Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Connection between Free-Fermion and Interacting Crystalline Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that interactions quotient free-fermion crystalline SPT classifications down to finite abelian groups: $\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_4$ in 1D reflection, mod-$n$ reductions under $C_n$ rotations, and…

desk verdict A useful, plausible spectral-sequence map between free and interacting crystalline SPT classifications; the main tables are likely right, but the load-bearing compatibility assumption (Eq. 17) is asserted, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19287 v1 pith:4BHOLTSK submitted 2024-11-28 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallhep-th

Chen-Shen Lee , Ken Shiozaki , Chang-Tse Hsieh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallhep-th
keywords crystallinesymmetry-protectedtopologicalphasesfree-fermionclassificationinteractioneffectsAtiyah-HirzebruchspectralsequenceK-homologygeneralizedhomologypoint-groupsymmetrybulk-boundarycorrespondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to turn a hard question — what happens to free-fermion topological classifications when interactions are switched on — into spectral-sequence bookkeeping. Its central claim is that the natural map from free-fermion phases to interacting phases commutes with every step of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, so interactions simply quotient the free-fermion integer invariants by the image of certain cell-pumping maps. For 1D reflection-symmetric systems this gives $\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}_4$; for 2D $C_n$-symmetric systems it gives the finite reductions collected in Table 2; for 3D inversion-symmetric systems it gives $\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}_8 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$. A reader should care because the reductions are explicit, computable, and checkable on small lattice models: interaction effects stop being a case-by-case mystery and become a quotient.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence (AHSS), a bookkeeping device that decomposes the real-space manifold into $G$-symmetric cells and computes the full homology class from local SPT data on each cell by repeatedly taking kernels and images of differentials. The paper's specific machinery is the induced homomorphism $\kappa^r$ between the free-fermion pages $E^{\mathrm{free},r}$ and the interacting pages $E^r$; the first differential describes pumping SPT states from a cell onto lower-dimensional cells, and the quantum numbers $(n_+,n_-)$, $(N_C,R_C)$, and $(N_{2\text{-cell}},N_{\rm BIQH})$ encode which cell states survive the quotient. The commuting diagram (20) then assembles the per-cell comparisons into a map on the final classifications.

