Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Repeated conditional-displacement interactions with an auxiliary qubit stabilize cat and squeezed-cat qubits without engineered two-photon reservoirs, while preserving the noise bias and partially correcting single-photon loss.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 08:40 UTC pith:4B5UE7W3

load-bearing objection Solid, usable stroboscopic stabilizer for ordinary and squeezed cats that preserves bias and partially corrects loss; the cooling-rate vs size tradeoff is real but already owned by the authors. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08363 v1 pith:4B5UE7W3 submitted 2026-07-09 quant-ph

Stroboscopic Stabilization of Cat Qubits

Timo Hillmann , Franco Nori , Fernando Quijandr\'ia This is my paper
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.Pp03.67.Lx42.50.Dv
keywords cat qubitssqueezed cat qubitsstroboscopic stabilizationconditional displacementnoise biasbosonic error correctionmodular stabilizer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Cat qubits encode logical information in coherent states of an oscillator so that bit-flip errors fall exponentially with the separation of those states, while phase-flip errors grow only linearly. Today that protection is usually maintained by continuous engineered two-photon dissipation, a technique that is hard to implement outside superconducting circuits and that fails to exploit the extra correctability of squeezed cats. This paper shows that the same steady-state manifold can be reached by a discrete, stroboscopic sequence of conditional displacements mediated by an ordinary two-level system that is reset after each cycle. The sequence is obtained by Trotterizing a modular interaction whose dark states are precisely the cat (or squeezed-cat) codewords. Numerical simulations under photon loss, dephasing, and auxiliary-qubit errors confirm that the exponential bit-flip suppression and linear phase-flip scaling survive, and that squeezing turns single-photon loss into a partially correctable error. Because only quadratic interactions are required, the protocol is compatible with trapped-ion as well as circuit-QED platforms and removes the need for high-frequency flux modulation or lossy engineered baths.

Core claim

A stroboscopic sequence of conditional displacements and auxiliary-qubit rotations, derived from a modular stabilizer of the cat (or squeezed-cat) manifold, implements effective dissipative cooling into that manifold without continuous reservoir engineering; the resulting dynamics preserve the exponential bit-flip / linear phase-flip noise bias and, for nonzero squeezing, render single-photon loss partially correctable.

What carries the argument

The small-Big-small (sBs) unitary obtained by a second-order Trotterization of the modular interaction Hamiltonian whose dark states are the finite-energy cat codewords; after each short interaction the auxiliary qubit is reset, generating the desired dissipative map.

Load-bearing premise

The cooling rate fixed by the modular condition of the Trotterized gate must remain large enough relative to physical error rates that the stabilized states stay close to the intended cat states as their size grows; the paper itself shows this rate vanishes for large effective size.

What would settle it

Measure bit-flip rates of stroboscopically stabilized cats (with and without squeezing) under controlled single-photon loss while increasing the effective cat size; if the rates stop falling exponentially once the modular cooling rate becomes comparable to the loss rate, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes stroboscopic dissipative stabilization of ordinary and squeezed cat qubits via repeated interactions with an auxiliary two-level system under a quadratic (conditional-displacement) Hamiltonian, without engineered two-photon reservoir coupling. Starting from a lattice view of the cat code and the finite-energy stabilizer S_Δ (Eqs. 11–16), the authors derive modular jump operators and Trotterized sequences (sBs, ST, BsB; App. C, Eqs. 22–27). They show analytically that single-photon loss is partially correctable for r>0 (Eqs. 28–36), that the noise bias is preserved under oscillator and ancilla errors, and that the choice of stabilizer S versus S^{2} controls attractors and bit-flip performance (phase-space portraits, Figs. 8, 13; comparison to Shitara et al. and Xu et al.). Extensive master-equation numerics (Figs. 1–6, 9–12) extract Γ_Z and Γ_X under loss, dephasing, and ancilla T1/Tφ, and first-order perturbation theory for continuous squeezed-cat bit-flip rates is supplied (App. A).

