Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning Physical Interaction: A Survey of Tactile- and Force-aware Robot Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.07558 v1 pith:3UCKV7WY submitted 2026-08-02 cs.RO cs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords learningrobotphysicalmulti-phasepoliciestaskcontrolexecution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Physically grounded robot intelligence requires robots to perceive, reason about, and regulate their interactions with the physical world. This capability is particularly critical in contact-sensitive manipulation, where successful task execution depends not only on visual perception and motion generation, but also on force regulation and adaptive control. In this context, recent robot learning methods have made substantial progress by integrating force, tactile, vision, language, and proprioceptive sensing into learned manipulation policies. In parallel, many systems adopt multi-phase architectures that combine high-level policies, action-refinement modules, and low-level controllers to bridge semantic task understanding with reactive physical execution. Despite these advances, existing surveys have not explicitly reviewed force- and tactile-aware robot learning from a unified perspective that jointly captures multimodal sensing and multi-phase system design. This survey addresses this gap by proposing TF-ART, a Tactile/Force-Aware Robot learning Taxonomy for multimodal and multi-phase frameworks, which maps individual methods into a unified hierarchical structure. The framework characterizes how recent works organize observation modalities, encode and fuse heterogeneous sensory inputs, generate and refine actions across multiple phases, and connect learned policies to reactive robot-end control. Building on this methodological view, we further examine the task settings and infrastructure requirements of physical interaction, thereby integrating both algorithmic and practical perspectives on force- and tactile-aware robot learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools