pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10995 · v1 · pith:3MKYRRC3new · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc

Topological and rotating effects on the Dirac field in the spiral dislocation spacetime

A. V. D. M. Maia , K. Bakke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 15:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qc
keywords spiral dislocation spacetimeDirac fieldhard-wall confining potentialrelativistic bound statesrotation effectstopological effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Both rotation and the topology of spiral dislocation spacetime restrict the radial coordinate values for Dirac bound states with hard-wall confinement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the Dirac field in a spacetime featuring a spiral dislocation, incorporating a hard-wall confining potential to find relativistic bound state solutions. It explores how the topology influences the energy levels and extends the analysis to include rotational effects. The central result is that both the spacetime topology and rotation impose restrictions on allowable radial coordinates for these bound states.

Core claim

The topology of the spiral dislocation spacetime and the presence of rotation each impose a restriction on the values of the radial coordinate when searching for relativistic bound states of the Dirac field subject to a hard-wall confining potential, thereby affecting the possible energy levels.

What carries the argument

The Dirac equation in the spiral dislocation metric with hard-wall boundary conditions, which leads to radial restrictions from both topological parameters and rotational terms.

If this is right

  • The energy spectrum of the Dirac field acquires additional constraints due to the dislocation topology.
  • Rotation further narrows the range of permitted radial positions for bound states.
  • Bound state solutions exist only within specific radial domains determined by these effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This restriction might generalize to other curved spacetimes with defects when analyzing fermionic fields.
  • Analogous effects could appear in effective models of condensed matter systems simulating such spacetimes.
  • Further work could examine the impact on other quantum fields or different confining potentials.

Load-bearing premise

The spiral dislocation metric is an appropriate fixed background and the hard-wall potential is a valid model for confinement that permits bound-state solutions of the Dirac equation.

What would settle it

Finding bound state solutions where the radial coordinate takes arbitrary values without the claimed restrictions would contradict the result.

read the original abstract

By considering a spacetime with a spiral dislocation, we analyse the behaviour of the Dirac field subject to a hard-wall confining potential. In search of relativistic bound states solutions, we discuss the influence of the topology of the spiral dislocation spacetime on the energy levels. Further, we analyse the effects of rotation on the Dirac field in the spiral dislocation spacetime. We show that both rotation and the topology of the spacetime impose a restriction on the values of the radial coordinate. Thus, we analyse the effects of rotation and the topology of the spiral dislocation spacetime on the Dirac field subject to a hard-wall confining potential by searching for relativistic bound states solutions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript solves the Dirac equation for a spinor field in the spiral dislocation spacetime (with dislocation parameter β) subject to a hard-wall confining potential. It obtains relativistic bound-state solutions and concludes that both the spacetime topology and the rotation (angular velocity Ω) impose restrictions on the allowed values of the radial coordinate r for which such solutions exist.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work adds to the literature on fermions in spacetimes with topological defects and frame-dragging by providing analytic expressions for energy levels modified by β and Ω. The explicit demonstration of radial restrictions is a concrete, falsifiable outcome that could be tested in analog systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [bound-state analysis (post-Eq. (27))] The hard-wall boundary condition is implemented by requiring the upper radial spinor component to vanish at a fixed r = r0 (see the paragraph following Eq. (27) and the subsequent quantization condition). In the presence of the non-diagonal tetrads induced by the spiral dislocation and the rotating frame, this flat-space-style Dirichlet condition does not automatically guarantee self-adjointness of the Dirac operator with respect to the curved-space inner product ∫ ψ† γ^0 √-g d³x. The manuscript must verify that the radial probability current vanishes at the wall and that the chosen condition is preserved under local Lorentz transformations; otherwise the reported restrictions on r are coordinate artifacts rather than physical consequences of topology or rotation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract contains repetitive phrasing of the main claim; a single concise statement would improve readability.
  2. [metric and tetrad section] Notation for the tetrad components and the rotating-frame transformation should be collected in a single table or appendix for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the treatment of the boundary condition.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The hard-wall boundary condition is implemented by requiring the upper radial spinor component to vanish at a fixed r = r0 (see the paragraph following Eq. (27) and the subsequent quantization condition). In the presence of the non-diagonal tetrads induced by the spiral dislocation and the rotating frame, this flat-space-style Dirichlet condition does not automatically guarantee self-adjointness of the Dirac operator with respect to the curved-space inner product ∫ ψ† γ^0 √-g d³x. The manuscript must verify that the radial probability current vanishes at the wall and that the chosen condition is preserved under local Lorentz transformations; otherwise the reported restrictions on r are coordinate artifacts rather than physical consequences of topology or rotation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check of self-adjointness is required when non-diagonal tetrads and a rotating frame are present. In the original manuscript we adopted the standard Dirichlet condition on the upper radial component that is common in the literature on hard-wall potentials in curved spacetimes, but we did not provide the auxiliary verification of the radial probability current. In the revised version we will add a short calculation (immediately after the quantization condition) showing that the radial component of the conserved current vanishes at r = r0 once the metric factor √-g and the chosen tetrads are taken into account. We will also include a brief remark confirming that the boundary condition is preserved under the local Lorentz transformations compatible with the fixed tetrad frame dictated by the spiral-dislocation symmetries. These additions will demonstrate that the reported restrictions on r arise from the topology and rotation rather than from a coordinate artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct solution of Dirac equation yields radial restrictions without reduction to inputs.

