Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Detection of stratospheric HCN and tropospheric CO in Uranus and the implication for their sources

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Uranus's deep interior holds oxygen enriched by at least a factor of 52 relative to the protoplanetary nebula.

desk verdict First unambiguous tropospheric CO detection on Uranus at 5.8 ppb, converted to deep O/H >52 via thermochemical modeling, plus stratospheric HCN; the enrichment step needs sensitivity checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.04510 v1 pith:44S7MT35 submitted 2026-06-03 astro-ph.EP

T. Cavalié , R. Moreno , C. Lefour , S. H. Luszcz-Cook , T. Fouchet , E. Lellouch , O. Carrión-González , B. Benmahi
show 11 more authors
S. Guerlet G. Milcareck N. Clément M. Dobrijevic I. de Pater A. Moullet J. I. Moses J. Leconte A. Spiga M. T. Roman L. N. Fletcher
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords UranuscarbonmonoxidehydrogencyanideoxygenabundanceALMAcometimpactthermochemicalmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents the first unambiguous detection of tropospheric carbon monoxide in Uranus at 5.8 ppb from ALMA submillimeter observations. Thermochemical equilibrium calculations convert this abundance into a minimum deep oxygen enrichment factor. The same data set also yields a detection of stratospheric hydrogen cyanide confined above 0.2 mbar and shows that the external carbon monoxide supply matches an ancient comet impact rather than steady external delivery.

What carries the argument

Thermochemical equilibrium model that maps the measured tropospheric CO mole fraction directly onto the deep O/H enrichment factor.

What would settle it

A revised thermochemical calculation or an independent measurement of deep oxygen that yields an enrichment factor below roughly 30 would falsify the reported minimum value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Tropospheric CO reaches 5.8 ± 0.3 ppb and stratospheric HCN reaches (1.8 ± 0.2) × 10^{-11} above 0.2 mbar. Thermochemical modeling of the CO abundance implies that the deep interior oxygen-to-hydrogen ratio exceeds the protoplanetary nebula value by a factor of at least 52^{+30}_{-20}. The meridional distribution of CO favors an old comet impact as the dominant external source, establishing a dual origin for stratospheric CO.

Load-bearing premise

The thermochemical equilibrium model accurately converts the observed tropospheric CO abundance into a deep oxygen enrichment factor without significant contributions from other processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uranus accreted a larger fraction of oxygen-rich ices than previously assumed in standard formation models.
  • Stratospheric CO on Uranus originates from both internal thermochemical production and an ancient comet impact.
  • Zonal winds at submillibar levels in the equatorial band are likely retrograde.
  • HCN is confined to pressures lower than 0.2 mbar, consistent with external delivery and rapid destruction at greater depths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar ALMA mapping on Neptune could test whether the same oxygen-enrichment pattern holds for both ice giants.
  • Future in-situ probe measurements of deep CO or H2O would directly calibrate the thermochemical conversion factor used here.
  • The comet-impact timing implied by the CO profile supplies a new constraint on the recent dynamical history of the outer solar system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ALMA observations of CO (J=3-2) and HCN (J=4-3) lines in Uranus, claiming the first unambiguous detection of tropospheric CO at 5.8 ± 0.3 ppb and stratospheric HCN at (1.8 ± 0.2) × 10^{-11} below 0.2 mbar. Radiative transfer and thermochemical modeling are used to infer a deep O/H enrichment factor of at least 52^{+30}_{-20} relative to the protoplanetary nebula; stratospheric CO is attributed to an old comet impact (dual origin), and no zonal winds are detected at submillibar levels.

