Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 88 references

A symmetry-allowed spin-dependent electric dipole moment lets THz light amplify topological magnon edge modes, making them visible in pump-probe and cavity transmission.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A symmetry-allowed electric-dipole term creates magnon pairs, so THz pumping can selectively amplify and detect topological magnon edge states.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection The n.n.n. symmetry mechanism is new and the protocol is concrete, but the quantitative predictions rest on a hand-scaled dipole coefficient and an inconsistent intensity map. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23170 v1 pith:3YC3SPFG submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.mes-hall

Signatures of Topological Magnon Edge States in THz Spectroscopy and Cavity Response

Ipsika Mohanty , Johannes Knolle , Silvia Viola Kusminskiy This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topological magnon insulatorsmagnon edge statesTHz spectroscopyparametric amplificationspin-dependent electric dipole momentmagnetoelectric couplingcavity optomagnonicshoneycomb ferromagnet CrI3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Topological magnon insulators are predicted to host chiral edge spin waves, but those edge modes have resisted direct detection because magnons barely couple to charge-based probes. This paper proposes an all-optical route: virtual charge fluctuations in a honeycomb ferromagnet create a spin-dependent electric dipole moment that, at next-nearest-neighbor order, lets one THz photon create a pair of edge magnons. Pumping at twice the edge-mode frequency then selectively amplifies the edge population while leaving bulk modes unexcited. The authors show the amplified edge modes appear as a sharp absorption peak in THz pump-probe spectroscopy and as a characteristic dip in a THz cavity transmission spectrum, both within reach for CrI3-like materials. If correct, this gives experimenters a direct, table-top signature of magnon topology.

Core claim

The central claim is that a spin-dependent effective electric dipole moment, allowed by lattice symmetry up to next-nearest-neighbor interactions, produces one-photon–two-magnon coupling. Driving at twice the edge-mode frequency activates parametric amplification of edge magnon pairs; linear and nonlinear damping stabilize a steady state. The amplified edge modes then dominate the two-magnon susceptibility, yielding a sharp absorption peak at 2ω_{K,e} and a distinct cavity-transmission dip that disappears without edge coupling. A static magnetic field shifts the one-magnon response by B0 and the two-magnon edge response by 2B0, separating the edge signature from bulk.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quadratic term ν_{k,ss'} in the magnon expansion of the electric dipole moment, which originates from the symmetry-allowed next-nearest-neighbor spin-dependent dipole interaction. Its physical role is to convert an electric field at frequency 2ω into creation (or annihilation) of magnon pairs at opposite momenta — the parametric process that amplifies edge modes. In the driven equations of motion this term appears as a coherent source ∝ ν⟨α†_{−k,s'}⟩c, competing with linear (ζ) and nonlinear (η) damping that select a steady state. The edge-localized enhancement of ν is what makes the drive edge-selective.

Load-bearing premise

The entire scheme depends on the estimated magnitude of the next-nearest-neighbor spin-dependent electric dipole coefficient, |ν| ≈ 50 µC/m² for CrI3 (scaled from a nearest-neighbor Hubbard estimate by a factor 0.05, since the full n.n.n. derivation is left to future work); if this coefficient is much smaller, the quoted threshold intensities and cavity dip would not appear at the stated powers.

What would settle it

Measure two-magnon THz absorption in monolayer CrI3 at low drive to extract |ν| directly from the absorption cross-section; or run the proposed pump-probe at 2ω_{K,e} with intensity near 10^13 W/m² and look for the predicted sharp peak. If the extracted ν is more than an order of magnitude below 50 µC/m², or the peak and cavity dip are absent at the quoted powers, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A THz pump at 2ω_{K,e} with intensity above threshold (~10^13 W/m² for linear polarization in CrI3) should produce a sharp absorption peak at twice the edge-mode frequency in a subsequent probe.
  • Applying a static magnetic field along the magnetization shifts the one-magnon bulk response by B0 and the two-magnon edge response by 2B0, allowing the edge signature to be resolved from bulk contributions.
  • In a driven THz cavity tuned to 2ω_{K,e}, the edge-mode coupling creates a dip in the transmission spectrum on top of bulk-induced linewidth broadening; without edge coupling only broadening remains.
  • Left circularly polarized driving lowers the amplification threshold by about an order of magnitude compared to linear polarization.
  • The same protocol transfers to other honeycomb ferromagnetic TMIs such as CrBr3 and CrXTe3; larger exchange and lower damping would reduce required intensities and timescales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ν is confirmed, the chiral nature of the amplified edge modes suggests the same mechanism could act as a tunable directional magnon amplifier or source, since the parametric gain is tied to edge localization and chirality.
  • The predicted edge enhancement of the electric dipole moment implies that boundary charge fluctuations are measurable in their own right; near-field THz or optical probes might detect the edge dipole directly.
  • A quantitative comparison of threshold intensity and cavity dip depth across bearded and zigzag boundaries would test how much of the signal relies on edge-bulk spectral separation rather than on the intrinsic dipole enhancement.
  • The cavity transmission dip could serve as a fast, non-thermal probe of magnon edge occupation, potentially allowing time-resolved studies of edge-mode dynamics after pulsed pumping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an all-optical protocol for detecting topological magnon edge modes in two-dimensional honeycomb ferromagnets. Working with a ribbon of a Heisenberg ferromagnet with next-nearest-neighbor DMI, the authors perform a symmetry classification of the spin-dependent electric dipole moment up to n.n.n. interactions, derive the magnon-photon couplings, and simulate driven classical equations of motion with linear and nonlinear damping. They show that a drive at 2ω_{K,e} can parametrically amplify edge-magnon pairs through the n.n.n. dipole coupling, leading to a detectable one-magnon / two-magnon probe response, and that a THz cavity can produce an edge-specific dip in transmission. Order-of-magnitude estimates for CrI3 are given in support of experimental feasibility.

