Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 135 references

Theory of Electron Spin Resonance Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: The First Decade

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Electric fields drive atomic spin resonance in STM junctions via exchange and scattering mechanisms.

desk verdict This is a review that organizes existing ESR-STM theory over a decade without adding new derivations or results. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.27830 v1 pith:3NEYK2I2 submitted 2026-06-26 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Saba Taherpour , Denis Janković , Hoang-Anh Le , Jose Reina-Galvez , Christoph Wolf This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords electronspinresonancescanningtunnelingmicroscopymanipulationHeisenbergexchangeKondoscatteringAndersonimpuritymodelhyperfineinteractioncoherentcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper establishes that ESR-STM enables all-electrical spectroscopic probing and coherent manipulation of individual spins on surfaces. The electric field in the tunnel junction drives the resonance through mechanisms based on Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity models. These frameworks are shown to account for observed signals by incorporating electronic correlations and many-body effects. The work then extends the approach to coherent multi-spin control for qubit operations and to coupled electron-nuclear systems with hyperfine resolution.

What carries the argument

Electric-field-driven spin resonance modeled by Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity models.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures ESR-STM resonance signals whose dependence on bias, current, or magnetic field cannot be reproduced by any combination of the Heisenberg, Kondo, and Anderson models.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The theory of ESR-STM shows that the electric field drives spin transitions through Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity models, allowing all-electrical coherent control of spins at the atomic scale without oscillating magnetic fields, with validation against experiments and extensions to multi-spin and electron-nuclear dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The three models of Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity capture the dominant driving mechanisms without major unmodeled contributions from tip geometry or surface environment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent manipulation of single spins becomes possible using only DC and RF voltages in the STM junction.
  • Multi-spin interactions can be controlled to perform multiple-qubit operations at the atomic scale.
  • Hyperfine-resolved spectroscopy reveals electron-nuclear coupling and enables driving of nuclear spins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same electric-field driving could be tested on different magnetic impurities or substrates to check model generality.
  • Combining ESR-STM with existing STM-based atomic manipulation might allow on-demand assembly of spin arrays for quantum simulation.
  • Time-resolved measurements of nuclear polarization could distinguish between direct driving and indirect relaxation pathways.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing the first decade of theoretical developments in Electron Spin Resonance Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (ESR-STM). It covers driving mechanisms for all-electrical spin resonance based on Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity models; validates theoretical predictions against experimental observations to illustrate manifestations of electronic correlations and many-body effects; reviews coherent spin control; discusses extensions to coherent multi-spin control for multiple-qubit operations; and addresses coupled electron-nuclear spin systems including hyperfine-resolved spectroscopy and nuclear spin driving/polarization.

Significance. If the review accurately aggregates and contextualizes the cited literature, it would be a significant contribution by providing a consolidated reference on atomic-scale all-electrical spin manipulation. The emphasis on model validations, coherent control, and multi-spin/electron-nuclear extensions highlights pathways for quantum information applications on surfaces and clarifies how many-body physics enters ESR-STM observables.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that predictions are validated against experiments, but the review would benefit from an explicit statement (e.g., in the introduction or a dedicated section) on the criteria used to select which experimental works are included as validations versus those left for future discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. Their summary accurately captures the scope and structure of the review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review aggregates external literature; no internal derivation reduces to self-inputs

full rationale

This is a review paper that summarizes mechanisms (Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, Anderson impurity models) drawn from prior literature, validates them against external experimental observations, and discusses applications and extensions. No load-bearing step is shown to reduce by the paper's own equations or self-citation chain to its inputs; the abstract and description indicate aggregation of independent cited results rather than a self-contained derivation or fitted prediction presented as novel. Self-citations, if present, are not described as load-bearing for any uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; the ledger reflects the models it summarizes rather than new postulates. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the review itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of Electron Spin Resonance Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: The First Decade." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3NEYK2I2

@misc{pith2026260627830,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of Electron Spin Resonance Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: The First Decade},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3NEYK2I2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.27830}
}
read the original abstract

