Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 91 references

A gradient-optimized two-body interaction can lock electrons into the Moore–Read Pfaffian state with overlaps above 99%.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 15:34 UTC pith:3N5RY77A

load-bearing objection Clean AD-ED inverse design that really does push two-body Pfaffian overlaps above 99% at accessible sizes, with a usable short-range recipe—thermodynamic claims are ahead of the data. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23695 v1 pith:3N5RY77A submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Engineering two-body interaction for the Moore-Read State

Yi Yang , Xin Wan , Zi-Xiang Hu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Moore-Read PfaffianHaldane pseudopotentialsinverse Hamiltonian designfractional quantum Hallnon-Abelian topological orderorbital entanglement spectrumquantum simulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Moore–Read Pfaffian is the canonical non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall wave function, but its exact parent Hamiltonian is a three-body interaction that real electrons and most quantum simulators do not have. This paper asks whether a carefully chosen two-body interaction can still produce that state. Treating the odd Haldane pseudopotentials as continuous knobs and maximizing the ground-state overlap with the Pfaffian by automatic differentiation and exact diagonalization, the authors obtain a short-range, monotonically decaying interaction that yields overlaps above 99 percent for systems up to twelve electrons. The same profile is essentially size-independent and fits a simple exponential; when that fit is used without further tuning on fourteen electrons it still produces large overlap and the correct entanglement spectrum. Neutral-gap and entanglement diagnostics confirm that the optimized ground state sits in the Pfaffian topological phase. The result supplies both a concrete interaction recipe and a general inverse-design route for engineering non-Abelian order from two-body forces alone.

Core claim

Essential features of the three-body Pfaffian parent Hamiltonian can be encoded in a purely two-body interaction whose odd Haldane pseudopotentials, optimized by gradient ascent on the Moore–Read overlap, produce ground-state overlaps exceeding 99 percent for systems up to twelve electrons and follow a nearly universal exponential decay that continues to stabilize Pfaffian entanglement structure at fourteen electrons.

What carries the argument

Overlap-driven pseudopotential optimization: the odd Haldane components Vm (m≥3) are variational parameters of a two-body Hamiltonian on the sphere; a JAX exact-diagonalization engine supplies automatic gradients of the loss L=1−|⟨ΨMR|Ψ0({Vm})⟩|, which is minimized under positivity and monotonicity constraints.

Load-bearing premise

That maximizing finite-size overlap under short-range constraints for six to twelve particles, then transferring a two-parameter exponential fit, is enough to guarantee the same two-body profile remains in the incompressible Pfaffian phase in the thermodynamic limit.

What would settle it

Exact diagonalization or DMRG of the exponential pseudopotential profile at substantially larger electron number (Ne≳20) that shows either collapse of the neutral gap or loss of the Pfaffian orbital-entanglement counting would falsify the claim that the optimized two-body interaction stabilizes the phase.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A concrete, nearly universal short-range two-body pseudopotential recipe now exists for targeting the Moore–Read phase in quantum simulators.
  • The same differentiable-overlap framework can be pointed at anti-Pfaffian, particle-hole Pfaffian, Laughlin, and Read–Rezayi target states.
  • Experimental platforms that can tune effective V1/V3 and suppress longer-range components (finite well width, screening, moiré bands) have an explicit target profile.
  • Three-body parent Hamiltonians are not strictly necessary once the right two-body ratios are engineered.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential profile remains gapped at larger sizes, dielectric or gate-screening recipes that approximate Vm∼e−m/ϵ become a practical materials-design target for 5/2 devices.
  • The method’s success on both Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian with nearly identical short-range profiles suggests the optimization is largely capturing particle-hole symmetric pairing energetics rather than chirality-specific details.
  • Combining the same loss with neural-network or variational Monte Carlo ground states would test whether the exponential interaction continues to favor Pfaffian order beyond exact-diagonalization sizes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The authors treat the odd Haldane pseudopotentials of a two-body interaction on the sphere (at the Moore-Read flux N_phi = 2Ne - 3, V1 fixed to its Coulomb value) as variational parameters and minimize the overlap loss L = 1 - |<Psi_MR|Psi_0>| by automatic differentiation through exact diagonalization (JAX), subject to positivity and monotonicity constraints. For Ne <= 12 the optimized interactions achieve >99% overlap with the Moore-Read Pfaffian (99.49% at Ne=12), with a unique L=0 ground state, a neutral gap larger than 1LL Coulomb, and OES counting/entanglement gaps matching the Pfaffian CFT spectrum; the topological entanglement entropy matches gamma = ln sqrt(8). The independently optimized profiles at Ne=6-12 collapse onto a nearly universal exponential, Vm ~ 0.561 e^{-0.176 m}, which transferred without refitting to Ne=14 gives 91.1% overlap and retains Pfaffian OES structure; an analogous optimization targeting the anti-Pfaffian yields a similar profile. The authors conclude that a suitably engineered two-body interaction captures the essential physics of the three-body Pfaffian parent Hamiltonian.

