pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18181 · v1 · pith:3NMT7PGDnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.AI· cs.CY

IUU+DB: Tracking Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, Seafood Fraud, and Labor Abuse through LLM-driven Information Extraction

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 22:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CY
keywords IUU fishingillegal fishingLLMinformation extractiondatabaseseafood fraudlabor abusefisheries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Large language models can organize scattered documents into a structured global database of illegal fishing, fraud, and labor abuse.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines IUU+ as an expanded category covering traditional illegal fishing plus seafood fraud and labor abuses in the supply chain. It presents IUU+DB, an LLM-based pipeline that ingests mixed documents, decides which ones describe incidents, pulls out actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, and enforcement results, then supports deduplication and trend analysis. If the system works as described, it would turn fragmented reports into usable data on frequency, geography, and patterns, helping research, industry risk checks, and government enforcement.

Core claim

IUU+DB is a large language model driven system for building a global incident database of IUU+ activity. The system ingests heterogeneous documents, classifies whether they describe relevant incidents, extracts key data elements such as actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, and enforcement outcomes, and supports deduplication and trend analysis. Case studies and validation results show that IUU+DB can help organize fragmented evidence, surface geographic and behavioral hotspots, support fisheries-domain specific research in academia and non-government organizations, assist source and species risk assessments for industry, and provide support for policy implementation and targeted

What carries the argument

LLM pipeline that classifies documents for relevance and extracts structured fields (actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, enforcement outcomes) from heterogeneous sources.

If this is right

  • Organizes fragmented evidence of IUU+ incidents into a coherent, queryable database.
  • Surfaces geographic and behavioral hotspots in fishing violations and related crimes.
  • Supports domain-specific research by academia and non-government organizations.
  • Assists industry with source and species risk assessments.
  • Aids government agencies in policy implementation and targeted enforcement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Linking the database to ongoing news or satellite feeds could enable earlier detection of emerging incidents.
  • Patterns across extracted fields might reveal previously unquantified connections between fishing violations and labor or fraud cases.
  • The same extraction approach could be tested on documents about other environmental or trade crimes.

Load-bearing premise

Large language models can classify documents and extract accurate structured details about complex incidents from varied sources without substantial errors or biases.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of the system's classifications and extracted fields against human labels on a held-out sample of documents, measuring error rates in incident detection and field accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18181 by Bella Sullivan, Henry Bodwell, Hong Yang, Jessica Gephart, John C. Simeone, Kelvin Gorospe, Lana Huang, Molly Masterton, Naren Ramakrishnan, Sandy Aylesworth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Framework of IUU+DB. these generative IE methods have notable issues when it comes to reliability and reproducibility [7]. To account for this, earlier work has looked at ways to limit hallucination through schema and grounded ontologies [15, 21]. Other approaches extract the exact supporting context alongside the generative IE to evaluate grounding against after the extraction [39], although this can be c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Web UI of the IUU+DB system. DOJ [51], Oceana [30], US NOAA Fisheries [29], and Undercurrent News [49]. To create queries for candidate source discovery, we used the previously defined IUU+ types and behaviors to build queries that would capture the wide range of behaviors (see Appendix A). For webscraping, we separated websites into two groups by how specific the sites were to the fish-seafood sector. For… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: KDE Group Extraction Rate. 4.2 KDE Prevalence Analysis For a given incident, IUU+DB extracts roughly 20% of the fields in the full schema; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: KDE Group Extraction Rate: Aquaculture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: KDEs extracted by source. have restrictions on rehosting under their Terms of Service. When paywalled articles were used, we accessed them through legitimate paid subscriptions or purchased access; the system does not scrape or redistribute protected content without authorization. To respect publisher rights and revenue models, IUU+DB does not show full article text to end users. Instead, users see a summa… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU) traditionally refers to fishing activities that violate applicable laws or occur in areas that lack applicable laws. We propose the term IUU+ to capture a broader suite of fisheries sector environmental and associated supply chain trade-related crimes and behaviors. Although IUU+ activity is widely recognized as a serious threat to marine ecosystems, markets, and livelihoods, a quantitative understanding of these incidents, e.g., their frequency, geography, species, actors, and patterns in the type of illicit activity, remains difficult to obtain. We propose IUU+DB, a large language model driven system for building a global incident database of IUU+ activity. The system ingests heterogeneous documents, classifies whether they describe relevant incidents, extracts key data elements such as actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, and enforcement outcomes, and supports deduplication and trend analysis. Case studies and validation results show that IUU+DB can help organize fragmented evidence, surface geographic and behavioral hotspots, support fisheries-domain specific research in academia and non-government organizations, assist source and species risk assessments for industry, and provide support for policy implementation and targeted enforcement efforts to government agencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes IUU+DB, an LLM-driven pipeline that ingests heterogeneous documents on IUU+ activities (illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing plus seafood fraud and labor abuse), classifies relevant incidents, extracts structured fields including actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, and enforcement outcomes, performs deduplication, and supports trend analysis. It asserts that case studies and validation results demonstrate the system's ability to organize evidence, identify geographic and behavioral hotspots, and aid research, industry risk assessments, and government policy/enforcement.

