Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Renormalizations in holomorphic field theories on K\"ahler manifolds

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Feynman graph integrals on real-analytic Kähler manifolds converge under heat-kernel, Cauchy principal value, and zeta-function renormalization, with a single common value.

desk verdict Proves scheme-independence of three renormalizations for holomorphic field theories on Kähler manifolds; the argument is likely sound, but the key quoted Theorem 2.9 is misstated (holomorphic vs anti-holomorphic variables) and must be fixed before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00546 v2 pith:3PTH6HF6 submitted 2026-08-01 math-ph hep-thmath.AGmath.MP

Minghao Wang , Junrong Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.AGmath.MP MSC 81T1881T1553C55
keywords holomorphicfieldtheoryFeynmangraphintegralsrenormalizationKählermanifoldswonderfulcompactificationszeta-functionCauchyprincipalvaluegaugeanomaly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Perturbative holomorphic field theories on closed real-analytic Kähler manifolds produce Feynman graph integrals that are not guaranteed to be Lebesgue integrable; the paper proves they are nevertheless convergent in three distinct regularization senses: heat-kernel renormalization, Cauchy principal value renormalization, and zeta-function renormalization. The central result is that all three procedures return the same value, and the assignment $\Phi\mapsto W(\vec{\Gamma},\Phi)$ defines a current on $M^{|\vec{\Gamma}_0|}$, so the renormalized Feynman weight is canonical for these theories. This matters because in general renormalization requires arbitrary scheme choices and comparing schemes is difficult; here no subtraction is needed and the scheme independence is built into the theorem. As a further consequence, the paper identifies the gauge anomaly—the failure of the current to be $\bar\partial$-closed—with explicit integrals over the boundary of the compactified Schwinger parameter space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the partially compactified Schwinger parameter space $\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$: the quotient of the wonderful compactification of $\mathbb{C}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$ by the compact torus $(S^1)^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$, a manifold with corners that resolves the simultaneous small-time limits $t_e\to0$ in a way compatible with the graph combinatorics. Over a further blow-up of $M^{|\vec{\Gamma}_0|}\times\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$, the regularized propagator extends to a smooth form that is flat along the critical locus of a semistable morphism to the complexified Schwinger space; a pushforward theorem for flat forms then shows the fiber integral extends smoothly. For zeta-function renormalization, the companion machinery is the class of generalized divisorial type singularities, which records powers of $\ln(|z|^2,s)=(|z|^{2s}-1)/s$ and remains stable under coordinate changes compatible with normal crossing divisors, allowing a global Cauchy principal value.

