Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

VeriDebug: A Unified LLM for Verilog Debugging via Contrastive Embedding and Guided Correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.19099 v1 pith:3XL5JS5E submitted 2025-04-27 cs.SE cs.AIcs.AR

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.AR
keywords debuggingveridebugverilogcorrectioncontrastiveguidedembeddingexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in debugging for various programming languages. However, the application of LLMs to Verilog debugging remains insufficiently explored. Here, we present VeriDebug, an approach that integrates contrastive representation and guided correction capabilities for automated Verilog debugging. Unlike existing methods, VeriDebug employs an embedding-based technique to accurately retrieve internal information, followed by bug-fixing. VeriDebug unifies Verilog bug detection and correction through a shared parameter space. By simultaneously learning bug patterns and fixes, it streamlines debugging via contrastive embedding and guided correction. Empirical results show the efficacy of VeriDebug in enhancing Verilog debugging. Our VeriDebugLoc, Type model achieves 64.7 accuracy in bug fixing (Acc1), a significant improvement from the existing open-source SOTAs 11.3. This performance not only outperforms open-source alternatives but also exceeds larger closed-source models like GPT-3.5-turbo (36.6), offering a more accurate alternative to conventional debugging methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. iDSE: Navigating Design Space Exploration in High-Level Synthesis Using LLMs

    cs.AR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-based design space exploration system for HLS combines design-space pruning, LLM-generated seed directives, and convergent/divergent refinement to approximate Pareto-optimal designs with few synthesis evaluations.

  2. SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SV-LLM automates SoC security verification with six cooperating LLM agents, reaching 84.8% vulnerability detection accuracy and 82% to 89% bug validation rates on benchmarks the paper does not disclose.

  3. Revolution or Hype? Seeking the Limits of Large Models in Hardware Design

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    Large models can help early-stage hardware design and verification, but their reliability, data, and precision limits mean traditional EDA algorithms and formal verification remain necessary.

Pith tools