What would settle it

Take one of the decomposable lattice models $H_{p,n}$ from Appendix A, add strong local interactions, and determine the many-body class exactly or numerically: the paper predicts $[n-p \bmod 4]$ for every $(p,n)$. A single mismatch with the interacting classification would show that $\partial\circ\kappa=\kappa\circ\partial$ fails and the reductions do not follow. Alternatively, look for a free-fermion phase whose boundary state, mapped to the interacting side, is not the image of the interacting boundary map.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the free-fermion classification of crystalline SPT phases, $K_0^G(X,Y)$ with $G$ a point group, is related to the interacting classification $h_0^G(X,Y)$ by a homomorphism $\kappa\colon K_0^G(X,Y)\to h_0^G(X,Y)$. The key statement is the compatibility condition $\partial \circ \kappa = \kappa \circ \partial$ (Eq. (17)), which asserts that mapping a free-fermion phase to its many-body incarnation does not interfere with bulk-boundary correspondence. Granting this, $\kappa$ induces maps on every page of the two AHSS computations, and the spectral-sequence differentials commute with $\kappa$. The reductions follow: $[N_R] \mapsto [N_R \bmod 4]$ in 1D; $[N_1]\oplus[N_{\rm CI}] \mapsto [-N_1 \bmod 4]\oplus[(N_{\rm CI},0)]$ for $C_2$, with analogous mod-$n$ formulas for $C_n$; and $[N_{2\text{-cell}}] \mapsto [(N_{2\text{-cell}} \bmod 8, 0)]$ for inversion in 3D. Thus interactions act as a computable quotient of the free-fermion equivalence classes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the unproven compatibility condition $\partial \circ \kappa = \kappa \circ \partial$ stated in Sec. 2.4 (Eq. (17)): the map that turns a free-fermion phase into its interacting counterpart must respect the way a bulk is related to its boundary; the paper calls this physically reasonable but gives no argument, and if it fails the per-cell maps cannot be assembled into a well-defined map on equivalence classes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In 1D systems with $U(1)$ and reflection symmetry, a free-fermion phase labeled by $N_R\in\mathbb{Z}$ becomes $[N_R \bmod 4]$ once interactions are included (Eq. (43)).
  • In 2D systems with $U(1)$ and $C_n$ rotation symmetry, the free-fermion classes $[(N_1,\dots,N_{n-1})]\oplus[N_{\rm CI}]$ map to the finite groups in Table 2, with the Chern number $N_{\rm CI}$ unchanged but the bosonic integer quantum Hall coordinate forced to zero.
  • In 3D systems with $U(1)$ and inversion symmetry, the free-fermion $\mathbb{Z}$ class $[N_{2\text{-cell}}]$ reduces to $[(N_{2\text{-cell}} \bmod 8, 0)]$ inside the interacting $\mathbb{Z}_8\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ classification (Eq. (98)).
  • The method handles both split and non-split group-extension short exact sequences, covering cases where stacking two trivial-looking pieces produces a nontrivial phase through an extension rather than a direct sum.
  • Because the reductions are phrased in terms of cell-local quantum numbers, the same comparison can be repeated for any symmetry whose free and interacting $E^1$ pages are known.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same quantum-number comparison should yield concrete mod-2 and mod-4 predictions for other point groups, such as mirror Chern insulators with $U(1)$ and $C_s$ symmetry, whenever both $E^1$ pages are computed.
  • Editorial inference: because the reduction is built from cell-local data, it is natural to expect extensions to magnetic space groups and to higher-order topology; proving the commuting condition (17) in those settings would be the essential first step.
  • Editorial inference: the decomposable lattice models $H_{p,n}$ in Appendix A can be promoted to fully interacting numerical tests; a failure of the predicted $[n-p \bmod 4]$ class under strong interactions would pinpoint where the commuting-differential assumption breaks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence (AHSS) framework for connecting free-fermion and interacting crystalline symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. The central idea is a homomorphism κ from K-homology to generalized homology that is claimed to commute with the bulk-boundary boundary map and hence with all AHSS differentials, inducing maps between spectral sequence pages. Working mainly with E1-page quantum numbers, the authors derive explicit reduction rules: 1d U(1)×Z_2^R free-fermion classes [N_R] reduce to [N_R mod 4]; 2d U(1)×C_n rotation classes reduce to mod-n or mod-2n/2 groups plus a Chern number factor; and 3d U(1)×inversion classes [N_{2-cell}] reduce to [(N_{2-cell} mod 8, 0)]. The paper includes a 1d lattice-model appendix supporting the 1d reduction and emphasizes that the approach handles both split and non-split short exact sequences.