What would settle it

Take a closed real-analytic Kähler manifold with explicit heat kernel, for instance a complex torus with a nontrivial holomorphic line bundle, and compute the $\theta$ graph (two vertices joined by three internal edges): if the zeta-regularized integral has a pole or fails to extend to the half-plane $\mathrm{Re}(s_e)\ge0$, or if the heat-kernel limit differs from the Cauchy principal value limit at $s=0$, then Theorem 2.31 would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for any decorated directed graph in a holomorphic field theory on a closed real-analytic Kähler manifold $(M,E,\omega)$, the Feynman graph integral converges under heat-kernel renormalization, Cauchy principal value renormalization, and zeta-function renormalization, and that all three limits coincide. The proof constructs a partial compactification $\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$ of the Schwinger parameter space—a manifold with corners obtained from the wonderful compactification of the complexified Schwinger space—such that the fiber integral over $M^{|\vec{\Gamma}_0|}$ extends smoothly to the compactification. The heat-kernel limit then exists as a Lebesgue integral, and a zeta-regularized Fubini-type argument identifies it with the other two schemes. The same mechanism yields a precise gauge anomaly formula: the failure of $\bar\partial W(\vec{\Gamma},-)=0$ is a finite sum of boundary integrals over $\partial\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$ in which edges are removed or subgraphs contracted.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the regular expression theorem imported from the authors' earlier paper: after multiplying by the Gaussian factor $e^{\rho^2/2t}$, the heat-kernel propagator and its holomorphic derivatives admit regular expressions in local holomorphic coordinates; if that short-time structure failed, the smooth extension over the compactification and therefore the equality of the three renormalization schemes would break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every holomorphic decorated directed graph, $W(\vec{\Gamma},\Phi)$ is a continuous current on $M^{|\vec{\Gamma}_0|}$, so the renormalized Feynman weight is a scheme-independent observable.
  • The heat-kernel renormalization is an absolutely convergent Lebesgue integral over $\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$, so the limits $\epsilon\to0$ and $L\to\infty$ may be taken independently and in either order.
  • Zeta-function renormalization, initially defined only for $\mathrm{Re}(s_e)\gg0$, extends holomorphically to the right half-plane and evaluates at $s=0$ without any pole subtraction.
  • The gauge anomaly of a holomorphic decorated directed graph is computed by boundary integrals over $\partial\widehat{[0,\infty)}^{|\vec{\Gamma}_1|}$, decomposing into graphs with one edge removed and graphs with a subgraph contracted.
  • The strategy also applies to topological field theories, where the compactification space differs from the Fulton–MacPherson compactification used in the topological case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension one can test: any field theory whose propagator satisfies the same regular-expression structure should inherit both convergence and scheme independence, since the proof uses only that structure, the pushforward criterion, and the wonderful compactification of Schwinger space.
  • The boundary anomaly formula has the shape of a quantum master equation; one could conjecture that the currents $W(\vec{\Gamma},-)$ assemble into a homotopy algebra on any real-analytic Kähler manifold, extending the known affine-space construction.
  • Because the theorem is explicit, a numerical check on a complex torus with standard line bundles could produce concrete boundary anomaly integrals for low-degree graphs, providing independent confirmation of Corollary 6.6.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Feynman graph integrals in holomorphic field theories on closed real-analytic Kähler manifolds. Its central claim is that these integrals are convergent under heat-kernel renormalization, Cauchy principal value renormalization, and zeta-function renormalization, and that all three procedures give the same renormalized value, defining a current W(Γ, −) on M^{|Γ0|} (Theorems 1.1, 2.31, and 5.1). The proof combines wonderful compactifications of Schwinger parameter spaces with a smooth-extension theorem for the graph integrand, then compares the three renormalization schemes through a zeta-regularized Fubini-type argument. The paper also derives a formula expressing the failure of Dolbeault closedness of W(Γ, −) as boundary integrals over compactified Schwinger spaces (§6).

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper establishes a canonical, scheme-independent renormalized current for holomorphic field theories on compact Kähler manifolds, extending previous affine-space results [48] and the CPV construction of [49]. This is a substantial step toward rigorous quantization of theories such as Kodaira-Spencer gravity and provides a useful geometric framework based on wonderful compactifications. The paper is careful and detailed in its geometric constructions, and it explicitly identifies the analytic inputs that come from prior work. The treatment is largely self-contained except for the quoted regular-expression theorem, and the structure of the argument is transparent.

