Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

T-RECS: A Simulation Tool to Study the Societal Impact of Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.08959 v2 pith:3TFDHYP4 submitted 2021-07-19 cs.CY cs.AIcs.MA

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.MA
keywords systemst-recsresearcherssimulationsociotechnicalimplementationmodeloutcomes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Simulation has emerged as a popular method to study the long-term societal consequences of recommender systems. This approach allows researchers to specify their theoretical model explicitly and observe the evolution of system-level outcomes over time. However, performing simulation-based studies often requires researchers to build their own simulation environments from the ground up, which creates a high barrier to entry, introduces room for implementation error, and makes it difficult to disentangle whether observed outcomes are due to the model or the implementation. We introduce T-RECS, an open-sourced Python package designed for researchers to simulate recommendation systems and other types of sociotechnical systems in which an algorithm mediates the interactions between multiple stakeholders, such as users and content creators. To demonstrate the flexibility of T-RECS, we perform a replication of two prior simulation-based research on sociotechnical systems. We additionally show how T-RECS can be used to generate novel insights with minimal overhead. Our tool promotes reproducibility in this area of research, provides a unified language for simulating sociotechnical systems, and removes the friction of implementing simulations from scratch.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. We're Still Doing It (All) Wrong: Recommender Systems, Fifteen Years Later

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Recommender systems research is still dominated by benchmark optimization and flawed evaluation assumptions, and this essay argues the field must adopt epistemic humility and human-centered goals.

Pith tools