Significance. If the claims hold, the work supplies a platform-agnostic route to biased-noise cat stabilization that avoids nonlinear reservoir engineering and high-frequency flux modulation, with direct relevance to circuit QED and trapped ions. Strengths include an explicit pull-through of â through U_sBs demonstrating partial phase-flip correction, phase-space portraits that cleanly explain the S versus S^{2} attractor structure, systematic comparison of Trotter sequences, and first-order analytic bit-flip rates for the continuous dissipator that match numerics for r≳0.1. The limitation that modular cooling rate vanishes with β_eff (and that Γ_Z therefore ceases to improve exponentially) is already stated by the authors and does not overturn the core claims of bias-preserving stabilization and partial correctability.

major comments (2)
  1. §V.A.1 and the heuristic Γ_Z ~ |β_eff|^{2} exp(-c|β_eff|^{2}) with c≈3: the paper correctly reports that for large β_eff the modular cooling rate fixed by translational invariance (√(Γδt)=Δπ/m_μ, App. C) vanishes, smaller cats are stabilized, and the exponential improvement of Γ_Z saturates (especially for r≳0.5). This is load-bearing for any reading of the abstract as promising arbitrarily scalable bit-flip suppression. The abstract and conclusions should state the limitation more explicitly (e.g., that exponential suppression is observed only in a finite window of effective size set by the cooling-rate constraint), so that the claim remains commensurate with the numerics.
  2. App. A / continuous dissipator comparison: first-order perturbation theory for Γ_bit-flip of the continuous squeezed-cat dissipator is accurate for r≳0.1 and is a useful side result, but the stroboscopic protocol itself lacks a comparable analytic expression for Γ_Z. The heuristic fit is acknowledged to fail at larger r. Either a short first-order (or effective-rate) calculation for the stroboscopic manifold, or a clearer statement that the reported Γ_Z are purely numerical, would strengthen the central quantitative claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 1(c) caption and surrounding text: the heuristic coefficient c≈3 is introduced without a derivation or error bar; a brief note that it is empirical would avoid over-interpretation.
  2. Eq. (5) and the large-α approximation for n-bar: the crossover between the exact and approximate expressions is used throughout the figures; stating the range of α,r where the approximation is used would improve reproducibility.
  3. §VI.D (trapped ions): the claim that first-order sideband rates are more favorable is plausible, but a short estimate of achievable Γ relative to typical heating/dephasing rates would make the platform argument more concrete.
  4. Notation: the modular operator q[m] and the two values of μ (S vs S^{2}) are introduced cleanly in App. C but appear earlier; a one-sentence pointer in §IV would help non-GKP readers.
  5. Typos / typesetting: occasional missing spaces around math (e.g., “r =0 .0” in Fig. 1 legend) and the arXiv id formatting in the header should be cleaned for the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: sequences are constructed from the modular dissipator via Trotterization; performance claims rest on independent master-equation numerics and shifted-Fock theory, not on fitted or self-definitional reductions.

full rationale

The load-bearing derivation (Secs. III–IV, App. C) starts from the stabilizer Ŝ_Δ of the (squeezed) cat manifold, obtains the modular jump operator d_Δ, replaces the bath by a reset auxiliary qubit, and Trotterizes the resulting unitary to the sBs (and ST/BsB) sequences. Translational invariance fixes the cooling rate √(Γδt)=Δπ/m_μ by construction; this is ordinary reservoir-engineering design, not a circular prediction of the subsequent error rates. Phase-flip asymptotics (App. B) follow from the shifted-Fock representation of the squeezed loss operator under the stated large-β approximation and are compared to independent numerical trajectories. Bit-flip rates for the continuous dissipator (App. A) are first-order perturbation results likewise checked against numerics. All Γ_Z/Γ_X values reported in Figs. 1–6,9,11–12 are extracted by exponential fits to master-equation data under explicit noise channels; no parameter is fitted to a data subset and then re-used as a “prediction.” Self-citations (Hillmann–Quijandría 2023 on continuous squeezed-cat dissipation; Royer et al. GKP sequences) supply background or comparison points and are not load-bearing for the stroboscopic construction or the bias-preservation claims. The paper’s own acknowledged limitation (cooling rate vanishes for large β_eff, so exponential improvement of Γ_Z eventually saturates) is an honest performance bound, not a circularity. Score 1 only for the minor, non-load-bearing self-citations that appear in the literature discussion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard open-system quantum optics plus the modular-dissipator / Trotter construction imported from GKP stabilization. Free parameters are simulation knobs (rates, g_eff, Trotter order), not fitted constants that define the result. No new particles or forces are invented; 'stabilizer' for cats is a loose analogy, not a new conserved charge. Load-bearing domain assumptions are Markovian GKSL dynamics, ideal or Hamiltonian-generated conditional displacements, and that short-time qubitized bath interactions approximate the modular dissipator.