major comments (2)
  1. [Definition 2.8 and Theorem 2.9] The variable convention for regular expressions is inconsistent, and this affects the central analytic input. Definition 2.8 defines y_i=(z_i-w_i)/t, but Proposition 3.6, Proposition 4.6, Proposition 4.7, and Definition 6.11 all use (\bar z_i-\bar w_i)/t and its differential. Since Theorem 2.9, quoted from [49, Theorem 4.3], is the foundation for the short-time control of e^{ρ²/2t}P_t and its holomorphic derivatives, the theorem as stated in the paper is not the theorem used later. Please correct the variables in Definition 2.8 and Theorem 2.9, state explicitly which version is imported from [49], and verify the globalization statement about preservation under pullback by holomorphic maps for the corrected notion.
  2. [Section 4.2, Definition 4.3 and Proposition 4.20] The generalized divisorial type singularity class is asserted in Remark 4.4 to be independent of the choice of coordinates compatible with the normal crossing divisor, but no proof or precise reference is supplied. This coordinate independence is used in the global generalized Cauchy principal value theorem (Proposition 4.20) and hence in Theorem 4.1. Please provide the missing argument, or give a precise statement of the corresponding lemma in [49].
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 1.1] The word "convergent" in the abstract may mislead, since the graph integrals are not Lebesgue integrable in general; the intended meaning is that the regularized limits exist and are independent of the scheme. Consider rewording to "the renormalized integrals converge" or "the graph integrals admit a convergent renormalization."
  2. [Theorem 5.1 heading] The heading reads "Fubini-ype theorem"; it should be "Fubini-type theorem."
  3. [Corollary 2.19] The sentence concerning lower-degree components and harmonic forms is confusing: since integration of a differential form over a manifold only sees the top-degree component, the lower-degree components do not affect Lebesgue integrability in the sense used here. Please clarify or remove that remark.
  4. [Section 3.6, Proposition 3.41] The proof states that the zeta-regularized integral is holomorphic on H^{|Γ1|}, but it does not explicitly justify integrability at the boundary faces where some t_e=0 and Re(s_e)=0. A short estimate showing that t_e^{s_e} times a smooth form is integrable for Re(s_e)≥0 would make the argument complete.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the main theorem extends the authors' prior regular-expression and CPV results rather than reducing to them.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central analytic input (Theorem 2.9, quoted as 'Theorem 4.3 in [49]') and the CPV existence result (Theorem 2.25, quoted from [49, Theorem 2.21]) are self-citations, but they are used as lemmas, not as the target statement. The paper's new content—the wonderful-compactification smooth-extension theorem (Theorem 3.38 and Corollary 3.39), the zeta-regularized generalized CPV (Theorem 4.1), and the Fubini-type equality W_HK = W_CPV = W_ZF (Theorem 5.1)—is not obtained by substituting [49]'s conclusions into the conclusion; it requires a separate blow-up construction, a Mellin-transform singularity analysis, and an analytic-continuation argument. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. The equality of the three schemes at s=0 follows from holomorphy and Fubini, not from a definition. The manuscript does contain a genuine correctness concern worth flagging: Definition 2.8 defines regular expressions with y_i=(z_i-w_i)/t, while the proof of Proposition 3.6 and Definition 6.11 use anti-holomorphic variables (z̄_i-w̄_i)/t; if the quoted [49] theorem is anti-holomorphic, the statement of Theorem 2.9 is mis-transcribed. That is a gap in verification, not a circular reduction, and it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, forces, or fitted constants; it proves a convergence and scheme-independence statement for existing Feynman graph integrals. The ledger tracks assumptions pulled from prior literature, chiefly the regular expression theorem and heat kernel estimates.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The spacetime M is a connected closed real-analytic Kähler manifold, and E is a real-analytic Hermitian holomorphic vector bundle with a non-degenerate holomorphic pairing ω: E⊗E → K_M.
    Invoked at the start of §2.2 to define the Dolbeault complex, heat kernel, and propagator; the compactness and real-analyticity are essential for the heat kernel estimates and the regular expression theorem.
  • domain assumption The propagator P is the unique distributional solution of (2.4) and is given by the heat kernel integral (2.6).
    Quoted from [49, Propositions 2.7 and 2.9]; defines the Schwinger-space propagator P_t used to build Feynman graph integrands.
  • domain assumption e^{ρ²/2t} P_t admits a regular expression on coordinate charts (Theorem 2.9).
    This structure theorem, taken from [49, Theorem 4.3], is the key analytic input that makes the smooth extension construction of §3.5 and the zeta-regularized singularity analysis of §4 work. It is a theorem from prior work by the same authors.
  • standard math Heat kernel short-time asymptotics and exponential decay estimates for the heat kernel and its derivatives (Lemma 2.27 and estimates from [9, Proposition 2.37] and [44, Theorem 3.5]).
    Used to prove the zeta-regularized propagator estimates and the integrability of fiber integrals.
  • standard math The theory of wonderful compactifications for building sets of submanifolds (Theorem 3.13, from [23, 39]).
    Used to construct the partially compactified Schwinger space and to prove the semistable morphism property.
  • standard math Lojasiewicz's inequality and the Schwartz-Poénaru theorem on smooth invariant functions.
    Used in the proof of the smoothness of pushforward (Theorem 3.3) and the descent criterion (Lemma 3.25).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalizations in holomorphic field theories on K\"ahler manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PTH6HF6

@misc{pith2026260800546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalizations in holomorphic field theories on K\"ahler manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PTH6HF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00546}
}
read the original abstract

The divergence of Feynman graph integrals is one of the central issues in the study of perturbative quantum field theories. A rigorous formulation of these integrals usually requires renormalization. In this paper, we prove that the Feynman graph integrals arising from holomorphic field theories on closed real-analytic K\"ahler manifolds are convergent with respect to heat-kernel renormalization, Cauchy principal value renormalization, and zeta-function renormalization. Moreover, these three renormalization procedures produce the same value. Our proof is based on the theory of wonderful compactifications in algebraic geometry, which provides a geometric understanding of these integrals. As a consequence, we establish a gauge anomaly formula for these graph integrals.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Wang and J