Significance. If the finite-size conclusions hold, the paper makes two useful contributions: (i) a practical, openly described differentiable-ED framework for inverse Hamiltonian design in FQH systems, demonstrated with multi-start optimization and validated against four independent diagnostics (overlap, neutral spectrum, OES, TEE); and (ii) a concrete, falsifiable, parameter-free prediction — the two-parameter exponential profile of Eq. (4) — that is tested out-of-sample at Ne=14 and against the particle-hole-conjugate anti-Pfaffian sector. The finding that a handful of short-range pseudopotentials suffices to reproduce Pfaffian entanglement structure is of direct interest to ongoing efforts to engineer non-Abelian phases in moiré and synthetic platforms, where two-body interactions are far more accessible than three-body parent Hamiltonians. The thermodynamic-limit implications are not yet established (see major comments), which tempers but does not remove the significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV / Table I / Sec. V] Sec. IV and Table I: the transferred exponential profile's Pfaffian overlap decreases monotonically with size — 0.95549 (Ne=10), 0.92891 (Ne=12), 0.91109 (Ne=14). A three-point monotone decreasing sequence is equally consistent with a profile whose thermodynamic-limit overlap degrades, and nothing shown demonstrates saturation. Yet Sec. V states that the Ne=14 transfer 'rules out finite-size overfitting,' and the abstract/introduction use 'stabilizes the Pfaffian topological phase' without qualification. This conclusion sentence is not supported by the paper's own data and should be removed or sharply qualified (e.g., 'is consistent with, but does not establish, thermodynamic-limit stability'). The authors' outlook paragraph already concedes this, so the fix is largely textual.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 3] Sec. III, Fig. 3: the neutral excitation spectrum — the paper's only direct evidence for incompressibility of the optimized interaction — is shown at a single size (Ne=12). No gap-versus-1/Ne scaling appears anywhere, and gap scaling is the standard discriminator between a gapped topological phase and a finite-size lookalike; the 0LL Coulomb rows of Table I (overlap 0 at Ne=10) are the canonical cautionary example within this manuscript itself. Since the authors already perform full L-resolved diagonalization, computing the neutral gap of the fitted exponential profile at Ne=6,8,10,12,14 and plotting it against 1/Ne is within their existing machinery. I ask for either this data or an explicit statement that incompressibility in the thermodynamic limit is unaddressed.
  3. [Sec. II / Eq. (4)] Sec. II (constraints) vs. Sec. IV (universality claim): the optimization is performed inside a hand-imposed manifold (0 <= Vm <= V1, V1 >= V3 >= V5 >= ... >= 0). The claim of a 'nearly universal exponentially decaying profile' (Eq. (4)) is therefore established only within a space that already enforces monotone decay. The exponential functional form is not forced by the constraints, so the finding remains nontrivial, but the paper should state explicitly that universality is conditional on the constraint manifold, and ideally report a control run with the monotonicity constraint relaxed to test whether the exponential shape survives. Relatedly, it should be clarified over which m the fit in Eq. (4) is performed: with V1 fixed to its Coulomb value, the fitted A*e^{-0.176} ~ 0.47 does not equal V1, so V1 appears to be excluded from the fit — this should be stated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III] For the directly optimized sizes (Ne<=12), the headline overlaps are partly by construction, since the loss is L = 1 - |<Psi_MR|Psi_0>|. The paper does provide independent grounding (neutral gap, OES counting and entanglement gap, TEE ~ ln sqrt(8), anti-Pfaffian conjugate test), which is a strength, but a one-sentence acknowledgment of the by-construction nature of the optimized overlaps in Sec. III would improve candor.
  2. [Table I] Table I: the 0LL Coulomb overlap is reported as exactly 0 at Ne=10. Presumably the ground state has L != 0 there (compressible composite-fermion-liquid regime); a footnote clarifying this would help readers.
  3. [Sec. II] The dimensions of the Hilbert spaces diagonalized (especially Ne=14 with the transferred interaction) are not given. Reporting them would document the computational scale of the differentiable-ED framework.
  4. [References] References 69 and 72 are the same paper (Li and Haldane, PRL 101, 010504 (2008)). Please merge.
  5. [Formatting] Fig. 8 and its caption appear at the end of Sec. V but belong to Appendix A; the layout in the current version is confusing. Also check minor typesetting (missing spaces around '99% for', 'Ne = 12', 'orbital entanglement spectrum') in the Introduction and Fig. 2 caption.
  6. [General] Is the optimization code (JAX-based differentiable ED) publicly available? Given the emphasis on the framework's generality, a repository link or a statement of availability would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