Significance. If the framework is correct, it offers a systematic and computationally tractable route from free-fermion classifications to interacting crystalline SPT classifications, a topic that has so far been addressed only in isolated examples. The paper's explicit predictions (mod-4 in 1d, mod-n and mod-2n in 2d, mod-8 in 3d) are concrete and falsifiable, and the appendix gives a family of lattice models realizing the 1d reduction. The AHSS perspective, using the same spectral sequence for both K-homology and interacting generalized homology, is a valuable organizing principle. The main reservations concern not the results' plausibility but the proof infrastructure: the compatibility condition that makes the whole page-by-page comparison possible is asserted rather than proved, and one stated structural assumption is contradicted by the paper's own 2d and 3d examples.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (17)] The condition ∂∘κ=κ∘∂ is asserted as 'physically reasonable' but is never proved. This condition is load-bearing: it is exactly what licenses the induced maps κ^r between all AHSS pages and justifies the commutative diagram (20) and every reduction in Tables 1–3. Naturality of the boundary map for one pair (X,Y) does not automatically give naturality of the filtration boundary maps defining the spectral-sequence differentials; one needs a proof that κ is a natural transformation of the relevant homology theories, or at least an explicit verification for the filtration pairs (X_p, X_{p-1}). Without such an argument, the per-cell quantum-number replacements cannot be assembled into a well-defined map on equivalence classes. A direct check of ∂∘κ=κ∘∂ for the 1d, 2d, and 3d examples would settle the issue and would be within the paper's scope.
  2. [Sec. 2.4 and Sec. 4.3/5.3] The paper states that for p=2 it 'consider[s] cases where there is no reduction, i.e., κ^1_{2,-2} is an isomorphism,' but in the 2d example the free E^1_{2,-2} is Z (Chern number) while the interacting E^1_{2,-2} is Z_2 (Chern plus bosonic integer quantum Hall states), and in the 3d example the same entry is Z versus Z_2. These are not isomorphic, and the paper itself later sends [N_CI] to [(N_CI,0)] (Eq. (68)) and [N_{2-cell}] to [(N_{2-cell} mod 8, 0)] (Eq. (98)), which is not an isomorphism. This inconsistency undermines the stated structural assumption and the derivation of the commutative diagram (20) in the very cases where the examples are worked out. The assumption should be replaced with a correct statement of what κ^1_{2,-2} actually is in these examples, with a computation.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (93)] The non-split extension in 3d rests on the deformation equivalence (N_CI=2)_f ≅ (n_+=1,n_-=0)_f, and the interacting version (N_CI=2,N_BIQH)_I ≅ (N_C=1,I_C=0)_I ⊕ (N_BIQH)_I, is asserted with 'can be verified' and a citation to [53,55]. This equivalence is load-bearing: it is what turns the short exact sequence (85)/(92) from a direct sum into Z and Z_8×Z_2, respectively. Since the paper presents the computation as its own framework rather than as a direct quotation, a proof or a precise theorem statement with the exact statement being imported from [53,55] should be supplied. Without it, the non-split example and the final mod-8 reduction rule do not follow from the arguments given.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (59)–(61)] The tables labeled 'E1' in Eqs. (59), (60), and (61) are E2 pages, not E1 pages, based on the surrounding text ('Using these results to compute the E2-page'); the labels should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 4.3] The phrase 'pertaining' is misspelled as 'pertainning' in Sec. 4.3, and similar small typographical errors appear elsewhere; the manuscript would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  3. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (20)] The notation κ^2_{0,0} and κ^2_{2,-2} is introduced without explicitly defining the superscript as the page index; adding one sentence explaining the notation would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (46)] The E1-page table for the free-fermion 2d case shows entries 'Z' at (p=1,q=0) and (p=2,q=0), but the surrounding discussion only explicitly defines the differential d^1_{1,0}; the reader must infer d^1_{2,0}=0. A sentence stating this explicitly would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reductions are explicit quantum-number maps between independently published AHSS pages; Eq. (17) is an unproven assumption (correctness risk) but not a definitional shortcut.

