Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Revisiting color superconductors in bottom-up holography

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single topological coupling between a flavor scalar and the RR 4-form triggers di-squark condensation at finite quark density and Higgses the color group, up to more than 96% of the gauge group at zero temperature.

desk verdict A clean, honest bottom-up CSC model with a genuinely new WZ-driven Higgsing mechanism, whose load-bearing WZ coupling is openly conjectural and whose headline numbers come from a thin parameter scan. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16472 v3 pith:3OUEQZ5Q submitted 2025-01-27 hep-th hep-ph

Edwan Préau This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords colorsuperconductivitybottom-upholographyWess-ZuminotermHiggsingDBIblackbranetachyoncondensationdensequarkmatterholographicQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

QCD at high baryon density is expected to form color superconducting phases, but the usual holographic dictionary struggles with them because the pairing order parameter is not gauge invariant. This paper proposes a five-dimensional bottom-up model in which a scalar field dual to the left-right squark-pair (di-squark) condensate is coupled topologically to the RR 4-form. That single coupling does two jobs: at high quark-number density it makes the scalar's effective mass negative deep in the bulk, driving condensation, and it converts the condensate into a decrease of the color flux from the ultraviolet to the infrared, so the color group is partially Higgsed (the effective number of colors drops). The paper constructs the condensed solution with full back-reaction, maps the phase diagram from marginal modes, and finds that the condensate and the Higgsed fraction grow with density, with more than 96% of the gauge group Higgsed at zero temperature for first-order potentials. If correct, this is the first bottom-up holographic color superconductor with dynamically generated pairing and a large Higgsing fraction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the topological Wess-Zumino coupling $S_{\mathrm{WZ}} = N_c^2 x_f \ell^{-2} \int C_4 \wedge dV_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$ between the RR 4-form $C_4$ and the flavor scalar $\chi$. Under the black-brane ansatz it integrates to the first-order relation $w' = x_f \ell^2 \partial_r V_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$, which ties the scalar profile directly to the color flux: where $\chi$ grows toward the horizon, $w$ decreases, and the IR number of colors $N_{c,\mathrm{IR}} = N_c w(r_H)$ drops. The same coupling appears in the scalar fluctuation equation through the effective mass $m^2_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = G(r)\left(m_f^2 + G(r)^{-1/2} m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2\right)$, with $G(r) = (1+\hat{n}^2 r^6)^{-1}$ measuring the density. Since $G < 1$ inside the bulk at finite baryon density, a negative $m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2$ lowers $m^2_{\mathrm{eff}}$ in the interior, which opens the channel for condensation that is absent at zero density; for $m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2/m_{\mathrm{UV}}^2 \geq 2$ the profile develops a genuine minimum at a finite bulk radius. The onset of the instability is located by solving for normalizable zero-frequency (marginally stable) modes of the fluctuation equation on the DBI black brane background, whose explicit hypergeometric form makes the computation tractable.