High Pfaffian overlaps for Ne≤12 are the direct optimization objective, and the 'universal' exponential is a fit to those same runs; independent OES/gap/TEE checks keep this only mildly circular.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. II, Eq. (3); Abstract; Sec. III]
    "The optimization procedure seeks to minimize the loss function L({Vm})=1−|⟨Ψ_MR|Ψ0({Vm})⟩|. ... By directly maximizing the overlap between the many-body ground state and the Moore-Read state, we obtain a robust pseudopotential profile that has Pfaffian overlaps exceeding 99% for systems up to Ne=12."

    The reported >99% overlaps for Ne≤12 are exactly the quantity being maximized. Once the optimizer converges inside the constrained {Vm} manifold, high overlap is true by construction of L, not an independent many-body prediction. Overlap numbers for optimized sizes therefore cannot by themselves evidence that the interaction 'stabilizes' the phase; only the non-overlap diagnostics can.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV, Eq. (4); Table I; Sec. V]
    "They are well described by a single exponential form, Vm=Ae^{−m/ϵ}, with a global fit Vm≃0.561e^{−0.176m}... To test the transferability of the optimized interaction, we construct the Ne=14 Hamiltonian using the exponential pseudopotential profile in Eq. (4), without further optimization. The resulting ground state has an overlap of 91.1% with the MR Pfaffian state. ... the successful transfer of the exponentially fitted interaction to Ne=14 confirms that the optimized pseudopotentials capture genuine physical features of the Pfaffian phase, ruling out finite-size overfitting."

    The exponential is fitted to the already-optimized Vm sets for Ne=6–12 (the same runs that produced the >99% overlaps). Ne=14 is then evaluated with that two-parameter fit and the resulting 91% overlap/OES is presented as evidence of a near-universal stabilizing profile that rules out overfitting. That is a fitted-input transfer test, not an independent derivation; Table I’s monotone drop (fitting overlaps 0.955→0.929→0.911 for Ne=10→12→14) is the expected signature of residual finite-size content in the fit.

full rationale

The paper is inverse Hamiltonian design: odd Haldane pseudopotentials are varied to minimize L=1−|⟨Ψ_MR|Ψ0⟩| under positivity/monotonicity constraints. Consequently the headline >99% overlaps for directly optimized Ne≤12 are obtained by construction of the loss, not as an independent prediction. The 'nearly universal' profile Vm≃0.561 e^{−0.176 m} is then a global exponential fit to those same optimized {Vm} across Ne=6–12; applying it without re-optimization to Ne=14 (91.1% overlap, Pfaffian-like OES) is a standard transfer test of a fitted ansatz, not a first-principles derivation, and Table I shows the fitted overlaps declining with size. That is mild fitted-input circularity around the universality/thermodynamic-stability rhetoric. It is not load-bearing self-citation or a uniqueness theorem smuggled from the authors. Neutral spectra, OES CFT counting and entanglement gaps, TEE vs ln√8, 0LL/1LL Coulomb baselines, and anti-Pfaffian optimization in a different Hilbert space are independent of the overlap loss and prevent a high circularity score. Score 3 reflects objective-by-construction overlaps plus one fitted-profile transfer, with substantial non-circular diagnostics remaining.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central numerical claim rests on standard single-Landau-level spherical FQHE machinery plus an optimization objective and hand constraints. Free parameters are the variational Vm’s (with V1 fixed) and the two-parameter exponential fit used for transfer. No new physical particles are postulated; the “entity” is an engineered interaction profile.

