REVIEW 5 cited by
Towards Collaborative Intelligence: Propagating Intentions and Reasoning for Multi-Agent Coordination with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Effective collaboration in multi-agent systems requires communicating goals and intentions between agents. Current agent frameworks often suffer from dependencies on single-agent execution and lack robust inter-module communication, frequently leading to suboptimal multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) policies and inadequate task coordination. To address these challenges, we present a framework for training large language models (LLMs) as collaborative agents to enable coordinated behaviors in cooperative MARL. Each agent maintains a private intention consisting of its current goal and associated sub-tasks. Agents broadcast their intentions periodically, allowing other agents to infer coordination tasks. A propagation network transforms broadcast intentions into teammate-specific communication messages, sharing relevant goals with designated teammates. The architecture of our framework is structured into planning, grounding, and execution modules. During execution, multiple agents interact in a downstream environment and communicate intentions to enable coordinated behaviors. The grounding module dynamically adapts comprehension strategies based on emerging coordination patterns, while feedback from execution agents influnces the planning module, enabling the dynamic re-planning of sub-tasks. Results in collaborative environment simulation demonstrate intention propagation reduces miscoordination errors by aligning sub-task dependencies between agents. Agents learn when to communicate intentions and which teammates require task details, resulting in emergent coordinated behaviors. This demonstrates the efficacy of intention sharing for cooperative multi-agent RL based on LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
How to Train a Leader: Hierarchical Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
A leader LLM trained with a GRPO variant that conditions on frozen agent responses improves both collaborative and zero-shot accuracy on BBH, MATH, and MMLU.
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions
A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.
-
Towards Cognitive Synergy in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Theory of Mind and Critical Evaluation
An LLM-agent team that combined viewpoint-prediction prompts with a dedicated critic agent scored best on an AI judge's ratings in a single fictional investment-decision case study.
-
The Coming Crisis of Multi-Agent Misalignment: AI Alignment Must Be a Dynamic and Social Process
Alignment in multi-agent AI should be studied as a dynamic, social process in which value, preference, and objective alignment are interdependent.
-
Modular Speaker Architecture: A Framework for Sustaining Responsibility and Contextual Integrity in Multi-Agent AI Communication
MSA is a modular role, responsibility, and context-validation framework for LLM dialogue; its pilot study reports higher annotation scores for MSA-active segments, but without random assignment, baselines, data, or code.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.