Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

NewsHomepages: Homepage Layouts Capture Information Prioritization Decisions

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Editorial priorities on news homepages can be inferred from layout alone, and the learned signal transfers across outlets and to non-news documents.

desk verdict A genuinely useful public dataset and a sensible pairwise model of layout prominence; the transfer demonstrations are exploratory and should be framed as such. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00004 v1 pith:3R7ZZDRS submitted 2024-11-21 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

Ben Welsh , Naitian Zhou , Arda Kaz , Michael Vu , Alexander Spangher This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords homepagelayoutsinformationprioritizationnewsworthinesseditorialdecision-makingpairwisepreferencemodelslayoutparsingcomputationaljournalismnewsdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the layout of a news homepage—where an article appears, how large it is, and whether it carries images—encodes the editorial judgment of how newsworthy that article is. To support this, it introduces NewsHomepages, a dataset of over 3,000 news homepages captured twice daily for three years, and trains pairwise text classifiers that predict which of two articles an editor would rank higher based on size and position. The paper shows these models transfer: a model trained on one outlet can sort another outlet's articles, and can rank non-news documents such as San Francisco city council policies by their newsworthiness. If the argument holds, homepage layouts become a large-scale, continuously updated source of editorial priority labels for journalism tools and for studying how news organizations allocate attention.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pipeline that converts homepage screenshots into pairwise training signals. First, a deterministic DOM-Tree algorithm extracts candidate article bounding boxes from the HTML; a Detectron2 object detector (ResNet-101 backbone with a feature pyramid network) is then trained on the filtered output to robustly find article cards in the 363,000 snapshots. Second, each article is reduced to a text sequence, and a distilbert-base-uncased Transformer is trained to classify pairs $(a_1, a_2)$ as preferring $a_1$ over $a_2$ according to three criteria: size, position, and the combination size $\times$ position. The key move is the pairwise formulation, which converts an intractable global placement prediction into a binary classification that captures the site's implicit ranking, with adjacent-article sampling keeping pairs challenging and topically similar.

What would settle it

Compare the model's inferred ranking against an explicit priority ranking provided by an outlet's editors for the same set of articles from that outlet's homepage; if the ranked lists disagree substantially, for instance Kendall's $\tau$ near zero on a held-out sample where editors state their true order, the claim that layout reveals editorial priorities would be falsified. The paper itself notes that no such gold truth currently exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that editorial priorities and decision-making can be inferred simply by examining the layout decisions made on homepages. Working from the visual cues editors manipulate—position (top-left is more prominent), surface area (larger is more important), and the presence of graphics—the paper casts homepage construction as a pairwise preference problem: for any two articles on a homepage, a model predicts which one the editor treated as more significant. A compact Transformer (distilbert-base-uncased) trained on these pairwise labels recovers the preference signal with respectable accuracy, most outlets scoring above $F_1 > 0.6$. Two demonstrations show the signal is not merely topical: a right-leaning outlet and a left-leaning outlet, Breitbart and Mother Jones, exhibit among the highest newsworthiness agreement despite being topically distant, and models trained on homepages can rank a decade of San Francisco policies to surface newsworthy leads, an application 81% of consulted journalists said they would consider using.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the editorial priority pattern learned from one outlet's homepage transfers to other domains, whether another outlet's articles or non-news texts like city policies, and the paper concedes that without a gold-standard ranking from editors this transfer cannot be conclusively measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If layout encodes editorial priorities, then every archived homepage becomes a training label, allowing newsworthiness models to be built at scale without manual annotation.
  • Newsworthiness judgments emerge as a measurable variable orthogonal to topical similarity, opening the way to study how outlets differ in priority even when they cover the same stories.
  • The pairwise preference formulation can be reused to rank any corpus, such as government documents, press releases, or social media posts, by implicit news value, supporting journalistic lead-finding.
  • Accuracy on held-out homepage pairs indicates that editorial layout policies are predictable enough to model, so the same approach could be extended to track how priorities shift over time or across sections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this transferability holds beyond news, curated interfaces such as social media feeds, streaming homepages, and app stores could be read the same way: their layouts are implicit priority statements that models could decode.
  • The Breitbart–Mother Jones agreement suggests a testable hypothesis that editorial priority norms are shared across the professional field more than ideology; other ideologically opposed pairs could be checked with the released models.
  • Because the dataset spans 18 languages but validation covers only English-language U.S. outlets, a natural extension is to test cross-lingual transfer; failure would indicate that layout-based newsworthiness is culturally specific.
  • A practical extension is a real-time newsworthiness score for arbitrary text, such as monitoring city council minutes, regulatory filings, or press releases, by applying the pairwise model to each incoming document.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper introduces NewsHomepages, a corpus of 3,489 news homepage snapshots collected twice daily over three years, together with a bootstrapped layout-parsing pipeline that trains a Detectron2 bounding-box detector from DOM-derived pseudo-labels. It then trains per-outlet DistilBERT pairwise classifiers to predict relative article prominence from article text, using size-based, position-based, and combined size-and-position labels derived from the layouts, and reports held-out F1 scores for 31 outlets. Two downstream demonstrations are presented: a cross-outlet rank-correlation analysis of newsworthiness judgments, and an application of the models to rank San Francisco Board of Supervisors policies. The paper argues that homepage layouts capture editorial prioritization decisions and that these learned preferences transfer across outlets and into non-news domains. It releases code and data links for the dataset and pipeline.

Significance. If the transferability claims were validated, this would be a genuinely useful contribution: a large, public homepage-layout dataset; a practical deterministic-to-learned parsing bootstrapping procedure; and evidence that textual cues can predict layout-derived prominence within outlets. The dataset release, the pipeline description, and the per-outlet pairwise benchmark are concrete, reproducible assets. The central scientific claim, however, is stronger than the evidence: the paper's own Section 6 concedes that transfer cannot be conclusively measured without a gold standard, yet the two demonstrations are presented as findings. The value of the resource is not in doubt, but the interpretive weight placed on the transfer experiments currently exceeds what the experiments support.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1 and §6] The central transferability claim is not directly tested. Section 5.1 computes Kendall's tau between rankings produced by different outlets' models on shared article lists, which measures agreement between models, not whether a model trained on outlet A can predict outlet B's actual layout-derived pairwise preferences. The dataset contains per-outlet held-out pairwise labels, so a direct cross-outlet evaluation is feasible: train on A, apply to B's held-out pairs, and measure pairwise accuracy/F1 against B's layout-derived ground truth. This missing evaluation is load-bearing because the Section 6 claim that 'editorial priorities and decision-making can be inferred simply by examining the layout decisions made on homepages' and both downstream demonstrations depend on transfer across outlets and domains.
  2. [§5.2] Task 2 lacks any ground-truth ranking or baseline. The top-10 policy lists are summarized by an LLM, and the 81% journalist-survey figure reports impressions of a tool, not quality of the ranking. No comparison is made to chronological, random, or topic-similarity baselines, and the top-10 cutoff is arbitrary. Since this task is one of the two demonstrations used to support domain transfer, the manuscript should either provide a ranking-quality evaluation (even a small human annotation of policy newsworthiness) or explicitly reframe the result as an uncontrolled case study.
  3. [Table 4 and Figure 2] No confidence intervals or significance tests are reported for the per-outlet pairwise classifiers or for the Kendall's tau agreement matrix. This matters because several outlets perform near chance (arstechnica F1=17.5, breitbartnews F1=22.8, foxnews F1=38.6, wsj F1=48.0), and the Figure 2 correlation matrix is built from rankings produced by these noisy models. A specific conclusion such as the Breitbart/Mother Jones agreement should be accompanied by bootstrapped intervals or a permutation test to establish that it is not an artifact of model noise.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Contributions bullet] The first bullet contains a typo: 'hompage' should be 'homepage'.
  2. [§5.1] The notation for the article lists is confusing: '{a1, a2, ..., a1000}9 j=1' and '{o}9 j=1' should be written with explicit subscripts and index ranges so that the outer loop over the nine outlets is clear.
  3. [§5.1 and §5.2] The outlet selection criterion 'matching on variables such as topic, length, publication date, and other potential confounders' is not described in enough detail to assess whether the Task 1 agreement analysis is confounded by these variables; please specify the matching procedure and the number of matched articles per outlet.
  4. [§4.1] The definition of the combined size-and-position preference is incomplete: 'particularly focusing on articles that are in the top 10' is a sentence fragment, and the manuscript does not state what 'top 10' refers to or how ties between the size and position criteria are broken.
  5. [Figure 1 and §4.1] Figure 1 lists graphics and font as newsworthiness signals, but the pairwise models in Section 4 use only text as input and size/position as labels; the paper should clarify that graphics and font are not modeled in the reported experiments.
  6. [Table 3] Model names are inconsistent: 'Flan-t5-base' and 'flan-t5-base' are both used, and 'Roberta' is sometimes written with lowercase 'b'; please standardize the names.
  7. [Appendix A] The sentence 'in Table 8 we show' is incomplete; it should be finished with the missing object (presumably the outlet identifiers or a description of the dataset breakdown).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central 'newsworthiness' construct is operationalized as layout prominence, making the Section 6 inference-from-layout claim definitional; core text-to-layout prediction remains empirically grounded.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.1 (preference definitions) and Section 6 (core finding)]
    "We explore three variations of preference criteria for the preference variable, p: 1. Size-based Preference: We define po(a1 > a2) = 1 if article a1 occupies more surface area on the homepage than article a2 ... 2. Position-based Preference: We set po(a1 > a2) = 1 if article a1 is placed in a more favorable location on the homepage ... Our demonstrations show two core findings: first, editorial priorities and decision-making can be inferred simply by examining the layout decisions made on homepages."

    The outcome construct 'editorial priorities' / 'newsworthiness' is operationalized entirely by layout attributes (size and position) in Section 4.1. Therefore the Section 6 conclusion that priorities can be inferred from layout is a restatement of the label definition rather than an empirically derived result. Likewise, the Section 5.2 policy 'newsworthiness' rankings are the same fitted model outputs, with no independent gold truth; the paper concedes this in Section 6. The held-out text-to-layout prediction task itself remains non-circular, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

The paper's core supervised pipeline is not circular: pairwise labels are derived from layout (size and position), models are evaluated on held-out pairs, and the reported F1 scores are genuine empirical outcomes. Task 1's Kendall tau matrix is an empirical property of the fitted models, although the text sometimes overstates it as agreement between publishers' decisions rather than between models. Task 2 is explicitly a demonstration without a gold standard, and Section 6 admits that no conclusive measurement of transfer is possible without editor rankings; Section 10.2 likewise states that the models rely on position and size as proxies for editorial decisions. The equation-level circularity is terminological: 'editorial priorities' and 'newsworthiness' are defined as layout prominence, and Section 6 then presents the inference of priorities from layout as a demonstrated finding. The paper's self-citations (notably Spangher et al. 2023a) supply the policy corpus and framing but are not load-bearing for the modeling result. Overall, there is partial circularity in the central framing, but substantial independent empirical content remains in the dataset and the text-to-layout prediction experiments.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several domain assumptions about the meaning of layout features and the transferability of learned preferences. No new physical entities, mediators, or conserved quantities are introduced. The free parameters are hand-chosen thresholds and cutoffs in the data processing and evaluation pipeline.

free parameters (3)
  • snapshot YOLO detection count match threshold = 80%
    In Section 3 Step 2, snapshots are discarded when the YOLO detection count is not within 80% of the archived snapshot. This threshold is chosen by hand and affects which homepages enter the training data.
  • challenge/clean evaluation split percentile = 10%
    Section 3.2 selects the best and worst 10% of homepages by OCR match to construct the clean and challenge evaluation sets. This choice affects the reported error rates and the comparison between DOM-Tree and Detectron2.
  • policy top-10 cutoff for Task 2 = 10
    In Section 5.2, the top 10 ranked policies from each outlet model are selected for LLM summarization and journalist feedback. This is a hand-chosen reporting parameter, not a fitted value.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Position and size of an article card on a homepage are valid proxies for editorial prioritization or newsworthiness.
    This is the core operationalization, supported by cited eye-tracking and design literature but not independently validated against editor judgments in this paper.
  • domain assumption Pairwise preference judgments can be aggregated into a global ranking of articles or policies.
    Section 5 uses pairwise models to produce fully sorted lists, but the paper does not discuss transitivity, cycles, or the aggregation algorithm.
  • domain assumption Editorial cues learned from one outlet's homepage transfer to other outlets and to non-news documents.
    Stated in Section 6 as the premise of both demonstrations. The paper notes there is no gold truth to validate this assumption.
  • domain assumption The URL classifier and OCR matching correctly identify news article links and article bounding boxes.
    Used in Section 3 to filter non-article links and low-quality boxes. The reported 96% accuracy of the URL classifier is not error-free, and errors propagate to the training data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NewsHomepages: Homepage Layouts Capture Information Prioritization Decisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3R7ZZDRS