free parameters (3)
  • Odd Haldane pseudopotentials {Vm} m≥3 (V1 fixed to Coulomb scale) = System-dependent; e.g. Ne=12 profile in Fig. 2
    Continuous variational parameters optimized to maximize Pfaffian overlap under positivity and monotonicity constraints; the reported high overlaps are outcomes of this fit.
  • Exponential fit amplitude A and decay 1/ε in Vm=A e^{-m/ε} = A≃0.561, 1/ε≃0.176 (Vm≃0.561 e^{-0.176 m})
    Global fit to independently optimized profiles for Ne=6,8,10,12; then used without re-optimization to build the Ne=14 Hamiltonian and Table I “Fitting” column.
  • Monotonicity/short-range box constraints 0≤Vm≤V1 and V1≥V3≥V5≥⋯≥0 = Inequality constraints (SLSQP)
    Imposed by hand to keep interactions Coulomb-like and short-ranged; they restrict the variational manifold and shape the reported “universal” profile.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption After projection to a single Landau level, any rotationally invariant two-body interaction is fully specified by odd Haldane pseudopotentials Vm.
    Sec. II, Eq. (1); standard Haldane pseudopotential expansion for spin-polarized fermions.
  • domain assumption The Moore–Read Pfaffian at shift Nϕ=2Ne−3 is the correct topological target whose overlap, OES counting, and TEE diagnose the desired non-Abelian phase.
    Sec. II target wave function Eq. (2) and diagnostics; standard but chooses Pfaffian over anti-Pfaffian/ph-Pfaffian as the design goal.
  • domain assumption In nondegenerate ground-state regimes, the overlap loss is differentiable through the symmetric eigensolver, so automatic-differentiation gradients are well-defined.
    Sec. II paragraph on JAX/AD; authors state the optimized state remains nondegenerate throughout.
  • ad hoc to paper Exact diagonalization on spheres up to Ne=12 (and ED at Ne=14 with a transferred interaction) is representative enough to infer a size-robust interaction profile.
    Secs. III–IV; underwrites “nearly universal” and thermodynamic-stability language despite acknowledged need for larger-scale methods in Sec. V.
  • standard math Standard linear algebra / Jack-polynomial or three-body-parent constructions correctly produce the reference MR and anti-Pfaffian wave functions used in the loss and OES comparisons.
    Sec. II citations to Moore–Read and Jack polynomial constructions.
invented entities (1)
  • Gradient-optimized / exponentially fitted two-body Pfaffian-stabilizing pseudopotential profile no independent evidence
    purpose: Serve as a practical two-body surrogate that encodes essential Moore–Read correlations usually associated with a three-body parent Hamiltonian.
    Not a new particle or force law in nature, but a new engineered interaction object defined by the optimization; independent_evidence is only partial (OES/gap diagnostics and Ne=14 transfer within the same numerical framework).