Significance. If the thermochemical conversion holds, the O/H enrichment supplies a valuable new constraint on Uranus's bulk interior composition and formation pathway, complementing existing constraints from other volatiles. The HCN detection and comet-impact interpretation for CO add to the inventory of exogenous delivery processes on ice giants. The ALMA mapping approach and wind retrieval are technically sound contributions to the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Thermochemical calculations] Thermochemical calculations (abstract and associated modeling section): the headline O/H enrichment of 52^{+30}_{-20} is obtained by direct conversion of the 5.8 ppb tropospheric CO abundance under equilibrium assumptions. No sensitivity analysis is shown for variations in the adopted K_zz profile or deep T(P) structure, both of which are known to shift the required oxygen reservoir by tens of percent and are load-bearing for the interior-enrichment claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'mole faction' is a typographical error and should read 'mole fraction'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and positive assessment of the manuscript's significance. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested sensitivity analysis in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Thermochemical calculations] Thermochemical calculations (abstract and associated modeling section): the headline O/H enrichment of 52^{+30}_{-20} is obtained by direct conversion of the 5.8 ppb tropospheric CO abundance under equilibrium assumptions. No sensitivity analysis is shown for variations in the adopted K_zz profile or deep T(P) structure, both of which are known to shift the required oxygen reservoir by tens of percent and are load-bearing for the interior-enrichment claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit sensitivity analysis for the adopted K_zz profile and deep T(P) structure would strengthen the robustness of the derived O/H enrichment. Our baseline profiles follow standard values from the literature on Uranus thermochemistry, and the reported 'at least 52' figure with its asymmetric uncertainties already reflects a conservative lower limit. Nevertheless, in the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (or appendix) presenting results for a range of plausible K_zz values (spanning an order of magnitude) and alternative deep T(P) structures drawn from prior studies. These tests will show that the minimum O/H enrichment remains above ~30 in all cases, confirming that the headline conclusion is not sensitive to these choices within the stated uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in O/H enrichment derivation

full rationale

The paper retrieves a tropospheric CO mole fraction of 5.8 ppb directly from ALMA spectral mapping observations via radiative transfer modeling. It then applies external thermochemical equilibrium calculations to convert this measured value into a deep O/H enrichment factor. No equation or step reduces the enrichment output to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the input CO abundance is observationally independent of the thermochemical conversion step. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The enrichment claim rests on two domain assumptions (radiative transfer conversion of line intensity to abundance and thermochemical equilibrium linking CO to deep oxygen) plus the measured CO value itself; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • tropospheric CO mole fraction = 5.8 ppb
    Fitted from the J=3-2 line intensity; reported as 5.8 ppb with uncertainty
  • stratospheric HCN mole fraction = 1.8e-11
    Fitted from the J=4-3 line; reported as 1.8e-11 with uncertainty
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Radiative transfer accurately converts observed line intensities to vertical mole fractions
    Invoked to obtain the 5.8 ppb CO and 1.8e-11 HCN values from ALMA spectra
  • domain assumption Thermochemical equilibrium relates observed tropospheric CO directly to deep interior O/H ratio
    Used to convert the CO abundance into the factor-of-52 enrichment claim

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detection of stratospheric HCN and tropospheric CO in Uranus and the implication for their sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/44S7MT35

@misc{pith2026260604510,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detection of stratospheric HCN and tropospheric CO in Uranus and the implication for their sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/44S7MT35}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.04510}
}
abstract

