REVIEW 2 cited by
Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The global geometry of language models is important for a range of applications, but language model probes tend to evaluate rather local relations, for which ground truths are easily obtained. In this paper we exploit the fact that in geography, ground truths are available beyond local relations. In a series of experiments, we evaluate the extent to which language model representations of city and country names are isomorphic to real-world geography, e.g., if you tell a language model where Paris and Berlin are, does it know the way to Rome? We find that language models generally encode limited geographic information, but with larger models performing the best, suggesting that geographic knowledge can be induced from higher-order co-occurrence statistics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Applying Large Language Models to Complement Single-Cell Foundation Models
A fusion model called scMPT, combining scGPT with an LLM text encoder, improves single-cell cell type classification on most tested datasets, and the paper shows the LLM relies on marker genes and simple expression patterns.
-
Linear Spatial World Models Emerge in Large Language Models
Spatial relation words in LLaMA and Qwen models form antipodal, roughly orthogonal directions in a low-dimensional subspace, and steering along these directions changes the model's output.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.