free parameters (4)
  • κδt (loss channel amplitude per idle interval)
    Chosen simulation values (e.g. 10^{-3}, 10^{-2}) set the noise regime; results are scanned over ranges but absolute Γ_Z depends on this choice.
  • g_eff/2π = 1 MHz
    Sets the physical timescale of conditional displacements; assumed compatible with prior circuit-QED experiments, not derived.
  • heuristic coefficient c ≈ 3 in Γ_Z ~ |β_eff|² exp(−c|β_eff|²)
    Empirical fit to stroboscopic bit-flip slopes; paper notes reduced accuracy for r ≳ 0.5.
  • Trotter order and sequence choice (sBs vs ST vs BsB)
    Second-order sBs is selected for best performance in the perturbative regime; higher-order attempts 'unsuccessful' in simulated regimes—an implementation choice affecting reported rates.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Markovian GKSL master equation adequately describes oscillator loss, dephasing, and ancilla decoherence during gates.
    Used throughout §V and Apps. E–F; standard but excludes non-Markovian or correlated noise.
  • domain assumption Short-time interaction with a reset qubit approximates the modular bath coupling Hint ∝ d_Δ w† + h.c., with modularity enforced by fixing √(Γδt).
    Core of §IV and App. C; inherited from Royer et al. GKP stabilization.
  • domain assumption Conditional displacements are generated by H_CD = (g_eff/2)(a e^{iφ} + h.c.) σ_z (or ion sideband Hamiltonians) with instantaneous ideal qubit rotations.
    §V.A–B; justified by circuit-QED and trapped-ion literature.
  • domain assumption In the large-α (or large-β) limit, displaced squeezed states are approximately orthogonal and the shifted Fock basis truncation is valid for phase-flip estimates.
    Eqs. (6), App. B; standard cat-code approximation.
  • standard math Suzuki-Trotter decompositions of the modular unitary yield effective cooling into the +1 eigenspace of S_Δ.
    App. C; first- and second-order formulas are standard.
  • ad hoc to paper The operator S = −D(iπ/(2α)) (and its finite-energy version) annihilates the ideal squeezed-cat manifold in the infinite-squeezing limit.
    §III defines this 'stabilizer' by analogy with GKP; cats are not stabilizer codes, so this is a modeling choice that selects the lattice period.
invented entities (1)
  • Finite-energy cat stabilizer S_Δ and modular jump operator d_Δ no independent evidence
    purpose: Define the dark-state condition and the target dissipator for stroboscopic cooling of (squeezed) cats.
    Constructed by conjugating a displacement with a one-quadrature envelope; analogous to GKP but specialized to cats. No independent experimental handle beyond the protocol's success.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 36927 in / 4167 out tokens · 42910 ms · 2026-07-10T08:40:56.540750+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dissipatively stabilized cat qubits provide a promising route toward fault-tolerant quantum computation, exhibiting exponential suppression of bit-flip errors with increasing phase-space separation of the logical states, while incurring only a linear increase in phase-flip errors. Existing implementations rely on engineered two-photon dissipation via nonlinear coupling to a lossy environment, an approach largely confined to superconducting platforms and limited by spurious decay channels and finite dissipation rates. Here, we propose a fundamentally different stabilization paradigm based on repeated interactions with an auxiliary two-level system mediated by a quadratic Hamiltonian, enabling dissipative stabilization without reservoir engineering. Our approach overcomes key limitations of existing schemes and is compatible with a wider class of experimental platforms. Furthermore, it preserves the noise bias and extends to squeezed cat qubits, rendering single-photon loss errors partially correctable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08363 by Fernando Quijandr\'ia, Franco Nori, Timo Hillmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bit-flip error rates of stabilized cat qubits as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Bit-flip error rates of stabilized cat qubits for var [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the bit-flip rate ΓZ as a function of the mean number of photons ¯n for different values of the squeezing parameter r, and for various qubit dephasing rates κϕ at a fixed oscillator single-photon loss rate κ−. If the dephasing rate is small, that is, γϕ/κ− = 1, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dissipative stabilization of the squeezed cat code [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase-space portraits of Shitara [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Bit- and phase-flip error rates of stabilization se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Bit-flip rate for the continuous dissipator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Bit- and phase-flip error rates of different stabiliza [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Phase-space portraits of ST and BsB stabilization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Performance of stabilization sequences in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    small- Big-small

