Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gaps

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.01484 v2 pith:3MUBOPQL submitted 2025-05-02 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords watermarkingmodelproposeschemesettingaccessadversaryapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a text, can we determine whether it was generated by a large language model (LLM) or by a human? A widely studied approach to this problem is watermarking. We propose an undetectable and elementary watermarking scheme in the closed setting. Also, in the harder open setting, where the adversary has access to most of the model, we propose an unremovable watermarking scheme.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Watermark in the Classroom: A Conformal Framework for Adaptive AI Usage Detection

    stat.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standard, hierarchical, and weighted conformal prediction applied to LLM watermark scores can control false-positive rates when detecting guideline-violating AI edits in simulated classroom essays.

Pith tools