Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond 2:4: exploring V:N:M sparsity for efficient transformer inference on GPUs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.16135 v3 pith:42UHATZW submitted 2024-10-21 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords sparsityaccuracysparsetransformersgpusmodelstasksdownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

To date, 2:4 sparsity has stood as the only sparse pattern that can be accelerated using sparse tensor cores on GPUs. In practice, 2:4 sparsity often possesses low actual speedups ($\leq 1.3$) and requires fixed sparse ratios, meaning that other ratios, such as 4:8, 8:16, or those exceeding 50% sparsity, do not incur any speedups on GPUs. Recent studies suggest that V:N:M sparsity is promising in addressing these limitations of 2:4 sparsity. However, regarding accuracy, the effects of V:N:M sparsity on broader Transformer models, such as vision Transformers and large language models (LLMs), are largely unexamined. Moreover, Some specific issues related to V:N:M sparsity, such as how to select appropriate V and M values, remain unresolved. In this study, we thoroughly investigate the application of V:N:M sparsity in vision models and LLMs across multiple tasks, from pertaining to downstream tasks. We propose three key approaches to enhance the applicability and accuracy of V:N:M-sparse Transformers, including heuristic V and M selection, V:N:M-specific channel permutation, and three-staged LoRA training techniques. Experimental results show that, with our methods, the DeiT-small achieves lossless accuracy at 64:2:5 sparsity, while the DeiT-base maintains accuracy even at 64:2:8 sparsity. In addition, the fine-tuned LLama2-7B at 64:2:5 sparsity performs comparably or better than training-free 2:4 sparse alternatives on downstream tasks. More importantly, V:N:M-sparse Transformers offer a wider range of speedup-accuracy trade-offs compared to 2:4 sparsity. Overall, our exploration largely facilitates the V:N:M sparsity to act as a truly effective acceleration solution for Transformers in cost-sensitive inference scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rethinking Depth Pruning for Vision Transformers: A Heterogeneity-Aware Perspective

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Heterogeneity-aware depth pruning of attention and activation layers, guided by a polynomial model-accuracy predictor, delivers up to 1.58× speedup on DeiT-B and 5.19× when combined with width pruning.

  2. From 2:4 to 8:16 sparsity patterns in LLMs for Outliers and Weights with Variance Correction

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    8:16 sparsity with variance correction and outlier handling lets compressed LLMs match or exceed dense-model accuracy under fixed memory limits, outperforming the common 2:4 pattern in flexibility.

Pith tools