Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 104 references

This paper claims that a non-zero three-point correlation in an isotropic, stationary stochastic gravitational-wave background is an unambiguous signature of scalar polarizations, with no tensor or vector contamination.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 20:58 UTC pith:3SF2DA2H

load-bearing objection The central claim is not supported: the psi-averaging that kills tensor and vector three-point signals is an extra projection, not the physical observable, and the authors' own Ref. [38] already found nonzero tensor three-point overlap functions. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.08273 v1 pith:3SF2DA2H submitted 2025-09-10 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

New test of modified gravity with gravitational wave experiments

N. M. Jim\'enez Cruz , Flavio C. S\'anchez , Gianmassimo Tasinato This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords stochastic gravitational-wave backgroundgravitational-wave polarizationsscalar modesbispectrummodified gravitypulsar timing arraysastrometryprimordial magnetic fields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that when you average over the arbitrary rotation of the polarization basis, the three-point correlation of an isotropic, stationary stochastic gravitational-wave background vanishes identically for tensor and vector modes, but not for scalar modes. That turns three-point measurements into a null experiment: a detected non-zero bispectrum would be a clean, contamination-free sign of scalar polarizations, which theories beyond General Relativity predict. The authors derive the relevant response functions for ground-based interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, and astrometry, construct an optimal estimator, and give Fisher forecasts for pulsar-timing sensitivity. They also exhibit a concrete cosmological source—second-order gravitational waves from primordial magnetic fields—whose scalar bispectrum can be enhanced in folded momentum configurations. If the claim holds, three-point correlations open a new observational window on modified gravity.

Core claim

The central discovery is a polarization selection rule for three-point statistics. For a detector signal s = D^{ij} h_{ij}, correlating three outputs and averaging over the polarization angle ψ in the plane transverse to each gravitational-wave direction makes the three-point response vanish for tensor and vector polarizations, because their polarization tensors rotate with phases e^{±2iψ} and e^{±iψ}; the scalar breathing polarization tensor is invariant under this rotation. Consequently, the three-point response of coincident ground-based detectors and the pulsar-timing-array overlap reduction function are non-zero only when scalar modes are present, with the simple angular form κ^scal_abc

What carries the argument

The central object is the polarization-angle-averaged three-point response function: detector tensors contracted with three copies of the same polarization tensor, integrated over all sky directions and averaged over the arbitrary rotation ψ of the transverse basis vectors. Under this average, spin-2 and spin-1 polarization tensors pick up phases e^{±2iψ} and e^{±iψ} and integrate to zero, while the scalar breathing tensor is ψ-invariant and survives. Combined with the stationary, isotropic, folded ansatz for the GW bispectrum, this machinery converts the three-point correlation into a null test for scalar polarizations and yields the concrete response functions used for forecasts.

Load-bearing premise

The whole zero-versus-nonzero separation rests on assuming the physical background's three-point statistics have the stationary, isotropic, folded form of Eq. (2.8), and that averaging over the polarization angle ψ is the correct way to implement rotational invariance of the response.