Electron spin resonance in scanning tunneling microscopy enabled the study of electronic transitions of magnetic impurities on surfaces at the atomic scale. This ESR-STM technique allows to spectroscopically probe and coherently manipulate spins using an all-electrical method without oscillating external magnetic driving fields. Here, we aim to review recent advancements in ESR-STM. We will discuss possible fundamental mechanisms by which the electric field drives spin resonance based on Heisenberg exchange, Kondo scattering, and Anderson impurity models. We validate theoretical predictions against experimental observations, to understand how electronic correlations, spin exchange, and many-body effects manifest in ESR-STM signals. After reviewing coherent spin control in the STM junction, we discuss potential applications of the ESR-STM method for coherent multi-spin control which enables multiple-qubit operations. Finally, we address recent developments in coupled electron-nuclear spin systems, including hyperfine-resolved ESR spectroscopy, and the driving and polarization of nuclear spins in ESR-STM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27830 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the ESR–STM junction and effective models. (a) A quantum impurity (QI, blue; sensor spin) is positioned in the STM junction and interacts with the tip and substrate with tunneling rates ΓT↔QI and ΓQI↔S, respectively. A DC bias VDC and an RF modulation VRF enable ESR driving. An external magnetic field B splits the electronic spin states (Sz = ± 1 2 ). Hyperfine coupling produces a nuclear-spin manifold … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spin dynamics and ESR-STM readout (a) The time evolution of a spin in a magnetic field. The columns show free time evolution (Larmor precession), and driven transi￾tions Rabi Oscillations in the lab frame and in the rotating frame. For the driving, a magnetic field B(t) along y direction was applied on-resonance. The upper row shows a closed quantum system whilst the lower row shows an open quantum system where the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental ESR Spectrum. ESR Spectrum of Ti on Ag/MgO. The measured spectrum is separated into asymmetric (green) and symmetric (blue) components highlighting the complex shape in experiments. The total fit (red) is described by Eq. (11). Measurement condition: VDC = 50 mV, IDC = 5 pA, VRF = 50 mV, Bext = 0.82 T. The resonant frequency is fres = 20.69 GHz. The extracted fit parameters are ∆Is = 17.34 fA, ∆Ia = 47.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Schematic of an Fe atom on MgO in the STM junction including the tip. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Anderson Impurity Model (a) Energy diagram of a quantum impurity (QI). Filled arrows indicate occupied single-electron states at εd defining the QI spin, while hollow arrows show unoccupied states at ϵ+U, corresponding to double occupancy. Only the tip (left) electrode…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of Simulated and Experimental ESR Signals. Simulated ESR spectra based on (a) the Heisenberg model; (b) the Kondo model and (c) the Anderson impurity model. (d) Experimentally measured ESR signal for a Ti atom [27]. Panel (b) is dapted from Ref. [86] with pe…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Rabi frequency Ω/2π as a function of the applied radio-frequency voltage VRF for individual Ti and Fe atoms, and FePc molecules. Solid lines are linear fits constrained to pass through the origin, illustrating the proportionality Ω ∝ VRF. The extracted slopes are 0…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Resonance frequency dependency to VDC (a) Universal, rescaled Ti resonance shift described by the exchange-field model. Adapted from Ref. [63] with permission. Copyright 2025 The Authors. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.. (b) Non-linear spin-electric coupling in the ESR spect…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Quantum Coherent Manipulation. Rabi oscillations measured via the tunneling current as a function of pulse width for varying VRF: (a) Ti atom, Adapted from [36], with permission. Copyright 2019 AAAS. (b) FePc molecule. Adapted from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2021 The Authors…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Multi-spin control. (a) Experimental setup for electron spin resonance of a Ti spin exchange-coupled to a nearby Fe single-atom magnet on an MgO substrate. (b) Angular dependence of the peak splitting in continuous-wave ESR (CW-ESR) spectra of Ti–Fe pairs, defined as …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Multi-spin spectroscopy (a) Experimental setup for double-resonance spec￾troscopy of two coupled Ti spins on a surface. Ti-1 is the sensor and the Ti-2 is the remote spin, which are coupled by J1,2. The Fe atom nearby the Ti-2 provides a strong magnetic field gradient…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Multi spin operations. (a) A multi-qubit structure including two remote qubits and a sensor qubit for a control scheme. (b) Driving the transition |0⟩|00⟩ ↔ |0⟩|10⟩ showing the CCNOT operation of remote qubit 1. (a) and (b) adapted from Ref. [55] , with permission fro…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Hyperfine energy spectra and protocols for single-atom spin readout/- control on MgO. Energies E (y-axis) are plotted versus applied magnetic field B (x-axis) for Ti isotopes and Ho adsorbed on MgO. Blue/black/dark red correspond to 47Ti, 48Ti, and 49Ti; non-ESR-drive…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Hyperfine splitting modulation in Ti isotopes. (a) Schematic of ESR-STM measurements on the three Ti isotopes (47Ti, 48Ti, 49Ti) on MgO in a rotating magnetic field. The MgO lattice directions are xˆ and yˆ, with zˆ out of plane. An external magnetic field Bext is app…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Nuclear levels read-out and addressing mechanisms. (a) Left: conductance jumps revealing the nuclear spin states (gray) of Tb (I = 3/2) and the resulting nuclear-spin tra￾jectory (red). Right: histograms of ∼40,000 jumps showing four non-overlapping Gaussian-like dist…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

    G. Binnig et al. “Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982), pp. 57–61.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.57

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.57 1982

  2. [2]

    Recent progress in probing atomic and molecular quantum coherence with scanning tunneling microscopy

    Liya Bi et al. “Recent progress in probing atomic and molecular quantum coherence with scanning tunneling microscopy”. In:Progress in Surface Science98.1 (2023), p. 100696. issn: 0079-6816.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2022.100696.url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079681622000442

    work page doi:10.1016/j.progsurf.2022.100696.url: 2023

  3. [3]

    Electron spin resonance scanning tunneling microscopy beyond a single spin

    Zixuan Guo, Jiajun Zhang, and Yi Chen. “Electron spin resonance scanning tunneling microscopy beyond a single spin”. In:Newton(Mar. 2026).issn: 2950-6360.doi:10. 1016/j.newton.2026.100413.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newton.2026. 100413. 45

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2026 2026

  4. [4]

    Photon emission of electrons tunneling in a scanning tunneling microscope

    J. K. Gimzewski et al. “Photon emission of electrons tunneling in a scanning tunneling microscope”. In:Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter72 (1988), pp. 497–501.doi: 10.1007/BF01314531

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01314531 1988

  5. [5]

    Photon emission in scanning tunneling mi- croscopy: Interpretation of photon maps of metallic systems

    Richard Berndt and James K. Gimzewski. “Photon emission in scanning tunneling mi- croscopy: Interpretation of photon maps of metallic systems”. In:Phys. Rev. B48 (7 Aug. 1993), pp. 4746–4754.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.48.4746.url:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.4746

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.4746.url:https://link 1993

  6. [6]

    Shot-noise measurements on mesoscopic contacts

    H. Birk et al. “Shot-noise measurements on mesoscopic contacts”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995), pp. 1610–1613.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1610

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1610 1995

  7. [7]

    High-speed force sensor for force microscopy and profilometry utilizing a quartz tuning fork

    Franz J. Giessibl. “High-speed force sensor for force microscopy and profilometry utilizing a quartz tuning fork”. In:Applied Physics Letters73.26 (1998), pp. 3956–3958.doi: 10.1063/1.122944

    work page doi:10.1063/1.122944 1998

  8. [8]

    Subatomic Features on the Silicon (111)-(7x7) Surface Observed by Atomic Force Microscopy

    Franz J. Giessibl et al. “Subatomic Features on the Silicon (111)-(7x7) Surface Observed by Atomic Force Microscopy”. In:Science289.5478 (2000), pp. 422–425.doi:10.1126/ science.289.5478.422

    2000

Show all 135 references
  1. [9]

    Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

    R. M. Stöckle et al. “Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy”. In:Chem. Phys. Lett.318 (2000), pp. 131–136.doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01451-7

    2000 doi

  2. [10]

    An ultrafast terahertz scanning tunnelling microscope

    T. L. Cocker et al. “An ultrafast terahertz scanning tunnelling microscope”. In:Nature Photonics7.8 (2013), pp. 620–625.doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.151

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Real-space imaging of transient carrier dynamics by nanoscale pump–probe microscopy

    Yasuhiko Terada et al. “Real-space imaging of transient carrier dynamics by nanoscale pump–probe microscopy”. In:Nature Photonics4.12 (2010), pp. 869–874.doi:10.1038/ nphoton.2010.239

    2010

  4. [12]

    Observation of vacuum tunneling of spin-polarized electrons with the scanning tunneling microscope

    R. Wiesendanger et al. “Observation of vacuum tunneling of spin-polarized electrons with the scanning tunneling microscope”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990), pp. 247–250. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.247

    1990 doi

  5. [13]

    Cambridge University Press, 1994

    Roland Wiesendanger.Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Methods and Ap- plications. Cambridge University Press, 1994

    1994

  6. [14]