full rationale

The claimed reductions are computed, not built in. The free-fermion and interacting E1-page inputs are quoted from prior published work ([55] and [53]) and the map between them is given explicitly by quantum-number assignments: e.g., in 1D a free state with (n+, n−)_f is assigned (n+ + n−, n− mod 2)_I (Eq. (41)), and composing with the interacting relation (NC,RC)_I + (2,1)_I ~ (NC,RC)_I gives [n+ − n− mod 4] (Eqs. (42)-(43)). The same pattern holds in 2D (Eqs. (69)-(77)) and 3D (Eqs. (93)-(98)); each reduction is the algebra of the specified maps and the independent quotient relations. The only genuinely unsupported step is Eq. (17), where ∂∘κ=κ∘∂ is called 'physically reasonable' rather than proved, and the inference that κ therefore induces maps on every AHSS page is not demonstrated. This is an omitted proof and a correctness risk, not circularity: the example reductions do not define κ by the target quotient, and the needed compatibility with d1 is checked in the worked pages (e.g., (1,1)_f maps to (2,1)_I, which is zero in the interacting E2 page). Self-citations [53,55,59] supply local SPT data and a deformation equivalence; they are published or separately posted prior results rather than restatements of this paper's conclusions, and Appendix A's lattice models independently realize the 1D map. No step reduces by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no fitted parameters or new entities; its load-bearing inputs are assumptions about the kappa map and imported E1 pages from prior work, two of which involve the same research group.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The homomorphism kappa is compatible with the boundary homomorphism, d o kappa = kappa o d (Eq. 17).
    Stated as 'physically reasonable' in Sec 2.4; it ensures the free-fermion to interacting map exists at every page of the AHSS. If it fails, the computed reductions are not guaranteed to be the physical map.
  • domain assumption No nontrivial SPT phases exist on 1- and 3-cells, E^{free,1}_{p,-p}=E^1_{p,-p}=0 for p=1,3.
    Sec 2.4 restriction limits the scope; the examples are chosen to satisfy it, so the paper does not cover general crystalline SPTs.
  • domain assumption kappa^1_{2,-2} is an isomorphism for the 2-cell contribution.
    Sec 2.4; this equates Chern-like free and interacting 2-cell classifications and is used in all 2D and 3D examples.
  • domain assumption E1 pages for free-fermion and interacting systems are as given in [55] and [53], respectively.
    Imported from prior literature; the paper does not rederive them. The 3D interacting table (88) appears to conflict with the differential (90) domain, so the import may contain a misprint.
  • domain assumption Two layers of Chern insulators in the 2-cell are equivalent to a monopole charge with even parity at the inversion center.
    Used in Sec 5.1 and 5.2 to determine the non-split extension; cited to [53,55] but not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Connection between Free-Fermion and Interacting Crystalline Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4BHOLTSK

@misc{pith2026241119287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Connection between Free-Fermion and Interacting Crystalline Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4BHOLTSK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19287}
}
read the original abstract

We present a framework for investigating the effects of interactions on crystalline symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. Within this framework, one can establish a direct connection between the equivalence classes of free-fermion systems and their corresponding interacting classes. A central component of this framework is the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, which provides a systematic way to represent crystalline SPT phases as SPT phases with internal symmetries on subspaces. We demonstrate the application of this approach through examples in various dimensions: 1d systems with U(1) and reflection symmetry, 2d systems with U(1) and C_{n} rotation symmetry, and 3d systems with U(1) and inversion symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19287 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) The Z2-symmetric cell decomposition of 1d space. The 0-cell A has U(1) and reflection symmetry, while the 1-cell a has U(1) symmetry only. (b) The first differential d 1 1,0 can be regarded as pumping two SPT states in 1-cell a onto the reflection center (0-cell A) while preserving reflection symmetry. The red dashed line denotes the reflection center, and the green wave packets represent the SPT states in the 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The Zn-symmetric cell decomposition of 2d space. The 0-cell A has U(1) and Cn rotation symmetry, while the 1-cell a and the 2-cell α have U(1) symmetry only. (b) The first differential d 1 1,0 under the Cn rotation symmetry. Let’s consider the 2d systems with U(1) and Cn rotation symmetry. Their free-fermion and in￾teracting classification can be determined by the K-homology K Zn 0 (R 2 , ∂R 2 ) and the generali… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Z2-symmetric cell decomposition of 3d space. The 0-cell A has U(1) and inversion symmetry, while the 1-cell a, the 2-cell α, and the 3-cell V have U(1) symmetry only. In this section, we demonstrate how our approach can be applied to investigate the interaction effects on crystalline SPT phases in cases where the classification fits into non-split short exact sequences. As an example, we consider 3d systems with… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) An inversion-symmetric pair of chiral edge states cancels each other out. (b) The first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic depiction of the relation among [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two layers of Chern insulators can be deformed into a monopole charge with even parity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic illustration of decomposable systems.The shadowed and rounded rectangles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The first differential d 1 1,0 , which represents a process of pumping SPT states in 1-cell onto 0-cell, can be realized by expanding the subsystem to include neighboring subsystems while maintaining reflection symmetry. Since, in the free-fermion setting, the 0d SPT s…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic depiction of a subsystem of H2,1. The solid black line and the dashed black line represent positive and negative hopping strengths, respectively. The red dashed line marks the midpoint of this subsystem, where a charge, represented by a green wave packet, is …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs. Quantized hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 49:405–408, Aug 1982