Significance. The conceptual scheme is attractive: it uses a symmetry-based magnetoelectric coupling to convert THz photons into edge-magnon pairs, and the predicted signatures are forward-model outputs rather than fits to a target signal. The symmetry analysis in SM B and the numerical ribbon calculations are careful, and the paper gives falsifiable predictions for pump-probe and cavity spectra. However, the quantitative feasibility claim is conditional on the microscopic magnitude of the n.n.n. dipole coefficient, which is not derived, and on a currently inconsistent intensity-to-coupling calibration. With those issues resolved, the protocol would be a useful contribution to the search for direct edge-mode probes.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM D (Eq. S8-S9) and Sec. II.C.1] The n.n.n. dipole coefficient |ν_{K,e,e}|≈50 μC/m² is obtained by multiplying the n.n. Hubbard estimate by an unexplained factor 0.05; SM D explicitly states that a full n.n.n. derivation is out of scope. This coefficient sets G̃^E_{ν,K,e,e}, which is the input for every threshold intensity, for the demagnetization check, and for the cavity dip. The central claim of experimentally feasible detection therefore rests on an order-of-magnitude guess. Please either derive the n.n.n. contribution or phrase all W/m² values as conditional on this parameter.
  2. [SM D and Fig. 4 caption] The intensity-to-coupling map is internally inconsistent. SM D gives I=4×10^12 W/m² for G̃(n.n.n.)=0.0075J. Since G̃∝√I, the threshold G̃>0.04J requires I≈1.1×10^14 W/m², not the '~10^13 W/m²' stated in Sec. II.C.1 or the '2.98×10^13 W/m²' in SM D. Similarly, the range 0.01–0.25J maps to ≈7×10^12–4.4×10^15 W/m² with this calibration, whereas the text quotes 1.86×10^11–1.16×10^14 W/m² and the Fig. 4 caption quotes 10^12–10^14 W/m². These differ by nearly a factor of 40. Correct the mapping; it controls Fig. 4, SM Fig. S2, and the free-space/cavity power comparison.
  3. [Sec. II.B / Eq. (12)] The threshold condition and selectivity are discussed for a fixed set of damping parameters (ζ=0.04J, η=0.004J). Since the threshold coupling scales linearly with ζ, and ζ is taken from a phenomenological model [50,68], the absolute intensities inherit a further uncertainty beyond the dipole coefficient. Please state this dependence explicitly and, if possible, show the threshold as a function of ζ.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (12) and Eq. (19)] The second equation of motion contains an apparent typo: '- η/2 η|...|²' should presumably read '- η/2 |...|²'.
  2. [Sec. IV.A / Eq. (16)] The one-magnon susceptibility is written with a delta function, while Eq. (15) contains a damping term iζ. Clarify whether the plotted spectra include finite lifetime broadening or are schematic.
  3. [SM E / Sec. II.C.1] The paper specifies a lower bound on pump linewidth from edge-mode splitting, but not the upper bound from the bulk-edge separation for the bearded geometry. Specifying this would make the 'optimal window' quantitative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: predicted edge signatures are forward-model outputs; the underived n.n.n. dipole coefficient is an input/limitation, not a self-referential step.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the symmetry analysis (SM B) yields the spin-dependent dipole operator; the HP transform (SM C) produces the pair-creation coefficient ν; Eq. (10) defines the coupling G_Eν; the EOMs (Eq. 12) show parametric amplification when G̃>ζ; the spectra in Figs. 4–5 are forward solutions of those EOMs with chosen G̃. At no point is the target signature (a peak at 2ω_K,e or a cavity dip) used to determine ν, ζ, or G̃; the amplification condition G̃>ζ is a standard parametric-instability criterion, not an inversion of the output. The n.n.n. coefficient is a load-bearing input, not a derived prediction: SM D explicitly states 'A complete derivation up to n.n.n. is technically involved and out of the scope of this work' and obtains ν via 'P_{n.n.n} ≈ 0.05 P_{n.n.}', so the quantitative thresholds are conditional on that order-of-magnitude estimate; this is a missing microscopic derivation/correctness risk, not a circular reduction. The paper also contains an internal inconsistency in the intensity–G̃ mapping (Fig. 4 caption quotes 10^12–10^14 W/m^2 for G̃=0.01–0.25J, while SM D's own anchor I=4×10^12 W/m^2 ↔ G̃=0.0075J implies ~7×10^12–4.4×10^15 W/m^2), but arithmetic inconsistency is not circularity. The same-group citations [29,50] supply the parametric-amplification concept and dissipation values, yet the paper solves its own EOMs and the central claim does not reduce to those citations. No circular step found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conservation laws are introduced; the spin-dependent electric dipole moment is a known magnetoelectric mechanism. The central claim instead rests on a set of material-model and approximation assumptions, plus hand-chosen damping and coupling values.