Uranus belongs to the category of ice giants that are common in our Galaxy. However, Uranus is one of the least explored and understood planets in our Solar System. This work aims to constrain the deep oxygen abundance of Uranus to better understand its formation. Another goal concerns the origin of exogeneous species, such as CO and HCN, found in the upper stratospheres of giant planets. We used spectral mapping observations of the CO (J=3-2) and HCN (J=4-3) rotational submillimeter lines obtained with ALMA in 2022 and 2024. We combined them with radiative transfer and thermochemical modeling to determine the tropospheric abundance of CO and the deep O/H ratio of Uranus. We used radiative transfer simulations with physical models of various sources of external CO and HCN to constrain the vertical and meridional distributions of these species and narrow down the nature of their external sources. We also applied a wind retrieval algorithm to search for zonal winds in the stratosphere of Uranus at the levels probed by the CO and HCN lines. We unambiguously detect tropospheric CO for the first time with a mole fraction of 5.8$\pm$0.3 ppb and stratospheric HCN with a mole faction of (1.8$\pm$0.2)$\times10^{-11}$ restricted to pressures lower than 0.2 mbar. Thermochemical calculations suggest that the deep interior of Uranus is enriched in oxygen with respect to the protoplanetary nebula by at least a factor of 52$^{+30}_{-20}$. We also find that the stratospheric CO is rather uniform over the observed latitudes and that the CO lines are best fit by an old comet impact model, in which a large comet hit the planet several centuries ago. CO therefore has a dual origin in Uranus. Finally, we do not detect stratospheric winds from these data, but the CO data indicate that zonal winds in the 10$^\circ$S-10$^\circ$N latitudinal range are likely retrograde at submillibar pressures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04510 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Uranus continuum images at 345 GHz. The image on the left was obtained from the combined-2022 observations (August 19 and October 18). The one on the right corresponds to the data from July 30, 2024, alone. The planet 1-bar level is delimited by the black ellipse, latitudes are indicated with white isocontours, the central meridian is depicted by the dashed black line, and the beam is represented by the filled white… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Uranus disk-center spectrum at 345 GHz, as extracted from the 2022+2024 spectral cube. The spectral resolution is 8.8 MHz. The ALMA bandwidth does not cover the full line. The tropospheric absorption can be reproduced with a deep CO mole fraction of (5.8±0.3)×10−9 . The best-fit models for external sources discussed in Section 5 cannot reproduce such a broad absorption nor can a “rock giant” model or a ”rock giant” … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Uranus CO maps. (Top left) Uranus CO (J=3-2) broadband (from -140 km·s −1 to 200 km·s −1 ) area map from the 2022+2024 observations. This illustrates the disk center absorption discussed in Section 4. (Top right) Uranus CO (J=3-2) emission line area image, obtained from the combined-2022 observations (August 19 and October 18). (Bottom) Uranus CO (J=3-2) emission line area image, obtained from the July 30, 2024, dat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Uranus HCN (J=4-3) emission line area map from the 2022+2024 observations. This illustrates the stratospheric emission detected at the limb by limiting the flux integration from -5 km·s −1 to +5 km·s −1 . The layout is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Selection of Uranus HCN (J=4-3) spectra across the planet limb, demonstrating the low-to-moderate S/N detection of the emission line. To avoid confusion, spectra are offset as follows: 07◦S west (dark-blue line) by +0.04 Jy/beam, 10◦N west (blue line) by +0.02 Jy/beam,…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Uranus HCN (J=4-3) emission line after averaging the signal from the 2022+2024 cube over all limb positions (see Section 2.2). The best-fit model is obtained with an HCN vertical profile in which HCN is restricted to pressures lower than 0.2 mbar with a mole fraction o…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mole fraction vertical profiles considered in this work for CO and HCN. For CO, we test the profiles based on Cavalié et al. (2014) that reflect: (i) an internal source with 5.8 ppb (dashed-dotted red line), as determined from the disk center spectrum (see text in Sect…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized contribution functions at the line center for the CO (J=3-2) line observed with ALMA in 2022 (solid black line), accounting for the internal source only. Contribution functions are also presented at 64 MHz (long-dashed blue line), 128 MHz (short-dashed yello…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Vertical profile derived from the thermochemical simulations that reproduces the 5.8 ppb of upper tropospheric CO abundance observed with ALMA. Because the CO profile is constant from ∼200 bar to the upper troposphere, the upper tropospheric CO abundance measured in th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Normalized contribution functions at the center for the CO (J=3-2) line observed with ALMA in 2022 (solid black line), accounting for the comet source and the internal source. Contribution functions are also presented at 0.5 MHz (dashed dark blue line), 1 MHz (short-d…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Example of fits to the CO (J=3-2) emission line from the combined-2022 data at various limb positions. (Top) Fits obtained at 15◦S comparing the various source models: the rescaled comet impact profile (dashed dark-purple lines), the IDP profile (blue dotted lines), a…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Column density of CO (in cm−2 ) from the external component only as a function of planetocentric latitude, as derived from scaling the comet profile at each observed limb position from the 2022 dataset. The average column is (7.5±0.6)×1015 cm−2 . The same data, after …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Wind speeds in the stratosphere of Uranus derived from the CO (J=3-2) observations. The yellow envelope represents the 1-σ uncertainties. It shows the range of possible speeds at 0.4+0.3 −0.1 mbar (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The atmospheric vertical structure of Uranus and Neptune from thermochemical models: the impact of model assumptions

    astro-ph.EP 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Varying assumed metallicity, C/O, S/N, and 1-bar temperature in thermochemical equilibrium models changes predicted mixing ratios and cloud decks of Uranus and Neptune by more than an order of magnitude, and thermal p...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S., Achilleos, N., Agarwal, J., et al

