REVIEW 1 cited by
DeepThink: Aligning Language Models with Domain-Specific User Intents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DeepThink: Aligning Language Models with Domain-Specific User Intents
read the original abstract
Supervised fine-tuning with synthesized instructions has been a common practice for adapting LLMs to domain-specific QA tasks. However, the synthesized instructions deviate from real user questions and expected answers. This study proposes a novel framework called DeepThink to generate high-quality instructions. DeepThink first generates a few seed questions to mimic actual user questions, simulates conversations to uncover the hidden user needs, and refines the answer by conversational contexts and the retrieved documents for more comprehensive answers. Experiments demonstrate that DeepThink achieves an average performance improvement of 7.92% compared to a GPT-4-turbo+RAG-based assistant on the real user test set in the advertising domain across dimensions such as relevance, completeness, clarity, accuracy, and actionability.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Experience to Skill: Multi-Agent Generative Engine Optimization via Reusable Strategy Learning
MAGEO is a multi-agent system that distills validated editing patterns into reusable optimization skills for generative engines, outperforming heuristic baselines on visibility and fidelity via a new benchmark and eva...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.