    The interaction Hamiltonian (21) realizes an exchange of generalized excitations ˆd† ∆ and ˆw† t between the oscilla- tor and the bath. However, as⟨ˆw † t ˆwt′⟩= 0, the reverse process ( ˆd† ∆ ˆwt) is forbidden and the effective dynamics become non-unitary, dissipatively cooling the oscillator into the +1 eigenstate of ˆS∆ at a rate∼Γ, see Ap- pendix C fo...

    work page

  2. [2]

    amplified

    Channel model We begin by analyzing the error-correcting properties of the protocol by considering the case of ideal stabiliza- tion followed by idle evolution for a timeδtduring which the oscillator is subject to a loss or a dephasing chan- nel with amplitudesκδtorκ ϕδt, respectively, see also Fig. 1(b). We repeat the protocol over multiple cycles until ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    For a durationt CD of the conditional displacement gate, in the regimeκ −tCD ≪ 1, the probability of a photon-loss event is small and can be treated perturbatively

    Gate errors One could also simulate conditional displacements im- plemented via the Hamiltonian (38) in the presence of single-photon loss errors. For a durationt CD of the conditional displacement gate, in the regimeκ −tCD ≪ 1, the probability of a photon-loss event is small and can be treated perturbatively. Then, to first order in κ−tCD, a photon-loss ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    big” conditional displacement fol- lowing the auxiliary qubit rotation ˆRx(π/2), see Fig. 4. The result of this error is that the sign of the last “small

    Dephasing Qubit dephasing with rateγ ϕ is described by the dis- sipator γϕ 2 D[ˆσz]ˆρ.(41) As the controlled-displacement commutes with the gener- ator of the dissipative evolution, it is sufficient to consider a stochastic error model in which ˆσz is inserted before or after gates during the stabilization circuit. There are three non-equivalent locations...

    work page

  5. [5]

    small” and the “big

    Decay The case of spontaneous decay of the auxiliary qubit is distinct from the case of dephasing, as the jump oper- ator ˆσ− =|0⟩ ⟨1|does not commute with the controlled displacement Hamiltonian (38). As a result, we need to analyze the evolution d dt ˆρ=−i h ˆHCD,ˆρ i +γ −D[ˆσ−]ˆρ,(42) whereγ − = 1/T1 is the decay time of the auxiliary qubit. Before we ...

    work page 2074

  6. [6]

    −i r Γδt 2 1 ∆ ˆq[mµ] ± √ 2µα ˆσx # (C6) ˆUT = exp

    First-order Suzuki-Trotter approximation - Sharpen and Trim sequences First-order approximations can be obtained using the relation exp( ˆA) exp(ˆB)≈exp( ˆA+ ˆB). This leads to the sharpen (S) and trim (T) gates ˆUS = exp −i r Γδt 2 ∆ˆpˆσy ! ×exp " −i r Γδt 2 1 ∆ ˆq[mµ] ± √ 2µα ˆσx # (C6) ˆUT = exp " −i r Γδt 2 1 ∆ ˆq[mµ] ± √ 2µα ˆσx # ×exp −i r Γδt 2 ∆ˆp...

    work page

  7. [7]

    −i r Γδt 2 1 2∆ ˆq[mµ] ± √ 2µα ˆσx # ×exp −i r Γδt 2 ∆ˆpˆσy ! ×exp

    Second-order Suzuki-Trotter approximations Second-order approximations are obtained using the relation exp( ˆA+ ˆB)≈exp( ˆA/2) exp(ˆB) exp( ˆA/2). a. small-Big-small sequence The so-called small-Big-small (sBs) sequence follows by replacing ˆA∝ˆpˆσy and ˆB∝ˆqˆσx. Thus, ˆUsBs = exp −i r Γδt 2 ∆ 2 ˆpˆσy ! ×exp " −i r Γδt 2 1 ∆ ˆq[mµ] ± √ 2µα ˆσx # ×exp −i r...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (C5) yield different approximations and, conse- quently, different bit- and phase-flip error rates