    Arridge, C. S., Achilleos, N., Agarwal, J., et al. 2014, Planet. Space Sci. , 104, 122

    2014

  2. [2]

    K., Hofstadter, M

    Atreya, S. K., Hofstadter, M. H., In, J. H., et al. 2020, Space Sci. Rev. , 216, 18

    2020

  3. [3]

    H., Mickelson, M

    Baines, K. H., Mickelson, M. E., Larson, L. E., & Ferguson, D. W. 1995, Icarus , 114, 328

    1995

  4. [4]

    K., et al

    Benmahi, B., Cavalié, T., Greathouse, T. K., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys. , 652, A125

    2021

  5. [5]

    2022, Astron

    Benmahi, B., Cavalié, T., Fouchet, T., et al. 2022, Astron. Astrophys. , 666, A117

    2022

  6. [6]

    2025, Astron

    Benmahi, B., Cavalié, T., Fouchet, T., et al. 2025, Astron. Astrophys. , 696, C5 Bockelée-Morvan, D. & Biver, N. 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 375, 20160252

    2025

  7. [7]

    J., Adriani, A., Adumitroaie, V., et al

    Bolton, S. J., Adriani, A., Adumitroaie, V., et al. 2017, Science, 356, 821

    2017

  8. [8]

    1985, Astrophys

    Borysow, J., Trafton, L., Frommhold, L., & Birnbaum, G. 1985, Astrophys. J. , 296, 644

    1985

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    1988, Astrophys

    Borysow, J., Frommhold, L., & Birnbaum, G. 1988, Astrophys. J. , 326, 509

    1988

  2. [10]

    & Frommhold, L

    Borysow, A. & Frommhold, L. 1986, Astrophys. J. , 304, 849

    1986

  3. [11]

    2026, Astron

    Briand, T., Hue, V., Mousis, O., et al. 2026, Astron. Astrophys. , submitted

    2026

  4. [12]

    2006, Icarus , 184, 634 Carrión-González, Ó., Moreno, R., Lellouch, E., et al

    Burgdorf, M., Orton, G., van Cleve, J., Meadows, V., & Houck, J. 2006, Icarus , 184, 634 Carrión-González, Ó., Moreno, R., Lellouch, E., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys. , 674, L3 Cavalié, T., Billebaud, F., Dobrijevic, M., et al. 2009, Icarus , 203, 531 Cavalié, T., Hartogh, P...

    2006

  5. [13]

    J., Beddingfield, C., Chancia, R., et al

    Cohen, I. J., Beddingfield, C., Chancia, R., et al. 2022, Planet. Sci. J. , 3, 58

    2022

  6. [14]

    Conrath, B., Hanel, R., Gautier, D., Marten, A., & Lindal, G. 1987, J. Geophys. Res. , 92, 15003

    1987

  7. [15]

    1998, Astron

    Coustenis, A., Salama, A., Lellouch, E., et al. 1998, Astron. Astrophys. , 336, L85 de Kleer, K., Luszcz-Cook, S., de Pater, I., Ádámkovics, M., & Hammel, H. B. 2015, Icarus , 256, 120 19 de Pater, I., Molter, E. M., & Moeckel, C. M. 2023, Remote Sensing, 15, 1313 de Pater, I....