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 17277 in / 3824 out tokens · 89104 ms · 2026-07-30T15:34:40.862432+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Engineering interactions that stabilize non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall phases is a central challenge in strongly correlated topological matter and quantum simulation. We introduce a differentiable framework for inverse Hamiltonian design, in which Haldane pseudopotentials are optimized by gradient-based exact diagonalization to stabilize target fractional quantum Hall phases. In spherical geometry, the Haldane pseudopotentials are treated as variational parameters and optimized in a JAX-based exact-diagonalization framework. By directly maximizing the overlap between the many-body ground state and the Moore-Read state, we obtain a robust pseudopotential profile that has Pfaffian overlaps exceeding $99\%$ for systems up to $N_e=12$, substantially improving over conventional Coulomb interactions. Analyses of the neutral excitation spectrum and orbital entanglement spectrum further confirm that the optimized interaction stabilizes the Pfaffian topological phase. Our results demonstrate that essential features of the three-body Pfaffian parent Hamiltonian can be effectively encoded in a suitably designed two-body interaction. Furthermore, they identify a nearly universal exponentially decaying pseudopotential profile that stabilizes the Pfaffian phase and establishes a general framework toward engineering non-Abelian topological order in quantum simulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23695 by Xin Wan, Yi Yang, Zi-Xiang Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic overview of the overlap-driven pseudopotential optimization scheme. A half-filled FQH system on the sphere [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Haldane pseudopotentials for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Orbital entanglement spectrum of the optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison of the OES at the MR shift for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Optimized odd Haldane pseudopotentials at the MR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: OES of the optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: presents the optimized pseudopotentials ob￾tained by explicitly targeting the anti-Pfaffian state. Even though the optimization is performed in a Hilbert space distinct from that used for the Pfaffian case, the resulting pseudopotential profile is remarkably similar to the one derived from Pfaffian optimization. This close re￾semblance reflects the particle-hole conjugate nature of the two states and indic… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: We analyze two representative orbital biparti￾tions, (NA, Norb,A) = (5, 11) and (6, 13). In both parti￾tions, the low-lying entanglement levels exhibit charac￾teristic anti-Pfaffian edge-state counting and are clearly separated from higher, nonuniversal levels by an entan￾glement gap. In addition, the dispersion of the lowest branch has chirality opposite to that of the Pfaffian case, consistent with the … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Griffin \ and\ author S

    author author C. Griffin \ and\ author S. X. \ Cui ,\ https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749922500253 journal journal International Journal of Quantum Information \ volume 20 ,\ pages 2250025 ( year 2022 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749922500253 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749922500253 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219749922500253 2022

  2. [14]

    Sati \ and\ author U

    author author H. Sati \ and\ author U. Schreiber ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22144 title Fractional quantum hall anyons via the algebraic topology of exotic flux quanta ( year 2025 a ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22144 arXiv:2505.22144 [cond-mat.mes-hall] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [39]

    \ Yang , author Q

    author author L.-P. \ Yang , author Q. Li ,\ and\ author Z.-X. \ Hu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/8/087306 journal journal Chinese Physics B \ volume 27 ,\ eid 087306 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/8/087306 2018

  4. [45]

    Cai , author E

    author author J. Cai , author E. Anderson , author C.-W. \ Wang , author X. Zhang , author X. Liu , author W. Holtzmann , author Y. Zhang , author F.-R. \ Fan , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author Y. Ran , author T. Cao , author L. Fu , author D. Xiao , author W. Yao ,\ and\ author X. Xu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06289-w journal ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06289-w 2023

  5. [46]

    Zeng , author Z

    author author Y. Zeng , author Z. Xia , author K. Kang , author J. Zhu , author P. Kn \"u ppel , author C. Vaswani , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author K. F. \ Mak ,\ and\ author J. Shan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06452-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 622 ,\ pages 69 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06452-3 2023

  6. [47]

    Park , author J

    author author H. Park , author J. Cai , author E. Anderson , author Y. Zhang , author J. Zhu , author X. Liu , author C.-W. \ Wang , author W. Holtzmann , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author J.-H. \ Chu , author T. Cao , author L. Fu , author W. Yao , author D. Cobden ,\ and\ author X. Xu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06536-0 journal...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06536-0 2023

  7. [48]

    author author N. R. \ Cooper , author J. Dalibard ,\ and\ author I. B. \ Spielman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015005 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 015005 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015005 2019

  8. [49]

    Aidelsburger , author M

    author author M. Aidelsburger , author M. Atala , author S. Nascimbene , author S. Trotzky , author Y.-A. \ Chen ,\ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 185301 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.185301 2013

  9. [50]

    Jotzu , author M

    author author G. Jotzu , author M. Messer , author R. Desbuquois , author M. Lebrat , author T. Uehlinger , author D. Greif ,\ and\ author T. Esslinger ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13915 journal journal Nature \ volume 515 ,\ pages 237 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature13915 2014

  10. [51]

    Semeghini , author H

    author author G. Semeghini , author H. Levine , author A. Keesling , author S. Ebadi , author T. T. \ Wang , author D. Bluvstein , author R. Verresen , author H. Pichler , author M. Kalinowski , author R. Samajdar , author A. Omran , author S. Sachdev , author A. Vishwanath , author M. Greiner , author V. Vuleti \'c ,\ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ https:/...

    doi:10.1126/science.abi8794 2021

  11. [52]

    Monroe , author W

    author author C. Monroe , author W. C. \ Campbell , author L.-M. \ Duan , author Z.-X. \ Gong , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , author P. W. \ Hess , author R. Islam , author K. Kim , author N. M. \ Linke , author G. Pagano , author P. Richerme , author C. Senko ,\ and\ author N. Y. \ Yao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025001 journal journal Rev. Mod....