    Single-Atom Spin-Flip Spectroscopy

    A. J. Heinrich et al. “Single-Atom Spin-Flip Spectroscopy”. In:Science306.5695 (2004), pp. 466–469.doi:10.1126/science.1101077

    2004 doi

  7. [15]

    Direct observation of the Larmor precession of individual spins by scanning-tunneling microscopy

    Y. Manassen et al. “Direct observation of the Larmor precession of individual spins by scanning-tunneling microscopy”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.62 (21 1989), pp. 2531–2534.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2531

    1989 doi

  8. [16]

    Electron paramagnetic resonance of individual atoms on a surface

    Susanne Baumann et al. “Electron paramagnetic resonance of individual atoms on a surface”. In:Science350.6259 (2015), pp. 417–420.doi:10. 1126 /science .aac8703. url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aac8703

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    Abragam and B

    A. Abragam and B. Bleaney.Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions. Ox- ford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences. Oxford University Press, 1970

    1970

  10. [18]

    Detection of nanoscale electron spin resonance spectra demonstrated us- ing nitrogen-vacancy centre probes in diamond

    L. T. Hall et al. “Detection of nanoscale electron spin resonance spectra demonstrated us- ing nitrogen-vacancy centre probes in diamond”. In:Nature Communications7.1 (2016), p. 10211.doi:10.1038/ncomms10211.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10211

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Quantum-coherent nanoscience

    Andreas J. Heinrich et al. “Quantum-coherent nanoscience”. In:Nature Nanotechnology 16.12 (Dec. 2021), pp. 1318–1329.issn: 1748-3395.doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00994-1. url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00994-1

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Molecular Vibration Spectra by Inelastic Electron Tun- neling

    J. Lambe and R. C. Jaklevic. “Molecular Vibration Spectra by Inelastic Electron Tun- neling”. In:Phys. Rev.165 (3 Jan. 1968), pp. 821–832.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.165.821. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.165.821. 46

    1968 doi

  13. [21]

    High-resolution tunnelling spectroscopy of a graphene quartet

    Young Jae Song et al. “High-resolution tunnelling spectroscopy of a graphene quartet”. In:Nature467.7312 (2010), pp. 185–189.doi:10 . 1038 / nature09330.url:https : //doi.org/10.1038/nature09330

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Sensing the quantum limit in scanning tunnelling spectroscopy

    Christian R. Ast et al. “Sensing the quantum limit in scanning tunnelling spectroscopy”. In:Nature Communications7.1 (2016), p. 13009.doi:10 . 1038 / ncomms13009.url: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13009

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Electron spin resonance with scanning tunneling microscopy: a tool for an on-surface quantum platform of identical qubits

    Deung-Jang Choi et al. “Electron spin resonance with scanning tunneling microscopy: a tool for an on-surface quantum platform of identical qubits”. In:Nanoscale Advances7.15 (2025), pp. 4551–4558.issn: 2516-0230.doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/d5na00316d. url:https://www.sciencedi...

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Controlling Single-Molecule Negative Differential Resistance in a Double-Barrier Tunnel Junction

    X. W. Tu, G. Mikaelian, and W. Ho. “Controlling Single-Molecule Negative Differential Resistance in a Double-Barrier Tunnel Junction”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (12 Mar. 2008), p. 126807.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.126807.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.126807

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    Readingandwritingsingle-atommagnets

    FabianD.Nattereretal.“Readingandwritingsingle-atommagnets”.In:Nature543.7644 (2017), pp. 226–228.doi:10.1038/nature21371.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature21371

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Atomic-scale sensing of the magnetic dipolar field from single atoms

    Taeyoung Choi et al. “Atomic-scale sensing of the magnetic dipolar field from single atoms”. In:Nature Nanotechnology12.5 (2017), pp. 420–424.doi:10 . 1038 / nnano . 2017.18.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.18

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Engineering the Eigenstates of Coupled Spin-1/2Atoms on a Surface

    Kai Yang et al. “Engineering the Eigenstates of Coupled Spin-1/2Atoms on a Surface”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (22 Nov. 2017), p. 227206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119. 227206.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227206

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Probing quantum coherence in single-atom electron spin resonance

    Philip Willke et al. “Probing quantum coherence in single-atom electron spin resonance”. In:Science Advances4.2 (2018), eaaq1543.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaq1543.url:https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1543

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Enhanced quantum coherence in exchange coupled spins via singlet- triplet transitions

    Y. Bae et al. “Enhanced quantum coherence in exchange coupled spins via singlet- triplet transitions”. In:Science Advances4.11 (2018), eaau4159.doi:10.1126/sciadv. aau4159.url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.aau4159

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Hyperfine interaction of individual atoms on a surface

    Philip Willke et al. “Hyperfine interaction of individual atoms on a surface”. In:Science 362.6412 (2018), pp. 336–339.doi:10.1126/science.aat7047.url:https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aat7047

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Electrically controlled nuclear polarization of individual atoms

    Kai Yang et al. “Electrically controlled nuclear polarization of individual atoms”. In: Nature Nanotechnology13.12 (Nov. 2018), pp. 1120–1125.issn: 1748-3395.doi:10 . 1038/s41565-018-0296-7.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0296-7

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Upgrade of a low-temperature scanning tunneling micro- scope for electron-spin resonance

    Fabian D. Natterer et al. “Upgrade of a low-temperature scanning tunneling micro- scope for electron-spin resonance”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments90.1 (Jan. 2019), p. 013706.issn: 0034-6748.doi:10.1063/1.5065384. eprint:https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/rsi/article-pdf/doi/10.1...

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Tuning Single-Atom Electron Spin Resonance in a Vector Magnetic Field

    Philip Willke et al. “Tuning Single-Atom Electron Spin Resonance in a Vector Magnetic Field”. In:Nano Letters19.11 (2019), pp. 8201–8206.doi:10 . 1021 / acs . nanolett . 9b03559.url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03559

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Tuning the Exchange Bias on a Single Atom from 1 mT to 10 T

    Kai Yang et al. “Tuning the Exchange Bias on a Single Atom from 1 mT to 10 T”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.122(22June2019),p.227203.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.227203. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.227203. 47

    doi

  27. [35]

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Atoms on a Surface

    Philip Willke et al. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Atoms on a Surface”. In: Nature Physics15.10 (2019), pp. 1005–1010.doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0573-x.url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0573-x

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Coherentspinmanipulationofindividualatomsonasurface

    KaiYangetal.“Coherentspinmanipulationofindividualatomsonasurface”.In:Science 366.6464 (2019), pp. 509–512.doi:10.1126/science.aay6779.url:https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aay6779

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    A scanning tunneling microscope capable of elec- tron spin resonance and pump–probe spectroscopy at mK temperature and in vector magnetic field

    Werner M. J. van Weerdenburg et al. “A scanning tunneling microscope capable of elec- tron spin resonance and pump–probe spectroscopy at mK temperature and in vector magnetic field”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments92.3 (Mar. 2021), p. 033906.issn: 0034-6748.doi:10.1063/5.0...