    1998

  8. [16]

    J., Drouin, B

    Dick, M. J., Drouin, B. J., & Pearson, J. C. 2009, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer , 110, 619

    2009

  9. [17]

    2004, Astron

    Encrenaz, T., Lellouch, E., Drossart, P., et al. 2004, Astron. Astrophys. , 413, L5

    2004

  10. [18]

    1997, Nature , 389, 159

    Feuchtgruber, H., Lellouch, E., de Graauw, T., et al. 1997, Nature , 389, 159

    1997

  11. [19]

    M., Conrath, B

    Flasar, F. M., Conrath, B. J., Gierasch, P. J., & Pirraglia, J. A. 1987, J. Geophys. Res. , 92, 15011

    1987

  12. [20]

    N., Helled, R., Roussos, E., et al

    Fletcher, L. N., Helled, R., Roussos, E., et al. 2022, Experimental Astronomy, 54, 1015

    2022

  13. [21]

    & Schmitt, B

    Fray, N. & Schmitt, B. 2009, Planet. Space Sci. , 57, 2053

    2009

  14. [22]

    2005, Annu

    Guillot, T. 2005, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. , 33, 493

    2005

  15. [23]

    N., Helled, R., et al

    Guillot, T., Fletcher, L. N., Helled, R., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 947

    2023

  16. [24]

    B., Rages, K., Lockwood, G

    Hammel, H. B., Rages, K., Lockwood, G. W., Karkoschka, E., & de Pater, I. 2001, Icarus , 153, 229

    2001

  17. [25]

    B., de Pater, I., Gibbard, S., Lockwood, G

    Hammel, H. B., de Pater, I., Gibbard, S., Lockwood, G. W., & Rages, K. 2005, Icarus , 175, 534

    2005

  18. [26]

    2011, Astron

    Hartogh, P., Lellouch, E., Moreno, R., et al. 2011, Astron. Astrophys. , 532, L2

    2011

  19. [27]

    & Fortney, J

    Helled, R. & Fortney, J. J. 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 378, 20190474

    2020

  20. [28]

    2020, Space Sci

    Helled, R., Nettelmann, N., & Guillot, T. 2020, Space Sci. Rev. , 216, 38

    2020

  21. [29]

    E., Davis, G

    Hesman, B. E., Davis, G. R., Matthews, H. E., & Orton, G. S. 2007, Icarus , 186, 342

    2007

  22. [30]

    Hue, V., Hersant, F., Cavalié, T., Dobrijevic, M., & Sinclair, J. A. 2018, Icarus , 307, 106

    2018

  23. [31]

    2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 378, 20190476

    Hueso, R., Guillot, T., & Sánchez-Lavega, A. 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 378, 20190476

    2020

  24. [32]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 211

    Hyder, A., Li, C., Chanover, N., & Bjoraker, G. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 211

    2025

  25. [33]

    Irwin, P. G. J., Toledo, D., Garland, R., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 420

    2018

  26. [34]

    Irwin, P. G. J., Toledo, D., Braude, A. S., et al. 2019, Icarus , 331, 69

    2019

  27. [35]

    Irwin, P. G. J., Wenkert, D. D., Simon, A. A., Dahl, E., & Hammel, H. B. 2025, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 540, 1719

    2025

  28. [36]

    & Tomasko, M

    Karkoschka, E. & Tomasko, M. 2009, Icarus , 202, 287

    2009

  29. [37]

    & Tomasko, M

    Karkoschka, E. & Tomasko, M. G. 2011, Icarus , 211, 780

    2011

  30. [38]

    A., & Grün, E

    Landgraf, M., Liou, J.-C., Zook, H. A., & Grün, E. 2002, Astron. J. , 123, 2857

    2002

  31. [39]

    2017, Astron

    Leconte, J., Selsis, F., Hersant, F., & Guillot, T. 2017, Astron. Astrophys. , 598, A98

    2017

  32. [40]

    2026, Astron

    Lefour, C., Cavalié, T., Moreno, R., et al. 2026, Astron. Astrophys. , DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202659264

    2026 doi

  33. [41]

    1995, Nature , 373, 592

    Lellouch, E., Paubert, G., Moreno, R., et al. 1995, Nature , 373, 592

    1995

  34. [42]

    I., et al

    Lellouch, E., Bézard, B., Moses, J. I., et al. 2002, Icarus , 159, 112

    2002

  35. [43]

    2005, Astron

    Lellouch, E., Moreno, R., & Paubert, G. 2005, Astron. Astrophys. , 430, L37

    2005

  36. [44]

