Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Causal Prompting: Debiasing Large Language Model Prompting based on Front-Door Adjustment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02738 v3 pith:3WWACNBZ submitted 2024-03-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords causalpromptingllmsbiasesmodeladjustmentchain-of-thoughtfront-door
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the notable advancements of existing prompting methods, such as In-Context Learning and Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models (LLMs), they still face challenges related to various biases. Traditional debiasing methods primarily focus on the model training stage, including approaches based on data augmentation and reweighting, yet they struggle with the complex biases inherent in LLMs. To address such limitations, the causal relationship behind the prompting methods is uncovered using a structural causal model, and a novel causal prompting method based on front-door adjustment is proposed to effectively mitigate LLMs biases. In specific, causal intervention is achieved by designing the prompts without accessing the parameters and logits of LLMs. The chain-of-thought generated by LLM is employed as the mediator variable and the causal effect between input prompts and output answers is calculated through front-door adjustment to mitigate model biases. Moreover, to accurately represent the chain-of-thoughts and estimate the causal effects, contrastive learning is used to fine-tune the encoder of chain-of-thought by aligning its space with that of the LLM. Experimental results show that the proposed causal prompting approach achieves excellent performance across seven natural language processing datasets on both open-source and closed-source LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BiasFilter: An Inference-Time Debiasing Framework for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BiasFilter filters low-fairness segments during LLM generation using a reward model trained on a GPT-4-scored preference dataset, cutting bias on CEB and FairMT.

  2. CAT: Causal Attention Tuning For Injecting Fine-grained Causal Knowledge into Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training method that injects token-level causal labels into attention improves out-of-distribution accuracy on a synthetic benchmark and slightly on math/reasoning tasks.

  3. A Variational Approach for Mitigating Entity Bias in Relation Extraction

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A variational information bottleneck that maps entity tokens to stochastic Gaussian embeddings with a blending factor improves relation extraction F1 on general, financial, and biomedical datasets, especially under en...

Pith tools