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Quantifying the interplay between fine structure and ge- ometry of an individual molecule on a surface

    Manuel Steinbrecher et al. “Quantifying the interplay between fine structure and ge- ometry of an individual molecule on a surface”. In:Phys. Rev. B103 (15 Apr. 2021), p. 155405.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155405.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155405

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Spin resonance amplitude and frequency of a single atom on a surface in a vector magnetic field

    Jinkyung Kim et al. “Spin resonance amplitude and frequency of a single atom on a surface in a vector magnetic field”. In:Phys. Rev. B104 (17 Nov. 2021), p. 174408. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.174408.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.104.174408

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    AnisotropicHyperfineInteractionofSurface-AdsorbedSingleAtoms

    JinkyungKimetal.“AnisotropicHyperfineInteractionofSurface-AdsorbedSingleAtoms”. In:Nano Letters22.23 (2022), pp. 9766–9772.doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02782. url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02782

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    Experimental Determination of a Single Atom Ground State Orbital through Hyperfine Anisotropy

    Laëtitia Farinacci et al. “Experimental Determination of a Single Atom Ground State Orbital through Hyperfine Anisotropy”. In:Nano Letters22.21 (Oct. 2022), pp. 8470– 8474.issn: 1530-6992.doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02783.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02783

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Spin-state engineering of single titanium adsorbates on ultrathin magnesium oxide

    Soo-hyon Phark et al. “Spin-state engineering of single titanium adsorbates on ultrathin magnesium oxide”. In:Nature Communications(2026).issn: 2041-1723.doi:10.1038/ s41467-026-68314-6.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68314-6

    2026 doi

  35. [43]

    Electron spin resonance of single iron phthalocyanine molecules and role of their non-localized spins in magnetic interactions

    Xue Zhang et al. “Electron spin resonance of single iron phthalocyanine molecules and role of their non-localized spins in magnetic interactions”. In:Nature Chemistry14.1 (2022), pp. 59–65.doi:10.1038/s41557-021-00827-7.url:https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41557-021-00827-7

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    ESR-STMondiamagneticmolecule: C60 on graphene

    ZionHazan,MichaelAverbukh,andYishayManassen.“ESR-STMondiamagneticmolecule: C60 on graphene”. In:Journal of Magnetic Resonance348 (2023), p. 107377.issn: 1090- 7807.doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . jmr . 2023 . 107377.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Coherent Spin Control of Single Molecules on a Surface

    Philip Willke et al. “Coherent Spin Control of Single Molecules on a Surface”. In:ACS Nano15.11 (2021), pp. 17959–17965.doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c06394.url:https: //doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c06394

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Probing resonating valence bond states in artificial quantum magnets

    Kai Yang et al. “Probing resonating valence bond states in artificial quantum magnets”. In:Nature Communications12.1 (2021), p. 993.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21274-5. url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21274-5

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Free coherent evolution of a coupled atomic spin system ini- tialized by electron scattering

    Lukas M. Veldman et al. “Free coherent evolution of a coupled atomic spin system ini- tialized by electron scattering”. In:Science372.6545 (2021), pp. 964–968.doi:10.1126/ science . abg8223.url:https : / / www . science . org / doi / abs / 10 . 1126 / science . abg8223. 48

    2021

  40. [48]

    Combining electron spin resonance spectroscopy with scanning tun- neling microscopy at high magnetic fields

    Robert Drost et al. “Combining electron spin resonance spectroscopy with scanning tun- neling microscopy at high magnetic fields”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments93.4 (Apr. 2022), p. 043705.issn: 0034-6748.doi:10 . 1063 / 5 . 0078137. eprint:https : / / pubs . aip . org / ...

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Development of a scanning tunneling microscope for variable tem- perature electron spin resonance

    Jiyoon Hwang et al. “Development of a scanning tunneling microscope for variable tem- perature electron spin resonance”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments93.9 (Sept. 2022), p. 093703.issn: 0034-6748.doi:10.1063/5.0096081. eprint:https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/rsi/article-pdf/doi/...

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Alkali Metal Atoms and Dimers on Ultrathin MgO

    Stepan Kovarik et al. “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Alkali Metal Atoms and Dimers on Ultrathin MgO”. In:Nano Letters22.10 (2022), pp. 4176–4181.doi:10.1021/ acs.nanolett.2c00980.url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00980

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Electric Control of Spin Transitions at the Atomic Scale

    Piotr Kot et al. “Electric Control of Spin Transitions at the Atomic Scale”. In:Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 6612.doi:10 . 1038 / s41467 - 023 - 42287 - 2.url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42287-2

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Universal quantum control of an atomic spin qubit on a surface

    Yu Wang et al. “Universal quantum control of an atomic spin qubit on a surface”. In: npj Quantum Information9.1 (2023), p. 48.doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00737-9.url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00716-6

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Electric-Field-Driven Spin Resonance by On-Surface Exchange Coupling to a Single-Atom Magnet

    Soo-hyon Phark et al. “Electric-Field-Driven Spin Resonance by On-Surface Exchange Coupling to a Single-Atom Magnet”. In:Advanced Science10.27 (2023), p. 2302033. doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1002 / advs . 202302033.url:https : / / advanced . onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ab...

