Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A comparison of syntheses approaches towards functional polycrystalline silicate ceramics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.11905 v1 pith:3XDSTATO submitted 2022-05-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A comparison of syntheses approaches towards functional polycrystalline silicate ceramics

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ceramicssilicateformationfunctionalmethodsol-geldifferentduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study aims to shed light on processing pathways towards functional silicate ceramics, which show some promise in various emerging applications, including dielectrics and bioactive implant materials. Polycrystalline silicate ceramics of Neso, Soro and Inosilicate families were synthesised by three different techniques: (i) a co-precipitation method, (ii) a modified sol-gel method and (iii) standard solid-state reactions. Co-precipitated samples show increased sintering and densification behaviour compared to sol-gel and solid-state methods, with diametral shrinkage values during sintering of 28.8%, 13.3% and 25.0%, respectively. Well-controlled phase formation in these ceramics was most readily achieved through the steric entrapment of cations and shorter diffusion pathways afforded by the modified Pechini-type sol-gel method. Substituting Zn2+ for Mg2+ in enstatite samples was found to enhance the formation of orthoenstatite during cooling, which is otherwise very slow. We present guidelines for the design of synthesis methods that consider the requirements for different functional silicate ceramics in terms of phase formation and microstructure.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.