What would settle it

Compute the ψ-averaged detector response for a stationary, isotropic tensor or vector bispectrum with a non-folded angular kernel (e.g., replace the two sky-direction delta functions in Eq. (2.8) by a kernel depending on the three pairwise dot products); if any tensor or vector contribution survives, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • A detected non-zero stationary, isotropic three-point correlation in ground-based or pulsar-timing data would directly imply scalar polarizations, because tensor and vector modes cannot generate one under the stated averaging.
  • The optimal Wiener filter in Eq. (3.16) isolates the scalar bispectrum without needing to build null streams, and Gaussian noise does not bias the estimator, making the test robust to certain clock and ephemeris systematics.
  • Under idealized Fisher forecasts, scalar bispectrum amplitudes P0 around 5×10^-17 are accessible with 100–200 pulsars and 15 years of data, with uncertainties that depend strongly on the bispectrum's spectral indices.
  • Second-order gravitational waves sourced by primordial magnetic fields produce a scalar bispectrum with amplitude scaling as Ω_B^3/Ω_rad^2, with support only on folded triangles; stationarity is what prevents the signal from being erased by decorrelation.
  • Astrometry alone is a null channel for three-point measurements—its overlap vanishes for all polarizations—while pulsar–star cross-correlations are non-zero for scalars and can help calibrate the search.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's argument suggests a stronger screening statement than the authors spell out: in any search that averages over sky directions and polarization angles, the leading three-point statistic is automatically scalar-selective, so one could search for scalar modes without first separating polarizations in the data.
  • The zero/nonzero dichotomy depends on the folded, stationary ansatz of Eq. (2.8); if a realistic tensor or vector background has non-folded three-point correlations, its signal could survive the averaging, so the method should be validated against non-folded bispectrum templates.
  • The same estimator could be applied to existing pulsar-timing datasets as a non-Gaussian null test for scalar modes, with an upper limit on the scalar bispectrum amplitude as a first practical result.
  • By symmetry, four-point correlation functions are the analogous channel for tensor modes, since products of spin-2 tensors can form ψ-invariant combinations; this points to a hierarchy of correlators that separately probe each spin sector of the gravitational field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes to use the three-point correlation function (bispectrum) of an isotropic, stationary stochastic gravitational-wave background as a discriminator of scalar (breathing) polarization. It claims that after averaging over the polarization angle ψ, the response of GW detectors to tensor and vector three-point correlations vanishes while the scalar response is nonzero, and therefore a detected three-point correlation is an unambiguous scalar signature. The authors derive three-point overlap reduction functions for coincident ground-based interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, astrometry, and cross-correlations; construct an optimal estimator and Fisher forecasts for PTA; and present a primordial magnetogenesis model that sources a scalar GW bispectrum in folded configurations.

Significance. If correct, the selection rule would constitute a qualitatively new null test for scalar polarizations, using only the three-point function and avoiding contamination from tensor/vector modes. The paper contains useful analytic material: explicit scalar three-point overlap functions (e.g., Eq. 2.33), an optimal filtering construction (Sec. 3.1), and a first calculation of a scalar-polarization GW bispectrum from a magnetic-field source (Sec. 4). The central physical claim, however, is not established: the polarization-angle average is an additional projection that is not equivalent to the physical three-point observable, and the tensor cancellation is shown only for a restricted equal-polarization, folded configuration. These issues must be resolved before the result can be accepted as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.17)–(2.18) and (2.29)–(2.30)] The selection rule is introduced by an additional average over the polarization angle ψ of products of polarization tensors with a ψ-independent bispectrum B. This is not the physical three-point correlator: the observable ⟨s1 s2 s3⟩ is the contraction of detector responses with the ensemble-averaged metric correlation, which is already invariant under basis rotations and contains all mixed-polarization terms. For a statistically isotropic background, B_{λ1λ2λ3} must transform under ψ so that the full sum is invariant; averaging only the equal-polarization response tensors with B held fixed discards exactly the components that can make tensor/vector contributions nonzero. The paper’s own footnote 4 states that this averaging was not performed in Ref. [38]; if, as that reference shows, tensor three-point overlap functions are nonzero without the average, the vanishing here is an artifact
  2. [Sec. 2.3–2.4, Eqs. (2.17), (2.29)] The tensor and vector response functions sum only over equal polarizations, ∑_{λ=+,×} F^λ_a F^λ_b F^λ_c. The full bispectrum of an isotropic tensor background includes mixed components such as B_{+ + ×}, B_{+ × +}, and B_{× + +}; these are omitted from the response. No argument is given that such mixed components vanish. Until a calculation contracts the complete B_{λ1λ2λ3} with F^{λ1}_a F^{λ2}_b F^{λ3}_c and performs the angular and polarization integrals, the claimed cancellation for tensor modes is not established.
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.8)] The folded delta structure δ^(2)(n1−n3)δ^(2)(n2−n3) is assumed, not derived. Stationarity in time requires only δ(f1+f2+f3); spatial homogeneity and isotropy require δ^(3)(f1 n1+f2 n2+f3 n3), which permits non-collinear triangle configurations. Non-folded tensor/vector bispectrum configurations can contribute to a stationary three-point statistic, and the paper does not show they are suppressed. Hence the abstract’s phrase “any detection of a non-zero three-point function” is broader than the configuration analyzed.
  4. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.22)–(4.27)] The magnetogenesis example is presented as a proof of principle, but the convolution G1(k1,k2,â) is not evaluated, no numerical amplitude is given, and no comparison with the Fisher sensitivity of Sec. 3.2 is attempted. The statement that “large three-point functions” can be produced is therefore not quantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.17), (4.21)] The logarithmic factor appears as ln²(k²τ_R²) in Eq. (4.17) but [ln|kτ_R|]² in Eq. (4.21). Please clarify the argument and the numerical factor relating the two expressions.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.23)] The inverse covariance C^{-1}_{AB} = 2TΔf²/(3 R^N_A R^N_B) δ_AB contains factors whose derivation and dimensions are not fully explained; in particular, the definition of R^N_A in Eq. (3.24) should be stated more explicitly.
  3. [Figs. 3 and 4] The color scales are not defined, and the plotted quantities Tr[H0H0] and K0·K0^T are not described in enough detail for the reader to interpret the angular structure.
  4. [Sec. 2.4, Eqs. (2.24), (2.29)–(2.30)] The pulsar term in the redshift response (2.24) is neglected in the three-point overlap functions without discussion. Since pulsar terms contribute to two-point PTA overlaps, their omission may affect the angular response (2.33) and the subsequent forecasts.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typographical issues: “idealized sitation” in Sec. 3; “an specific” in the abstract; the notation n_{1,2} and f^{3−n1}_1 f^{3−n2}_2 in Eqs. (3.20)–(3.22) is confusing and should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the selection rule is a derived null-test under stated assumptions, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a mathematical selection rule: under the folded, stationary ansatz of Eq. (2.8) and the explicit polarization-angle average in Eqs. (2.17)-(2.18), pure tensor and vector three-point detector responses vanish while scalar responses do not. This follows from the transformation properties of the polarization tensors and is not obtained by fitting a parameter to data. The Fisher forecasts and magnetogenesis example use free parameters (P0, n1, n2, Omega_B, f(k)) as illustrative inputs; they are not tuned to produce the zero/nonzero dichotomy. The reliance on the authors' prior work [38] is load-bearing for the stationarity/folded-ansatz motivation, but that result is an external, published calculation and is partly re-derived in the text, so it does not make the argument circular. The main caveats, such as the physical status of the psi-averaging prescription and the restrictiveness of the folded ansatz, are correctness/scope concerns rather than circularity: the paper states its assumptions explicitly. The abstract's unconditional phrasing ('any detection of a non-zero three-point function... unambiguous signature') overstates the conditional nature of the result, but this is an over-claim, not an equivalence of inputs and outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. Its free parameters are the forecast template parameters and the magnetogenesis model inputs. The critical unproven premise is the equivalence between psi-averaged response functions and the physical ensemble average for general tensor/vector bispectra.