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Double-Resonance Spectroscopy of Coupled Electron Spins on a Surface

    Soo-hyon Phark et al. “Double-Resonance Spectroscopy of Coupled Electron Spins on a Surface”. In:ACS Nano17.14 (2023), pp. 14144–14151.doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c04754. url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c04754

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    An atomic-scale multi-qubit platform

    Yu Wang et al. “An atomic-scale multi-qubit platform”. In:Science382.6666 (2023), pp. 87–92.doi:10.1126/science.ade5050.url:https://www.science.org/doi/ abs/10.1126/science.ade5050

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    Spatially Resolving Electron Spin Resonance ofπ-Radical in Single-Molecule Magnet

    Ryo Kawaguchi et al. “Spatially Resolving Electron Spin Resonance ofπ-Radical in Single-Molecule Magnet”. In:Nano Letters23.1 (2023), pp. 213–219.doi:10.1021/acs. nanolett.2c04049.url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04049

    2023 doi

  49. [59]

    All-Electrical Driving and Probing of Dressed States in a Single Spin

    Hong T. Bui et al. “All-Electrical Driving and Probing of Dressed States in a Single Spin”. In:ACS Nano18.19 (2024), pp. 12187–12193.doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c00196. url:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c00196

    2024 doi

  50. [60]

    Spin torque–driven electron paramagnetic resonance of a single spin in a pentacene molecule

    Stepan Kovarik et al. “Spin torque–driven electron paramagnetic resonance of a single spin in a pentacene molecule”. In:Science384.6702 (2024), pp. 1368–1373.doi:10.1126/ science . adh4753.url:https : / / www . science . org / doi / abs / 10 . 1126 / science . adh4753. 49

    2024

  51. [61]

    A Quantum Sensor for Atomic-Scale Electric and Magnetic Fields

    Taner Esat et al. “A Quantum Sensor for Atomic-Scale Electric and Magnetic Fields”. In:Nature Nanotechnology19.10 (2024), pp. 1466–1471.doi:10.1038/s41565- 024- 01724-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01724-z

    2024 doi

  52. [62]

    Construction of topological quantum magnets from atomic spins on surfaces

    Hao Wang et al. “Construction of topological quantum magnets from atomic spins on surfaces”. In:Nature Nanotechnology19.12 (2024), pp. 1782–1788.issn: 1748-3395.doi: 10.1038/s41565-024-01775-2.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01775- 2

    2024 doi

  53. [63]

    Xue Zhang et al.Controlling the Exchange Field of Surface Spin Impurities via DC Voltages. 2025. arXiv:2412.03866 [cond-mat.mes-hall].url:https://arxiv.org/ abs/2412.03866

    2025

  54. [64]

    Paul Greule et al.Spin-Electric Control of Individual Molecules on Surfaces. 2025. arXiv: 2507.13699 [cond-mat.mes-hall].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13699

    2025

  55. [65]

    Electrically tunable quantum interference of atomic spins on surfaces

    Hao Wang et al. “Electrically tunable quantum interference of atomic spins on surfaces”. In:Nature Communications16.1 (2025), p. 8988.doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64022-9. url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64022-9

    2025 doi

  56. [66]

    Gregory Czap et al.Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Organic Radicals with Sub- Molecular Resolution. 2025. arXiv:2504 . 18043 [cond-mat.mes-hall].url:https : //arxiv.org/abs/2504.18043

    2025

  57. [67]

    Quantum Spin-Engineering in On-Surface Molecular Ferrimag- nets

    Wantong Huang et al. “Quantum Spin-Engineering in On-Surface Molecular Ferrimag- nets”. In:Nature Communications16.1 (2025), p. 5208.doi:10. 1038 / s41467 - 025- 60409-w.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60409-w

    2025 doi

  58. [68]

    Single-shot readout of the nuclear spin of an on-surface atom

    Evert W. Stolte et al. “Single-shot readout of the nuclear spin of an on-surface atom”. In:Nature Communications16.1 (2025), p. 7785.doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63232-5. url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63232-5

    2025 doi

  59. [69]

    Fingerprints of single nuclear spin energy levels using STM – ENDOR

    Yishay Manassen et al. “Fingerprints of single nuclear spin energy levels using STM – ENDOR”. In:Journal of Magnetic Resonance289 (Apr. 2018), pp. 107–112.issn: 1090- 7807.doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.02.005.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr. 2018.02.005

    2018 doi

  60. [70]

    Vennema et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance on a single atom with a local probe

    Hester G. Vennema et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance on a single atom with a local probe. 2025.doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2512.11652.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11652

    2025 doi

  61. [71]

    Kwan Ho Au-Yeung et al.Atomic-Scale Quantum Control of Single Spin Defects in a Two-Dimensional Semiconductor.2026.arXiv:2602.22301 [cond-mat.mes-hall].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22301

    2026

  62. [72]

    Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltoni- ans

    J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff. “Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltoni- ans”. In:Phys. Rev.149 (2 Sept. 1966), pp. 491–492.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.149.491. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.149.491

    1966 doi

  63. [73]

    A theoretical review on the single-impurity elec- tron spin resonance on surfaces

    Fernando Delgado and Nicolás Lorente. “A theoretical review on the single-impurity elec- tron spin resonance on surfaces”. In:Progress in Surface Science96.2 (2021), p. 100625. issn: 0079-6816.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2021.100625.url: https://www.sciencedirect.co...

    2021 doi

  64. [74]

    On the magnetic bistability of small iron clusters used in scanning tunneling microscopy tip preparation

    Jisoo Yu et al. “On the magnetic bistability of small iron clusters used in scanning tunneling microscopy tip preparation”. In:New Journal of Physics25.11 (Nov. 2023), p. 113035.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad0a4e.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367- 2630/ad0a4e

    2023 doi

  65. [75]

    Contrasting exchange-field and spin-transfer torque driving mechanisms in all-electric electron spin resonance

    Jose Reina-Gálvez et al. “Contrasting exchange-field and spin-transfer torque driving mechanisms in all-electric electron spin resonance”. In:Phys. Rev. B112 (24 Dec. 2025), p.245408.doi:10.1103/nzhr-syhs.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/nzhr- syhs. 50

    2025 doi

  66. [76]

    Amplifier for scanning tunneling microscopy at MHz frequencies

    K. M. Bastiaans et al. “Amplifier for scanning tunneling microscopy at MHz frequencies”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments89.9 (Sept. 2018), p. 093709.issn: 0034-6748.doi: 10.1063/1.5043267. eprint:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article-pdf/doi/10. 1063/1.5043267/16140624/0937...

    2018 doi

  67. [77]

    Harnessing the Quantum Behavior of Spins on Surfaces

    Yi Chen, Yujeong Bae, and Andreas J. Heinrich. “Harnessing the Quantum Behavior of Spins on Surfaces”. In:Advanced Materials35.27 (2023), p. 2107534.doi:https://doi. org/10.1002/adma.202107534. eprint:https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.202107534.url...