    Numerical performance Different approaches to implementing the unitary Eq. (C5) yield different approximations and, conse- quently, different bit- and phase-flip error rates. This stems from various factors. First, the ST protocol is only a first-order approximation of Eq. (C5), whereas sBs and BsB are second-order Trotter approximations. Second, the prot...

    work page

  9. [9]

    For the case of ideal gates,δtis the idle time in which the state is subject to the loss channel upon which the instantaneous ideal gates are applied

    Estimating error rates We numerically calculate the effective bit- and phase- flip rates by fitting the decaying logical observables, Tr[ ˆJZ ˆρ(t)]∼e−ΓZ t,(E7) Tr[ ˆJX ˆρ(t)]∼e−ΓX t.(E8) To this end, we initialize the system in an ideal state |α, r⟩or|0⟩ C (respectively) before time evolving it for a total timeT=nδt, withnthe total number of correction c...

    work page

  10. [10]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    M. E. Beverland, A. Kubica, and K. M. Svore, Cost of Universality: A Comparative Study of the Overhead of State Distillation and Code Switching with Color Codes, PRX Quantum2, 020341 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Gidney and M

    C. Gidney and M. Eker˚ a, How to factor 2048 bit RSA in- tegers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits, Quantum 5, 433 (2021)

    work page 2048

  13. [13]

    Aliferis and J

    P. Aliferis and J. Preskill, Fault-tolerant quantum com- putation against biased noise, Phys. Rev. A78, 052331 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Aliferis, F

    P. Aliferis, F. Brito, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. Preskill, M. Steffen, and B. M. Terhal, Fault-tolerant computing with biased-noise superconducting qubits: A case study, New J. Phys.11, 013061 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    D. Ruiz, J. Guillaud, A. Leverrier, M. Mirrahimi, and C. Vuillot, LDPC-cat codes for low-overhead quantum 20 computing in 2D, Nat Commun16, 1040 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Moving beyond the transmon: Noise-protected superconducting quantum circuits

    A. Gyenis, A. Di Paolo, J. Koch, A. Blais, A. A. Houck, and D. I. Schuster, Moving beyond the Transmon: Noise- Protected Superconducting Quantum Circuits, PRX Quantum2, 030101 (2021), arXiv:2106.10296

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynami- cally protected cat-qubits: A new paradigm for universal quantum computation, New J. Phys.16, 045014 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation, Phys. Rev. X9, 041053 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED

    A. Joshi, K. Noh, and Y. Y. Gao, Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 033001 (2021), arXiv:2008.13471

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in supercon- ducting quantum circuits, Fundamental Research1, 50 (2021), arXiv:2010.08699

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Inf.3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    K. S. Dubovitskii, Bit-flip errors in dissipative cat qubits: Second-order perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. A111, 012617 (2025), arXiv:2407.17299 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, Quantum error correction using squeezed Schr¨ odinger cat states, Phys. Rev. A106, 022431 (2022), arXiv:2201.02570

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    X. Pan, J. Schwinger, N.-N. Huang, P. Song, W. Chua, F. Hanamura, A. Joshi, F. Valadares, R. Filip, and Y. Y. Gao, Protecting the Quantum Interference of Cat States by Phase-Space Compression, Phys. Rev. X13, 021004 (2023), arXiv:2212.01271 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Quantum error correction with dissipatively stabilized squeezed cat qubits

    T. Hillmann and F. Quijandr´ ıa, Quantum error cor- rection with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits, Phys. Rev. A107, 032423 (2023), arXiv:2210.13359 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Q. Xu, G. Zheng, Y.-X. Wang, P. Zoller, A. A. Clerk, and L. Jiang, Autonomous quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation with squeezed cat qubits, npj Quantum Inf9, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Exploiting Translational Symmetry for Quantum Computing with Squeezed Cat Qubits

    T. Shitara, G. Mintzer, Y. Tokunaga, and S. Endo, Ex- ploiting Translational Symmetry for Quantum Comput- ing with Squeezed Cat Qubits (2025), arXiv:2510.00497 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping

    B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, T. Behrle, and J. P. Home, Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping, Nat. Phys.18, 296 (2022), arXiv:2010.09681 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature584, 368 (2020), arXiv:1907.12487

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Stabilization of Finite-Energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States

    B. Royer, S. Singh, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilization of Finite-Energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 260509 (2020), arXiv:2009.07941

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even, Nature616, 50 (2023), arXiv:2211.09116 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Autonomous quantum error correction of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states

    D. Lachance-Quirion, M.-A. Lemonde, J. O. Simoneau, L. St-Jean, P. Lemieux, S. Turcotte, W. Wright, A. Lacroix, J. Fr´ echette-Viens, R. Shillito, F. Hopf- mueller, M. Tremblay, N. E. Frattini, J. Camirand Le- myre, and P. St-Jean, Autonomous Quantum Error Cor- rection of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 150607 (2024), arXiv:2310.114...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Towards Non- Abelian Quantum Signal Processing: Efficient Control of Hybrid Continuous- and Discrete-Variable Architec- tures,

    S. Singh, B. Royer, and S. M. Girvin, Towards Non- Abelian Quantum Signal Processing: Efficient Control of Hybrid Continuous- and Discrete-Variable Architectures (2025), arXiv:2504.19992 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys.16, 509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Enhancing dissipative cat qubit protection by squeezing

    R. Rousseau, D. Ruiz, E. Albertinale, P. d’Avezac, D. Banys, U. Blandin, N. Bourdaud, G. Campanaro, G. Cardoso, N. Cottet, C. Cullip, S. Del´ eglise, L. De- vanz, A. Devulder, A. Essig, P. F´ evrier, A. Gicquel, ´E. Gouzien, A. Gras, J. Guillaud, E. G¨ um¨ u¸ s, M. Hall´ en, A. Jacob, P. Magnard, A. Marquet, S. Miklass, T. Per- onnin, S. Polis, F. Rautsch...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedramrazi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. J¨ unger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dres- sel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, High- Coherence Kerr-Cat Qubit in 2D Architecture, Phys. Rev. X14, 041049 (2024), arXiv:2404.16697 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits

    H. Putterman, K. Noh, C. T. Hann, G. S. MacCabe, S. Aghaeimeibodi, R. N. Patel, M. Lee, W. M. Jones, H. Moradinejad, R. Rodriguez, N. Mahuli, J. Rose, J. C. Owens, H. Levine, E. Rosenfeld, P. Reinhold, L. Mon- celsi, J. A. Alcid, N. Alidoust, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, J. Barnett, P. Bienias, H. A. Carson, C. Chen, L. Chen, H. Chinkezian, E. M. Chisholm, M.-H....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A54, 3824 (1996)

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    Knill and R

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Theory of quantum error- correcting codes, Phys. Rev. A55, 900 (1997)

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science347, 853 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Touzard, A

    S. Touzard, A. Grimm, Z. Leghtas, S. O. Mundhada, P. Reinhold, C. Axline, M. Reagor, K. Chou, J. Blumoff, K. M. Sliwa, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Coherent oscilla- tions inside a quantum manifold stabilized by dissipation, Phys. Rev. X8, 021005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Quantum control of a cat-qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds

    U. R´ eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, A. Marquet, E. Al- bertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall´ en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Jezouin, and Z. Leghtas, Quantum control of a cat-qubit with bit- flip times exceeding ten seconds (2023), arXiv:2307.06617 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    A. L. Grimsmo and S. Puri, Quantum Error Correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Code, PRX Quan- tum2, 020101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    A. J. Brady, A. Eickbusch, S. Singh, J. Wu, and Q. Zhuang, Advances in bosonic quantum error correc- tion with Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill Codes: Theory, en- gineering and applications, Progress in Quantum Elec- tronics93, 100496 (2024), arXiv:2308.02913 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Exponential convergence of a dissipative quantum system towards finite-energy grid states of an oscillator

    L.-A. Sellem, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, M. Mirrahimi, A. Sar- lette, and P. Rouchon, Exponential convergence of a dissi- pative quantum system towards finite-energy grid states of an oscillator, in2022 IEEE 61st Conf. Decis. Control CDC(2022) pp. 5149–5154, arXiv:2203.16836 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    J. A. Gross, C. M. Caves, G. J. Milburn, and J. Combes, Qubit models of weak continuous measurements: Marko- vian conditional and open-system dynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 024005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Ciccarello, Collision models in quantum optics, Quan- tum Meas