What would settle it

Run the dimensional reduction that the paper sketches in appendix A one step further: keep the full non-linear DBI/Sen action of a brane-antibrane system (or the D3/D7 instanton setup at finite baryon density) and check whether a coupling of the exact form $C_4 \wedge dV_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$ survives, with the sign and magnitude of $V_{\mathrm{WZ}}''(0)$ required here. If no such term appears, the condensation-and-Higgsing mechanism loses its only string-theoretic anchor. Within the model, a second check is to re-solve the marginal-mode equation with a mild running dilaton: the paper's analysis is conformal, and if a slow dilaton washes out the effective-mass minimum, the claimed high-density phase does not survive in a non-conformal version.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's claim is that the 5D action $S = S_c + S_f + S_{\mathrm{WZ}}$, with $S_f$ the non-linear Sen action for a baryon-number gauge field and a scalar $\chi$, and with the Wess-Zumino term $S_{\mathrm{WZ}} = N_c^2 x_f \ell^{-2} \int C_4 \wedge dV_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$, possesses a stable phase in which the di-squark operator $\langle \phi_R^\dagger \phi_L \rangle$ condenses and the RR flux $w(r)$ runs from its UV value $w_0$ to a smaller IR value, so that the effective number of colors $N_{c,\mathrm{IR}} = N_c w(r_H)$ is reduced. The same topological coupling that produces the Higgsing, through the integrated equation $w' = x_f \ell^2 \partial_r V_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$, is also what triggers the instability to pairing: the fluctuation effective mass $m^2_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = G(r)\left(m_f^2 + G(r)^{-1/2} m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2\right)$ dips below its UV value once $m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2 < 0$ and the horizon probes the interior at finite density, so the DBI black brane becomes unstable above a critical density. The paper computes the continuous phase diagram from marginally stable modes, and analyzes the condensed branch for two classes of potentials: quadratic potentials give a second-order transition with $N_{c,\mathrm{IR}}$ self-tuned positive (never below about 10% of $N_c$), while a quartic WZ potential gives a first-order transition and more than 96% Higgsing at zero temperature. The author presents this as the first example of a holographic color superconductor in which a paired phase is dynamically generated at finite quark-number density with a large fraction of the color group Higgsed.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the assumed topological coupling between the flavor scalar and the RR 4-form, a term of the form $C_4 \wedge dV_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$, which the paper concedes does not appear in the flat-space string-field-theory Wess-Zumino action and is conjectured to follow from dimensional reduction of a critical string setup, with one top-down example given in appendix A.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model provides the first bottom-up holographic realization of a color superconductor in which the paired phase is dynamically generated at finite quark-number density, with the full back-reaction of all fields included.
  • The two headline features, condensation and Higgsing, are produced by the same WZ potential, so the Higgsing fraction is computed from the solution rather than imposed, and both the condensate and the Higgsed fraction grow with density.
  • For the quadratic potentials the transition is second order and $N_{c,\mathrm{IR}}$ is self-tuned positive for all parameters, never falling below about 10% of $N_c$; full Higgsing is therefore not realized in this class.
  • For the quartic WZ potential the transition is first order and the zero-temperature solution Higgs more than 96% of the gauge group, with the leading partial-breaking solution $x_b^* \simeq 0.875$ dominating while having very similar properties.
  • At large $|m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2|$ the critical temperature scales as $T_c \propto (m_{\mathrm{WZ}}^2/m_{\mathrm{UV}}^2)^{1/6}$, and beyond $x_f \gtrsim 20$ the zero-temperature transition becomes of BKT type.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The double duty of the WZ coupling suggests a general recipe for bottom-up models: a topologically coupled scalar potential of the form $dV_{\mathrm{WZ}}(\chi)$ converts a density-driven instability into gauge-group Higgsing, and any effect that makes $m^2_{\mathrm{eff}}$ dip in the interior could replace the WZ term's role in triggering condensation while the color-flux run still reports the Higg
  • The progressive, density-controlled Higgsing is a concrete large-$N_c$ prediction that differs from the $N_c=3$ CFL expectation of abrupt full breaking; if the model is right, transport in the paired phase (which the paper sets aside) is where the condensation should show up most sharply, via the emergence of light Goldstone modes.
  • The paper's own remark that 2-form fields become light in the IR under strong Higgsing points to a direct test of the 96% claim: those fields are omitted here, and including them could lower the maximal Higgsing fraction or shift the first-order boundary.