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele. Quantum spin hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:226801, Nov 2005

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele. Z2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:146802, Sep 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L

    B. Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L. Hughes, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells. Science, 314(5806):1757–1761, December 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Molenkamp, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Shou-Cheng Zhang

    Markus Konig, Steffen Wiedmann, Christoph Brune, Andreas Roth, Hartmut Buhmann, Lau- rens W. Molenkamp, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells. Science, 318(5851):766–770, November 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Liang Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:106803, Mar 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Reviews of Modern Physics , 82(4):3045–3067, November 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Zirnbauer

    Alexander Altland and Martin R. Zirnbauer. Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B , 55:1142–1161, Jan 1997

    work page 1997

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Schnyder, Shinsei Ryu, Akira Furusaki, and Andreas W

    Andreas P. Schnyder, Shinsei Ryu, Akira Furusaki, and Andreas W. W. Ludwig. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B, 78:195125, Nov 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Periodic table for topological insu- lators and superconductors

    Alexei Kitaev, Vladimir Lebedev, and Mikhail Feigel’man. Periodic table for topological insu- lators and superconductors. In AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy.New Journal of Physics, 12(6):065010, June 2010

    Shinsei Ryu, Andreas P Schnyder, Akira Furusaki, and Andreas W W Ludwig. Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy.New Journal of Physics, 12(6):065010, June 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Ching-Kai Chiu, Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Andreas P. Schnyder, and Shinsei Ryu. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 88:035005, Aug 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order

    Zheng-Cheng Gu and Xiao-Gang Wen. Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order. Phys. Rev. B , 80:155131, Oct 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order. Phys. Rev. B , 82:155138, Oct 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    Topological origin of zero-energy edge states in particle-hole symmetric systems

    Shinsei Ryu and Yasuhiro Hatsugai. Topological origin of zero-energy edge states in particle-hole symmetric systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 89:077002, Jul 2002. 21

    2002

  8. [16]

    Hui Li and F. D. M. Haldane. Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:010504, Jul 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Hatsugai

    Y. Hatsugai. Bulk-edge correspondence in graphene with/without magnetic field: Chiral sym- metry, dirac fermions and edge states. Solid State Communications , 149(27):1061–1067, 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Roger S. K. Mong and Vasudha Shivamoggi. Edge states and the bulk-boundary correspondence in dirac hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. B , 83:125109, Mar 2011

    2011

  11. [19]

    Delplace, D

    P. Delplace, D. Ullmo, and G. Montambaux. Zak phase and the existence of edge states in graphene. Phys. Rev. B , 84:195452, Nov 2011

    2011

  12. [20]

    Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensional topo- logical insulators

    Gian Michele Graf and Marcello Porta. Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensional topo- logical insulators. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 324(3):851–895, October 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    Asb´ oth, L´ aszl´ o Oroszl´ any, and Andr´ as P´ alyi.A Short Course on Topological Insulators

    J´ anos K. Asb´ oth, L´ aszl´ o Oroszl´ any, and Andr´ as P´ alyi.A Short Course on Topological Insulators. Springer International Publishing, 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Boundary green functions of topological insulators and superconductors

    Yang Peng, Yimu Bao, and Felix von Oppen. Boundary green functions of topological insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. B , 95:235143, Jun 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Winding number and zak phase in multi-band ssh models

    Chen-Shen Lee, Iao-Fai Io, and Hsien-chung Kao. Winding number and zak phase in multi-band ssh models. Chinese Journal of Physics , 78:96–110, August 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    A linear algebra-based approach to understanding the relation between the winding number and zero-energy edge states

    Chen-Shen Lee. A linear algebra-based approach to understanding the relation between the winding number and zero-energy edge states. SciPost Phys. Core , 7:003, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hughes, and Shou-Cheng Zhang

    Xiao-Liang Qi, Taylor L. Hughes, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological field theory of time- reversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B , 78:195424, Nov 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems

    Lukasz Fidkowski and Alexei Kitaev. Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems. Phys. Rev. B , 81:134509, Apr 2010

    2010

  19. [27]

    Interacting one-dimensional fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases

    Evelyn Tang and Xiao-Gang Wen. Interacting one-dimensional fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 109:096403, Aug 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    Effect of interactions on two-dimensional fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases with Z2 symmetry

    Zheng-Cheng Gu and Michael Levin. Effect of interactions on two-dimensional fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases with Z2 symmetry. Phys. Rev. B, 89:201113, May 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Symmetry-protected topological states of interacting fermions and bosons

    Yi-Zhuang You and Cenke Xu. Symmetry-protected topological states of interacting fermions and bosons. Phys. Rev. B , 90:245120, Dec 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Breakdown of the topological classification Z for gapped phases of noninteracting fermions by quartic interactions

    Takahiro Morimoto, Akira Furusaki, and Christopher Mudry. Breakdown of the topological classification Z for gapped phases of noninteracting fermions by quartic interactions. Phys. Rev. B, 92:125104, Sep 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Liang Fu and C. L. Kane. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B , 76:045302, Jul 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    Topological crystalline insulators

    Liang Fu. Topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106:106802, Mar 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Topological crystalline insulators and topological superconductors: From concepts to materials

    Yoichi Ando and Liang Fu. Topological crystalline insulators and topological superconductors: From concepts to materials. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , 6(1):361–381, March 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Topological classification with additional symmetries from clifford algebras

    Takahiro Morimoto and Akira Furusaki. Topological classification with additional symmetries from clifford algebras. Phys. Rev. B , 88:125129, Sep 2013

    2013

  27. [35]

    Classification of topological insulators and su- perconductors in the presence of reflection symmetry

    Ching-Kai Chiu, Hong Yao, and Shinsei Ryu. Classification of topological insulators and su- perconductors in the presence of reflection symmetry. Phys. Rev. B , 88:075142, Aug 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Schnyder

    Ching-Kai Chiu and Andreas P. Schnyder. Classification of reflection-symmetry-protected topo- logical semimetals and nodal superconductors. Phys. Rev. B , 90:205136, Nov 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    Topology of crystalline insulators and superconductors

    Ken Shiozaki and Masatoshi Sato. Topology of crystalline insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. B , 90:165114, Oct 2014. 22

    2014

  30. [38]

    Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states

    Norbert Schuch, David P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, and Ignacio Cirac. Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Phys. Rev. B , 84:165139, Oct 2011

    2011

  31. [39]

    Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems. Phys. Rev. B , 83:035107, Jan 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    Complete classification of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in interacting spin systems

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Complete classification of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in interacting spin systems. Phys. Rev. B , 84:235128, Dec 2011

    2011

  33. [41]

    Chang-Tse Hsieh, Olabode Mayodele Sule, Gil Young Cho, Shinsei Ryu, and Robert G. Leigh. Symmetry-protected topological phases, generalized laughlin argument, and orientifolds. Phys. Rev. B, 90:165134, Oct 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Cpt theorem and classification of topological insulators and superconductors

    Chang-Tse Hsieh, Takahiro Morimoto, and Shinsei Ryu. Cpt theorem and classification of topological insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. B , 90:245111, Dec 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Distinct trivial phases protected by a point-group symmetry in quantum spin chains

    Yohei Fuji, Frank Pollmann, and Masaki Oshikawa. Distinct trivial phases protected by a point-group symmetry in quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 114:177204, May 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Topological phases protected by reflection symmetry and cross-cap states

    Gil Young Cho, Chang-Tse Hsieh, Takahiro Morimoto, and Shinsei Ryu. Topological phases protected by reflection symmetry and cross-cap states. Phys. Rev. B , 91:195142, May 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    Characterization and classi- fication of interacting (2 + 1)-dimensional topological crystalline insulators with orientation- preserving wallpaper groups