full rationale

The paper performs a direct analysis of the Dirac equation in the prescribed spiral dislocation metric subject to a hard-wall potential, deriving bound-state solutions and identifying restrictions on the radial coordinate from the topology and rotation terms. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present in the abstract or described derivation chain; the central results follow from solving the wave equation with the stated boundary condition rather than being equivalent to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the spiral dislocation metric as a background and on the appropriateness of the hard-wall potential for producing bound states. No free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spiral dislocation spacetime metric is a valid fixed background for the Dirac field.
    Invoked by the choice of spacetime in which the Dirac equation is solved.
  • domain assumption A hard-wall confining potential yields relativistic bound states whose spectrum can be found analytically.
    Stated goal of searching for bound-state solutions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1147 out tokens · 18731 ms · 2026-05-25T15:52:27.542213+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V. B. Bezerra, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2031 (1987)

    work page 2031

  2. [2]

    V. B. Bezerra, J. Math. Phys. 30, 2895 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    V. B. Bezerra, J. Math. Phys. 38, 2553 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Furtado, F

    C. Furtado, F. Moraes and V.B. Bezerra, Phys. Rev. D 59, 107504 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    G. de A. Marques, V. B. Bezerra, C. Furtado and F. Moraes, I nt. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 6051 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    R. L. L. Vit´ oria and K. Bakke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Bakke and C

    K. Bakke and C. Furtado, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012130 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Bakke and C

    K. Bakke and C. Furtado, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19, 85 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Salazar-Ram ´ ırez, D

    M. Salazar-Ram ´ ırez, D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, A. Morales-Gonz´ alez and V. H. Garc ´ ıa-Ortega, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 8 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Hosseinpour, H

    M. Hosseinpour, H. Hassanabadi and M. de Montigny, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 15, 1850165 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Wang, Z.-W

    B.-Q. Wang, Z.-W. Long, C.-Y. Long and S.-R. Wu, Mod. Phy s. Lett. A 33, 1850025 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Deng, C.-Y

    L.-F. Deng, C.-Y. Long, Z.-W. Long and T. Xu, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, 2741694 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Hassanabadi, M

    H. Hassanabadi, M. Hosseinpour and M. de Montigny, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 541 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    de Montigny, M

    M. de Montigny, M. Hosseinpour and H. Hassanabadi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1650191 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Ma, J.-H

    K. Ma, J.-H. Wang, H.-X. Yang and and H.-W. Fan, Chinese P hys. Lett. 33, 100401 (2017). 12

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Carvalho, A

    J. Carvalho, A. M. de M. Carvalho, E. Cavalcante and C. Fu rtado, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 365 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [18]

    J.-H. Wang, K. Ma, K. Li and H.-W. Fan, Ann. Phys. (NY) 362, 327 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [19]

    Messai and A

    N. Messai and A. Boumali, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 140 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [20]

    Hassanabadi, A

    H. Hassanabadi, A. Afshardoost and S. Zarrinkamar, Ann . Phys. (NY) 356, 346 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [21]

    Z. Wang, H. Cai and C. Xu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950023 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    Cai and Z

    H. Cai and Z. Ren, Class. Quantum Grav. 35, 235014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [23]

    Cai et al , Class

    H. Cai et al , Class. Quantum Grav. 35, 155016 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [24]

    Jusufi, F

    K. Jusufi, F. Rahaman and A. Banerjee, Ann. Phys. (NY) 389, 219 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [25]

    Wang et al , Eur

    B.-Q. Wang et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 378 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [26]

    Hassanabadi and M

    H. Hassanabadi and M. Hosseinpour, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 553 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [27]

    Amaro Neto et al , Eur

    J. Amaro Neto et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 185 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [28]

    G. Q. Garcia et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 183 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [29]

    Ye¸ silta¸ s, Eur

    ¨O. Ye¸ silta¸ s, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 128 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [30]

    M. J. Bueno et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [31]

    ¨Ozdemir and N

    F. ¨Ozdemir and N. ¨Ozdemir, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 36, 2053 (2004)

    work page 2053

  31. [32]

    P. M. Pitelli and P. S. Letelier, J. Math. Phys. 48, 092501 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [33]

    A. M. de M. Carvalho, C. A. de Lima Ribeiro and C. Furtado, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 237 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [34]

    Li and X

    X. Li and X. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850156 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [35]

    J. R. S. Oliveira et al , Ann. Phys. (NY) 383, 610 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [36]

    Amaro Neto et al , Ann

    J. Amaro Neto et al , Ann. Phys. (NY) 373, 273 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [37]

    Salazar-Ram ´ ırezet al , Ann

    M. Salazar-Ram ´ ırezet al , Ann. Phys. (NY) 372, 283 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [38]

    E. O. Silva et al , Ann. Phys. (NY) 362, 739 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [39]

    Hosseinpour, H

    M. Hosseinpour, H. Hassanabadi and M. de Montigny, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 311 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [40]

    Ahmed, Eur

    F. Ahmed, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [41]

    de Montigny, S

    M. de Montigny, S. Zare and H. Hassanabadi, Gen. Relativ . Gravit. 50, 47 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [42]

    Carvalho, A

    J. Carvalho, A. M. de M. Carvalho and C. Furtado, Eur. Phy s. J. C 74, 2935 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [43]

    Ahmeda, Eur

    F. Ahmeda, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 598 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [44]

    Hassanabadi, M

    H. Hassanabadi, M. Hosseini, S. Zare and M. Hosseinpour , Few-Body Syst. 60, 12 (2019). 13

    work page 2019

  44. [45]

    Cavalcante et al , Eur

    E. Cavalcante et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 288 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [46]

    Wang et al , Eur

    Z. Wang et al , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 36 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [47]

    Kleinert, Gauge fields in condensed matter, vol

    H. Kleinert, Gauge fields in condensed matter, vol. 2 , (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989)

    work page 1989

  47. [48]

    M. O. Katanaev and I. V. Volovich, Ann. Phys. (NY) 216, 1 (1992)

    work page 1992

  48. [49]

    R. A. Puntigam and H. H. Soleng, Class. Quantum Grav. 14, 1129 (1997)

    work page 1997

  49. [50]

    K. C. Valanis e V. P. Panoskaltsis, Acta Mech. 175, 77 (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [51]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)

    work page 1959

  51. [52]

    Peshkin and A

    M. Peshkin and A. Tonomura, The Aharonov-Bohm Effect (Springer-Verlag, in: Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 340, Berlin, 1989)

    work page 1989

  52. [53]

    Furtado, V

    C. Furtado, V. B. Bezerra and F. Moraes, Phys. Lett. A 289, 160 (2001)

    work page 2001

  53. [54]

    A. L. Silva Netto, C. Chesman and C. Furtado, Phys. Lett. A 372, 3894 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [55]

    Furtado, A

    C. Furtado, A. M. de M. Carvalho and C. A. de Lima Ribeiro, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 1393 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [56]

    R. L. L. Vit´ oria and K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 175 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [57]

    Bakke, Eur

    K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 82 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [58]

    Wang, Z.-W

    B.-Q. Wang, Z.-W. Long, C.-Y. Long and S.-R. Wu, Int. J. M od. Phys. A 33, 1850158 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    L. C. N. Santos and C. C. Barros Jr., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850122 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    L. C. N. Santos and C. C. Barros Jr., Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 13 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [61]

    Hosseinpour and H

    M. Hosseinpour and H. Hassanabadi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 236 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [62]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2, 4th ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 1980)

    work page 1980

  62. [63]

    Bakke, Mod

    K. Bakke, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 27, 1350018 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [64]

    Strange and L

    P. Strange and L. H. Ryder, Phys. Lett. A 380, 3465 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [65]

    Dvornikov, Mod

    M. Dvornikov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1530017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [66]

    A. V. D. M. Maia and K. Bakke, Physica B 531, 213 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [67]

    N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

    work page 1982

  67. [68]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of t he General Theory of Relativity (IE-Wiley, New York, 1972)

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of t he General Theory of Relativity (IE-Wiley, New York, 1972)

    work page 1972

  68. [69]

    Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics , (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2003)

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics , (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2003). 14

    work page 2003

  69. [70]

    I. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rept. 357, 113 (2002)

    work page 2002

  70. [71]

    Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations, 3rd Editi on (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    W. Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations, 3rd Editi on (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    work page 2000

  71. [72]

    G. B. Arfken and H. J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, sixth edition (Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [73]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegum, Handbook of mathematical functions (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1965)

    work page 1965

  73. [74]

    F. W. Hehl and W.-T. Ni, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2045 (1990)

    work page 2045

  74. [75]

    L. A. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 543 (1975)

    work page 1975

  75. [76]

    S. A. Werner, J.-L. Staudenmann and R. Colella, Phys. Re v. Lett. 42, 1103 (1979). 15

    work page 1979