  • A natural next computation, made tractable by the conformal background, is the quasi-normal spectrum of the Higgsed phase at finite squark mass; the mass dependence of the lightest modes would give a sharper fingerprint of the paired state than the condensate curve alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a five-dimensional bottom-up holographic model intended to describe a color-superconducting phase at finite quark-number density. The bulk theory contains gravity, a dynamical RR 4-form, a U(1)_B gauge field, and a scalar field chi dual to the di-squark condensate. The flavor sector is described by a Sen/DBI-type action, and a Wess-Zumino term couples C_4 to dV_WZ(chi). The central mechanism is that this WZ coupling makes the effective scalar mass squared negative in the dense DBI black-brane background, triggering scalar hair formation, while the resulting radial profile of the 4-form flux w(r) is interpreted as partial color Higgsing. The paper derives the equations of motion, the uncondensed analytic solution, and the marginal-mode instability condition, and it computes the continuous phase diagram numerically. For quadratic potentials the transition is second order, with an IR effective number of colors that stays positive; adding a quartic term to the WZ potential produces a first-order transition with a larger condensate and, for the displayed x_b=1 solution, more than 96% of the color group Higgsed at zero temperature. An appendix gives a top-down D3/D7 example and argues that its reduction contains a WZ term of the same form.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be the first bottom-up holographic realization of a color-superconducting phase that is dynamically generated at finite baryon density and that exhibits a large Higgsing fraction. The paper is commendably explicit: the action, equations of motion, boundary conditions, and the uncondensed DBI black-brane solution are given in closed form, the parameter count is transparent, and the model is not fitted to data. The top-down appendix provides useful motivation for the WZ coupling. The main caveats are that the key WZ coupling is partly conjectural and that the headline 'more than 96% Higgsing' statement is made for a solution that the paper itself identifies as not being the true ground state. These issues are localizable and addressable, so the manuscript is a plausible candidate for publication after a substantial revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Appendix D, Figs. 10-12] The claim that more than 96% of the gauge group is Higgsed at zero temperature is computed for the x_b=1 branch, but Appendix D states that for the first-order potentials the true ground state has x_b = x_b* approximately 0.875, and the x_b=1 solution is not the ground state. This is load-bearing because Eq. (D.11) shows that w'(r) is proportional to x_b, so the IR color flux, and hence N_c,IR/N_c, will generically differ for the dominant branch. The manuscript does not provide the corresponding N_c,IR/N_c for x_b=x_b*, nor a plot of N_c,IR as a function of x_b. The 'very similar' statement should be made quantitative, and the 96% claim should either be re-evaluated for the true ground state or explicitly qualified.
  2. [Section 2.1, Eq. (2.6), and Appendix A] The WZ coupling (2.6) is the mechanism that makes chi condense and that produces color Higgsing; without it, Eq. (3.8) shows m_eff^2 = m_UV^2 G(r), which is non-negative and would not trigger the instability. The paper honestly notes that this term does not appear in the flat-space string field theory WZ action, but then states that it can arise from dimensional reduction and refers to Appendix A. The appendix does reduce C_4 wedge Tr(F wedge F) to a term of the form C_4 wedge dV(a) after integrating over the S^3, which is encouraging. However, the reduction also contains an additional scalar phi and a direct coupling between the instanton scalar and the isospin gauge field, and the original top-down coupling is not literally the scalar coupling (2.6). Since the entire construction depends on this coupling, the paper should either provide a more direct string-theoretic derivation of (2.6) for baryon-number density, or present the coupling more cautiously as a modeling assumption and discuss how the results would change for plausible alternative forms.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 4] The numerical results that support the phase diagram and the Higgsing fractions are presented without code, without a description of the numerical algorithm, and without convergence checks or error estimates. This is particularly important because the first-order-transition analysis is based on a single parameter point (w0=x_f=1, m_WZ^2=4 m_UV^2, alpha=8), and the displayed solution is not the dominant chiral-symmetry-breaking branch. I would ask the authors to make the numerical code and data available, or at minimum to describe the shooting/relaxation method, grid resolution, and the accuracy to which the boundary conditions are satisfied, and to present the analogous plots for the x_b=x_b* ground state.
  4. [Section 3 and Sections 4.1-4.2] For the quadratic potentials of Section 4.1, the paper identifies the onset of instability via the marginal mode but does not show a free-energy comparison between the hairy solution and the DBI black brane. The conclusion that the condensed phase is thermodynamically preferred below T_c is standard for continuous transitions, but it is not demonstrated here, especially because Figs. 5 and 6 show that the metric back-reaction is very small. A free-energy plot for the quadratic case, analogous to Fig. 10 for the first-order case, would close this gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1.1] There is a typo: 'ocurring' should be 'occurring'.
  2. [Figure 12 caption] The caption uses T_c without defining it; it should state that T_c is the perturbative-instability temperature, as done in the captions of Figs. 10 and 11.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Appendix D] The chiral-symmetry-breaking fraction x_b is first used in Section 4.2 without a definition; it is only defined in Appendix D. A one-sentence definition should be given at its first appearance.
  4. [Appendix A] The sentence 'This setup therefore provides a concrete example where a WZ term of the form that is considered in this work (2.6) arises' is slightly overstated, since the original ten-dimensional term is a Chern-Simons coupling of C_4 to the flavor gauge field, and the reduced potential V(a) is not arbitrary. The wording should be adjusted to 'a term of the same reduced form'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WZ coupling is a transparent model input, and the condensed phase and Higgsing are computed consequences rather than fitted or self-referential outputs.