    2023 doi

  68. [79]

    Exchange mechanism for electron paramagnetic resonance of individual adatoms

    J. L. Lado, A. Ferrón, and J. Fernández-Rossier. “Exchange mechanism for electron paramagnetic resonance of individual adatoms”. In:Physical Review B96.20 (Nov. 2017), p. 205420.issn: 24699969.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205420.url:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205420

    2017 doi

  69. [81]

    Longitudinal and transverse electron paramagnetic resonance in a scanning tunneling microscope

    Tom S. Seifert et al. “Longitudinal and transverse electron paramagnetic resonance in a scanning tunneling microscope”. In:Science Advances6.40 (Oct. 2020), pp. 1–12.issn: 23752548.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc5511.url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/sciadv.abc5511

    2020 doi

  70. [82]

    Spin excitations and correlations in scanning tunneling spectroscopy

    Markus Ternes. “Spin excitations and correlations in scanning tunneling spectroscopy”. In:New Journal of Physics17.6 (June 2015), p. 063016.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/ 6/063016.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/063016

    2015 doi

  71. [83]

    Theory of electron spin resonance in scanning tunneling mi- croscopy

    Christian R. Ast et al. “Theory of electron spin resonance in scanning tunneling mi- croscopy”.In:Phys. Rev. Res.6(2May2024),p.023126.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch. 6.023126.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023126

    doi

  72. [84]

    Spin transfer torque in- duced paramagnetic resonance

    Alexey M. Shakirov, Alexey N. Rubtsov, and Pedro Ribeiro. “Spin transfer torque in- duced paramagnetic resonance”. In:Phys. Rev. B99 (5 Feb. 2019), p. 054434.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 99 . 054434.url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB.99.054434

    2019

  73. [86]

    Theory of Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

    Lyuzhou Ye, Xiao Zheng, and Xin Xu. “Theory of Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (17 Oct. 2024), p. 176201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.176201.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.176201

    2024 doi

  74. [87]

    The Role of Magnetic Anisotropy in the Kondo Effect

    Alexander F. Otte et al. “The Role of Magnetic Anisotropy in the Kondo Effect”. In: Nature Physics4.11 (2008), pp. 847–850.doi:10.1038/nphys1072.url:https://doi. org/10.1038/nphys1072. 51

    2008 doi

  75. [88]

    Spin Excitations of a Kondo-Screened Atom Coupled to a Second Magnetic Atom

    A. F. Otte et al. “Spin Excitations of a Kondo-Screened Atom Coupled to a Second Magnetic Atom”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (10 Sept. 2009), p. 107203.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.107203.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.107203

    2009 doi

  76. [89]

    Cotunneling mechanism for all-electrical electron spin resonance of single adsorbed atoms

    J. Reina Gálvez et al. “Cotunneling mechanism for all-electrical electron spin resonance of single adsorbed atoms”. In:Phys. Rev. B100 (3 July 2019), p. 035411.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.100.035411.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100. 035411

    2019 doi

  77. [90]

    Theoryoftransportthroughquantum- dot spin valves in the weak-coupling regime

    MatthiasBraun,JürgenKönig,andJanMartinek.“Theoryoftransportthroughquantum- dot spin valves in the weak-coupling regime”. In:Phys. Rev. B70 (19 Nov. 2004), p. 195345.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195345.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.70.195345

    2004 doi

  78. [91]

    Hanle effect in transport through single atoms in spin-polarized STM

    Piotr Busz et al. “Hanle effect in transport through single atoms in spin-polarized STM”. In:Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials588 (2023), p. 171465.issn: 0304- 8853.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171465.url:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

    2023 doi

  79. [92]

    Zero-bias anomaly indicating exchange interaction and spin readout in a canted quantum dot spin valve

    Piotr Busz, Damian Tomaszewski, and Jan Martinek. “Zero-bias anomaly indicating exchange interaction and spin readout in a canted quantum dot spin valve”. In:Phys. Rev. B111 (12 Mar. 2025), p. 125415.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 111 . 125415.url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103...

    2025 doi

  80. [93]

    Tunnel magnetoresistance of quantum dots coupled to ferro- magnetic leads in the sequential and cotunneling regimes

    Ireneusz Weymann et al. “Tunnel magnetoresistance of quantum dots coupled to ferro- magnetic leads in the sequential and cotunneling regimes”. In:Phys. Rev. B72 (11 Sept. 2005), p. 115334.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.115334.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.115334

    2005 doi

  81. [94]

    Nonequilibrium diagrammatic technique for Hubbard Green functions

    Feng Chen, Maicol A. Ochoa, and Michael Galperin. “Nonequilibrium diagrammatic technique for Hubbard Green functions”. In:The Journal of Chemical Physics146.9 (Nov. 2016), p. 092301.issn: 0021-9606.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 4965825. eprint:https : / / pubs . aip . org / aip / jcp / ...

    2016 doi

  82. [95]

    Distribution of waiting times between electron cotunneling events

    Samuel L. Rudge and Daniel S. Kosov. “Distribution of waiting times between electron cotunneling events”. In:Phys. Rev. B98 (24 Dec. 2018), p. 245402.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB.98.245402.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98. 245402

    2018 doi

  83. [96]

    Nonrenewal statistics in quantum transport from the perspective of first-passage and waiting time distributions

    Samuel L. Rudge and Daniel S. Kosov. “Nonrenewal statistics in quantum transport from the perspective of first-passage and waiting time distributions”. In:Phys. Rev. B99 (11 Mar. 2019), p. 115426.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 99 . 115426.url:https : //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phy...

    2019 doi

  84. [97]

    Periodic conductance oscillations in the single-electron tunneling transis- tor

    D.V. Averin. “Periodic conductance oscillations in the single-electron tunneling transis- tor”. In:Physica B: Condensed Matter194-196 (1994), pp. 979–980.issn: 0921-4526. doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0921 - 4526(94 ) 90819 - 2.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect.com...

    1994

  85. [98]

    Thermopower of single-molecule devices

    Jens Koch et al. “Thermopower of single-molecule devices”. In:Phys. Rev. B70 (19 Nov. 2004), p. 195107.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195107.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195107

    2004 doi

  86. [99]

    Theory of the Franck-Condon blockade regime

    Jens Koch, Felix von Oppen, and A. V. Andreev. “Theory of the Franck-Condon blockade regime”. In:Phys. Rev. B74 (20 Nov. 2006), p. 205438.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74. 205438.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.205438. 52

    2006 doi

  87. [100]

    Cotunneling thermopower of single electron transistors

    M. Turek and K. A. Matveev. “Cotunneling thermopower of single electron transistors”. In:Phys. Rev. B65 (11 Mar. 2002), p. 115332.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.115332. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.115332

    2002 doi

  88. [101]

    Modeling of cotunneling in quantum dot systems

    Jonas Nyvold Pedersen and Andreas Wacker. “Modeling of cotunneling in quantum dot systems”. In:Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures42.3 (2010). Pro- ceedings of the international conference Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermo- dynamics FQMT ’08, pp. 595...