@misc{pith2026250100004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NewsHomepages: Homepage Layouts Capture Information Prioritization Decisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3R7ZZDRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00004}
}
read the original abstract

Information prioritization plays an important role in how humans perceive and understand the world. Homepage layouts serve as a tangible proxy for this prioritization. In this work, we present NewsHomepages, a large dataset of over 3,000 new website homepages (including local, national and topic-specific outlets) captured twice daily over a three-year period. We develop models to perform pairwise comparisons between news items to infer their relative significance. To illustrate that modeling organizational hierarchies has broader implications, we applied our models to rank-order a collection of local city council policies passed over a ten-year period in San Francisco, assessing their "newsworthiness". Our findings lay the groundwork for leveraging implicit organizational cues to deepen our understanding of information prioritization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two “newsworthiness” signals that editors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of Kendall’s τ rank correlation (on newsworthiness judgements) and SBERT cosine similarity (on articles) across news outlets. dings, as shown in Figure 2b. These embedding￾level similarities align more closely with topical overlaps, indicating distinct right-wing and left￾wing clusters with some overlap in between. Taken together, these results suggest that news￾worthiness preference is a compelling and o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. We show three sections of a sample homepage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of our deterministic bootstrapping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Different analyses we run on bounding boxes across time: average locations of bounding boxes on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: With our suite of tools for parsing homepages, we can examine on a granular level the movement of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: This diagram is an overview of the data preparation and training of the Detectron2 model for predicting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: When sorting our sources to determine the ones most difficult for the DOM-Tree algorithm, we define the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DiscoSum: Discourse-aware News Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DiscoSum pairs news articles with cross-platform human summaries and shows that beam search guided by a discourse labeler produces summaries that better match a target sentence structure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Massih-Reza Amini, Vasilii Feofanov, Loic Pauletto, Lies Hadjadj, Emilie Devijver, and Yury Maximov. 2022. Self-training: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12040

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Christin Ang \`e le. 2020. Metrics at work: Journalism and the contested meaning of algorithms

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Chandrakala Arya and Sanjay K Dwivedi. 2016. News web page classification using url content and structure attributes. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), pages 317--322. IEEE

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Barnhurst and John Nerone

    Kevin G. Barnhurst and John Nerone. 2001. The Form of News: A History. Guilford Press

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Mark Boukes, Natalie P Jones, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2022. Newsworthiness and story prominence: How the presence of news factors relates to upfront position and length of news stories. Journalism, 23(1):98--116

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Brian S Brooks and James L Pinson. 2022. The Art of Editing: In the Age of Convergence. Routledge

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Hans-J \"u rgen Bucher and Peter Schumacher. 2006. The relevance of attention for selecting news content. an eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Sasha Costanza-Chock and Pablo Rey-Mazon. 2016. Pageonex: New approaches to newspaper front page analysis. International Journal of Communication, 10:28

    work page 2016

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Nicholas Diakopoulos, Mor Naaman, and Funda Kivran-Swaine. 2010. Diamonds in the rough: Social media visual analytics for journalistic inquiry. In 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pages 115--122. IEEE

    2010

  2. [10]

    Johan Galtung and Mari Holmboe Ruge. 1965. The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1):64--90

    1965

  3. [11]

    Mario R. García. 1987. Contemporary Newspaper Design: Shaping the News in the Digital Age. Prentice Hall

    1987

  4. [12]

    Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M Shapiro. 2010. What drives media slant? evidence from us daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1):35--71

    2010

  5. [13]

    Tony Harcup and Deirdre O'Neill. 2001. What is news? galtung and ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2):261--280

    2001

  6. [14]

    Tony Harcup and Deirdre O'Neill. 2017. What is news? news values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12):1470--1488

    2017

  7. [15]

    Stephanie Hays. 2018. An analysis of design components of award-winning newspaper pages. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 9(2):44--63

    2018

  8. [16]

    Edward S Herman and Noam Chomsky. 2021. Manufacturing consent. In Power and Inequality, pages 198--206. Routledge

    2021

  9. [17]

    Zhenhui Jiang, Weiquan Wang, Bernard CY Tan, and Jie Yu. 2016. The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users’ first interaction with websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1):229--259

    2016

  10. [18]

    Alan Lambert and Julie Brock. 2005. Layout complexity and visitors’ attention on web pages: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Digital Information, 6(2)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Kalev Leetaru and Philip A Schrodt. 2013. Gdelt: Global data on events, location, and tone, 1979--2012. In ISA annual convention, volume 2, pages 1--49. Citeseer

