Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Next step in gravity and cosmology: fundamental theory or data-driven models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.00846 v1 pith:3N6TK4U4 submitted 2020-09-02 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords modelsbottom-upcosmologicaldata-drivenfundamentalgravitationalgravitytheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We comment on the difference between bottom-up (i.e., data-driven, ad hoc) and top-down (i.e., derived from a fundamental theory of gravitational interactions) cosmological models, their respective status, predictive power and viability. We fuel the debate on whether present and future research on theoretical models of inflation, dark energy and gravitational waves should concentrate on bottom-up models such as $f(R)$, Horndeski or DHOST theories or on cosmological models of quantum gravity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools