Pith. sign in

REVIEW

AutoPETIII: The Tracer Frontier. What Frontier?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02807 v2 pith:42HPDR6Z submitted 2024-09-19 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV
keywords segmentationlesiontracerautomaticfrontierfullymodelsused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For the last three years, the AutoPET competition gathered the medical imaging community around a hot topic: lesion segmentation on Positron Emitting Tomography (PET) scans. Each year a different aspect of the problem is presented; in 2024 the multiplicity of existing and used tracers was at the core of the challenge. Specifically, this year's edition aims to develop a fully automatic algorithm capable of performing lesion segmentation on a PET/CT scan, without knowing the tracer, which can either be a FDG or PSMA-based tracer. In this paper we describe how we used the nnUNetv2 framework to train two sets of 6 fold ensembles of models to perform fully automatic PET/CT lesion segmentation as well as a MIP-CNN to choose which set of models to use for segmentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools