REVIEW 3 cited by
Deep Learning Models for Predicting Wildfires from Historical Remote-Sensing Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Identifying regions that have high likelihood for wildfires is a key component of land and forestry management and disaster preparedness. We create a data set by aggregating nearly a decade of remote-sensing data and historical fire records to predict wildfires. This prediction problem is framed as three machine learning tasks. Results are compared and analyzed for four different deep learning models to estimate wildfire likelihood. The results demonstrate that deep learning models can successfully identify areas of high fire likelihood using aggregated data about vegetation, weather, and topography with an AUC of 83%.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CanadaFireSat: Toward high-resolution wildfire forecasting with multiple modalities
Introduces a multi-modal 100m wildfire forecasting benchmark for Canada and shows deep learning models benefit from fusing Sentinel-2 imagery with environmental predictors.
-
Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning for Wildfire Danger Forecasting
A joint epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty framework improves next-day wildfire danger forecasts by about two percent in F1 and calibration, and shows that aleatoric uncertainty grows with forecast horizon.
-
Physics-guided spatiotemporal neural models for fuel density prediction
Adding physics-guided loss terms to ConvLSTM, AFNONet, and ViViT improves fuel density prediction accuracy and stability over purely data-driven baselines on simulated prescribed-fire data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.