free parameters (6)
  • DMI strength D = 0.3J
    Chosen to open the topological gap; the entire band structure and edge-mode spectrum depend on it.
  • Linear magnon damping ζ = 0.04J ≈ 0.02 THz
    Sets the parametric amplification threshold; taken as an estimate of Gilbert damping, not measured in this setup.
  • Nonlinear magnon damping η = 0.004J ≈ 0.002 THz
    Controls steady-state amplification; chosen one order of magnitude below ζ.
  • Edge-mode pair coupling G̃ν,K,e,e = scanned 0.01–0.25J; 0.15J in Fig. 3, 0.05J in Fig. 5
    The central control parameter in the dynamics; the mapping to physical intensity given in SM D is internally inconsistent with the stated scaling.
  • n.n.n. dipole coefficient |ν_K,e,e| = ≈50 µC/m²
    Obtained by scaling the n.n. Hubbard-model estimate by 0.05; converts laser intensity into coupling and sets all threshold intensities.
  • Edge-to-bulk dipole suppression factor = ≥10⁻³ bulk suppression
    Used to argue that bulk demagnetization remains small and that edge modes dominate the signal.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The FM Heisenberg + n.n.n. DMI Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) is a valid minimal model for honeycomb TMIs such as CrI3-family materials.
    Used for the entire band structure; supported by refs [31,36] for bulk spectra, but not for the edge/magnetoelectric properties being probed.
  • domain assumption Linear spin-wave (harmonic) approximation is valid and topological edge modes remain protected under the considered driving.
    HP expansion is truncated at quadratic order; Ref. [50] is cited for nonlinear breakdown, but the driven steady state is computed entirely in LSWT.
  • domain assumption The electric dipole moment can be expanded to bilinear order in spins (Eq. 7) with no linear term; on-site, n.n., and n.n.n. terms dominate.
    This is the central coupling; higher-order spin terms are declared smaller without a quantitative bound, and the linear term is forbidden by inversion symmetry.
  • domain assumption On-site quadratic spin interactions give a nonzero electric dipole for S≥1 via spin-orbit coupling.
    Underpins the P^(1) term; footnote [59] notes destructive-interference cancellations but does not compute them.
  • ad hoc to paper The n.n.n. dipole coefficient can be estimated by scaling the n.n. Hubbard result by 0.05.
    SM D explicitly says a full n.n.n. derivation is out of scope; the scaling factor is a rough estimate with no microscopic justification.
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation and mean-field factorization ⟨αα⟩≈⟨α⟩⟨α⟩ are valid for the strong-drive parameters used.
    Used to obtain the classical EOMs in Eqs. (12) and (19); correlations and noise are neglected without quantitative bounds.
  • ad hoc to paper Phenomenological linear and nonlinear damping terms capture magnon relaxation.
    ζ=0.04J and η=0.004J are chosen, not derived; they set the threshold and the steady-state population.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of Topological Magnon Edge States in THz Spectroscopy and Cavity Response." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YC3SPFG