free parameters (4)
  • P0 = 5e-17 (fiducial in Fisher forecast)
    Bispectrum amplitude in the power-law Ansatz (Eq. 3.20); chosen by hand to illustrate detectability, not derived from a model.
  • n1, n2 = -0.03, 0, 0.03 (chosen values)
    Spectral indices in the bispectrum template (Eq. 3.20); fixed when computing Fisher constraints, treated as free model parameters.
  • Omega_B = unspecified
    Magnetic field amplitude in the magnetogenesis example (Section 4); enters two- and three-point GW amplitudes, no numerical value or bound mapping is given.
  • f(k) = unspecified
    Dimensionless magnetic spectrum shape in Eq. (4.3); model-dependent and not specified in the example.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The SGWB is stationary and isotropic, with folded three-point structure as in Eq. (2.8).
    The entire scalar-only selection rule is derived under this background assumption, stated in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Averaging over the polarization angle psi is a valid way to enforce gauge invariance of observable three-point responses.
    The psi-average is introduced in Section 2.1 and used in the response functions (2.17)-(2.18); if it is not equivalent to the physical ensemble average, the central diagnostic fails.
  • domain assumption The longitudinal scalar polarization is excluded because it would be a ghost in Lorentz-covariant modified gravity.
    Stated in Section 2.1; restricts the analysis to the breathing scalar mode.
  • domain assumption The breathing scalar polarization obeys the same free wave equation as tensor modes, sourced by the magnetic stress tensor in Section 4.
    Eq. (4.5) is assumed without deriving it from a specific modified gravity action; the magnetogenesis example is illustrative.
  • domain assumption Noise in GW detectors is stationary, Gaussian, and uncorrelated between detectors.
    Used to construct the estimator and Fisher forecasts in Section 3.1; departures from Gaussian noise would introduce extra three-point contributions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25132 in / 38199 out tokens · 452328 ms · 2026-08-04T20:58:23.041645+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New test of modified gravity with gravitational wave experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SF2DA2H