    2010

  89. [102]

    Influence of radio-frequency voltage on electron spin resonance spec- troscopy in scanning tunneling microscopy†

    Jiaan Cao et al. “Influence of radio-frequency voltage on electron spin resonance spec- troscopy in scanning tunneling microscopy†”. In:Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics 38.4 (Aug. 2025), pp. 375–381.issn: 1674-0068.doi:10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2409127. url:https://doi.org/10.1...

    2025 doi

  90. [103]

    Microscopic Mechanism of Coexisting Electron Spin Resonance and Kondo Resonance in a Single Iron Phthalocyanine Molecule

    Qi Chen et al. “Microscopic Mechanism of Coexisting Electron Spin Resonance and Kondo Resonance in a Single Iron Phthalocyanine Molecule”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (8 Aug. 2025), p. 086403.doi:10.1103/cgq3-dyxb.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/cgq3-dyxb

    2025 doi

  91. [105]

    Many-body nonequilibrium effects in all-electric electron spin resonance

    Jose Reina-Gálvez, Christoph Wolf, and Nicolás Lorente. “Many-body nonequilibrium effects in all-electric electron spin resonance”. In:Phys. Rev. B107 (23 June 2023), p. 235404.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235404.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235404

    2023 doi

  92. [106]

    Relationbetweenscattering-matrixandKeldysh formalisms for quantum transport driven by time-periodic fields

    LilianaArracheaandMichaelMoskalets.“Relationbetweenscattering-matrixandKeldysh formalisms for quantum transport driven by time-periodic fields”. In:Phys. Rev. B74 (24 Dec. 2006), p. 245322.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245322.url:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245322

    2006 doi

  93. [107]

    Model for electron spin resonance in STM noise

    Alvaro Caso, Baruch Horovitz, and Liliana Arrachea. “Model for electron spin resonance in STM noise”. In:Physical Review B89.7 (Feb. 2014).issn: 1098-0121, 1550-235X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.075412.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.89.075412(visited on 07/31/2018)

    2014 doi

  94. [108]

    Time-dependent transport in interacting and noninteracting resonant-tunneling systems

    Antti-Pekka Jauho, Ned S. Wingreen, and Yigal Meir. “Time-dependent transport in interacting and noninteracting resonant-tunneling systems”. In:Phys. Rev. B50 (8 Aug. 1994), pp. 5528–5544.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5528.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5528

    1994 doi

  95. [109]

    Unraveling spin entanglement using quantum gates with scan- ning tunneling microscopy-driven electron spin resonance

    Eric D. Switzer et al. “Unraveling spin entanglement using quantum gates with scan- ning tunneling microscopy-driven electron spin resonance”. In:Nanoscale Adv.(2025), pp. 8048–8057.doi:10 . 1039 / D5NA00421G.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1039 / D5NA00421G

    2025

  96. [110]

    (Accessed on 2024-12-12)

    Nicolás Lorente et al.TimeESR: An STM-ESR code solving a QME in the time do- main.https://github.com/qphensurf/TimeESR. (Accessed on 2024-12-12). 2022.url: https://github.com/qphensurf/TimeESR

    2024

  97. [111]

    Transition-Metal Phthalocyanines as Versatile Building Blocks for Molecular Qubits on Surfaces

    Corina Urdaniz et al. “Transition-Metal Phthalocyanines as Versatile Building Blocks for Molecular Qubits on Surfaces”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry A129.9 (Mar. 2025), pp. 2173–2181.issn: 1089-5639.doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07627.url:https: //doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07627. 53

    2025 doi

  98. [112]

    Multiphoton Process Observed in the Interaction of Microwave Fields with the Tunneling between Superconductor Films

    P. K. Tien and J. P. Gordon. “Multiphoton Process Observed in the Interaction of Microwave Fields with the Tunneling between Superconductor Films”. In:Phys. Rev. 129 (2 Jan. 1963), pp. 647–651.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.129.647.url:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.129.647

    1963 doi

  99. [113]

    Quantum electrodynamic treatment of photon- assisted tunneling

    C. L. Foden and D. M. Whittaker. “Quantum electrodynamic treatment of photon- assisted tunneling”. In:Phys. Rev. B58 (19 Nov. 1998), pp. 12617–12620.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.58.12617.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.12617

    1998 doi

  100. [114]

    Driven quantum tunneling

    Milena Grifoni and Peter Hänggi. “Driven quantum tunneling”. In:Physics Reports 304.5 (1998), pp. 229–354.issn: 0370-1573.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370- 1573(98)00022- 2.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0370157398000222

    1998 doi

  101. [115]

    Generalized open quantum system approach for the electron paramagnetic resonance of magnetic atoms

    Gal Shavit, Baruch Horovitz, and Moshe Goldstein. “Generalized open quantum system approach for the electron paramagnetic resonance of magnetic atoms”. In:Phys. Rev. B99 (19 May 2019), p. 195433.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 99 . 195433.url:https : //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys...

    2019 doi

  102. [116]

    Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.isbn: 978-0-19-852063-4

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.isbn: 978-0-19-852063-4

    2002

  103. [117]

    Protocol for certifying entanglement in surface spin systems using a scanning tunneling microscope

    Rik Broekhoven et al. “Protocol for certifying entanglement in surface spin systems using a scanning tunneling microscope”. In:npj Quantum Information10.1 (2024), p. 92.doi: 10.1038/s41534-024-00888-9.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00888- 9

    2024 doi

  104. [118]

    Fundamental limitations in Lindblad descriptions of systems weakly coupled to baths

    Devashish Tupkary et al. “Fundamental limitations in Lindblad descriptions of systems weakly coupled to baths”. In:Phys. Rev. A105 (3 Mar. 2022), p. 032208.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.105.032208.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.105. 032208

    2022 doi

  105. [119]

    Origin of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy and Large Orbital Moment in Fe Atoms on MgO

    S. Baumann et al. “Origin of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy and Large Orbital Moment in Fe Atoms on MgO”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (23 Dec. 2015), p. 237202.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.237202.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.237202

    2015 doi

  106. [120]

    Efficient Ab Initio Multiplet Calculations for Magnetic Adatoms on MgO

    Christoph Wolf et al. “Efficient Ab Initio Multiplet Calculations for Magnetic Adatoms on MgO”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry A124.11 (2020). PMID: 32098473, pp. 2318–2327.doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b10749. eprint:https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jpca.9b10749.url:https://doi.org...

