REVIEW 1 cited by
Note on recent measurements of the psi(1S)toga η_C(1S) and psi(2S)toga η_C(1S) branching ratios
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Note on recent measurements of the psi(1S)toga η_C(1S) and psi(2S)toga η_C(1S) branching ratios
read the original abstract
Recently published measurements of the branching ratios ${\cal B}(\psi(1S)\to\ga \eta_C(1S))$ and ${\cal B}(\psi(2S)\to\ga \eta_C(1S))$ by the CLEO collaboration are examined in the context of a potential model that includes both relativistic and one-loop QCD corrections to the quark-antiquark interaction. The prediction for the width $\Gamma(\psi(1S)\to\ga \eta_C(1S))$ is in excellent agreement with the new data but the prediction for $\Gamma(\psi(2S)\to\ga \eta_C(1S))$ is too small. In an effort to understand this discrepancy, we derive an upper bound on $\Gamma(\psi(2S)\to\ga \eta_C(1S))$ and point out its experimental value saturates this bound.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Radiative decays $J/\psi,\,\psi(2S)\rightarrow\gamma\eta^{(\prime)}$ in perturbative QCD with relativistic corrections
Order-q² relativistic corrections in pQCD roughly double J/ψ→γη(') rates and favor a smaller mixing angle, while ψ(2S) rates overshoot data and may require coherent ηc mixing.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.