communications,

    Y . Gao, Y . Wu, Z. Cui, W. Yang, and N. Li, “Anti- jamming trajectory and power design for cognitive uav communications,” in 2021 International Wireless Com- munications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) , 2021, pp. 1370–1375

    2021

  85. [93]

    A one-leader multi-follower bayesian- stackelberg game for anti-jamming transmission in uav communication networks,

    Y . Xu, G. Ren, J. Chen, Y . Luo, L. Jia, X. Liu, Y . Yang, and Y . Xu, “A one-leader multi-follower bayesian- stackelberg game for anti-jamming transmission in uav communication networks,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 21 697–21 709, 2018

    2018

  86. [94]

    Anti-jamming strategy based on game theory in single-channel uav communication network,

    J. Xu, K. Wang, X. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Kong, and H. Zhou, “Anti-jamming strategy based on game theory in single-channel uav communication network,” in 2021 Sixth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), 2021, pp. 1–7

    2021

  87. [95]

    Irs-assisted anti-jamming transmission for an integrated satellite-uav-terrestrial network with imperfect csi: A game-based perspective,

    C. Liao, K. Xu, X. Xia, G. Hu, C. Li, Y . Wang, W. Xie, X. Yang, Y . Shi, and L. Wan, “Irs-assisted anti-jamming transmission for an integrated satellite-uav-terrestrial network with imperfect csi: A game-based perspective,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 10, no. 23, p...

    2023

  88. [96]

    Allocation of uav-assisted cognitive vehicle network resources under malicious 16 jamming: A hierarchical game approach,

    Q. Yi, Y . Wang, and F. Wu, “Allocation of uav-assisted cognitive vehicle network resources under malicious 16 jamming: A hierarchical game approach,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Communication (ICAIRC) , 2024, pp. 847–851

    2024

  89. [97]

    Collaborative multiagent reinforcement learning aided resource allocation for uav anti-jamming communica- tion,

    Z. Yin, Y . Lin, Y . Zhang, Y . Qian, F. Shu, and J. Li, “Collaborative multiagent reinforcement learning aided resource allocation for uav anti-jamming communica- tion,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23 995–24 008, 2022

    2022

  90. [98]

    A new approach for solving anti-jamming games in stochastic scenarios as pursuit-evasion games,

    J. Parras, J. del Val, S. Zazo, J. Zazo, and S. V . Macua, “A new approach for solving anti-jamming games in stochastic scenarios as pursuit-evasion games,” in 2016 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP) , 2016, pp. 1–5

    2016

  91. [99]

    Convert harm into benefit: A coordination-learning based dynamic spectrum anti- jamming approach,

    Y . Xu, Y . Xu, X. Dong, G. Ren, J. Chen, X. Wang, L. Jia, and L. Ruan, “Convert harm into benefit: A coordination-learning based dynamic spectrum anti- jamming approach,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 13 018–13 032, 2020

    2020

  92. [100]

    Anti-jamming power control game in unmanned aerial vehicle networks,

    S. Lv, L. Xiao, Q. Hu, X. Wang, C. Hu, and L. Sun, “Anti-jamming power control game in unmanned aerial vehicle networks,” in GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference , 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  93. [101]

    Interference-aware cooperative anti-jamming distributed channel selection in uav communication networks,

    Y . Xu, G. Ren, J. Chen, X. Zhang, L. Jia, and L. Kong, “Interference-aware cooperative anti-jamming distributed channel selection in uav communication networks,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 10, 2018

    2018

  94. [102]

    Joint trajectory and passive beamforming optimization in irs-uav enhanced anti- jamming communication networks,

    Z. Hou, J. Chen, Y . Huang, Y . Luo, X. Wang, J. Gu, Y . Xu, and K. Yao, “Joint trajectory and passive beamforming optimization in irs-uav enhanced anti- jamming communication networks,” China Communi- cations, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 191–205, 2022

    2022

  95. [103]

    Resilient path planning for uavs in data collection under adversarial attacks,

    X. Wang and M. C. Gursoy, “Resilient path planning for uavs in data collection under adversarial attacks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 18, pp. 2766–2779, 2023

    2023

  96. [104]

    Resilient path planning for uavs in data collection under adversarial attacks,

    xueyuan Wang and M. C. Gursoy, “Resilient path planning for uavs in data collection under adversarial attacks,” CoRR, vol. abs/2401.08634, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    A mission- driven online learning approach for multi-uav cooper- ative anti-jamming communication,