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025001 2021

  12. [53]

    Roushan , author C

    author author P. Roushan , author C. Neill , author A. Megrant , author Y. Chen , author R. Babbush , author R. Barends , author B. Campbell , author Z. Chen , author B. Chiaro , author A. Dunsworth , author A. G. \ Fowler , author E. Jeffrey , author J. Kelly , author E. Lucero , author J. Mutus , author P. J. J. \ O'Malley , author D. Sank , author A. V...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13891 2014

  13. [54]

    Schine , author A

    author author N. Schine , author A. Ryou , author A. Gromov , author A. Sommer ,\ and\ author J. Simon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17943 journal journal Nature \ volume 534 ,\ pages 671 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nature17943 2016

  14. [63]

    Zhu , author Y

    author author J. Zhu , author Y. Huang , author X. Hu , author D. Xiao ,\ and\ author T. Cao ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06316 title Crystallization in the fractional quantum hall regime with disorder-aware neural quantum states ( year 2026 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06316 arXiv:2604.06316 [cond-mat.str-el] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [68]

    Frostig , author M

    author author R. Frostig , author M. J. \ Johnson ,\ and\ author C. Leary ,\ in\ @noop booktitle SysML conference 2018 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2018

  16. [73]

    Two-Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1982 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1559 1982

  17. [74]

    Observation of an even-denominator quantum number in the fractional quantum Hall effect , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1987 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1776 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.1776 1987

  18. [75]

    2001 , issn =

    Quantum groups and non-Abelian braiding in quantum Hall systems , journal =. 2001 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00308-X , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00308-x 2001

  19. [76]

    2002 , issn =

    Fermionic Quantum Computation , journal =. 2002 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 , url =

    arXiv 2002

  20. [77]

    2003 , issn =

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , journal =. 2003 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 , url =

    doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 2003

  21. [78]

    Topologically Protected Qubits from a Possible Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall State , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.166802 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.166802 2005

  22. [79]

    Braid Topologies for Quantum Computation , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.140503 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.140503 2005

  23. [80]

    Topological Quantum Computing with Only One Mobile Quasiparticle , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070503 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.070503 2006

  24. [81]

    Universal quantum computation with the

    Bravyi, Sergey , journal =. Universal quantum computation with the. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.042313 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.73.042313 2006

  25. [82]

    Towards universal topological quantum computation in the

    Freedman, Michael and Nayak, Chetan and Walker, Kevin , journal =. Towards universal topological quantum computation in the. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245307 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.245307 2006

  26. [83]

    Topological quantum compiling , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165310 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.165310 2007

  27. [84]

    Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083 , url =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 2008

  28. [85]

    , title =

    Griffin, Colton and Cui, Shawn X. , title =. International Journal of Quantum Information , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  29. [86]

    2025 , eprint=

    Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  30. [87]

    , title=

    Iulianelli, Filippo and Kim, Sung and Sussan, Joshua and Lauda, Aaron D. , title=. Nature Communications , year=. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61342-8 , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61342-8

  31. [88]

    2025 , publisher=

    Hisham Sati and Urs Schreiber , journal=. 2025 , publisher=. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.107 , url=

    doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.107 2025

  32. [89]

    1991 , issn =

    Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect , journal =. 1991 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90407-O , url =

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90407-o 1991

  33. [90]

    Morf, R. H. , journal =. Transition from Quantum Hall to Compressible States in the Second Landau Level: New Light on the. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1505 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1505 1998

  34. [91]

    Incompressible Paired Hall State, Stripe Order, and the Composite Fermion Liquid Phase in Half-Filled Landau Levels , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4685 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4685 2000

  35. [92]

    Paired Hall state at half filling , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3205 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.3205 1991

  36. [93]

    1996 , issn =

    2n-quasihole states realize 2n-1-dimensional spinor braiding statistics in paired quantum Hall states , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00430-0 , url =