Significance. A reliable system for structuring fragmented IUU+ data would address a recognized gap in quantitative fisheries-crime research and could support evidence-based interventions in marine conservation and supply-chain governance. The manuscript's contribution is difficult to assess, however, because the central utility claims rest on unquantified extraction performance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'case studies and validation results show that IUU+DB can help organize fragmented evidence, surface geographic and behavioral hotspots, support fisheries-domain specific research...' is unsupported by any reported quantitative metrics (precision, recall, F1, error rates), validation-set size, annotation protocol, or comparison to human gold labels. This is load-bearing because all downstream uses (deduplication, hotspot detection, risk assessment) presuppose reliable classification and extraction from heterogeneous sources.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and the opportunity to clarify the manuscript. We address the concern about unsupported claims in the abstract below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'case studies and validation results show that IUU+DB can help organize fragmented evidence, surface geographic and behavioral hotspots, support fisheries-domain specific research...' is unsupported by any reported quantitative metrics (precision, recall, F1, error rates), validation-set size, annotation protocol, or comparison to human gold labels. This is load-bearing because all downstream uses (deduplication, hotspot detection, risk assessment) presuppose reliable classification and extraction from heterogeneous sources.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's language implies quantitative validation results that are not provided in the manuscript. The presented case studies are qualitative illustrations of the pipeline's outputs on real documents rather than a formal evaluation against gold labels. In the revision we will edit the abstract to remove the reference to 'validation results' and describe the case studies more precisely as demonstrations of functionality. We will also add an explicit limitations statement noting the absence of quantitative extraction metrics in this work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; descriptive systems paper with no derivations or fitted parameters

full rationale

This is a systems-description paper proposing IUU+DB for LLM-driven document classification and extraction. No equations, mathematical derivations, parameter fittings, or prediction steps appear in the abstract or described content. Central claims rest on case studies and validation results whose accuracy is an empirical question, not a reduction to inputs by construction. Absence of quantitative metrics is a validation gap rather than circularity. No self-citation chains or ansatzes are invoked to justify any derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified reliability of LLM-based classification and extraction from heterogeneous documents; this is treated as a domain assumption rather than demonstrated capability.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Large language models can be prompted to accurately classify documents and extract structured information such as actors, locations, species, vessels, violations, and enforcement outcomes from heterogeneous sources.
    This assumption underpins the entire IUU+DB pipeline described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1334 out tokens · 49033 ms · 2026-06-26T22:12:03.954646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    AFP. 2022. Fish trade’s murky waters cloud double murder in Ama- zon. https://www.digitaljournal.com/world/fish-trades-murky-waters-cloud- double-murder-in-amazon/article Accessed: 13 May 2026

  2. [2]

    PLOS ONE7(6), 38869 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone

    David J. Agnew, John Pearce, Ganapathiraju Pramod, Tom Peatman, Reg Watson, John R. Beddington, and Tony J. Pitcher. 2009. Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing.PLOS ONE4, 2 (Feb. 2009), e4570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0004570

  3. [3]

    Kathleen Auld, Raphael Baumler, Deukhoon Peter Han, and Francis Neat. 2023. The collective effort of the United Nations Specialised Agencies to tackle the global problem of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.Ocean & Coastal Management243 (Sept. 2023), 106720. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023. 106720

  4. [4]

    Dyhia Belhabib. 2026. Spyglass: Global Fishing Crimes Map. http://spyglass.fish/ IUU+DB: Tracking Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, Seafood Fraud, and Labor Abuse through LLM-driven Information Extraction Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA

  5. [5]

