Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Insight on Gaussian basis set truncation errors in weak to intermediate magnetic fields with an approximate Hamiltonian

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.02635 v2 pith:3QPBH2Q7 submitted 2023-07-05 physics.chem-ph physics.atom-phphysics.comp-ph

classification physics.chem-phphysics.atom-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords basiscalculationsfieldsgaussianmagneticsetserrorstruncation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Strong magnetic fields such as those found on white dwarfs have significant effects on the electronic structure of atoms and molecules. However, the vast majority of molecular studies in the literature in such fields are carried out with Gaussian basis sets designed for zero field, leading to large basis set truncation errors [Lehtola et al, Mol. Phys. 2020, 118, e1597989]. In this work, we aim to identify the failures of the Gaussian basis sets in atomic calculations to guide the design of new basis sets for strong magnetic fields. We achieve this by performing fully numerical electronic structure calculations at the complete basis set (CBS) limit for the ground state and low lying excited states of the atoms $1 \le Z \le 18$ in weak to intermediate magnetic fields. We also carry out finite-field calculations for a variety of Gaussian basis sets, introducing a real-orbital approximation for the magnetic-field Hamiltonian. Our primary focus is on the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set, which has been used in many works in the literature. A study of the differences in total energies of the fully numerical CBS limit calculations and the approximate Gaussian basis calculations is carried out to provide insight into basis set truncation errors. Examining a variety of states over the range of magnetic field strengths from $B = 0$ to $B = 0.6 B_0$, we observe significant differences for the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set, while much smaller errors are afforded by the benchmark-quality AHGBSP3-9 basis set [Lehtola, J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 134108]. This suggests that there is considerable room to improve Gaussian basis sets for calculations at finite magnetic fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Atomic Confinement Potentials and the Generation of Numerical Atomic Orbitals

    physics.comp-ph 2025-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Valence orbitals are largely insensitive to the form of soft confinement, a new exponential potential localizes numerical atomic orbitals faster than polynomial potentials, and FHI-aims singular-potential defaults yie...

Pith tools