    F. Ciccarello, Collision models in quantum optics, Quan- tum Meas. Quantum Metrol.4, 10.1515/qmetro-2017- 0007 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1515/qmetro-2017- 2017

  49. [49]

    Y. Liu, S. Singh, K. C. Smith, E. Crane, J. M. Martyn, A. Eickbusch, A. Schuckert, R. D. Li, J. Sinanan-Singh, M. B. Soley, T. Tsunoda, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid Oscillator-Qubit Quantum Proces- sors: Instruction Set Architectures, Abstract Machine Models, and Applications, PRX Quantum7, 010201 (2026)

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    V. G. Matsos, C. H. Valahu, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, X. C. Kolesnikow, M. J. Biercuk, and T. R. Tan, Robust and Deterministic Preparation of Bosonic Logical States in a Trapped Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 050602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    McGarry, T

    C. McGarry, T. Chalermpusitarak, K. Schwennicke, F. Scuccimarra, M. J. Millican, V. G. Matsos, C. H. Valahu, P. Nagpal, H.-K. Chan, H. L. Nourse, I. Kassal, and T. R. Tan, Programmable quantum simulation of an- harmonic dynamics (2026), arXiv:2603.04744 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Fast Universal Control of an Oscillator with Weak Dispersive Coupling to a Qubit

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2022), arXiv:2111.06414

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Encoding qubits in multimode grid states

    B. Royer, S. Singh, and S. Girvin, Encoding Qubits in Multimode Grid States, PRX Quantum3, 010335 (2022), arXiv:2201.12337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Haroche and J.-M

    S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond,Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9710025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quantum Computing with Rotation-Symmetric Bosonic Codes, Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Performance of teleportation-based error correction circuits for bosonic codes with noisy measurements

    T. Hillmann, F. Quijandr´ ıa, A. L. Grimsmo, and G. Ferrini, Performance of Teleportation-Based Error- Correction Circuits for Bosonic Codes with Noisy Measurements, PRX Quantum3, 020334 (2022), arXiv:2108.01009 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V. V. Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin, New Class of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes for a Bosonic Mode, Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Y. Zeng, F. Quijandr´ ıa, C. Gneiting, and F. Nori, Quan- tum Error Correction with Superpositions of Squeezed Fock States, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 190602 (2026), arXiv:2510.04209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    E. N. Bashmakova, S. B. Korolev, and T. Yu. Golubeva, Bosonic quantum error correction using squeezed Fock states, Phys. Rev. A112, 032434 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Squeezed-vacuum bosonic codes

    N. Gutman, E. Blumenthal, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, A. Orda, and I. Kaminer, Squeezed-vacuum bosonic codes, Advanced Physics Research , e00007 (2026), arXiv:2511.06108 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Leviant, Q

    P. Leviant, Q. Xu, L. Jiang, and S. Rosenblum, Quan- tum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss-dephasing channel, Quantum6, 821 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Zeng, Z.-Y

    Y. Zeng, Z.-Y. Zhou, E. Rinaldi, C. Gneiting, and F. Nori, Approximate Autonomous Quantum Error Cor- rection with Reinforcement Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 050601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    R. Wang, A. Udupa, T. Hillmann, U. Chabaud, A. Fer- raro, and G. Ferrini, Bosonic quantum error-correcting codes with finite stellar rank (2026), arXiv:2607.06404 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer using concatenated cat codes

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brand˜ ao, Building a Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes, PRX Quan- tum3, 010329 (2022), arXiv:2012.04108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Analog information decoding of bosonic quantum LDPC codes

    L. Berent, T. Hillmann, J. Eisert, R. Wille, and J. Roffe, Analog Information Decoding of Bosonic Quantum Low- Density Parity-Check Codes, PRX Quantum5, 020349 (2024), arXiv:2311.01328 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu` ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su´ arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 22 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, Physics Reports QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python,1153, 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90 (2007)

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    C. R. Harris and others, Array programming with NumPy, Nature585, 357 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Virtanen and others, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algo- rithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat

    P. Virtanen and others, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algo- rithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020)

    work page 2020