    F., et al

    Lellouch, E., Bézard, B., Strobel, D. F., et al. 2006, Icarus , 184, 478

    2006

  37. [45]

    S., et al

    Lellouch, E., Moreno, R., Orton, G. S., et al. 2015, Astron. Astrophys. , 579, A121 20

    2015

  38. [46]

    2019, Nat

    Lellouch, E., Gurwell, M., Moreno, R., et al. 2019, Nat. Astron. , 3, 614

    2019

  39. [47]

    2020, Nat

    Li, C., Ingersoll, A., Bolton, S., et al. 2020, Nat. Astron. , 4, 609

    2020

  40. [48]

    F., Lyons, J

    Lindal, G. F., Lyons, J. R., Sweetnam, D. N., Eshleman, V. R., & Hinson, D. P. 1987, J. Geophys. Res. , 92, 14987

    1987

  41. [49]

    2021, Space Sci

    Lodders, K. 2021, Space Sci. Rev. , 217, 44

    2021

  42. [50]

    Luszcz-Cook, S. H. & de Pater, I. 2013, Icarus , 222, 379

    2013

  43. [51]

    J., et al

    Marten, A., Gautier, D., Griffin, M. J., et al. 1995, Geophys. Res. Lett. , 22, 1589

    1995

  44. [52]

    2024, Astron

    Milcareck, G., Guerlet, S., Montmessin, F., et al. 2024, Astron. Astrophys. , 686, A303

    2024

  45. [53]

    M., de Pater, I., Luszcz-Cook, S., et al

    Molter, E. M., de Pater, I., Luszcz-Cook, S., et al. 2021, Planet. Sci. J. , 2, 3

    2021

  46. [54]

    E., & Biraud, Y

    Moreno, R., Marten, A., Matthews, H. E., & Biraud, Y. 2003, Planet. Space Sci. , 51, 591

    2003

  47. [55]

    2005, Astron

    Moreno, R., Marten, A., & Hidayat, T. 2005, Astron. Astrophys. , 437, 319

    2005

  48. [56]

    2017, Astron

    Moreno, R., Lellouch, E., Cavalié, T., & Moullet, A. 2017, Astron. Astrophys. , 608, L5

    2017

  49. [57]

    Moses, J. I. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 372, 20130073

    2014

  50. [58]

    Moses, J. I. & Poppe, A. R. 2017, Icarus , 297, 33

    2017

  51. [59]

    I., Lellouch, E., Bézard, B., et al

    Moses, J. I., Lellouch, E., Bézard, B., et al. 2000, Icarus , 145, 166

    2000

  52. [60]

    I., Fletcher, L

    Moses, J. I., Fletcher, L. N., Greathouse, T. K., Orton, G. S., & Hue, V. 2018, Icarus , 307, 124

    2018

  53. [61]

    I., Brown, Z

    Moses, J. I., Brown, Z. L., Koskinen, T. T., et al. 2023, Icarus , 391, 115328

    2023

  54. [62]

    H., Cavalié, T., et al

    Mousis, O., Atkinson, D. H., Cavalié, T., et al. 2018, Planet. Space Sci. , 155, 12

    2018

  55. [63]

    Mousis, O., Aguichine, A., Helled, R., Irwin, P. G. J., & Lunine, J. I. 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 378, 20200107

    2020

  56. [64]

    H., Ambrosi, R., et al

    Mousis, O., Atkinson, D. H., Ambrosi, R., et al. 2022, Experimental Astronomy, 54, 975

    2022

  57. [65]

    E., Waite Jr., J

    Perry, M. E., Waite Jr., J. H., Mitchell, D. G., et al. 2018, Geophys. Res. Lett. , 45, 10,093

    2018

  58. [66]

    2005, in SF2A-2005: Semaine de l’Astrophysique Francaise, ed

    Pety, J. 2005, in SF2A-2005: Semaine de l’Astrophysique Francaise, ed. F. Casoli, T. Contini, J. M. Hameury, & L. Pagani, 721

    2005

  59. [67]

    M., Poynter, R

    Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer , 60, 883

    1998

  60. [68]