    M. Wang and J. Yan. Feynman graph integral on K¨ ahler manifolds. arXiv:2507.09170, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  2. [48]

    M. Wang. Feynman graph integrals onCd. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(5):116, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Weak semistable reduction in characteristic 0

    Dan Abramovich and Kalle Karu. Weak semistable reduction in characteristic 0. Inventiones Mathematicae, 139(2):241–273, 2000. 78

    work page 2000

  4. [2]

    Semistable reduction in charac- teristic 0

    Karim Adiprasito, Gaku Liu, and Michael Temkin. Semistable reduction in charac- teristic 0. S´ eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, 82B:Article #25, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [3]

    Alexandrov, A

    M. Alexandrov, A. Schwarz, O. Zaboronsky, and M. Kontsevich. The geometry of the master equation and topological quantum field theory. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 12(07):1405–1429, 1997

    work page 1997

  6. [4]

    Ammann, J

    B. Ammann, J. Mougel, and V. Nistor. A comparison of the Georgescu and Vasy spaces associated to the N-body problems and applications. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 23(4):1141–1203, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [5]

    Axelrod and I

    S. Axelrod and I. M. Singer. Chern-Simons perturbation theory. II. Journal of Differential Geometry, 39(1):173–213, 1994

    work page 1994

  8. [6]

    Axelrod and I.M

    S. Axelrod and I.M. Singer. Chern-Simons perturbation theory. In Proceedings of the XXth DGM conference , pages 3–45. World Scientific Singapore, 1992

    work page 1992

Show all 53 references
  1. [7]

    I. A. Batalin and E. S. Fradkin. A generalized canonical formalism and quantization of reducible gauge theories. Physics Letters B , 122(2):157–164, 1983

    1983

  2. [8]

    I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky. Gauge algebra and quantization. Physics Letters B, 102(1):27–31, 1981

    1981

  3. [9]

    Berline, E

    N. Berline, E. Getzler, and M. Vergne. Heat kernels and Dirac operators . Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

    2003

  4. [10]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa. Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 165:311–427, 1994

    1994

  5. [11]

    N. N. Bogoliubov and O. S. Parasiuk. On the Multiplication of the causal function in the quantum theory of fields. Acta Math., 97:227–266, 1957

    1957

  6. [12]

    Bott and A

    R. Bott and A. S. Cattaneo. Integral invariants of 3-manifolds. II. Journal of Dif- ferential Geometry, 53(1):1–13, 1999

    1999

  7. [13]

    Bott and A

    R. Bott and A. S. Cattaneo. Integral invariants of 3-manifolds. Raoul Bott: Collected Papers, 5:383, 2018

    2018

  8. [14]

    Budzik, D

    K. Budzik, D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, J. Wu, and M. Yu. Feynman diagrams in four- dimensional holomorphic theories and the operatope.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(7):1–40, 2023

    2023

  9. [15]

    Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry

    Alain Connes and Dirk Kreimer. Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. , 199:203–242, 1998. 79

    1998

  10. [16]

    Costello

    K. Costello. Renormalization and Effective Field Theory . Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Soc., 2011

    2011

  11. [17]

    Costello and O

    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam. Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory , volume 1 of New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  12. [18]

    Costello and O

    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam. Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory , volume 2 of New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, 2021

    2021

  13. [19]

    Costello and S

    K. Costello and S. Li. Quantization of open-closed BCOV theory, I. arXiv: 1505.06703, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  14. [20]

    K. J. Costello and S. Li. Quantum BCOV theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds and the higher genus B-model. arXiv:1201.4501, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Costello

    Kevin J. Costello. Notes on supersymmetric and holomorphic field theories in di- mensions 2 and 4. arXiv:1111.4234, 2011

    2011 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Renormalization of feynman amplitudes on man- ifolds by spectral zeta regularization and blow-ups

    Nguyen Viet Dang and Bin Zhang. Renormalization of feynman amplitudes on man- ifolds by spectral zeta regularization and blow-ups. Journal of the European Mathe- matical Society, 2017

    2017

  17. [23]

    De Concini and C

    C. De Concini and C. Procesi. Wonderful models of subspace arrangements. Selecta Mathematica, 1(3):459–494, 1995

    1995

  18. [24]

    Semistable reduction for complex analytic spaces

    Makoto Enokizono and Kenta Hashizume. Semistable reduction for complex analytic spaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 2025