    2013

  12. [20]

    Minghao Li, Leyang Cui, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, and Ming Zhou. 2020. Docbank: A benchmark dataset for document layout analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 949--960

    2020

  13. [21]

    Sourab Mangrulkar, Sylvain Gugger, Lysandre Debut, Younes Belkada, Sayak Paul, and Benjamin Bossan. 2022. Peft: State-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. https://github.com/huggingface/peft

    2022

  14. [22]

    George A Miller. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2):81

    1956

  15. [23]

    Rishabh Misra. 2022. News category dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11429

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Clifford Nass and Laurie Mason. 1990. On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. Organizations and communication technology, 46:67

    1990

  17. [25]

    Jakob Nielsen. 2006. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/. Accessed: 2023-10-06

    2006

  18. [26]

    Jakob Nielsen and Kara Pernice. 2009. Eyetracking Web Usability. New Riders

    2009

  19. [27]

    Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv

    2018

  20. [28]

    Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3982--3992

    2019

  21. [29]

    Hal Roberts, Rahul Bhargava, Linas Valiukas, Dennis Jen, Momin M Malik, Cindy Sherman Bishop, Emily B Ndulue, Aashka Dave, Justin Clark, Bruce Etling, et al. 2021. Media cloud: Massive open source collection of global news on the open web. In Proceedings of the International A...

    2021

  22. [30]

    Louis Rosenfeld. 2002. Information architecture for the world wide web. O'Reilly Media

    2002

  23. [31]

    Salganik, Peter S

    Matthew J. Salganik, Peter S. Dodds, and Duncan J. Watts. 2006. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762):854--856

    2006

  24. [32]

    Zejiang Shen, Ruochen Zhang, Melissa Dell, Benjamin Charles Moser, Jacob Carlson, and Weining Li. 2021. Layoutparser: A unified toolkit for deep learning based document image analysis. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages...

    2021

  25. [33]

    Shoemaker

    Pamela J. Shoemaker. 1991. Gatekeeping. Sage Publications

    1991

  26. [34]

    Emily Silcock, Abhishek Arora, Luca D'Amico-Wong, and Melissa Dell. 2024. Newswire: A large-scale structured database of a century of historical news. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09490

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Alexander Spangher. 2015. Building the next new york times recommendation engine. The New York Times, pages 08--26

    2015

  28. [36]

    Alexander Spangher, Emilio Ferrara, Ben Welsh, Nanyun Peng, Serdar Tumgoren, and Jonathan May. 2023 a . Tracking the newsworthiness of public documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09734

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Alexander Spangher, Yao Ming, Xinyu Hua, and Nanyun Peng. 2022 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.509 Sequentially controlled text generation . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 6848--6866, Abu Dhabi, United Arab E...

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Alexander Spangher, Nanyun Peng, Emilio Ferrara, and Jonathan May. 2023 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.221 Identifying informational sources in news articles . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 362...

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Alexander Spangher, Xiang Ren, Jonathan May, and Nanyun Peng. 2022 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.10 N ews E dits: A news article revision dataset and a novel document-level reasoning challenge . In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chap...

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Margaret Sullivan. 2016. The end of the page one meeting: Making way for the reader in choosing the news. The New York Times. https://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/the-end-of-the-page-one-meeting-making-way-for-the-reader-in-choosing-the-news/

    2016

  33. [41]

    Peyman TalebiFard and Victor CM Leung. 2014. Context-aware dissemination of information and services in heterogeneous network environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 5:775--787

    2014

  34. [42]

    Edward R. Tufte. 1990. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press

    1990

  35. [43]

    Nikki Usher. 2014. Making news at the New York times. University of Michigan Press

    2014

  36. [44]

    Yuxin Wu, Alexander Kirillov, Francisco Massa, Wan-Yen Lo, and Ross Girshick. 2019. Detectron2. https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2

    2019

  37. [45]

    Xiaojie Zhong, Jianbin Tang, and Antonio Jimeno Yepes. 2019. Publaynet: largest dataset ever for document layout analysis. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pages 1015--1022. IEEE

    2019

  38. [46]

    Dolf Zillmann, Silvia Knobloch, and Zhao Yu. 2001. Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3(4):301--324

    2001

  39. [47]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list...

  40. [48]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.