full rationale

This is a bottom-up model-construction paper, not a first-principles derivation of an empirical prediction. The central object, the WZ coupling S_WZ = N_c^2 x_f ell^-2 int C4 wedge dV_WZ(chi) in Eq. (2.6), is explicitly introduced as an assumption; the paper states in Section 2.1 that "a term like (2.6) does not appear in the flat space WZ term derived from string field theory [41,42]" and only conjectures that such a term may arise from dimensional reduction. That is a limitation or a rigor concern about the model input, but it is not circularity, because the claimed results are not obtained by renaming that input. The instability onset is computed by solving the marginal-mode equation (3.2), the phase diagram in figures 2-4 is a numerical output of that analysis, and the Higgsing fractions in figures 6, 9, and 12 are solutions of the coupled equations (2.11)-(2.15), not quantities put in by hand. No parameter is fitted to any dataset, and no prediction reduces to a fitted constant. Appendix A provides a concrete dimensional-reduction example of a term of the form C4 wedge dV(a), so the WZ structure is not merely an ungrounded self-citation. The paper's own caveat about the conjectural origin of the WZ term is located in Section 2.1 and is weighed here as a correctness/rigor risk rather than as circularity. On the definitions used in this review, none of the seven circularity patterns is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on two kinds of input: standard holographic tools (AdS/CFT, quasi-normal modes, AdS_2 BF bound) and ad hoc model-building choices (Sen/DBI flavor action, the WZ coupling, the form of the potentials). The key free parameters are m_WZ^2, x_f, w_0, alpha, plus the choice Delta = 2; none are fitted to external data. The most fragile axiom is the WZ term (2.6), which the author acknowledges is not present in flat-space string field theory.