    2025

  19. [25]

    Fulton and R

    W. Fulton and R. MacPherson. A compactification of configuration spaces. Annals of Mathematics , 139(1):183–225, 1994

    1994

  20. [26]

    Models for real subspace arrangements and stratified manifolds

    Giovanni Gaiffi. Models for real subspace arrangements and stratified manifolds. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2003(12):627–656, 01 2003

    2003

  21. [27]

    Getzler and J

    E. Getzler and J. D. S. Jones. Operads, homotopy algebra and iterated integrals for double loop spaces. arXiv hep-th/9403055 , 1994

    1994 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Schaeffer

    Martin Golubitsky, Ian Stewart, and David G. Schaeffer. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, Volume II , volume 69 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988

    1988

  23. [29]

    Williams

    Zhengping Gui, Minghao Wang, and Brian R. Williams. Higher-dimensional chiral algebras in the jouanolou model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26608 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization

    Klaus Hepp. Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization. Com- mun. Math. Phys. , 2:301–326, 1966. 80

    1966

  25. [31]

    Herrera and D

    M. Herrera and D. Lieberman. Residues and principal values on complex spaces. Mathematische Annalen, 194, 1971

    1971

  26. [32]

    H¨ ormander

    L. H¨ ormander. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators: Distribution theory and Fourier analysis . Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen mit besonderer Ber¨ ucksichtigung der Anwendungsgebiete. Springer-Verlag, 1983

    1983

  27. [33]

    Y. Hu. A compactification of open varieties. Transactions of the American Mathe- matical Society, 355(12):4737–4753, 2003

    2003

  28. [34]

    Johansen

    A. Johansen. Twisting of N = 1 SUSY gauge theories and heterotic topological theories. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 10:4325–4358, 1995

    1995

  29. [35]

    Kontsevich

    M. Kontsevich. Feynman diagrams and low-dimensional topology. In First European Congress of Mathematics Paris, July 6–10, 1992 , pages 97–121. Springer, 1994

    1992

  30. [36]

    Kontsevich

    M. Kontsevich. Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Letters in Math- ematical Physics, 48:35–72, 1999

    1999

  31. [37]

    Kontsevich

    M. Kontsevich. Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Letters in Mathe- matical Physics, 66:157–216, 2003

    2003

  32. [38]

    On the Hopf algebra structure of perturbative quantum field theories

    Dirk Kreimer. On the Hopf algebra structure of perturbative quantum field theories. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 2:303–334, 1998

    1998

  33. [39]

    L. Li. Wonderful compactification of an arrangement of subvarieties. Michigan math- ematical journal, 58(2):535–563, 2009

    2009

  34. [40]

    S. Li. BCOV theory on the elliptic curve and higher genus mirror symmetry. arXiv:1112.4063, 2011

    2011 arXiv

  35. [41]

    S. Li. Feynman graph integrals and almost modular forms. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys., 6:129–157, 2012

    2012

  36. [42]

    S. Li. Vertex algebras and quantum master equation. J. Diff. Geom., 123(3):461–521, 2023

    2023

  37. [43]

    Li and J

    S. Li and J. Zhou. Regularized integrals on Riemann surfaces and modular forms. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 388:1403–1474, 2021

    2021

  38. [44]

    M. Ludewig. Strong short-time asymptotics and convolution approximation of the heat kernel. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry , 55(2):371–394, 2019

    2019

  39. [45]

    MacPherson and C

    R. MacPherson and C. Procesi. Making conical compactifications wonderful. Selecta Mathematica, 4(1):125, 1998. 81

    1998

  40. [46]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math. , 103:547–597, 1991

    1991

  41. [47]

    A. Schwarz. Geometry of Batalin-Vilkovisky quantization. Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 155(2):249–260, 1993

    1993

  42. [50]

    On the renormalization and quantization of topological–holomorphic field theories

    Minghao Wang and Brian Williams. On the renormalization and quantization of topological–holomorphic field theories. Advances in Mathematics , 2026

    2026

  43. [51]

    B. R. Williams. Renormalization for holomorphic field theories. Commun. Math. Phys., 374(3):1693–1742, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial

    Edward Witten. Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial. Commun. Math. Phys., 121:351–399, 1989

    1989

  45. [53]

    Zimmermann

    W. Zimmermann. Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in mo- mentum space. Commun. Math. Phys. , 15:208–234, 1969. 82

    1969

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.