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00430-0 1996

  37. [94]

    Quasiholes and fermionic zero modes of paired fractional quantum Hall states: The mechanism for non-Abelian statistics , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.16864 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.16864 1996

  38. [95]

    Lee, Sung-Sik and Ryu, Shinsei and Nayak, Chetan and Fisher, Matthew P. A. , journal =. Particle-Hole Symmetry and the. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.236807 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.236807 2007

  39. [96]

    Particle-Hole Symmetry and the Pfaffian State , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.236806 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.236806 2007

  40. [97]

    and Park, Kwon and Das Sarma, S

    Peterson, Michael R. and Park, Kwon and Das Sarma, S. , journal =. Spontaneous Particle-Hole Symmetry Breaking in the. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.156803 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.156803 2008

  41. [98]

    Particle-hole-symmetric model for a paired fractional quantum Hall state in a half-filled Landau level , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045126 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.045126 2019

  42. [99]

    Finite-Layer Thickness Stabilizes the Pfaffian State for the 5/2 Fractional Quantum Hall Effect: Wave Function Overlap and Topological Degeneracy , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.016807 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.016807 2008

  43. [100]

    Orbital Landau level dependence of the fractional quantum Hall effect in quasi-two-dimensional electron layers: Finite-thickness effects , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.155308 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.155308 2008

  44. [101]

    Approximate two-body generating Hamiltonian for the particle-hole Pfaffian wave function , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245306 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.245306 2021

  45. [102]

    Describing Landau Level Mixing in Fractional Quantum Hall States with Deep Learning , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.176503 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.176503 2025

  46. [103]

    Solving the fractional quantum Hall problem with self-attention neural network , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.205117 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.205117 2025

  47. [104]

    2025 , archivePrefix=

    Neural Network-Augmented Pfaffian Wave-functions for Scalable Simulations of Interacting Fermions , author=. 2025 , archivePrefix=. 2507.10705 , primaryClass=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [105]

    2025 , archivePrefix=

    Dressing composite fermions with artificial intelligence , author=. 2025 , archivePrefix=. 2512.00527 , primaryClass=

    arXiv 2025

  49. [106]

    2025 , archivePrefix=

    Extracting Anyon Statistics from Neural Network Fractional Quantum Hall States , author=. 2025 , archivePrefix=. 2512.15872 , primaryClass=

    arXiv 2025

  50. [107]

    2025 , archivePrefix=

    Gradient-based search of quantum phases: discovering unconventional fractional Chern insulators , author=. 2025 , archivePrefix=. 2509.10438 , primaryClass=

    arXiv 2025

  51. [108]

    2025 , archivePrefix=

    Modeling Quantum Geometry for Fractional Chern Insulators with unsupervised learning , author=. 2025 , archivePrefix=. 2510.03018 , primaryClass=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [109]

    2026 , archivePrefix=

    First-Principles AI finds crystallization of fractional quantum Hall liquids , author=. 2026 , archivePrefix=. 2602.03927 , primaryClass=

    arXiv 2026

  53. [110]

    2026 , eprint=

    Crystallization in the Fractional Quantum Hall Regime with Disorder-Aware Neural Quantum States , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  54. [111]

    Fractional Quantization of the Hall Effect: A Hierarchy of Incompressible Quantum Fluid States , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.605 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.51.605 1983

  55. [112]

    Configuration-interaction calculations on the fractional quantum Hall effect , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1986 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.2670 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.2670 1986

  56. [113]

    Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010504 2008

  57. [114]

    Entanglement Gap and a New Principle of Adiabatic Continuity , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.180502 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.180502 2010

  58. [115]

    Real-space entanglement spectrum of quantum Hall states , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125308 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.125308 2012

  59. [116]

    Model Fractional Quantum Hall States and Jack Polynomials , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.246802 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.246802 2008

  60. [117]

    Andrei and Haldane, F

    Bernevig, B. Andrei and Haldane, F. D. M. , journal =. Properties of Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall States at Filling. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.246806 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.246806 2008

  61. [118]

    SysML conference 2018 , year=

    Compiling machine learning programs via high-level tracing , author=. SysML conference 2018 , year=

    2018

  62. [119]