@misc{pith2026260723170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of Topological Magnon Edge States in THz Spectroscopy and Cavity Response},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YC3SPFG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23170}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Topological magnon insulators (TMIs) have emerged as promising platforms for low-energy spin-based information processing, due to their non-trivial bulk magnon topology and robust, chiral edge modes that support dissipationless transport. Although theoretical models predict these edge states, direct experimental detection remains challenging due to their limited sensitivity to conventional probes. In this work, we propose an all-optical pathway to detect topological magnon edge modes in ferromagnetic TMIs. Our approach harnesses parametric amplification of edge magnons via resonant electromagnetic driving, enabled by magnetoelectric coupling mechanisms. We concentrate on two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnetic materials on the honeycomb lattice with magnonic band gaps in the terahertz (THz) range. We show that a spin-dependent effective electric dipole moment, arising from dynamic charge fluctuations and consistent with the lattice symmetry up to next-nearest-neighbor interactions, gives rise to one-photon-two-magnon processes leading to parametric amplification. On this basis, we propose a THz pump-probe spectroscopy protocol in which edge modes are selectively amplified and subsequently detected in absorption. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility of using THz cavities, enabling selective coupling to edge modes while filtering out bulk contributions. These findings establish a route for probing topological magnets and open new avenues for experimental exploration of exotic topological phenomena in magnetic quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23170 by Ipsika Mohanty, Johannes Knolle, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (c,d)). Above a critical pump-power threshold, the system undergoes exponential amplification of the edge-mode popula￾tion, as described in the previous section. At these pump powers, two-magnon processes dominate the response (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A cavity enhances the coupling strength due to mode confinement (the vacuum fluctuations of the EM field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) shows the cavity transmission spectrum when the cavity is tuned close to the parametric resonance condition ωc ≈ 2ωK,e, corresponding to the frequency of the edge-magnon pair. The laser driving the cavity is also tuned close to this resonance frequency, ωd ≈ 2ωK,e. The coupling between the cavity and the magnon pair leads to a splitting in the transmission spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Topological insulators and superconductors.Rev

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological insulators and superconductors.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:1057–1110, Oct

  2. [2]

    To overcome this limitation, we propose an alternative approach using a THz cavity as a sensitive probe of edge magnons, see Fig

    Cavity as a probe While parametric amplification under direct driving provides a viable route to accessing edge-mode signatures, it typically requires high input powers due to the weak effective electric dipole moment of the material. To overcome this limitation, we propose an alternative approach using a THz cavity as a sensitive probe of edge magnons, s...

    1995

  3. [3]

    F. D. M. Haldane. Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”.Phys. Rev. Lett., 61:2015–2018, Oct 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2015 2015

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane. Colloquium: Topological insulators.Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:3045–3067, Nov 2010. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  5. [5]

    Quantum materials for spin and charge conversion.npj Quantum Materials, 2018

    Wei Han, YoshiChika Otani, and Sadamichi Maekawa. Quantum materials for spin and charge conversion.npj Quantum Materials, 2018. 15

    2018

  6. [6]

    2024 roadmap on 2d topological insulators.Journal of Physics: Materials, 2024

    Bent Weber, Michael S Fuhrer, Xian-Lei Sheng, Shengyuan A Yang, Ronny Thomale, Saquib Shamim, Laurens W Molenkamp, David Cobden, Dmytro Pesin, Harold J W Zandvliet, Pantelis Bampoulis, Ralph Claessen, Fabian R Menges, Johannes Gooth, Claudia Felser, Chandra Shekhar, Anton Tadich, Mengting Zhao, Mark T Edmonds, Junxiang Jia, Maciej Bieniek, Jukka I V¨ ayry...

    2024

  7. [7]

    Ashvin Vishwanath and T. Senthil. Physics of three-dimensional bosonic topological insulators: Surface-deconfined crit- icality and quantized magnetoelectric effect.Phys. Rev. X, 3:011016, Feb 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011016. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011016

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.011016 2013

  8. [8]

    Magnetic topological insulators.Nature Reviews Physics, 2019

    Yoshinori Tokura, Kenji Yasuda, and Atsushi Tsukazaki. Magnetic topological insulators.Nature Reviews Physics, 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    Topological phonon modes and their role in dynamic instability of microtubules

    Emil Prodan and Camelia Prodan. Topological phonon modes and their role in dynamic instability of microtubules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:248101, Dec 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.248101. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.103.248101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.248101 2009

  10. [10]

    Symmetry-protected topological orders in interacting bosonic systems.Science, 2012

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Symmetry-protected topological orders in interacting bosonic systems.Science, 2012

    2012

  11. [11]

    Olaf Stenull, C. L. Kane, and T. C. Lubensky. Topological phonons and weyl lines in three dimensions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:068001, Aug 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.068001. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 117.068001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.068001 2016

  12. [12]

    Topological phononics: From fundamental models to real materials.Advanced Functional Materials, 2020

    Yizhou Liu, Xiaobin Chen, and Yong Xu. Topological phononics: From fundamental models to real materials.Advanced Functional Materials, 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    Rechtsman, Julia M

    Mikael C. Rechtsman, Julia M. Zeuner, Yonatan Plotnik, Yaakov Lumer, Daniel Podolsky, Felix Dreisow, Stefan Nolte, Mordechai Segev, and Alexander Szameit. Photonic floquet topological insulators.Nature, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Khanikaev, S

    Alexander B. Khanikaev, S. Hossein Mousavi, Wang-Kong Tse, Mehdi Kargarian, Allan H. MacDonald, and Gennady Shvets. Photonic topological insulators.Nature Materials, 2013

    2013

  15. [15]