    L. Ruan, H. Yu, X. Guan, and L. Chen, “A mission- driven online learning approach for multi-uav cooper- ative anti-jamming communication,” in 2024 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1609–1616

    2024

  98. [106]

    Multi- agent reinforcement learning in adversarial game envi- ronments: Personalized anti-interference strategies for heterogeneous uav communication,

    Y . Qin, J. Tang, F. Tang, M. Zhao, and N. Kato, “Multi- agent reinforcement learning in adversarial game envi- ronments: Personalized anti-interference strategies for heterogeneous uav communication,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , pp. 1–13, 2025

    2025

  99. [107]

    Uav communication against intelligent jamming: A stackelberg game approach with federated reinforcement learning,

    Z. Yin, J. Li, Z. Wang, Y . Qian, Y . Lin, F. Shu, and W. Chen, “Uav communication against intelligent jamming: A stackelberg game approach with federated reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1796–1808, 2024

    2024

  100. [108]

    Towards reinforcement learning in uav relay for anti- jamming maritime communications,

    C. Liu, Y . Zhang, G. Niu, L. Jia, L. Xiao, and J. Luan, “Towards reinforcement learning in uav relay for anti- jamming maritime communications,” Digital Commu- nications and Networks , vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1477–1485, 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Approximating nash equilibrium for anti-uav jamming markov game using a novel event-triggered multi-agent reinforcement learn- ing,

    Z. Feng, M. Huang, Y . Wu, D. Wu, J. Cao, I. Korovin, S. Gorbachev, and N. Gorbacheva, “Approximating nash equilibrium for anti-uav jamming markov game using a novel event-triggered multi-agent reinforcement learn- ing,” Neural Networks, vol. 161, pp. 330–342, 2023

    2023

  102. [110]

    Multi-domain cognitive anti-jamming engine based on dl and cbr for multi-uav communications,

    X. Zhou, W. Xie, B. Yan, and X. Wang, “Multi-domain cognitive anti-jamming engine based on dl and cbr for multi-uav communications,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) , 2024, pp. 921–927

    2024

  103. [111]

    Jamming-resilient path planning for multiple uavs via deep reinforcement learning,

    X. Wang, M. Cenk Gursoy, T. Erpek, and Y . E. Sagduyu, “Jamming-resilient path planning for multiple uavs via deep reinforcement learning,” in 2021 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  104. [112]

    Reinforcement learning-based dynamic anti- jamming power control in uav networks: An effective jamming signal strength based approach,

    N. Ma, K. Xu, X. Xia, C. Wei, Q. Su, M. Shen, and W. Xie, “Reinforcement learning-based dynamic anti- jamming power control in uav networks: An effective jamming signal strength based approach,” IEEE Com- munications Letters , vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2355–2359, 2022

    2022

  105. [113]

    Joint channel selection and power control for multi-uav-enabled anti-jamming communications based on game guided reinforcement learning,

    Y . Chen, H. Yang, C. Xu, Z. Shao, L. Xiao, Y . Jiang, and Z. Xiong, “Joint channel selection and power control for multi-uav-enabled anti-jamming communications based on game guided reinforcement learning,” in GLOBE- COM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Con- ference, 20...

    2024

  106. [114]

    Uav- aided anti-jamming maritime communications: A deep reinforcement learning approach,

    K. Liu, P. Li, C. Liu, L. Xiao, and L. Jia, “Uav- aided anti-jamming maritime communications: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” in 2021 13th Inter- national Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) , 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  107. [115]

    Ris-assisted robust beamforming for uav anti-jamming and eavesdropping communications: A deep reinforcement learning ap- proach,

    C. Zou, C. Li, Y . Li, and X. Yan, “Ris-assisted robust beamforming for uav anti-jamming and eavesdropping communications: A deep reinforcement learning ap- proach,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 21, 2023

    2023

  108. [116]

    An offline learning-based anti-interference communi- cation scheme for uav networks,

    T. Tang, R. Zhao, H. Wen, X. Feng, W. Shi, and Y . Peng, “An offline learning-based anti-interference communi- cation scheme for uav networks,” in Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Wireless Communi- cations, Networking and Applications. Springer Nature Singap...