    James Bradbury and Roy Frostig and Peter Hawkins and Matthew James Johnson and Chris Leary and Dougal Maclaurin and George Necula and Adam Paszke and Jake Vander

  63. [120]

    JAX-FEM: A differentiable GPU-accelerated 3D finite element solver for automatic inverse design and mechanistic data science , journal =

    Tianju Xue and Shuheng Liao and Zhengtao Gan and Chanwook Park and Xiaoyu Xie and Wing Kam Liu and Jian Cao , keywords =. JAX-FEM: A differentiable GPU-accelerated 3D finite element solver for automatic inverse design and mechanistic data science , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108802 , url =

    arXiv 2023

  64. [121]

    JAX MD: A Framework for Differentiable Physics , url =

    Schoenholz, Samuel and Cubuk, Ekin Dogus , booktitle =. JAX MD: A Framework for Differentiable Physics , url =

  65. [123]

    2025 , title =

    Wang, Ziang and Wu, Feng and Zhao, Hui-Hai and Wan, Xin and Ni, Xiaotong , journal =. 2025 , title =. doi:10.22331/q-2025-04-24-1722 , url =

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2025-04-24-1722 2025

  66. [124]

    and Alieva, Ayya and Wang, Qing and Brenner, Michael P

    Kochkov, Dmitrii and Smith, Jamie A. and Alieva, Ayya and Wang, Qing and Brenner, Michael P. and Hoyer, Stephan , title =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2101784118 , url =

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2101784118 2021

  67. [125]

    Fractional quantum Hall nematics at

    Ye, Dan and Jiang, Chen-Xin and Hu, Zi-Xiang , journal =. Fractional quantum Hall nematics at. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.165123 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.165123 2024

  68. [126]

    Landau-Level Mixing and the Emergence of Pfaffian Excitations for the 5/2 Fractional Quantum Hall Effect , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.096802 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.096802 2010

  69. [127]

    and Simon, Steven H

    Rezayi, Edward H. and Simon, Steven H. , journal =. Breaking of Particle-Hole Symmetry by Landau Level Mixing in the. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.116801 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.116801 2011

  70. [128]

    2012 , month =

    Smith, Peter M and Kennett, Malcolm P , title =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/24/5/055601 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/24/5/055601 2012

  71. [129]

    Landau level mixing in the perturbative limit , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155426 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.155426 2013

  72. [130]

    Landau level mixing and the fractional quantum Hall effect , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245425 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.245425 2013

  73. [131]

    and Jolicoeur, Thierry and Scarola, Vito W

    Pakrouski, Kiryl and Peterson, Michael R. and Jolicoeur, Thierry and Scarola, Vito W. and Nayak, Chetan and Troyer, Matthias , journal =. Phase Diagram of the. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021004 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.021004 2015

  74. [132]

    2018 , journal =

    Lin-Peng Yang and Qi Li and Zi-Xiang Hu , title =. 2018 , journal =

    2018

  75. [133]

    Effects of Landau Level Mixing on Various Fractional Quantum Hall States in Trilayer Graphene , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/frpm-3fs8 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/frpm-3fs8 2025

  76. [134]

    Signatures of Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall States in Twisted

    Cai, Jiaqi and Anderson, Eric and Wang, Chang-Wei and Zhang, Xiaodong and Liu, Xiaowei and Holtzmann, Wolf and Zhang, Yihang and Fan, Feng-Ren and Taniguchi, Takashi and Watanabe, Kenji and Ran, Ying and Cao, Ting and Fu, Liang and Xiao, Di and Yao, Wang and Xu, Xiaodong , journal =. Signatures of Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall States in Twisted. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  77. [135]

    Thermodynamic Evidence of Fractional

    Zeng, Yihang and Xia, Zhengchao and Kang, Kaifei and Zhu, Jiacheng and Kn. Thermodynamic Evidence of Fractional. Nature , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  78. [136]

    Nature , volume =

    Observation of Fractionally Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect , author =. Nature , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  79. [137]

    Topological Bands for Ultracold Atoms , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  80. [138]

    Realization of the

    Aidelsburger, Monika and Atala, Marcos and Nascimbene, Sylvain and Trotzky, Stefan and Chen, Yu-Ao and Bloch, Immanuel , journal =. Realization of the. 2013 , doi =

    2013

Showing first 80 references.