    Raghu and F

    S. Raghu and F. D. M. Haldane. Analogs of quantum-hall-effect edge states in photonic crystals.Phys. Rev. A, 78:033834, Sep 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.033834. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.033834

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.033834 2008

  16. [16]

    Hall effect of light.Phys

    Masaru Onoda, Shuichi Murakami, and Naoto Nagaosa. Hall effect of light.Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:083901, Aug 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.083901. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.083901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.083901 2004

  17. [17]

    Roman S¨ usstrunk and Sebastian D. Huber. Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator.Science, 2015

    2015

  18. [19]

    W. Cai, J. Han, Feng Mei, Y. Xu, Y. Ma, X. Li, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Zheng-Yuan Xue, Zhang-qi Yin, Suotang Jia, and Luyan Sun. Observation of topological magnon insulator states in a superconducting circuit.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:080501, Aug 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.080501. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.080501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.080501 2019

  19. [20]

    Sebastian D. Huber. Topological mechanics.Nature Physics, 2016

    2016

  20. [21]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, and K. S. Novoselov. Magnetic 2d materials and heterostructures.Nature Nanotechnology, 2019

    2019

  21. [22]

    McClarty

    Paul A. McClarty. Topological magnons: A review.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 2022

    2022

  22. [23]

    A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator.Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 28:38, 2016

    S A Owerre. A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator.Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 28:38, 2016. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/38/386001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/38/386001 2016

  23. [24]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto. 2d materials and van der waals heterostructures. Science, 2016

    2016

  24. [26]

    Fransson, A

    J. Fransson, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and A. V. Balatsky. Magnon dirac materials.Phys. Rev. B, 94:075401, Aug 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.075401 2016

  25. [27]

    P. A. McClarty, X.-Y. Dong, M. Gohlke, J. G. Rau, F. Pollmann, R. Moessner, and K. Penc. Topological magnons in kitaev magnets at high fields.Phys. Rev. B, 98:060404, Aug 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.060404. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.060404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.060404 2018

  26. [28]

    Darshan G. Joshi. Topological excitations in the ferromagnetic kitaev-heisenberg model.Phys. Rev. B, 98:060405, Aug

  27. [29]

    Topological magnon amplification.Nature Communications, 10:3937, 2019

    Daniel Malz, Johannes Knolle, and Andreas Nunnenkamp. Topological magnon amplification.Nature Communications, 10:3937, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11914-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11914-2 2019

  28. [30]

    Vittorio Peano, Martin Houde, Florian Marquardt, and Aashish A. Clerk. Topological quantum fluctuations and traveling wave amplifiers.Phys. Rev. X, 6:041026, Nov 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041026. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041026

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.041026 2016

  29. [31]

    Edge states in topological magnon insulators.Phys

    Alexander Mook, J¨ urgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig. Edge states in topological magnon insulators.Phys. Rev. B, 90:024412, Jul 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024412. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024412

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.024412 2014

  30. [32]

    Chisnell, J

    R. Chisnell, J. S. Helton, D. E. Freedman, D. K. Singh, R. I. Bewley, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee. Topological magnon bands in a kagome lattice ferromagnet.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:147201, Sep 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.147201. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.147201. 16

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.147201 2015

  31. [33]

    Ideue Onose Y, Katsura T, Shiomi H, Nagaosa Y, and Tokura Y. N. Observation of the magnon hall effect.Science., 329: 5989, 2010. doi:10.1126/science.1188260

    doi:10.1126/science.1188260 2010

  32. [34]

    Schmidt, Alexandre Ivanov, Jitae T

    Fengfeng Zhu, Lichuan Zhang, Xiao Wang, Flaviano Jos´ e dos Santos, Junda Song, Thomas Mueller, Karin Schmalzl, Wolfgang F. Schmidt, Alexandre Ivanov, Jitae T. Park, Jianhui Xu, Jie Ma, Samir Lounis, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Yuriy Mokrousov, Yixi Su, and Thomas Br¨ uckel. Topological magnon insulators in two-dimensional van der waals ferromagnetsCrSiT e 3 andCrGe...

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7532 2021

  33. [35]

    Stone, Alexander I

    Lebing Chen, Jae-Ho Chung, Bin Gao, Tong Chen, Matthew B. Stone, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, Qingzhen Huang, and Pengcheng Dai. Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet cri 3.Phys. Rev. X, 8:041028, Nov 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041028. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.041028 2018

  34. [36]

    Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet crbr 3.Phys

    Zhengwei Cai, Song Bao, Zhao-Long Gu, Yi-Peng Gao, Zhen Ma, Yanyan Shangguan, Wenda Si, Zhao-Yang Dong, Wei Wang, Yizhang Wu, Dongjing Lin, Jinghui Wang, Kejing Ran, Shichao Li, Devashibhai Adroja, Xiaoxiang Xi, Shun-Li Yu, Xiaoshan Wu, Jian-Xin Li, and Jinsheng Wen. Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet crbr 3.P...

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l020402 2021

  35. [37]

    Observation of topological magnon edge states.ACS Nano, 2025

    Jihai Zhang, Meng-Han Zhang, Peigen Li, Zizhao Liu, Ye Tao, Hongkun Wang, Dao-Xin Yao, Donghui Guo, and Dingyong Zhong. Observation of topological magnon edge states.ACS Nano, 2025

    2025

  36. [38]

    Hosho Katsura, Naoto Nagaosa, and Patrick A. Lee. Theory of the thermal hall effect in quantum magnets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:066403, Feb 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.066403. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 104.066403

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.066403 2010

  37. [39]

    Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal hall effect.Phys

    Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami. Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal hall effect.Phys. Rev. B, 84: 184406, Nov 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.184406. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.184406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.184406 2011

  38. [40]

    Magnon hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation.Phys

    Alexander Mook, J¨ urgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig. Magnon hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation.Phys. Rev. B, 89:134409, Apr 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134409. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.134409 2014

  39. [41]

    McIver, Angel Rubio, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy, and Michael A

    Emil Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, Tahereh Sadat Parvini, James W. McIver, Angel Rubio, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy, and Michael A. Sentef. Direct optical probe of magnon topology in two-dimensional quantum magnets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:026701, Jan

  40. [42]

    Sentef, and Silvia Viola Kusminskiy

    Ying Shing Liu, Emil Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, Michael A. Sentef, and Silvia Viola Kusminskiy. Light-matter-coupling formalism for magnons: probing quantum geometry with light, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11931

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [43]

    Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets.Phys

    Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami. Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:197202, May 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.197202. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.106.197202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.197202 2011

  42. [44]

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics with hyperbolic van der waals materials.Phys

    Yuto Ashida, Ata ¸ c ˙Imamo˘ glu, and Eugene Demler. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with hyperbolic van der waals materials.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:216901, May 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.216901. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.216901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.216901 2023

  43. [45]

    Terahertz chiral sub- wavelength cavities breaking time-reversal symmetry via ultrastrong light-matter interaction.Phys

    Johan Andberger, Lorenzo Graziotto, Luca Sacchi, Mattias Beck, Giacomo Scalari, and J´ erˆ ome Faist. Terahertz chiral sub- wavelength cavities breaking time-reversal symmetry via ultrastrong light-matter interaction.Phys. Rev. B, 109:L161302, Apr 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L161302. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L161302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l161302 2024

  44. [46]

    Tunable cryogenic terahertz cavity for strong light–matter coupling in complex materials.Review of Scientific Instruments, 2022

    Giacomo Jarc, Shahla Yasmin Mathengattil, Francesca Giusti, Maurizio Barnaba, Abhishek Singh, Angela Montanaro, Filippo Glerean, Enrico Maria Rigoni, Simone Dal Zilio, Stephan Winnerl, and Daniele Fausti. Tunable cryogenic terahertz cavity for strong light–matter coupling in complex materials.Review of Scientific Instruments, 2022

    2022

  45. [47]

    Theory of absorption and scattering of light by magnetic crystals.Journal of Applied Physics, 39:1042, 1968

    Tˆ oru Moriya. Theory of absorption and scattering of light by magnetic crystals.Journal of Applied Physics, 39:1042, 1968. doi:10.1063/1.1656160

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1656160 1968

  46. [48]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:013904, Jan 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.013904 2008

  47. [49]

    X. S. Wang, Arne Brataas, and Roberto E. Troncoso. Bosonic bott index and disorder-induced topological transitions of magnons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:217202, Nov 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.217202. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.217202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.217202 2020

  48. [50]

    Breakdown of chiral edge modes in topological magnon insulators.Phys

    Jonas Habel, Alexander Mook, Josef Willsher, and Johannes Knolle. Breakdown of chiral edge modes in topological magnon insulators.Phys. Rev. B, 109:024441, Jan 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.024441. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.024441

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.024441 2024

  49. [51]

    Patel and Christos Argyropoulos

    Shobhit K. Patel and Christos Argyropoulos. Plasmonic nanoantennas: enhancing light-matter interactions at the nanoscale.EPJ Applied Metamaterials, 2015. doi:DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2015006

    arXiv 2015

  50. [52]

    McGuire, Di Xiao, and Xiaodong Xu

    John Cenker, Bevin Huang, Nishchay Suri, Pearl Thijssen, Aaron Miller, Tiancheng Song, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Michael A. McGuire, Di Xiao, and Xiaodong Xu. Direct observation of two-dimensional magnons in atomically thin cri3.Nature Physics, 2021

    2021

  51. [53]