    Talisic, Tito P

    Benjie B. Talisic, Tito P. Tan. 2022. 3 nabbed for illegal fishing in Bohol. https:// www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/local-news/3-nabbed-for-illegal-fishing-in-bohol Ac- cessed: 13 May 2026

  6. [6]

    Blaha, A

    F. Blaha, A. Vincent, and Y. Piedrahita. 2023.Guidance document: Advancing end-to-end traceability. Critical tracking events and key data elements along capture fisheries and aquaculture value chains. FAO, Rome, Italy. doi:10.4060/cc5484en

  7. [7]

    Anthea Dathe, Kiran Hoffmann, and Aline Mangold. 2026. Useful for Ex- ploration, Risky for Precision: Evaluating AI Tools in Academic Research. arXiv:2605.10125 [cs.AI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10125

  8. [8]

    Environment Agency of the United Kingdom. 2024. 4 licence dodgers receive fines of £710 for fishing illegally. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/4-licence- dodgers-receive-fines-of-690-for-fishing-illegally Accessed: 13 May 2026

  9. [9]

    2025.Import control schemes in major seafood markets: a com- parative study of key data elements in the European Union, the United States, Japan and the Republic of Korea

    EU IUU Coalition. 2025.Import control schemes in major seafood markets: a com- parative study of key data elements in the European Union, the United States, Japan and the Republic of Korea. Technical Report. EU IUU Coalition. 33 pages. https: //www.iuuwatch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/CDS-KDE-Study-FINAL.pdf

  10. [10]

    European Commission. 2026. EU rules to combat IUU fishing. https://oceans- and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/fisheries/rules/illegal-fishing_en

  11. [11]

    Firstpost.com. 2023. Sri Lanka arrests 14 Indian fishermen for ’poaching’ in its waters, in all 240 so far this year. https://www.firstpost.com/world/sri- lanka-arrests-14-indian-fishermen-for-poaching-in-its-waters-in-all-240-so- far-this-year-13516332.html Accessed: 13 May 2026

  12. [12]

    Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2023. Owners of Canadian fishing vessel Ocean Provider fined and over 30,000 pounds of tuna seized. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2023/09/owners-of- canadian-fishing-vessel-ocean-provider-fined-and-over-30000-pounds- of-tuna-seized.html Accessed: 13 May 2026

  13. [13]

    GDST. 2026. Global Dialogue on Seafood Traceability. https://thegdst.org/

  14. [14]

    Glaser, Paige M

    Sarah M. Glaser, Paige M. Roberts, and Kaija J. Hurlburt. 2019. Foreign Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing in Somali Waters Perpetuates Conflict. Frontiers in Marine Science6 (Dec. 2019). doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00704

  15. [15]

    Harry Caufield, Dalal E

    Ryan Y Hodgson, Steven A Robinson, Amélie C Boutin, Felix K Chan, Joseph R Bennett, Rachel T Buxton, J. Harry Caufield, Dalal E. L Hanna, and Tim Alamen- ciak. 2026. Assessing the effectiveness of ontology-grounded AI term extraction using OntoGPT for environmental evidence synthesis.Environmental Evidence (2026)

  16. [16]

    Interoperability

    Gilles E. Hosch and Shelley C. Clarke. 2025. Advancing the Crucial Notion of “Interoperability” in Catch Documentation Schemes.Fisheries Management and Ecology(2025). doi:10.1111/fme.12812

  17. [17]

    Ian Urbina. 2024. Two men charged with getting early illegal jump on floridas spiny lobster season. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-saya-de- malha-bank-seagrass-carbon-sink-fishing-threats/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  18. [18]

    Island.lk. 2023. Navy detain two Indian trawlers 25 fisherman poaching in Sri Lankan waters. https://island.lk/navy-detain-two-indian-trawlers-25- fishermen-poaching-in-sri-lanka-waters/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  19. [19]

    Keith Doucette. 2023. Officers seize $500,000 worth of baby eels outside Halifax amid fishery closure. https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/atlantic/officers- seize-500-000-worth-of-baby-eels-outside-halifax-amid-fishery-closure/ article_0d2c90ef-b7b5-5074-bdf6-c2ae340bcbe0.html Accessed: 13 May 2026

  20. [20]