free parameters (5)
  • m_WZ^2 (Wess-Zumino mass squared) = not fitted; varied, e.g. 4 m_UV^2 in figures 5-9
    Strength of the WZ coupling V_WZ''(0); controls effective scalar mass and Higgsing; the instability requires m_WZ^2 < 0. It is a free model parameter, not determined by any external input.
  • x_f = not fitted; varied from 0.1 to 10 in figures
    Flavor-to-color ratio N_f/N_c; controls back-reaction and the phase diagram.
  • w_0 = not fitted; varied, with w_0 = 1 in most plots
    Color brane tension and constant RR 4-form flux in the uncondensed solution; affects the Higgsing strength.
  • alpha = 8 in the first-order example
    Coefficient of the quartic term in V_WZ for the first-order potentials (4.5); chosen by hand to make the transition first order, with threshold alpha_1 approximately 5.
  • m_UV^2 = -4 / ell^2
    Fixed by choosing the conformal dimension Delta = 2 for the di-squark operator; this is a model choice, and the relation m_f^2 + m_WZ^2 = m_UV^2 fixes one potential in terms of the other.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary: the bulk scalar chi is dual to the di-squark operator phi_R^dagger phi_L of conformal dimension Delta = 2.
    Section 2.1 and Eq. (2.25). The whole construction assumes this holographic identification.
  • domain assumption The flavor sector is described by the non-linear Sen/DBI action (2.4), including the tachyonic scalar's coupling to A_mu and gravity.
    Section 2.1; this form is taken from string field theory but extended to a QCD-like setup.
  • ad hoc to paper The WZ coupling takes the exact form S_WZ = N_c^2 x_f ell^{-2} integral C_4 and dV_WZ(chi), fixed by RR gauge invariance and assumed to survive dimensional reduction.
    Section 2.1, Eq. (2.6). The paper admits this term does not appear in flat-space string field theory; it is a conjecture.
  • ad hoc to paper The RR 4-form C_4 is dynamical in the bottom-up 5D theory, and its flux w(r) indicates color brane charge and Higgsing.
    Section 2.1 and Eqs. (2.10)-(2.17); usually C_4 is non-dynamical in bottom-up models.
  • ad hoc to paper The quadratic and quartic potentials (4.1) and (4.5) capture the essential dynamics; exponential string-theory potentials give qualitatively similar results.
    Section 4.1; the author states this was checked but does not show the details.
  • standard math Standard holographic tools: quasi-normal modes and marginally stable modes diagnose instability, and the AdS_2 BF bound applies in the near-horizon extremal geometry.
    Section 3, refs [32, 47, 48].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting color superconductors in bottom-up holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3OUEQZ5Q

@misc{pith2026250116472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting color superconductors in bottom-up holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3OUEQZ5Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16472}
}
read the original abstract

We revisit the problem of constructing a color superconducting phase in bottom-up holography. We introduce a model that describes the five-dimensional dynamics of a scalar field dual to a chiral symmetry breaking condensate, which is coupled to the RR 4-form. The coupling is given by a topological WZ term, which is elegantly responsible both for scalar condensation at high density, and color Higgsing in the condensed phase. This construction realizes both properties at finite density and Higgsing fraction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    QCD and Strongly – 37 – Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives,

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, P. Foka, S. Gardner, A. S. Kronfeld, M. G. Alford, R. Alkofer, M. Butenschoen, T. D. Cohen and J. Erdmenger,et al. “QCD and Strongly – 37 – Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives,”Eur. Phys. J. C74, no.10, 2981 (2014); [ArXiv:1404.3723][hep-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    The phase diagram of dense QCD,

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda,“The phase diagram of dense QCD,”Rept. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011); [ArXiv:1005.4814][hep-ph]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    The Condensed matter physics of QCD,

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek,“The Condensed matter physics of QCD,” doi:10.1142/9789812810458 0043 [ArXiv:hep-ph/0011333]

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Color superconducting quark matter,

    M. G. Alford,“Color superconducting quark matter,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.51, 131-160 (2001); [ArXiv:hep-ph/0102047]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal and T. Sch¨ afer,“Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,”Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455-1515 (2008); [ArXiv:0709.4635][hep-ph]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations,

    M. Troyer and U. J. Wiese,“Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 170201 (2005); [ArXiv:cond-mat/0408370][cond-mat]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena,“The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998); [ArXiv:hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,“Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428, 105-114 (1998); [ArXiv:hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten,“Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253-291 (1998); [ArXiv:hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,“Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,”Phys. Rept.323, 183-386 (2000); [ArXiv:hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,“Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,”Prog. Theor. Phys.113, 843-882 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-th/0412141]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [12]

    More on a holographic dual of QCD,

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,“More on a holographic dual of QCD,”Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 1083-1118 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-th/0507073]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers and D. J. Winters,“Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,”JHEP07, 049 (2003); [ArXiv:hep-th/0304032]

    2003 arXiv

  6. [14]

    QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,“QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 261602 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-ph/0501128]

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,

    L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol,“Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B721, 79-97 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-ph/0501218]

    2005 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,“Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,”Phys. Rev. D74, 015005 (2006); [ArXiv:hep-ph/0602229]. – 38 –

    2006 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,

    M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis,“Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,” JHEP03, 002 (2012); [ArXiv:1112.1261][hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    On finite-temperature holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,

    T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis and K. Tuominen,“On finite-temperature holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,”JHEP01, 093 (2013); [ArXiv:1210.4516][hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A holographic model for QCD in the Veneziano limit at finite temperature and density,

    T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis, C. Rosen and K. Tuominen,“A holographic model for QCD in the Veneziano limit at finite temperature and density,” JHEP04, 124 (2014) [erratum: JHEP02, 033 (2015)]; [ArXiv:1312.5199][hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and J. Remes,“Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,”JHEP03, 041 (2019); [ArXiv:1809.07770][hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dense and Hot QCD at Strong Coupling,

    T. Demircik, C. Ecker and M. J¨ arvinen,“Dense and Hot QCD at Strong Coupling,” Phys. Rev. X12, no.4, 041012 (2022); [ArXiv:2112.12157][hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Holographic description of color superconductivity,

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, J. Cruz Rojas and N. Evans,“Holographic description of color superconductivity,”Phys. Rev. D98, no.6, 066010 (2018); [ArXiv:1803.03107][hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Holographic quark matter with colour superconductivity and a stiff equation of state for compact stars,

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, J. Cruz Rojas and N. Evans,“Holographic quark matter with colour superconductivity and a stiff equation of state for compact stars,”Phys. Rev. D 103, no.2, 026012 (2021); [ArXiv:2009.14079][hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Color superconductivity in a holographic model,

    K. Ghoroku, K. Kashiwa, Y. Nakano, M. Tachibana and F. Toyoda,“Color superconductivity in a holographic model,”Phys. Rev. D99, no.10, 106011 (2019); [ArXiv:1902.01093][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Strong coupling effective Higgs potential and a first order thermal phase transition from AdS/CFT duality,

    R. Apreda, J. Erdmenger, N. Evans and Z. Guralnik,“Strong coupling effective Higgs potential and a first order thermal phase transition from AdS/CFT duality,”Phys. Rev. D71, 126002 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-th/0504151]

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Towards a Holographic Model of Color-Flavor Locking Phase,

    H. Y. Chen, K. Hashimoto and S. Matsuura,“Towards a Holographic Model of Color-Flavor Locking Phase,”JHEP02, 104 (2010); [ArXiv:0909.1296][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A Supersymmetric Color Superconductor from Holography,

    A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, C. Pantelidou and J. Tarr ´ ıo,“A Supersymmetric Color Superconductor from Holography,”JHEP05, 106 (2019); [ArXiv:1807.09712][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Supersymmetric color superconductivity,

    R. Harnik, D. T. Larson and H. Murayama,“Supersymmetric color superconductivity,” JHEP03, 049 (2004); [ArXiv:hep-ph/0309224]

    2004 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Higgs phases at non-zero density from holography,

    O. Henriksson, A. Hippel¨ ainen, C. Hoyos, N. Jokela and A. Piispa,“Higgs phases at non-zero density from holography,”JHEP08, 186 (2023); [ArXiv:2212.07364][hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,

    A. Sen,“Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 5513-5656 (2005); [ArXiv:hep-th/0410103]

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Towards A – 39 – Holographic Model of Color Superconductivity,

    P. Basu, F. Nogueira, M. Rozali, J. B. Stang and M. Van Raamsdonk,“Towards A – 39 – Holographic Model of Color Superconductivity,”New J. Phys.13, 055001 (2011); [ArXiv:1101.4042][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon,

    S. S. Gubser,“Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon,”Phys. Rev. D78, 065034 (2008); [ArXiv:0801.2977][hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,

