Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Nucleon electromagnetic form factors and polarization observables in space-like and time-like regions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv nucl-th/0503001 v1 pith:3TQPX5JD submitted 2005-03-01 nucl-th

Nucleon electromagnetic form factors and polarization observables in space-like and time-like regions

classification nucl-th
keywords factorsformobservablesspace-liketime-likeannihilationdataelectromagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We perform a global analysis of the experimental data of the electromagnetic nucleon form factors, in space-like and time-like regions. We give the expressions of the observables in annihilation processes, such as $p+\bar{p}\to \ell^+ +\ell^- $, $\ell=e$ or $\mu$, in terms of form factors. We discuss some of the phenomenological models proposed in the literature for the space-like region, and consider their analytical continuation to the time-like region. After determining the parameters through a fit on the available data, we give predictions for the observables which will be experimentally accessible with large statistics, polarized annihilation reactions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explicitly on-shell currents in relativistic mean field models

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The 'off-shell ambiguity' in relativistic mean-field one-body currents is spurious when currents are defined via free-nucleon operators; the correct mapping (Eq. 26) is parametrization-independent and requires time-li...