    Petr Knoth, Drahomira Herrmannova, Matteo Cancellieri, Lucas Anastasiou, Nancy Pontika, Samuel Pearce, Bikash Gyawali, and David Pride. 2023. CORE: A global aggregation service for open access papers.Nature Scientific Data10, 1 (June 2023), 366

  21. [21]

    Sha Li, Ayush Sadekar, Nathan Self, Yiqi Su, Lars Andersland, Mira Chaplin, Annabel Zhang, Hyoju Yang, James B Henderson, Krista Wigginton, et al. 2025. Exploring LLMs for Scientific Information Extraction Using The SciEx Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10004(2025). doi:10.1186/s13750-026-00381-0

  22. [22]

    Luque and C

    Gloria M. Luque and C. Josh Donlan. 2019. The characterization of seafood mislabeling: A global meta-analysis.Biological Conservation236 (Aug. 2019), 556–570. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.006

  23. [23]

    Marshall, Colin T

    Benjamin M. Marshall, Colin T. Strine, Meredith L. Gore, Evan A. Eskew, Oliver C. Stringham, Pedro Cardoso, Sebastian Chekunov, Freyja Watters, Caro- line Fukushima, Pablo García-Díaz, James S. Sinclair, Michael F. Tlusty, Ryan J. Almeida, Jose W. Valdez, and Alice C. Hughes. 2025. Mapping the global dimen- sions of US wildlife imports.Current Biology35, ...

  24. [24]

    2017.Transnational Crime and the Developing World

    Channing May-Mavrellis. 2017.Transnational Crime and the Developing World. Technical Report. Global Financial Integrity. 166 pages. https://gfintegrity.org/ report/transnational-crime-and-the-developing-world/

  25. [25]

    MongaBay. 2026. https://mongabay.org/ Accessed: 2 November 2025

  26. [26]

    NewsAPI.ai. 2026. Real-time and Historical News Data. https://newsapi.ai Accessed: 2 November 2025

  27. [27]

    2024.Action Plan to Improve the U.S

    NOAA Fisheries. 2024.Action Plan to Improve the U.S. Seafood Import Monitoring Program. Technical Report. NOAA. 4 pages. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/ 2024-11/SIMP-Action-Plan_final.pdf

  28. [28]

    NOAA Fisheries. 2025. Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP). https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/international/international-affairs/seafood- import-monitoring-program Archive Location: International

  29. [29]

    NOAA Fisheries. 2026. United States National Oceanic and Atmostsperic Admin- istration National Marine Fisheries Service. https://fisheries.noaa.gov Accessed: 2 November 2025

  30. [30]

    Oceana. 2026. https://oceana.org Accessed: 2 November 2025

  31. [31]

    Goucher, Adam Perelman, and Aditya Ramesh; et al

    OpenAI, Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P. Goucher, Adam Perelman, and Aditya Ramesh; et al. 2024. GPT-4o System Card. arXiv:2410.21276 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276

  32. [32]

    OpenAI, Aaditya Singh, Adam Fry, Adam Perelman, Adam Tart, Adi Ganesh, Ahmed El-Kishky, Aidan McLaughlin, and Aiden Low; et al. 2026. OpenAI GPT-5 System Card. arXiv:2601.03267 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03267

  33. [33]

    Krista Opsahl-Ong, Michael J Ryan, Josh Purtell, David Broman, Christo- pher Potts, Matei Zaharia, and Omar Khattab. 2024. Optimizing In- structions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs. arXiv:2406.11695 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11695

  34. [34]

    Patrick Gouldsbrough. 2022. County Durham man fined for killing fish with spear in River Wear. https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/20069085.county- durham-man-fined-killing-fish-spear-river-wear/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  35. [35]

    Schnurr, Myles de Jong, Maya Duff, and Kate Swanson

    Daniel Salas, Abdirahim Sheik Heile, Matthew A. Schnurr, Myles de Jong, Maya Duff, and Kate Swanson. 2026. Seas of unfreedom: A scoping review of labour exploitation as a structural feature of global fisheries.Marine Policy191 (Sept. 2026), 107147. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107147

  36. [36]

    SerpAPI.com. 2025. Google Scholar API. https://serpapi.com/ Accessed: 2 November 2025

  37. [37]

    2018.Casting a Wider Net: The Security Implications of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing

    Amanda Shaver and Sally Yozell. 2018.Casting a Wider Net: The Security Implications of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing. Technical Report. The Stimson Center. 40 pages. https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special- interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/Stimson- %20Casting%20a%20Wider%20Net.pdf