@misc{pith2026250908273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New test of modified gravity with gravitational wave experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SF2DA2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08273}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose a new strategy to probe non-tensorial polarizations in the stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background. Averaging over polarization angles, we find that three-point correlations of the GW signal vanish for tensor and vector modes, while scalar modes generically leave a nonzero imprint. This property makes the GW bispectrum a distinctive and robust diagnostic of scalar polarizations predicted in theories beyond General Relativity. We derive the corresponding response functions for ground-based interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, and astrometric observables, and we construct an optimal estimator together with simple Fisher forecasts for pulsar-timing sensitivity. As a proof of principle, we show that second-order GWs sourced by primordial magnetogenesis can be characterized by large three-point functions. Our results demonstrate that GW three-point correlations provide a novel observational window on physics beyond General Relativity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08273 by Flavio C. S\'anchez, Gianmassimo Tasinato, N. M. Jim\'enez Cruz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representation of folded configurations for the shape of the tensor bispectrum in momentum space. The three side of triangles lie on top of each other, and the length of the biggest triangle side, corresponding here to frequency f3, is equal to the sum of the other two sides, f1 + f2. and, by Fourier transforming, we write the three-point function of the detector signal as ⟨s(t1)s(t2)s(t3)⟩ = Z df1 df2 df3… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geometry used to compute three-point overlap functions from pulsars a, b, and c. The Earth is at the origin, pulsar a is placed on the z-axis, pulsar b lies in the xz-plane, and pulsar c is at a generic position. We now extend this construction to higher-order correlators. The three-point correlator of PTA measurements is ⟨za(t) zb(t) zc(t)⟩ = 1 2 Z ∞ −∞ dfh BT (f) κ tens abc (na, nb, nc) + Bb(f) κ scal ab… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mollweide projection of Tr[H0H0] which correlate two stars with a pulsar position, see Eq. (2.41). The result depends only on the star positions. For illustrative reasons, we fix one star at the center of the plot, and we allow the direction of the second vary across the sky. This remarkably simple expression generalizes in an intuitive way the two-point result of Eq. (2.16). In fact, it maintains the mono… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mollweide projection of K0 · KT 0 from Eq. (2.44), for different pulsar–star configurations. In both panels, the first pulsar is fixed at the center. The left panel corresponds to the case where the second pulsar is far from the first, while the right panel shows the case where the two pulsars are close to each other. Correspondingly, in both plots we vary the position of the star. For the correlation of t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Constraints on the parameter P0 of Eq. (3.22) at 3-σ confidence level from the Fisher forecast described in Sec. 3.2. In the two plots we represent results for two pulsar populations and different choices of spectral indices. We take n1 = n2 in the cases shown. The confidence intervals are displayed in the left box of each panel. In all cases, the fiducial value is fixed to P0 = 5 × 10−17 . For the forecas… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007

    2007

  2. [2]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 3, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Andersson,Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

    N. Andersson,Gravitational-Wave Astronomy. Oxford Graduate Texts. Oxford University Press, 11, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,”Phys. Rev. D8(1973) 3308–3321

    1973

  5. [5]

    Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, “Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 884–886

    1973

  6. [6]

    C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background,

    T. Regimbau, “The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.11(2011) 369–390,arXiv:1101.2762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, “Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,”Living Rev. Rel.20no. 1, (2017) 2,arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 16, (2018) 163001,arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]. [10]NANOGravCollaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951no. 1, (2023) L8,arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [11]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

    D. J. Reardonet al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951no. 1, (2023) L6,arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [12]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

    H. Xuet al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.23no. 7, (2023) 075024, arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]. [13]EPT A, InPT A:Collaboration, J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravit...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [15]

    Pulsar timing as a probe of non-einsteinian polarizations of gravitational waves,

    J. F. Lee, KJ and R. H. Price, “Pulsar timing as a probe of non-einsteinian polarizations of gravitational waves,”The Astrophysical Journal685no. 2, (2008) 1304

    2008

  13. [16]

    Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays,

    S. J. Chamberlin and X. Siemens, “Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 082001, arXiv:1111.5661 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [17]

    Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,

    N. Yunes and X. Siemens, “Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,”Living Reviews in Relativity16no. 1, (2013) 1–124

    2013

  15. [18]

    Testing general relativity with low-frequency, space-based gravitational-wave detectors,

