Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Qibo: A Large Language Model for Traditional Chinese Medicine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.16056 v3 pith:4C25CAU5 submitted 2024-03-24 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords medicinefine-tuningperformanceqiboaveragechallengeschinesecorpus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) has made significant progress in a number of professional fields, including medicine, law, and finance. However, in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), there are challenges such as the essential differences between theory and modern medicine, the lack of specialized corpus resources, and the fact that relying only on supervised fine-tuning may lead to overconfident predictions. To address these challenges, we propose a two-stage training approach that combines continuous pre-training and supervised fine-tuning. A notable contribution of our study is the processing of a 2GB corpus dedicated to TCM, constructing pre-training and instruction fine-tuning datasets for TCM, respectively. In addition, we have developed Qibo-Benchmark, a tool that evaluates the performance of LLM in the TCM on multiple dimensions, including subjective, objective, and three TCM NLP tasks. The medical LLM trained with our pipeline, named $\textbf{Qibo}$, exhibits significant performance boosts. Compared to the baselines, the average subjective win rate is 63%, the average objective accuracy improved by 23% to 58%, and the Rouge-L scores for the three TCM NLP tasks are 0.72, 0.61, and 0.55. Finally, we propose a pipline to apply Qibo to TCM consultation and demonstrate the model performance through the case study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 13 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. SCOPE and SCION: A Benchmark and an Auditable Reference Pipeline for Schema Induction and Fusion from Text

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 24-dataset benchmark for inducing schema graphs from raw text, plus an auditable LLM-based pipeline that reports the highest scores on the benchmark's four schema-similarity metrics.

  2. MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicine

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MTCMB is a 12-dataset benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Traditional Chinese Medicine knowledge, reasoning, and safety, with results showing models still fail at clinical reasoning and safe prescriptions.

  3. DoPI: Doctor-like Proactive Interrogation LLM for Traditional Chinese Medicine

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DoPI pairs a knowledge-graph-guided questioning model with a TCM expert model and claims 84.68% diagnostic accuracy, but the benchmark is built from the same symptom-disease rules that drive the system.

  4. Improving TCM Question Answering through Tree-Organized Self-Reflective Retrieval with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A tree-organized, self-reflective retrieval framework over a TCM knowledge base lifts GPT-4 accuracy on a 600-question licensing-exam sample by 19.85 absolute percentage points.

  5. RACE-Align: Retrieval-Augmented and Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Preference Alignment for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    RACE-Align generates preference pairs from RAG-grounded chain-of-thought answers and applies DPO to align a 1.7B model, showing improved reasoning scores in TCM QA but lacking statistical support.

Pith tools