  38. [38]

    John C. Simeone. 2026.U.S. Imports of Fish and Seafood: An Evaluation of Coverage under the Seafood Import Monitoring Program. Technical Report. U.S. IUU Fishing & Labor Rights Coalition. 64 pages. https://www.iuufishing-laborrights.org/ simp-coverage-report

  39. [39]

    Spillias, K

    S. Spillias, K. M. Ollerhead, M. Andreotta, R. Annand-Jones, F. Boschetti, J. Duggan, D. B. Karcher, C. Paris, R. J. Shellock, and R. Trebilco. 2025. Evaluating generative AI for qualitative data extraction in community-based fisheries management literature.Environmental Evidence(2025)

  40. [40]

    Stringham, Stephanie Moncayo, Eilish Thomas, Sarah Heinrich, Adam Toomes, Jacob Maher, Katherine G

    Oliver C. Stringham, Stephanie Moncayo, Eilish Thomas, Sarah Heinrich, Adam Toomes, Jacob Maher, Katherine G. W. Hill, Lewis Mitchell, Joshua V. Ross, Chris R. Shepherd, and Phillip Cassey. 2021. Dataset of seized wildlife and their intended uses.Data in Brief39 (Dec. 2021), 107531. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2021.107531

  41. [41]

    Temple, Daniel J

    Andrew J. Temple, Daniel J. Skerritt, Philippa E. C. Howarth, John Pearce, and Stephen C. Mangi. 2022. Illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing impacts: A systematic review of evidence and proposed future agenda.Marine Policy139 (2022), 105033. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105033

  42. [42]

    TRAFFIC. 2026. Wildlife Trade Portal. https://www.wildlifetradeportal.org/

  43. [43]

    2023.Quantifying IUU fishing

    UN FAO. 2023.Quantifying IUU fishing. UN FAO. doi:10.4060/cc6434en

  44. [44]

    UN FAO. 2026. Agreement on Port State Measures (PSMA). https://www.fao. org/port-state-measures/background/en/

  45. [45]

    UN FAO. 2026. Monitoring, control and surveillance systems to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php? id=1128

  46. [46]

    Undercurrent News. 2022. Two men charged with getting early illegal jump on floridas spiny lobster season. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2022/06/15/ two-men-charged-with-getting-early-illegal-jump-on-floridas-spiny-lobster- season/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  47. [47]

    Undercurrent News. 2024. Mexican drug cartel linked to illegal red snapper harvests in US waters. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2024/11/28/mexican- drug-cartel-turns-to-lucrative-side-hustle-illegally-harvests-red-snapper-in- us/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  48. [48]

    Undercurrent News. 2025. Canadian man gets CAD 1m fine, six years in jail for illegal fishing. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2025/07/29/canadian-man- gets-cad-1-0m-fine-six-years-in-jail-for-illegal-fishing/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  49. [49]

    Undercurrent News. 2026. https://undercurrentnews.com Accessed: 2 November 2025

  50. [50]

    Undercurrent News. 2026. North Star faces $53,000 fine over Alaska viola- tions. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2026/02/24/north-star-faces-53000- fine-over-alaska-violations/ Accessed: 13 May 2026

  51. [51]

    US DOJ. 2026. United States Department of Justice. https://doj.gov Accessed: 2 November 2025

  52. [52]

    Weissgold

    Bruce J. Weissgold. 2024. US wildlife trade data lack quality control nec- essary for accurate scientific interpretation and policy application.Con- servation Letters17, 2 (2024), e13005. doi:10.1111/conl.13005 _eprint: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/conl.13005

  53. [53]

    2014.Illegal Russian Crab: An Investigation of Trade Flow

    WWF. 2014.Illegal Russian Crab: An Investigation of Trade Flow. Technical Report. World Wildlife Fund. 40 pages. https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/ illegal-russian-crab-an-investigation-of-trade-flow/

  54. [54]

    Zikang Zhang, Wangjie You, Tianci Wu, Xinrui Wang, Juntao Li, and Min Zhang

  55. [55]

    InProceedings of the Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Bodwell et al

    A Survey of Generative Information Extraction. InProceedings of the Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Bodwell et al. 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Owen Rambow, Leo Wanner, Marianna Apidianaki, Hend Al-Khalifa, Barbara Di Eugenio, and Steven Schockaert (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, U...