    J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, “Testing general relativity with low-frequency, space-based gravitational-wave detectors,”Living Reviews in Relativity16(2013) 1–109

    2013

  16. [19]

    Mapping gravitational-wave backgrounds of arbitrary polarisation using pulsar timing arrays,

    J. R. Gair, J. D. Romano, and S. R. Taylor, “Mapping gravitational-wave backgrounds of arbitrary polarisation using pulsar timing arrays,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 10, (2015) 102003, arXiv:1506.08668 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [20]

    Constraining alternative theories of gravity using pulsar timing arrays,

    N. J. Cornish, L. O’Beirne, S. R. Taylor, and N. Yunes, “Constraining alternative theories of gravity using pulsar timing arrays,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 18, (2018) 181101, arXiv:1712.07132 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [21]

    The nanograv 12.5-year data set: Search for non-einsteinian polarization modes in the gravitational-wave background,

    Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, H. Blumer, B. Becsy, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, S. Chen,et al., “The nanograv 12.5-year data set: Search for non-einsteinian polarization modes in the gravitational-wave background,”The Astrophysical journal letters923no. 2, (2021) L22

    2021

  19. [22]

    The nanograv 15 yr data set: Search for transverse polarization modes in the gravitational-wave background,

    G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, J. Baier, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook,et al., “The nanograv 15 yr data set: Search for transverse polarization modes in the gravitational-wave background,”The Astrophysical Journal Letters964 no. 1, (2024) L14

    2024

  20. [23]

    Search for nontensorial gravitational-wave backgrounds in the nanograv 15-year dataset,

    Z.-C. Chen, Y.-M. Wu, Y.-C. Bi, and Q.-G. Huang, “Search for nontensorial gravitational-wave backgrounds in the nanograv 15-year dataset,”Physical Review D109no. 8, (2024) 084045. 25

    2024

  21. [24]

    Constraining the polarization of gravitational waves with the parkes pulsar timing array second data release,

    Y.-M. Wu, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, “Constraining the polarization of gravitational waves with the parkes pulsar timing array second data release,”The Astrophysical Journal925no. 1, (2022) 37

    2022

  22. [25]

    Constraining alternative theories of gravity using pulsar timing arrays,

    N. J. Cornish, L. O’Beirne, S. R. Taylor, and N. Yunes, “Constraining alternative theories of gravity using pulsar timing arrays,”Physical review letters120no. 18, (2018) 181101

    2018

  23. [26]

    The polarizations of gravitational waves,

    Y. Gong and S. Hou, “The polarizations of gravitational waves,” 2018

    2018

  24. [27]

    Astrometric effects of gravitational wave backgrounds with non-einsteinian polarizations,

    D. P. Mihaylov, C. J. Moore, J. R. Gair, A. Lasenby, and G. Gilmore, “Astrometric effects of gravitational wave backgrounds with non-einsteinian polarizations,”Physical Review D97no. 12, (June, 2018) .http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124058

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124058 2018

  25. [28]

    Constraining the Polarization Content of Gravitational Waves with Astrometry,

    L. O’Beirne and N. J. Cornish, “Constraining the Polarization Content of Gravitational Waves with Astrometry,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 2, (2018) 024020,arXiv:1804.03146 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [29]

    Beyond the Hellings–Downs curve: Non-Einsteinian gravitational waves in pulsar timing array correlations,

    R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, “Beyond the Hellings–Downs curve: Non-Einsteinian gravitational waves in pulsar timing array correlations,”Astron. Astrophys.691(2024) A126, arXiv:2310.07537 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [30]

    A test of gravity with Pulsar Timing Arrays,

    Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, “A test of gravity with Pulsar Timing Arrays,”JCAP11 (2023) 042,arXiv:2304.02640 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [31]

    Search for Non-Tensorial Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds in the NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set

    Z.-C. Chen, Y.-M. Wu, Y.-C. Bi, and Q.-G. Huang, “Search for nontensorial gravitational-wave backgrounds in the NANOGrav 15-year dataset,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 084045, arXiv:2310.11238 [astro-ph.CO]. [32]NANOGravCollaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Transverse Polarization Modes in the Gravitational-wave Backgroun...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [33]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Harmonic Analysis of the Pulsar Angular Correlations,

    G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Harmonic Analysis of the Pulsar Angular Correlations,”arXiv:2411.13472 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [34]