    Poppe, A. R. 2016, Icarus , 264, 369 Prangé, R., Fouchet, T., Courtin, R., Connerney, J. E. P., & McConnell, J. C. 2006, Icarus , 180, 379

    2016

  61. [69]

    2020, Mon

    Reinhardt, C., Chau, A., Stadel, J., & Helled, R. 2020, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 492, 5336

    2020

  62. [70]

    Rohart, F., Derozier, D., & Legrand, J. 1987, J. Chem. Phys. , 87, 5794

    1987

  63. [71]

    T., Banfield, D., & Gierasch, P

    Roman, M. T., Banfield, D., & Gierasch, P. J. 2018, Icarus , 310, 54

    2018

  64. [72]

    T., Fletcher, L

    Roman, M. T., Fletcher, L. N., Hammel, H. B., et al. 2026, Nat. Commun., submitted

    2026

  65. [73]

    Solem, J. C. 1994, Nature , 370, 349

    1994

  66. [74]

    A., Fry, P

    Sromovsky, L. A., Fry, P. M., & Kim, J. H. 2011, Icarus , 215, 292

    2011

  67. [75]

    A., Karkoschka, E., Fry, P

    Sromovsky, L. A., Karkoschka, E., Fry, P. M., et al. 2014, Icarus , 238, 137

    2014

  68. [76]

    A., de Pater, I., Fry, P

    Sromovsky, L. A., de Pater, I., Fry, P. M., Hammel, H. B., & Marcus, P. 2015, Icarus , 258, 192

    2015

  69. [77]

    A., Fry, P

    Sromovsky, L. A., Fry, P. M., de Pater, I., & Hammel, H. B. 2024, Icarus , 420, 116186 21

    2024

  70. [78]

    Sromovsky, L. A. & Fry, P. M. 2008, Icarus , 193, 252

    2008

  71. [79]

    Strobel, D. F. & Yung, Y. L. 1979, Icarus , 37, 256

    1979

  72. [80]

    Teanby, N. A. & Irwin, P. G. J. 2013, Astrophys. J. Lett. , 775, L49

    2013

  73. [81]

    A., Irwin, P

    Teanby, N. A., Irwin, P. G. J., & Moses, J. I. 2019, Icarus , 319, 86

    2019

  74. [82]

    A., Irwin, P

    Teanby, N. A., Irwin, P. G. J., Moses, J. I., & Helled, R. 2020, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 378, 20190489

    2020

  75. [83]

    A., Irwin, P

    Teanby, N. A., Irwin, P. G. J., Sylvestre, M., Nixon, C. A., & Cordiner, M. A. 2022, Planet. Sci. J. , 3, 96

    2022

  76. [84]

    M., et al

    Tollefson, J., de Pater, I., Molter, E. M., et al. 2021, Planet. Sci. J. , 2, 105

    2021

  77. [85]

    & Helled, R

    Vazan, A. & Helled, R. 2020, Astron. Astrophys. , 633, A50

    2020

  78. [86]

    2019, Astron

    Venot, O., Bounaceur, R., Dobrijevic, M., et al. 2019, Astron. Astrophys. , 624, A58

    2019

  79. [87]

    2020, Astron

    Venot, O., Cavalié, T., Bounaceur, R., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys. , 634, A78

    2020

  80. [88]

    I., & Saslow, S

    Visscher, C., Moses, J. I., & Saslow, S. A. 2010, Icarus , 209, 602

    2010

  81. [89]

    H., Perryman, R

    Waite, J. H., Perryman, R. S., Perry, M. E., et al. 2018, Science , 362, 51

    2018

  82. [90]

    J., Lunine, J

    Wang, D., Gierasch, P. J., Lunine, J. I., & Mousis, O. 2015, Icarus , 250, 154

    2015

  83. [91]

    2025, Geophys

    Wang, X., Li, L., Roman, M., et al. 2025, Geophys. Res. Lett. , 52, e2025GL115660

    2025

  84. [92]

    2003, Icarus , 163, 263

    Zahnle, K., Schenk, P., Levison, H., & Dones, L. 2003, Icarus , 163, 263

    2003

  85. [93]

    & Dong, S

    Zhu, W. & Dong, S. 2021, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 59, 291 22

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.