    2023

  109. [117]

    Multi-agent reinforcement learning based uav swarm communications against jamming,

    Z. Lv, L. Xiao, Y . Du, G. Niu, C. Xing, and W. Xu, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning based uav swarm communications against jamming,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 9063– 9075, 2023

    2023

  110. [118]

    Rein- forcement learning based uav swarm communications against jamming,

    Z. Lv, G. Niu, L. Xiao, C. Xing, and W. Xu, “Rein- forcement learning based uav swarm communications against jamming,” in ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications , 2023, pp. 5204–5209

    2023

  111. [119]

    Safe exploration in wireless security: A safe reinforcement learning algorithm with hierarchical structure,

    X. Lu, L. Xiao, G. Niu, X. Ji, and Q. Wang, “Safe exploration in wireless security: A safe reinforcement learning algorithm with hierarchical structure,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 17, pp. 732–743, 2022. 17

    2022

  112. [120]

    Uav anti-jamming video transmissions with qoe guar- antee: A reinforcement learning-based approach,

    L. Xiao, Y . Ding, J. Huang, S. Liu, Y . Tang, and H. Dai, “Uav anti-jamming video transmissions with qoe guar- antee: A reinforcement learning-based approach,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5933–5947, 2021

    2021

  113. [121]

    En- ergy efficient relay in uav networks against jamming: A reinforcement learning based approach,

    W. Wang, X. Lu, S. Liu, L. Xiao, and B. Yang, “En- ergy efficient relay in uav networks against jamming: A reinforcement learning based approach,” in 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020- Spring), 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  114. [122]

    Anti- jamming communication game for uav-aided vanets,

    X. Lu, D. Xu, L. Xiao, L. Wang, and W. Zhuang, “Anti- jamming communication game for uav-aided vanets,” in GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communica- tions Conference, 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  115. [123]

    Two-dimensional antijamming mobile communi- cation based on reinforcement learning,

    L. Xiao, D. Jiang, D. Xu, H. Zhu, Y . Zhang, and H. V . Poor, “Two-dimensional antijamming mobile communi- cation based on reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans- actions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 9499–9512, 2018

    2018

  116. [124]

    Multi-regional anti-jamming com- munication scheme based on transfer learning and q learning,

    C. Han and Y . Niu, “Multi-regional anti-jamming com- munication scheme based on transfer learning and q learning,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Informa- tion Systems, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3333–3350, 2019

    2019

  117. [125]

    A transfer games actor–critic learning framework for anti-jamming in multi-channel cognitive radio networks,

    H. T. Thien, V .-H. Vu, and I. Koo, “A transfer games actor–critic learning framework for anti-jamming in multi-channel cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 47 887–47 900, 2021

    2021

  118. [126]

    Meta-reinforcement learning in time- varying uav communications: Adaptive anti-jamming channel selection,

    L. HU, Y . SHAO, Y . QIAN, F. DU, J. LI, Y . LIN, and Z. W ANG, “Meta-reinforcement learning in time- varying uav communications: Adaptive anti-jamming channel selection,” Radioengineering, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 417, 2024

    2024

  119. [127]

    Uav networks against multiple maneuvering smart jamming with knowledge-based reinforcement learning,

    Z. Li, Y . Lu, X. Li, Z. Wang, W. Qiao, and Y . Liu, “Uav networks against multiple maneuvering smart jamming with knowledge-based reinforcement learning,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 12 289– 12 310, 2021

    2021

  120. [128]

    Afrl: Adaptive federated reinforcement learning for intelli- gent jamming defense in fanet,

    N. I. Mowla, N. H. Tran, I. Doh, and K. Chae, “Afrl: Adaptive federated reinforcement learning for intelli- gent jamming defense in fanet,” Journal of Commu- nications and Networks , vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 244–258, 2020

    2020

  121. [129]

    Anti-jamming v2v commu- nication in an integrated uav-cav network with hybrid attackers,

    S. Feng and S. Haykin, “Anti-jamming v2v commu- nication in an integrated uav-cav network with hybrid attackers,” in ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  122. [130]

    Toward optimal adaptive wire- less communications in unknown environments,

    P. Zhou and T. Jiang, “Toward optimal adaptive wire- less communications in unknown environments,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 15, no. 5, p. 3655–3667, 2016

    2016

  123. [131]

    Bandit based dynamic spectrum anti-jamming strategy in software defined uav swarm network,

    Q. Qiu, H. Li, H. Zhang, and J. Luo, “Bandit based dynamic spectrum anti-jamming strategy in software defined uav swarm network,” in 2020 IEEE 11th In- ternational Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS) , 2020, pp. 184–188

    2020

  124. [132]

    Selfish bandit-based cog- nitive anti-jamming strategy for aeronautic swarm net- work in presence of multiple jammer,

    H. Li, J. Luo, and C. Liu, “Selfish bandit-based cog- nitive anti-jamming strategy for aeronautic swarm net- work in presence of multiple jammer,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 30 234–30 243, 2019

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.