    An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism,

    E. Babichev and C. Deffayet, “An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism,”Class. Quant. Grav. 30(2013) 184001,arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [35]

    Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model,

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, “Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model,”Phys. Rept.568(2015) 1–98,arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [36]

    Tests of Chameleon Gravity,

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein, “Tests of Chameleon Gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.21no. 1, (2018) 1, arXiv:1709.09071 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [37]

    The spectral density of astrophysical stochastic backgrounds,

    E. Belgacem, F. Iacovelli, M. Maggiore, M. Mancarella, and N. Muttoni, “The spectral density of astrophysical stochastic backgrounds,”arXiv:2411.04028 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [38]

    Probing a stationary non-Gaussian background of stochastic gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays

    C. Powell and G. Tasinato, “Probing a stationary non-Gaussian background of stochastic gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays,”JCAP01(2020) 017,arXiv:1910.04758 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [39]

    Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA,

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, “Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 10, (2019) 103521,arXiv:1810.12224 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [40]

    Detection methods for nonGaussian gravitational wave stochastic backgrounds,

    S. Drasco and E. E. Flanagan, “Detection methods for nonGaussian gravitational wave stochastic backgrounds,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 082003,arXiv:gr-qc/0210032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [41]

    Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational waves in the presence of non-Gaussian noise: A performance of generalized cross-correlation statistic

    Y. Himemoto, A. Taruya, H. Kudoh, and T. Hiramatsu, “Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational waves in the presence of non-Gaussian noise: A Performance of generalized cross-correlation statistic,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 022003,arXiv:gr-qc/0607015. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  38. [42]

    Non-Gaussianity analysis of GW background made by short-duration burst signals

    N. Seto, “Non-Gaussianity analysis of GW background made by short-duration burst signals,” Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 043003,arXiv:0908.0228 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [43]

    A Semi-Parametric Approach to the Detection of Non-Gaussian Gravitational Wave Stochastic Backgrounds

    L. Martellini and T. Regimbau, “Semiparametric approach to the detection of non-Gaussian gravitational wave stochastic backgrounds,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 12, (2014) 124009, arXiv:1405.5775 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [44]

    Searching for Bispectrum of Stochastic Gravitational Waves with Pulsar Timing Arrays,

    M. Tsuneto, A. Ito, T. Noumi, and J. Soda, “Searching for Bispectrum of Stochastic Gravitational Waves with Pulsar Timing Arrays,”JCAP03(2019) 032,arXiv:1812.10615 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [45]

    Detecting non-Gaussian gravitational wave backgrounds: a unified framework

    R. Buscicchio, A. Ain, M. Ballelli, G. Cella, and B. Patricelli, “Detecting non-Gaussian gravitational wave backgrounds: A unified framework,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 063027, arXiv:2209.01400 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [46]

    Improved detection statistics for non Gaussian gravitational wave stochastic backgrounds

    M. Ballelli, R. Buscicchio, B. Patricelli, A. Ain, and G. Cella, “Improved detection statistics for non-Gaussian gravitational wave stochastic backgrounds,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 12, (2023) 124044, arXiv:2212.10038 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [47]

    3-pt Statistics of Cosmological Stochastic Gravitational Waves

    P. Adshead and E. A. Lim, “3-pt Statistics of Cosmological Stochastic Gravitational Waves,”Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 024023,arXiv:0912.1615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [48]

    Searching for Fossil Fields in the Gravity Sector,

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and G. Tasinato, “Searching for Fossil Fields in the Gravity Sector,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 6, (2020) 061302,arXiv:1906.07204 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [49]

    Anisotropic tensor power spectrum at interferometer scales induced by tensor squeezed non-Gaussianity,

    A. Ricciardone and G. Tasinato, “Anisotropic tensor power spectrum at interferometer scales induced by tensor squeezed non-Gaussianity,”JCAP02(2018) 011,arXiv:1711.02635 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [50]

    Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background,

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto, and G. Tasinato, “Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 12, (2019) 121501,arXiv:1908.00527 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [51]

    Probing non-Gaussian Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with LISA,

    N. Bartolo, V. Domcke, D. G. Figueroa, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, M. Sakellariadou, L. Sorbo, and G. Tasinato, “Probing non-Gaussian Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with LISA,”JCAP11(2018) 034,arXiv:1806.02819 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [52]

    Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity,

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto, and G. Tasinato, “Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 023527,arXiv:1912.09433 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [53]

    Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,

    B. Allen and J. D. Romano, “Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,”Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 102001,arXiv:gr-qc/9710117

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [54]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope,

    A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,”arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [55]

    UPPER LIMITS ON THE ISOTROPIC GRA VITATIONAL RADIATION BACKGROUND FROM PULSAR TIMING ANALYSIS,

    R. w. Hellings and G. s. Downs, “UPPER LIMITS ON THE ISOTROPIC GRA VITATIONAL RADIATION BACKGROUND FROM PULSAR TIMING ANALYSIS,”Astrophys. J. Lett.265 (1983) L39–L42

    1983

  52. [56]

    Gravity-Wave Watching

    R. Fakir, “Gravity wave watching,”Astrophys. J.426(1994) 74–78,arXiv:gr-qc/9304003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  53. [57]

    Gravitational radiation and very long baseline interferometry,

    T. Pyne, C. R. Gwinn, M. Birkinshaw, T. M. Eubanks, and D. N. Matsakis, “Gravitational radiation and very long baseline interferometry,”Astrophys. J.465(1996) 566–577, arXiv:astro-ph/9507030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [58]

    Bending of light by gravity waves,

    N. Kaiser and A. H. Jaffe, “Bending of light by gravity waves,”Astrophys. J.484(1997) 545–554, arXiv:astro-ph/9609043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  55. [59]

    Observing gravitational radiation with QSO proper motions and the SKA,

    A. H. Jaffe, “Observing gravitational radiation with QSO proper motions and the SKA,”New Astron. Rev.48(2004) 1483–1485,arXiv:astro-ph/0409637. 27

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [60]

    Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,

    L. G. Book and E. E. Flanagan, “Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 024024,arXiv:1009.4192 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [61]

    Testing Gravity with Pulsars in the SKA Era,

    L. Shaoet al., “Testing Gravity with Pulsars in the SKA Era,”PoSAASKA14(2015) 042, arXiv:1501.00058 [astro-ph.HE]. [62]GaiaCollaboration, T. Prustiet al., “The Gaia Mission,”Astron. Astrophys.595no. Gaia Data Release 1, (2016) A1,arXiv:1609.04153 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [63]

    Astrometric Search Method for Individually Resolvable Gravitational Wave Sources with Gaia,

    C. J. Moore, D. P. Mihaylov, A. Lasenby, and G. Gilmore, “Astrometric Search Method for Individually Resolvable Gravitational Wave Sources with Gaia,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119no. 26, (2017) 261102,arXiv:1707.06239 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [64]

    Gaia-like astrometry and gravitational waves,

    S. A. Klioner, “Gaia-like astrometry and gravitational waves,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 4, (2018) 045005,arXiv:1710.11474 [astro-ph.HE]. [65]TheiaCollaboration, C. Boehmet al., “Theia: Faint objects in motion or the new astrometry frontier,”arXiv:1707.01348 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [66]

    Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves,

    W. Qin, K. K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, and L. Dai, “Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 6, (2019) 063002,arXiv:1810.02369 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [67]

    Exploring the early Universe with Gaia and Theia,

    J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama, and G. White, “Exploring the early Universe with Gaia and Theia,”JCAP12no. 12, (2021) 023,arXiv:2104.04778 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [68]

    Theia : science cases and mission profiles for high precision astrometry in the future

    F. Malbetet al., “Theia : science cases and mission profiles for high precision astrometry in the future,” inSPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation 2022. 7, 2022.arXiv:2207.12540 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [69]

    Astrometric Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,

    J. Darling, A. E. Truebenbach, and J. Paine, “Astrometric Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,”Astrophys. J.861no. 2, (2018) 113,arXiv:1804.06986 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [70]

    Constraining the stochastic gravitational wave background with photometric surveys,

    Y. Wang, K. Pardo, T.-C. Chang, and O. Dor´ e, “Constraining the stochastic gravitational wave background with photometric surveys,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 084006, arXiv:2205.07962 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [71]

    Gravitational Wave Detection with Photometric Surveys,

    Y. Wang, K. Pardo, T.-C. Chang, and O. Dor´ e, “Gravitational Wave Detection with Photometric Surveys,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 084007,arXiv:2010.02218 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [72]

