REVIEW 2 cited by
A study of the decays of $S-$wave $\bar D^\ast K^\ast$ hadronic molecules: the scalar $X_0(2900)$ and its spin partners $X_{J(J=1,2)}$
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this work, we investigated the decays of the fully open-flavor tetraquark state $X_0(2900)$ which was observed by the LHCb Collaboration very recently. Here, the $X_0(2900)$ was assigned as a $S-$wave $\bar D^\ast K^\ast$ hadronic molecule with $I=0$, and the effective lagrangian approach was applied to estimate the partial decay widths. Moreover, we also predicted the decay behaviors of the other unobserved $X_{J(J=1,2)}$, which were the spin partners of the $X_0(2900)$ in the $S-$wave $\bar D^\ast K^\ast$ picture. It was pointed out that the $X_1$ state with $I=0$ was a broad state with the width more than one hundred MeV, while another $X_2$ state with $I=0$ was a narrow state with the width approaching half of that for the $X_0(2900)$. In addition, our results also showed that the $\bar D^\ast K$ mode was expected to be the dominant decay mode for both $X_1$ and $X_2$. Searching for those unobserved $X_{J(J=1,2)}$ in the future experiments might be helpful to understand the nature of $X_0(2900)$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Singly heavy tetraquarks
A hybrid quark model with gluon and meson exchange predicts that LHCb's T-c̄s̄0(2870) and T-cs̄0(2900) are compact tetraquarks, and that Ds0(2317), Ds1(2460), Tbs(5568), and Tcs(2327) are not.
-
$T^a_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$, $T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0$, and other singly-heavy tetraquark states
A mass splitting model anchored to X(4140) interprets LHCb's T^a_c sbar0(2900) and T_cs0*(2870)^0 as particular singly-heavy tetraquarks and forecasts several narrow states.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.