    E. Kiritsis,“Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,”Fortsch. Phys.57, 396-417 (2009); [ArXiv:0901.1772][hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,

    M. J¨ arvinen,“Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,”Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.4, 282 (2022); [ArXiv:2110.08281][hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,

    A. Karch and E. Katz,“Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,”JHEP06, 043 (2002); [ArXiv:hep-th/0205236]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Probing flavored mesons of confining gauge theories by supergravity,

    T. Sakai and J. Sonnenschein,“Probing flavored mesons of confining gauge theories by supergravity,”JHEP09, 047 (2003); [ArXiv:hep-th/0305049]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The Wall of the cave,

    A. M. Polyakov,“The Wall of the cave,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14, 645-658 (1999); [ArXiv:hep-th/9809057]

    1999 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Some exact results on tachyon condensation in string field theory,

    D. Kutasov, M. Marino and G. W. Moore,“Some exact results on tachyon condensation in string field theory,”JHEP10, 045 (2000); [ArXiv:hep-th/0009148]

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Effective tachyon dynamics in superstring theory,

    J. A. Minahan and B. Zwiebach,“Effective tachyon dynamics in superstring theory,” JHEP03, 038 (2001); [ArXiv:hep-th/0009246]

    2001 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Tachyon couplings on nonBPS D-branes and Dirac-Born-Infeld action,

    M. R. Garousi,“Tachyon couplings on nonBPS D-branes and Dirac-Born-Infeld action,”Nucl. Phys. B584, 284-299 (2000); [ArXiv:hep-th/0003122]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Brane - anti-brane action from boundary string field theory,

    T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi,“Brane - anti-brane action from boundary string field theory,”JHEP03, 019 (2001); [ArXiv:hep-th/0012210]

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,

    R. Casero, E. Kiritsis and A. Paredes,“Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,”Nucl. Phys. B787, 98-134 (2007); [ArXiv:hep-th/0702155]

    2007 arXiv

  35. [43]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten,“AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B556, 89-114 (1999); [ArXiv:hep-th/9905104]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis,“Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,”Commun. Math. Phys.217, 595-622 (2001); [ArXiv:hep-th/0002230]

    2001 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis,“Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,”Class. Quant. Grav.19, 5849-5876 (2002); [ArXiv:hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets,“Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,”JHEP09, 042 (2002); [ArXiv:hep-th/0205051]. – 40 –

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transitions,

    K. Jensen, A. Karch, D. T. Son and E. G. Thompson,“Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transitions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 041601 (2010); [ArXiv:1002.3159][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Quantum phase transitions in holographic models of magnetism and superconductors,

    N. Iqbal, H. Liu, M. Mezei and Q. Si,“Quantum phase transitions in holographic models of magnetism and superconductors,”Phys. Rev. D82, 045002 (2010); [ArXiv:1003.0010][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Fragmentation of Spinning Branes,

    D. Yamada,“Fragmentation of Spinning Branes,”Class. Quant. Grav.25, 145006 (2008); [ArXiv:0802.3508][hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bounding the Temperatures of Black Holes Dual to Strongly Coupled Field Theories on Flat Spacetime,

    B. McInnes,“Bounding the Temperatures of Black Holes Dual to Strongly Coupled Field Theories on Flat Spacetime,”JHEP09, 048 (2009); [ArXiv:0905.1180][hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Emergent Quantum Near-Criticality from Baryonic Black Branes,

    C. P. Herzog, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and T. Tesileanu,“Emergent Quantum Near-Criticality from Baryonic Black Branes,”JHEP03, 093 (2010); [ArXiv:0911.0400][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Novel color superconducting phases ofN= 4 super Yang-Mills at strong coupling,

    O. Henriksson, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,“Novel color superconducting phases ofN= 4 super Yang-Mills at strong coupling,”JHEP09, 088 (2019); [ArXiv:1907.01562][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,“The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,”JHEP04, 017 (1999); [hep-th]. – 41 –

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.