    Dissecting the stochastic gravitational wave background with astrometry,

    M. C ¸ alı¸ skan, Y. Chen, L. Dai, N. Anil Kumar, I. Stomberg, and X. Xue, “Dissecting the stochastic gravitational wave background with astrometry,”JCAP05(2024) 030,arXiv:2312.03069 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [73]

    Gravitational Wave Detection with Relative Astrometry using Roman’s Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey,

    K. Pardo, T.-C. Chang, O. Dor´ e, and Y. Wang, “Gravitational Wave Detection with Relative Astrometry using Roman’s Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey,”arXiv:2306.14968 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [74]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background constraints from Gaia DR3 astrometry,

    S. Jaraba, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Ferraiuolo, and M. Braglia, “Stochastic gravitational wave background constraints from Gaia DR3 astrometry,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524no. 3, (2023) 3609–3622,arXiv:2304.06350 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [75]

    A New Approach to the Low-frequency Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background: Constraints from Quasars and the Astrometric Hellings–Downs Curve,

    J. Darling, “A New Approach to the Low-frequency Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background: Constraints from Quasars and the Astrometric Hellings–Downs Curve,”Astrophys. J. Lett.982 no. 2, (2025) L46,arXiv:2412.08605 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [76]

    Gaia 400,894 QSO constraint on the energy density of low-frequency gravitational waves,

    S. Aoyama, D. Yamauchi, M. Shiraishi, and M. Ouchi, “Gaia 400,894 QSO constraint on the energy density of low-frequency gravitational waves,”arXiv:2105.04039 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [77]

    Observing gravitational waves with solar system astrometry,

    G. Mentasti and C. R. Contaldi, “Observing gravitational waves with solar system astrometry,” JCAP05(2024) 028,arXiv:2311.03474 [gr-qc]. 28

    arXiv 2024

  72. [78]

    Overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays and astrometry,

    K. Inomata, M. Kamionkowski, C. M. Toral, and S. R. Taylor, “Overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays and astrometry,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 6, (2024) 063547,arXiv:2406.00096 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [79]

    Astrometry meets Pulsar Timing Arrays: Synergies for Gravitational Wave Detection,

    N. M. J. Cruz, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, “Astrometry meets Pulsar Timing Arrays: Synergies for Gravitational Wave Detection,”arXiv:2412.14010 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  74. [80]

    Searching for Gravitational Waves with Gaia and its Cross-Correlation with PTA: Absolute vs Relative Astrometry,

    M. Vaglio, M. Falxa, G. Mentasti, A. I. Renzini, A. Kuntz, E. Barausse, C. Contaldi, and A. Sesana, “Searching for Gravitational Waves with Gaia and its Cross-Correlation with PTA: Absolute vs Relative Astrometry,”arXiv:2507.18593 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  75. [81]

    Assessing and mitigating the impact of glitches on gravitational-wave parameter estimation: A model agnostic approach,

    S. Ghonge, J. Brandt, J. M. Sullivan, M. Millhouse, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, T. Littenberg, N. Cornish, S. Hourihane, and L. Cadonati, “Assessing and mitigating the impact of glitches on gravitational-wave parameter estimation: A model agnostic approach,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 122002,arXiv:2311.09159 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [82]

    Characterization of non-Gaussian stochastic signals with heavier-tailed likelihoods

    N. Karnesis, A. Sasli, R. Buscicchio, and N. Stergioulas, “Characterization of non-Gaussian stochastic signals with heavier-tailed likelihoods,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 022005, arXiv:2410.14354 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [83]

    Non-Gaussian statistics of nanohertz stochastic gravitational waves,

    X. Xue, Z. Pan, and L. Dai, “Non-Gaussian statistics of nanohertz stochastic gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 4, (2025) 043022,arXiv:2409.19516 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [84]

    Toward a test of Gaussianity of a gravitational wave background,

    R. C. Bernardo, S. Appleby, and K.-W. Ng, “Toward a test of Gaussianity of a gravitational wave background,”JCAP01(2025) 017,arXiv:2407.17987 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [85]

    Modeling Non-Gaussianities in Pulsar Timing Array data analysis using Gaussian Mixture Models,

    M. Falxa and A. Sesana, “Modeling Non-Gaussianities in Pulsar Timing Array data analysis using Gaussian Mixture Models,”arXiv:2508.08365 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv

  80. [86]

    Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data,

    M. Anholm, S. Ballmer, J. D. E. Creighton, L. R. Price, and X. Siemens, “Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 084030,arXiv:0809.0701 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.