REVIEW 2 cited by
CantTalkAboutThis: Aligning Language Models to Stay on Topic in Dialogues
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in instruction-tuning datasets have predominantly focused on specific tasks like mathematical or logical reasoning. There has been a notable gap in data designed for aligning language models to maintain topic relevance in conversations - a critical aspect for deploying chatbots to production. We introduce the CantTalkAboutThis dataset to help language models remain focused on the subject at hand during task-oriented interactions. It consists of synthetic dialogues on a wide range of conversation topics from different domains. These dialogues are interspersed with distractor turns that intentionally divert the chatbot from the predefined topic. Fine-tuning language models on this dataset helps make them resilient to deviating from the role assigned and improves their ability to maintain topical coherence compared to general-purpose instruction-tuned LLMs like GPT-4-turbo and Mixtral-Instruct. Additionally, preliminary observations suggest that training models on this dataset also enhance their performance on fine-grained instruction following tasks, including safety alignment.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DeepThink: Aligning Language Models with Domain-Specific User Intents
DeepThink improves domain-specific QA by synthesizing conversation-based training data and refining answers with retrieval-augmented feedback, beating a GPT-4-turbo+RAG assistant by 7.92% on advertising-domain real us...
-
Understanding Why ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Visualization Design Advice
ChatGPT responses to visualization design questions were rated higher than forum-user responses, mainly due to broader coverage and task-focused structure, with GPT-4 showing a hybrid of human and GPT-3.5 styles.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.