    Shuvaev, V

    A. Shuvaev, V. Dziom, Anna Pimenov, M. Schiebl, A. A. Mukhin, A. C. Komarek, T. Finger, M. Braden, and A. Pimenov. Electric field control of terahertz polarization in a multiferroic manganite with electromagnons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111: 227201, Nov 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.227201. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111. 227201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.227201 2013

  52. [54]

    Mashkovich, Kirill A

    Evgeny A. Mashkovich, Kirill A. Grishunin, Roman M. Dubrovin, Anatoly K. Zvezdin, Roman V. Pisarev, and Alexey V. Kimel. Terahertz light–driven coupling of antiferromagnetic spins to lattice.Science, 2021. 17

    2021

  53. [55]

    Peter Stavropoulos, Xiaoyu Liu, and Hae-Young Kee

    P. Peter Stavropoulos, Xiaoyu Liu, and Hae-Young Kee. Magnetic anisotropy in spin-3/2 with heavy ligand in honeycomb mott insulators: Application to cri 3.Phys. Rev. Research, 3:013216, Mar 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013216. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013216

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013216 2021

  54. [56]

    P. A. Fleury and R. Loudon. Scattering of light by one- and two-magnon excitations.Phys. Rev., 166:514–530, Feb 1968. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.166.514. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.166.514

    doi:10.1103/physrev.166.514 1968

  55. [57]

    Symmetry analysis of spin-dependent electric dipole and its ap- plication to magnetoelectric effects.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 86:034704, 2017

    Masashige Matsumoto, Kosuke Chimata, and Mikito Koga. Symmetry analysis of spin-dependent electric dipole and its ap- plication to magnetoelectric effects.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 86:034704, 2017. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.86.034704. URLhttps://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.86.034704

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.86.034704 2017

  56. [58]

    Microscopic theory of spin-polarization coupling in multiferroic transition metal oxides.Phys

    Chenglong Jia, Shigeki Onoda, Naoto Nagaosa, and Jung Hoon Han. Microscopic theory of spin-polarization coupling in multiferroic transition metal oxides.Phys. Rev. B, 76:144424, Oct 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.144424. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.144424

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.144424 2007

  57. [59]

    Theory of electronic magnetoelectric coupling ind 5 mott insulators.Phys

    Adrien Bolens. Theory of electronic magnetoelectric coupling ind 5 mott insulators.Phys. Rev. B, 98:125135, Sep 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.125135. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.125135

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.125135 2018

  58. [60]

    Neumann, J¨ urgen Henk, Ingrid Mertig, and Alexander Mook

    Robin R. Neumann, J¨ urgen Henk, Ingrid Mertig, and Alexander Mook. Electrical activity of topological chiral edge magnons.Phys. Rev. B, 109:L180412, May 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180412. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180412

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l180412 2024

  59. [61]

    V. M. Khrustalyov, V. M. Savytsky, and M. F. Kharchenko. Magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetic licopo4 in pulsed magnetic fields.Low Temperature Physics, 2016

    2016

  60. [62]

    Interaction-stabilized topological magnon insulator in ferromagnets.Phys

    Alexander Mook, Kirill Plekhanov, Jelena Klinovaja, and Daniel Loss. Interaction-stabilized topological magnon insulator in ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. X, 11:021061, Jun 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021061. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021061

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021061 2021

  61. [63]

    On-site quadratic spin interactions originate from microscopic processes in which an electron virtually hops from the magnetic site to a neighboring non-magnetic site and back

    Note1. On-site quadratic spin interactions originate from microscopic processes in which an electron virtually hops from the magnetic site to a neighboring non-magnetic site and back. In general due to destructive interference between the hopping processes, the net electric dipole moment is zero. However, forS≥1, spin-orbit coupling can lead to a non-zero...

  62. [64]

    S. A. Nikolaev and I. V. Solovyev. Microscopic theory of electric polarization induced by skyrmionic order in gav 4s8.Phys. Rev. B, 99:100401, Mar 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.100401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 99.100401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.100401 2019

  63. [65]

    New York, McGraw-Hill, 1964

    Marshall Sparks.Ferromagnetic-relaxation theory. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1964

    1964

  64. [66]

    Gardiner and P

    C.W. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise. Springer, 2004

    2004

  65. [67]

    Moir´ e-driven multiferroic order in twisted crcl3, crbr3 and cri3 bilayers.2D Materials, 2023

    Adolfo O Fumega and Jose L Lado. Moir´ e-driven multiferroic order in twisted crcl3, crbr3 and cri3 bilayers.2D Materials, 2023

    2023

  66. [68]

    Multi-domain ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic van der waals crystalsCrI 3 andCrBr 3.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2021

    Xi Shen, Haoran Chen, Yi Li, Hong Xia, Fanlong Zeng, Jia Xu, Hee Young Kwon, Yi Ji, Changyeon Won, Wei Zhang, and Yizheng Wu. Multi-domain ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic van der waals crystalsCrI 3 andCrBr 3.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2021