    2020 doi

  107. [121]

    Control of the millisecond spin lifetime of an electrically probed atom

    William Paul et al. “Control of the millisecond spin lifetime of an electrically probed atom”. In:Nature Physics13.4 (Apr. 2017), pp. 403–407.issn: 1745-2481.doi:10 . 1038/nphys3965.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3965

    2017 doi

  108. [122]

    Quantum coherence and relaxation of single spins on surfaces probed by ESR-STM

    Dalong Xuan et al. “Quantum coherence and relaxation of single spins on surfaces probed by ESR-STM”. In:Nanoscale17 (45 2025), pp. 26024–26032.doi:10.1039/D5NR03773E. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D5NR03773E

    2025 doi

  109. [123]

    Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second

    Nir Bar-Gill et al. “Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second”. In:Nature Communications4.1 (2013), p. 1743.doi:10.1038/ncomms2771.url:https: //doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2771

    2013 doi

  110. [124]

    A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits

    P. Krantz et al. “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits”. In:Applied Physics Reviews6.2 (June 2019), p. 021318.issn: 1931-9401.doi:10.1063/1.5089550. url:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550

    2019 doi

  111. [125]

    Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges

    Colin D. Bruzewicz et al. “Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges”. In:Applied Physics Reviews6.2 (May 2019), p. 021314.issn: 1931-9401.doi:10.1063/ 1.5088164.url:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164. 54

    2019 doi

  112. [126]

    A singlet-triplet hole spin qubit in planar Ge

    Daniel Jirovec et al. “A singlet-triplet hole spin qubit in planar Ge”. In:Nature Materials 20.8 (2021), pp. 1106–1112.doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01022-2.url:https://doi. org/10.1038/s41563-021-01022-2

    2021 doi

  113. [127]

    Efficient driving of a spin qubit using single-atom magnets

    Jose Reina-Gálvez et al. “Efficient driving of a spin qubit using single-atom magnets”. In:Phys. Rev. Res.7 (4 Dec. 2025), p. L042055.doi:10.1103/qpz5-s6fw.url:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/qpz5-s6fw

    2025 doi

  114. [129]

    Krotov: A Python implementation of Krotov’s method for quan- tum optimal control

    Michael H. Goerz et al. “Krotov: A Python implementation of Krotov’s method for quan- tum optimal control”. In:SciPost Phys.7 (2019), p. 080.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys. 7.6.080.url:https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.6.080

    2019 doi

  115. [130]

    Spin entanglement via scanning tunneling micro- scope current

    Baruch Horovitz and Carsten Henkel. “Spin entanglement via scanning tunneling micro- scope current”. In:Phys. Rev. B104 (8 Aug. 2021), p. L081405.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 104.L081405.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L081405

    2021 doi

  116. [131]

    Single-shot readout of the nuclear spin of an on-surface atom

    Evert W. Stolte et al. “Single-shot readout of the nuclear spin of an on-surface atom”. In:Nature Communications16.1 (Aug. 2025).issn: 2041-1723.doi:10.1038/s41467- 025-63232-5.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63232-5

    2025 doi

  117. [132]

    Arthur Schweiger and Gunnar Jeschke.Principles of pulse electron paramagnetic reso- nance. en. London, England: Oxford University Press, Oct. 2001

    2001

  118. [133]

    Controlling the state of quantum spins with electric currents

    Sebastian Loth et al. “Controlling the state of quantum spins with electric currents”. In: Nature Physics6.5 (May 2010), pp. 340–344.issn: 1745-2481.doi:10.1038/nphys1616. url:https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1616

    2010 doi

  119. [134]

    Quantum state manipulation of single atom magnets using the hyperfine interaction

    Patrick Robert Forrester et al. “Quantum state manipulation of single atom magnets using the hyperfine interaction”. In:Physical Review B100.18 (Nov. 2019).issn: 2469- 9969.doi:10 . 1103 / physrevb . 100 . 180405.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB.100.180405

    2019

  120. [135]

    Electrical Readout of Individual Nuclear Spin Trajectories in a Single- Molecule Magnet Spin Transistor

    S. Thiele et al. “Electrical Readout of Individual Nuclear Spin Trajectories in a Single- Molecule Magnet Spin Transistor”. In:Physical Review Letters111.3 (July 2013).issn: 1079-7114.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.037203.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.111.037203

    2013 doi

  121. [136]

    Noisy qudit vs multiple qubits: conditions on gate efficiency for enhancing fidelity

    Denis Janković et al. “Noisy qudit vs multiple qubits: conditions on gate efficiency for enhancing fidelity”. In:npj Quantum Information10.1 (June 2024).issn: 2056-6387.doi: 10.1038/s41534- 024- 00829- 6.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41534- 024- 00829-6

    2024 doi

  122. [137]

    Operating Quantum States in Single Magnetic Molecules: Implemen- tation of Grover’s Quantum Algorithm

    C. Godfrin et al. “Operating Quantum States in Single Magnetic Molecules: Implemen- tation of Grover’s Quantum Algorithm”. In:Physical Review Letters119.18 (Nov. 2017). issn: 1079-7114.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.187702.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.187702

    2017 doi

  123. [138]

    Designing quantum error correction codes for prac- tical spin qudit systems

    Sumin Lim and Arzhang Ardavan. “Designing quantum error correction codes for prac- tical spin qudit systems”. In:Physical Review A112.2 (Aug. 2025).issn: 2469-9934.doi: 10.1103/7q6l-d4qh.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/7q6l-d4qh

    2025 doi

  124. [139]

    Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography

    Matthias Steffen et al. “Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography”. In:Science313.5792 (2006), pp. 1423–1425.doi:10. 1126 / science . 1130886.url:https : / / www . science . org / doi / abs / 10 . 1126 / science.1130886. 55

    2006

  125. [140]

    Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quan- tum dot hybrid qubit

    Dohun Kim et al. “Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quan- tum dot hybrid qubit”. In:Nature511.7507 (2014), pp. 70–74.issn: 1476-4687.doi: 10.1038/nature13407

    2014 doi

  126. [141]

    Tomography of entangling two-qubit logic operations in exchange- coupled donor electron spin qubits

    Holly G. Stemp et al. “Tomography of entangling two-qubit logic operations in exchange- coupled donor electron spin qubits”. In:Nature Communications15.1 (2024), p. 8415. issn: 2041-1723.doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52795-4

    2024 doi

  127. [142]

    Fast Quantum State Tomography in the Nitrogen Vacancy Center of Diamond

    Jingfu Zhang, Swathi S. Hegde, and Dieter Suter. “Fast Quantum State Tomography in the Nitrogen Vacancy Center of Diamond”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (9 Feb. 2023), p. 090801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.090801.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.090801. 56

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.