    Naren Manjunath, Vladimir Calvera, and Maissam Barkeshli. Characterization and classi- fication of interacting (2 + 1)-dimensional topological crystalline insulators with orientation- preserving wallpaper groups. Phys. Rev. B , 109:035168, Jan 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Vector bundles and homogeneous spaces , page 196–222

    Michael F Atiyah and Friedrich Hirzebruch. Vector bundles and homogeneous spaces , page 196–222. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 1972

    1972

  39. [47]

    Topological phases protected by point group symmetry

    Hao Song, Sheng-Jie Huang, Liang Fu, and Michael Hermele. Topological phases protected by point group symmetry. Phys. Rev. X , 7:011020, Feb 2017

    2017

  40. [48]

    Building crystalline topo- logical phases from lower-dimensional states

    Sheng-Jie Huang, Hao Song, Yi-Ping Huang, and Michael Hermele. Building crystalline topo- logical phases from lower-dimensional states. Phys. Rev. B , 96:205106, Nov 2017

    2017

  41. [49]

    Real-space recipes for general topological crystalline states

    Zhida Song, Chen Fang, and Yang Qi. Real-space recipes for general topological crystalline states. Nature Communications, 11(1), August 2020

    2020

  42. [50]

    Rotation symmetry-protected topological phases of fermions

    Meng Cheng and Chenjie Wang. Rotation symmetry-protected topological phases of fermions. Phys. Rev. B , 105:195154, May 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    Real-space construction of crys- talline topological superconductors and insulators in 2d interacting fermionic systems

    Jian-Hao Zhang, Shuo Yang, Yang Qi, and Zheng-Cheng Gu. Real-space construction of crys- talline topological superconductors and insulators in 2d interacting fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:033081, Jul 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Construction and classifi- cation of crystalline topological superconductor and insulators in three-dimensional interacting fermion systems

    Jian-Hao Zhang, Shang-Qiang Ning, Yang Qi, and Zheng-Cheng Gu. Construction and classifi- cation of crystalline topological superconductor and insulators in three-dimensional interacting fermion systems. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2204.13558, April 2022

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Generalized homology and atiyah–hirzebruch spectral sequence in crystalline symmetry protected topological phenomena

    Ken Shiozaki, Charles Zhaoxi Xiong, and Kiyonori Gomi. Generalized homology and atiyah–hirzebruch spectral sequence in crystalline symmetry protected topological phenomena. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , 2023(8), July 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Atiyah-hirzebruch spectral sequence in band topology: General formalism and topological invariants for 230 space groups

    Ken Shiozaki, Masatoshi Sato, and Kiyonori Gomi. Atiyah-hirzebruch spectral sequence in band topology: General formalism and topological invariants for 230 space groups. Phys. Rev. B, 106:165103, Oct 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    Topological classification under nonmag- netic and magnetic point group symmetry: Application of real-space atiyah-hirzebruch spectral sequence to higher-order topology

    Nobuyuki Okuma, Masatoshi Sato, and Ken Shiozaki. Topological classification under nonmag- netic and magnetic point group symmetry: Application of real-space atiyah-hirzebruch spectral sequence to higher-order topology. Phys. Rev. B , 99:085127, Feb 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Freed and Gregory W

    Daniel S. Freed and Gregory W. Moore. Twisted Equivariant Matter. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 12 2013

    2013

  49. [57]

    On the K-Theoretic Classification of Topological Phases of Matter

    Guo Chuan Thiang. On the K-Theoretic Classification of Topological Phases of Matter. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 04 2016. 23

    2016

  50. [58]

    Theory and classification of interacting integer topo- logical phases in two dimensions: A chern-simons approach

    Yuan-Ming Lu and Ashvin Vishwanath. Theory and classification of interacting integer topo- logical phases in two dimensions: A chern-simons approach. Phys. Rev. B , 86:125119, Sep 2012

    2012

  51. [59]

    Crystalline-equivalent topological phases of many-body fermionic systems in 1+1 dimensions

    Chen-Shen Lee, Ken Shiozaki, and Chang-Tse Hsieh. Crystalline-equivalent topological phases of many-body fermionic systems in 1+1 dimensions. arXiv e-prints , 2024. 24

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.