Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Edge Directionality Improves Learning on Heterophilic Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.10498 v3 pith:3ZU6SBQ4 submitted 2023-05-17 cs.LG cs.SI

Edge Directionality Improves Learning on Heterophilic Graphs

classification cs.LG cs.SI
keywords directedgraphgraphsdir-gnndirectionalityheterophilicinformationneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become the de-facto standard tool for modeling relational data. However, while many real-world graphs are directed, the majority of today's GNN models discard this information altogether by simply making the graph undirected. The reasons for this are historical: 1) many early variants of spectral GNNs explicitly required undirected graphs, and 2) the first benchmarks on homophilic graphs did not find significant gain from using direction. In this paper, we show that in heterophilic settings, treating the graph as directed increases the effective homophily of the graph, suggesting a potential gain from the correct use of directionality information. To this end, we introduce Directed Graph Neural Network (Dir-GNN), a novel general framework for deep learning on directed graphs. Dir-GNN can be used to extend any Message Passing Neural Network (MPNN) to account for edge directionality information by performing separate aggregations of the incoming and outgoing edges. We prove that Dir-GNN matches the expressivity of the Directed Weisfeiler-Lehman test, exceeding that of conventional MPNNs. In extensive experiments, we validate that while our framework leaves performance unchanged on homophilic datasets, it leads to large gains over base models such as GCN, GAT and GraphSage on heterophilic benchmarks, outperforming much more complex methods and achieving new state-of-the-art results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neural Networks With Dense Weights Are Not Universal Approximators

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dense neural networks subject to constraints on weights and dimensions cannot approximate arbitrary Lipschitz continuous functions.

  2. Neural Networks With Dense Weights Are Not Universal Approximators

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dense ReLU networks under natural weight and dimension constraints fail to approximate certain Lipschitz functions, unlike unrestricted networks.

  3. Flow Matters: Directional and Expressive GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    A GAT model with polynomial gating (Poly) and a directed variant (Dir-Poly) report strong heterophilic node classification results, with Dir-Poly's largest gain on a single directed dataset.