    2021

  67. [69]

    Ruiz, and Jos´ e J

    Andrei Shumilin, Diego L´ opez-Alcal´ a, Nassima Benchtaber, Alberto M. Ruiz, and Jos´ e J. Baldov ´ ı. Intrinsic (non)-gilbert damping in magnetic insulators calculated from a minimal model andab initiospin hamiltonians, 2026. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2602.21885

    arXiv 2026

  68. [70]

    Curtis, Mingyao Guo, Chang Jae Roh, C

    Jun-Yi Shan, Jonathan B. Curtis, Mingyao Guo, Chang Jae Roh, C. R. Rotundu, Young S. Lee, Prineha Narang, Tae Won Noh, Eugene Demler, and D. Hsieh. Dynamic magnetic phase transition induced by parametric magnon pumping.Phys. Rev. B, 109:054302, Feb 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.054302. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 109.054302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.054302 2024

  69. [71]

    Barsukov, H

    I. Barsukov, H. K. Lee, Jara A. A., Y.-J. Chen, A.M. Gon¸ calves, C. Sha, J.A. Katine, R.E. Aria, B.A. Ivanov, and I.N. Krivorotov. Giant nonlinear damping in nanoscale ferromagnets.Science Advances, 2019

    2019

  70. [72]

    Helmrich, H

    F. Helmrich, H. S. Adlong, M. Kroner, I. Khanonkin, G. Scalari, J. Faist, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and T. F. Nova. Cavity-driven attractive interactions in quantum materials.Nature, 2026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10609-1

    doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10609-1 2026

  71. [73]

    WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2020

    Silvia Viola Kusminskiy.Cavity Optomagnonics. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2020

    2020

  72. [74]

    Ultrasmall and tunable terahertz surface plasmon cavities at the ultimate plasmonic limit.Nature Communications, 2023

    Ian Aupiais, Romain Grasset, Tingwen Guo, Dmitri Daineka, Javier Briatico, Sarah Houver, Luca Perfetti, Jean-Paul Hugonin, Jean-Jacques Greffet, and Yannis Laplace. Ultrasmall and tunable terahertz surface plasmon cavities at the ultimate plasmonic limit.Nature Communications, 2023

    2023

  73. [75]

    Wimmer, M

    T. Wimmer, M. Althammer, L. Liensberger, N. Vlietstra, S. Gepr¨ ags, M. Weiler, R. Gross, and H. Huebl. Spin transport in a magnetic insulator with zero effective damping.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:257201, Dec 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.257201. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.257201

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.257201 2019

  74. [76]

    Cavity electrodynamics of van der waals heterostructures,

    Gunda Kipp, Hope M Bretscher, Benedikt Schulte, Dorothee Herrmann, Kateryna Kusyak, Matthew W Day, Sivasruthi Kesavan, Toru Matsuyama, Xinyu Li, Sara Maria Langner, Jesse Hagelstein, Felix Sturm, Alexander M Potts, Christian J Eckhardt, Yunfei Huang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Angel Rubio, Dante M Kennes, Michael A Sentef, Emmanuel Baudin, Guido M...

  75. [77]

    Selective excitation of high-order modes in two-dimensional cavity resonator integrated grating filters.Optics Letters, 2024

    Antoine Monmayrant Antoine Rouxel, Olivier Gauthier-Lafaye and St´ ephane Calvez. Selective excitation of high-order modes in two-dimensional cavity resonator integrated grating filters.Optics Letters, 2024

    2024

  76. [78]

    Gate-tunable spin waves in antiferromagnetic atomic bilayers.Nature Materials, 2020

    Xiao-Xiao Zhang, Lizhong Li, Daniel Weber, Joshua Goldberger, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan. Gate-tunable spin waves in antiferromagnetic atomic bilayers.Nature Materials, 2020. 18

    2020

  77. [79]

    David Alcaraz Iranzo, S´ ebastien Nanot, Eduardo J. C. Dias, Itai Epstein, Cheng Peng, Dmitri K. Efetov, Mark B. Lundeberg, Romain Parret, Johann Osmond, Jin-Yong Hong, Jing Kong, Dirk R. Englund, Nuno M. R. Peres, and Frank H. L. Koppens. Probing the ultimate plasmon confinement limits with a van der waals heterostructure.Science, 360(6386): 291–295, 202...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar8438 2025

  78. [80]

    Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    Ryogo Kubo. Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. i. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1957

    1957

  79. [81]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett. Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation.Phys. Rev. A, 31:3761–3774, Jun 1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3761. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3761

    doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3761 1985

  80. [82]

    Winter, Ying Li, Harald O

    Stephen M. Winter, Ying Li, Harald O. Jeschke, and Roser Valent ´ ı. Challenges in design of kitaev materials: Magnetic interactions from competing energy scales.Phys. Rev. B, 93:214431, Jun 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.214431 2016

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.